-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Gears of War 4: Review Thread
- Thread starter Theorry
- Start date
Oh great. It's a 9 then.
nekkid
It doesn't matter who we are, what matters is our plan.
Yeah in MP. The campaign was pretty safe, though. Almost a greatest hits of previous game chapters.
For Gears 4 it doesn't seem to be hitting the heights of Gears 1-3. I'm not a fan of the series but can appreciate Gears 1-3 as industry defining games, an ip in full swing on 360. This is not the case with Gears 4 and its not the full dev team who created the first 3 games.
Also as an outsider, the original cast had some character and were engaging.
These are quite bland.
The game is probably solid and an improvement of Judgement.
Gears Judgement got a 79 on metacritic. It wasn't' given a great score despite it being a last gen game. Same with God of War Ascension. Nothing to do with being harsher this gen and more to do with ip's getting stale and being done by others teams with a few of the original team and no new ip breaking ground like they did in 2006/7.
Majority of reviewers have said the opposite, it's the best Gears has been. And it's supposed to look spectacular on PC.
Hmm, I'll have to test higher difficulties as I played through the campaign on Normal and ran into few issues.
I know how annoying those types of frustrating battles can be, though. I hate running into scenes like that.
Succinct Verbosity
Member
The industry has moved on a lot since gears, but the core gameplay is super fun. I think playing it safe is fine, but I can see why it might get docked a few points for sitting in its comfort zone.
I think suggesting the character designs of the early games "had character and were engaging" is some major nostalgia goggles bullshit. They looked too samey, and I doubt anyone was like "oh man, this Baird guy looks interesting." when Gears 1 was launching. Marcus, sure, and Cole wins you over with his voice acting but there's nothing notable about his design.
BananasWithGuns
Member
Reviews for sequels, especially in longer running series, seem pretty pointless these days.
Either you're blasted for innovating and changing the formula or you're blasted for staying true to everything that made the series great.
I guess it just depends what you're looking for out of it. For me, I'm happy that Judgement was the experiment and Gears 4 is the back to basics.
Either you're blasted for innovating and changing the formula or you're blasted for staying true to everything that made the series great.
I guess it just depends what you're looking for out of it. For me, I'm happy that Judgement was the experiment and Gears 4 is the back to basics.
Karak
Member
And new gamers are jumping in. Thats the great part. Its the great ego of gamers to somehow think that NO ONE ever enters the industry lol
That is interesting as gamers we had do the MP tests had never played gears so we went back and played them all then this. Everyone liked the characters in the previous titles to these.
and again new gamers who are getting their first experiences.
oof
Normalization is important.
It's decent for a series that consistently held some of the top scores on their last console. Gears 1 is the 10th highest rated Xbox 360 game at 94 with Gears 3 being low 30s at 91.
So yes, it's like an MGS getting a ton of 8s, that's going to be considered decent when normalizing the scores- they're all good scores in comparison to most games, just not good for the series.
paperspace
Member
If the end result is great, why would you get blasted for innovating?
Some of my favorite memories in the previous gen were playing the Gears campaign with my brother in couch coop. I skipped judgement because that looked really meh, and I'm glad Gears is still going strong.
I'm just sad that my PC conked out on me before I was able to play this lol.
I'm just sad that my PC conked out on me before I was able to play this lol.
In his defense he was hoping it would do worse.
SecondVariety
Member
High-Def Digest 4/5 (Ultimate Edition)
http://games.highdefdigest.com/39102/gears_of_war_4_ultimate_edition_xbox_one.html
http://games.highdefdigest.com/39102/gears_of_war_4_ultimate_edition_xbox_one.html
Bits N Pieces
Member
JimiNutz
Banned
To be honest I felt the same. Ever since Gears 2 the very first thing I've jumped into when playing a new Gears for the first time is PVP multiplayer. This might be the first Gears since the original where I initially jump into campaign and Horde and simply leave the MP altogether.
BananasWithGuns
Member
I mean, look at Judgement. Epic innovated a lot with that and the most recurring complaint about that game was "it's not Gears."
I think TC made the right choice with Gears 4 though. Pumping Gears 4 full of the lifeblood that made the original trilogy great is what they needed to do in my opinion. Now they have the foundation to build on.
Arby 'n' the Chief
Member
lol to some a game not hitting 90s in metacritic is a meh
people and their skewed expectations these day smh
I am still pending with the score because I want to spend way more time with the multiplayer (I got to level 15, spending around 7 hours between PvP and Horde) but I did enjoy what I played, as I wrote on IGN Italia here.
Pros:
Impressive graphics
Fun and entertaining campaign (even the DeeBees are better than expected, and they bring some good new weapons along!)
Still the best gunplay ever
Marcus is as cool as he ever was
Superb multiplayer
Cons:
Shallow new cast
Bad campaign ending (not the epilogue per se, but I absolutely didn't like the last 20' of the campaign)
Campaign co-op limited to two players (could have been at least three)
Gameplay is still fun and rewarding, but feels a bit stale as well
Pros:
Impressive graphics
Fun and entertaining campaign (even the DeeBees are better than expected, and they bring some good new weapons along!)
Still the best gunplay ever
Marcus is as cool as he ever was
Superb multiplayer
Cons:
Shallow new cast
Bad campaign ending (not the epilogue per se, but I absolutely didn't like the last 20' of the campaign)
Campaign co-op limited to two players (could have been at least three)
Gameplay is still fun and rewarding, but feels a bit stale as well
Sounds really good. Can't wait to dive in next week.
Mr.Fletcher
Member
Where's xviper?
Karak
Member
It would be more irritating if it got 5/5 and 10/10 and 9/10 like most review sites give things, because it skews expectations. giving something a perfect score despite issues being present and noted is doing a disservice to the entire point of a review scale.
I agree, I would be annoyed too if a game was better and he--
what
it's a number representative of a product
if it got 90+ that would mean more people liked it, meaning it was a better game
I'm so confused.
People are saddened when something isn't 90+ because the game wasn't better, not "aww my favorite reviewers were having an off week!"
Yes, an 85 is decent for a game in a series whose last 3 games (in the main series) scored 90+.
Decent doesn't mean bad so don't get so touchy y'all!
I'm not talking about the game itself, the quality of the game stays static. I'm talking about reviews in general. People seem dissapointed about the game not getting perfect scores across the board as if that would have made any more of a statement than reviewers just not having any nuance to their reviews
After Bioshock Infinite, i learned that review scores MUST be looked at critically and fans should not be taken in by hype or disappointment with them in general
Reviewing really well so far. I can understand a few jibes at the cut down co-op but at the same time it's better than constantly having a campaign designed for 4 players. I felt a lot of the areas in Gears 3 were unnecessarily large to accommodate for that and I hope Gears 4 feels a lot more intimate as a result of the smaller co-op size.
Looking forward to grabbing my copy tonight.
Looking forward to grabbing my copy tonight.
Yeah it's not slight on the game just my tastes and reflexes have changed in the ten years, it's the reason I can only play cod a certain amount now, insert getting to old for this shit meme.
Right now I'd say it seems like an 84-85/100 game
Well, there was Resident Evil 4...
I agree in general though, and would argue that there's only so much reinventing the wheel you can do before it becomes a different series under the same name.
People aren't disappointed because of the number, they're disappointed because the number is representative of something, and that representation is a product that's under the average for an amazing series.
I agree with infinite, but I think that this type of stance basically destroys any legitimacy reviews have, as we'd have to section off 90+ as untouchable, similar to how 1-65 aren't used except for games you should not buy without knowing what you're getting into.
Gameblog 8/10: http://www.gameblog.fr/tests/2564-gears-of-war-4-xb1
Big Green Anus
Member
I was not expecting Forza Horizon 3 to have a higher metacritic than Gears 4. I still want to play this.
StrongBlackVine
Banned
Very solid scores. I can't see how any one that was looking forward to this would disappointed especially when you factor in a new, completely unproven studio taking over.
Garrett 2U
Member
Haha you really edited this from 80-85 to 70-80?
The Metacritic and OpenCritic are both at 85/100 so where do you get this low boundary of 70?
N7Commander95
Member
People lamenting that Gears of War 4 didn't get the above 90 score of its predecessors without factoring in just how much more critical game reviews have become in the past 5 years