demigod
Member
Spot on.Jokes on you, because they'll just play their favorite card...
![]()
Spot on.Jokes on you, because they'll just play their favorite card...
![]()
This makes sense to me. And I'm willing to attest that Kacho ain't no Xbot no more. He was Pony-fied long ago so this whole debate is kinda moot.No one is going to go out of their way to cancel ultra niche hardware, a Diablo 4 season or an Indiana Jones expansion that came out earlier this month. All three things are irrelevant.
Yotei is a tentpole release. If Bethesda, MS or Blizzard had anything similar they were promoting right now it would get the same treatment. Bethesda especially.
No one is going to go out of their way to cancel ultra niche hardware, a Diablo 4 season or an Indiana Jones expansion that came out earlier this month. All three things are irrelevant.
Yotei is a tentpole release. If Bethesda, MS or Blizzard had anything similar they were promoting right now it would get the same treatment. Bethesda especially.
Nope. The only thing equivalent to a release like Yotei is Outer Worlds 2 but that's not Bethesda. You can't cancel something like an Indy expansion. It already came and went.
It's not? Where's the same energy from you in regards to MS, Blizzard, Bethesda?
Nope. The only thing equivalent to a release like Yotei is Outer Worlds 2 but that's not Bethesda. You can't cancel something like an Indy expansion. It already came and went.
So what you're saying is they need to cancel PS+ also? This constant escalation must stop guys.Hell......you could push and communicate for people to not use GamePass
But you could advocate for other people not to play Indy at all. And you could advocate for others not to download and play the Indy Expansion that's on GamePass. Hell......you could push and communicate for people to not use GamePass until Microsoft fires and corrects the record for the things some of their devs have said and down on social media around the Charlie Kirk stuff.
I strongly recommend you don't play Indy or use Game PassBut you could advocate for other people not to play Indy at all. And you could advocate for others not to download and play the Indy Expansion that's on GamePass. Hell......you could push and communicate for people to not use GamePass until Microsoft fires and corrects the record for the things some of their devs have said and down on social media around the Charlie Kirk stuff.
So what you're saying is they need to cancel PS+ also? This constant escalation must stop guys.
Well now they're extra not gonna buy it.But those are not the buzz topics everyone is talking about at the moment. Gotta jump on the bandwagon with the currently hot thing.
Especially the hot thing that they probably weren't even gonna buy anyway.
Criticizing cancel culture on the right and the left is a logically consistent position. That's what I've done pretty much from 2012 - present day. Many instances of it were criticized even earlier when it wasn't called cancel culture.No, I'm not saying that![]()
![]()
. But I'm also not the one telling people that they shouldn't buy a game because an employee said something that could be viewed as disrespectful.
Criticizing cancel culture on the right and the left is a logically consistent position. That's what I've done pretty much from 2012 - present day.
Criticizing cancel culture for not also going after MS and Gamepass is genuinely a new (and hilarious) front of the console wars that I never expected. You're breaking new ground.
Boycotting anything is fundamentally peaceful and I'm personally fine with it. Spend your money where you want. That's not the same thing as cancel culture. Boycott whatever you want. No one is owed your purchase.Hold on… So you're saying:
Can you explain why? Break this down for me.
- When gamers boycott Ghost of Yotei because of something a developer said, that's considered fine and makes sense.
- But if gamers do the same thing by boycotting another game owned by Microsoft because that developer was (at least in your view) disrespectful toward Kirk, that would somehow be "odd" and "hilarious"?
Microsoft (Bethesda) was actively promoting Indy...What game are these companies actively promoting right now?
Microsoft (Bethesda) was actively promoting Indy...
I can see a reason why. A boycott needs to be targeted and meaningful to be effective. This isn't some widespread movement that has gained sufficient mass to go after everything out there. LikeHold on… So you're saying:
Can you explain why? Break this down for me.
- When gamers boycott Ghost of Yotei because of something a developer said, that's considered fine and makes sense.
- But if gamers do the same thing by boycotting another game owned by Microsoft because that developer was (at least in your view) disrespectful toward Kirk, that would somehow be "odd" and "hilarious"?
Boycotting anything is fundamentally peaceful and I'm personally fine with it. Spend your money where you want. That's not the same thing as cancel culture. Boycott whatever you want. No one is owed your purchase.
I actually never once have spoken about this boycott because I don't care what people here buy. I have criticized cancel culture, multiple times. I was 100% fine with people choosing to boycott Tesla. Buy whatever you want. Doesn't mean I agree with every right wing boycott out there, but they have the right to do it. I didn't criticize anyone for choosing to not buy Bud Light and I didn't call it cancel culture.
What I was mostly making fun of here is you clearly not being comfortable with this boycott, but wanting to add MS just to console war. It's just funny. People process things in different ways I guess.
Not at all. Similar problem at REEE when they set their sites on a game. Similar shit happened with Avowed. My advice is just ignore every thread but the OT. Especially ignore the Review Thread. Just how it is.I'm okay with people boycotting this game. I just wish we could have a thread on GAF about Sony first-party games that are reasonable and not turned into political fights every single time. Is that too much to ask?
Microsoft (Bethesda) was actively promoting Indy...
Not at all. Similar problem at REEE when they set their sites on a game. Similar shit happened with Avowed. My advice is just ignore every thread but the OT. Especially ignore the Review Thread. Just how it is.
Well said. You understand. Some people think this is about console wars because that's their entire identity.I can see a reason why. A boycott needs to be targeted and meaningful to be effective. This isn't some widespread movement that has gained sufficient mass to go after everything out there. LikeKacho said, if this issue is still relevant when Bethesda announces a new game, I'm sure the likes of Grummz or Asmongold will be all over it. A boycott needs to be impactful to be effective. Niche stuff and DLCs for games already bought isn't that. And even there, Bethesda already got drowned by negative comments after that tasteless Indy tweet. But are they going to go after Indy specifically? Not unless MachineGames runs their mouth. He has a point.
Except a few edge cases, I don't think this has anything to do with console wars. No one is going after Naughty Dog right now even though they are probably the most woke studio in Sony's portfolio. It's because they've kept their mouth shut about it (as far as I know). Good for them. I'm sure Neil is watching trash talking Tati like a hawk at this point.
They were promoting their game with grave dancing and joking about the murder.Yep and the deleted the tweet. They haven't tweeted since. Now what?
You need to look it up from the twitter thread, Bethesda panic deleted the video.What is Grummz asking us to see here? I don't notice anything.
They were promoting their game with grave dancing and joking about the murder.
There's this weird sentiment going around that the right shouldn't support "cancel culture" because they were against it during Me Too/BLM. This is a child's argument. It's not considering the stark difference between:
Situation A
Woman on X: "This man sexually harassed me" (Result: man is dragged through the mud on X and other social media platforms and fired, despite it not being proven or clear that what the woman said was true or if the action justified the consequence)
Situation B
Woman on X: "I celebrate and encourage the murder of those I don't agree with."
It's perfectly fine to condemn cancel culture in the first case, but support it in the second. Just like it's perfectly reasonable be against violence in the forms of murder, assault, rape, but for it the case of self defense. Only a child would argue that you can't support violence in every single form imaginable (e.g. self defense) just because you said "I'm against violence."
The video of a game made multiple months/years ago well before the events of the last couple of weeks contains a character who for multiple decades has been known for fighting Nazis and Fascists saying to the cat that "You don't care much about these fascists, do ya?", and then they're big mad because they're somehow making that out to be about their boy.What is Grummz asking us to see here? I don't notice anything.
What about "consequence culture" ?I personally find whole "cancel culture" or "boycotting" just complete nonsense.
I don't give rat ass about dev's personal life or beliefs and politics, if the game looks good and I like what I see then I will buy that game no matter what…I'm not gonna stop buying games I like based on politic or social media nonsense.
The video of a game made multiple months/years ago well before the events of the last couple of weeks contains a character who is noted for fighting Nazis and Fascists saying to the cat that "You don't care much about these fascists, do ya?", and then they're big mad because they're somehow making that out to be about their boy.
It's a reach at best.
You're missing absolutely nothing other than a circlejerk of stupidity.But the Indy game and literally IP is about fighting Nazis and Fascists. Am I missing something? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
And wouldn't some of these people be labeling Charlie Kirk a fascist if they believe that video was about him and not the game characters in the Indy game?
Don't care….when it comes to games, the only thing I care about is if the game is for my taste or not…..all other thing outside of that is just noise.What about "consequence culture" ?
You are correct, imho. This sentiment is born from gleefully facile ignorance imho.There's this weird sentiment going around that the right shouldn't support "cancel culture" because they were against it during Me Too/BLM. This is a child's argument. It's not considering the stark difference between:
Situation A
Woman on X: "This man sexually harassed me" (Result: man is dragged through the mud on X and other social media platforms and fired, despite it not being proven or clear that what the woman said was true or if the action justified the consequence)
Situation B
Woman on X: "I celebrate and encourage the murder of those I don't agree with."
It's perfectly fine to condemn cancel culture in the first case, but support it in the second. Just like it's perfectly reasonable to be against violence in the forms of murder, assault, rape, but for it in the case of self defense. Only a child would argue that you can't support violence in every single form imaginable (e.g. self defense) just because you said "I'm against violence."
Controversial stuff apparently.But the Indy game and literally IP is about fighting Nazis and Fascists.
this is what these nuts have been labeling him as, and the post and it's timing is not a coincidence.But the Indy game and literally IP is about fighting Nazis and Fascists. Am I missing something? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
And wouldn't some of these people be labeling Charlie Kirk a fascist if they believe that video was about him and not the game characters in the Indy game?
"A fascist is an adherent of fascism, a political ideology and mass movement characterized by extreme nationalism, authoritarianism, and a dictatorial leader. Fascists reject democratic and liberal values and often prioritize the perceived interests of the nation or race above individual rights."this is what these nuts have been labeling him as, and the post is not a coincidence.
What if I made a game you like, a masterpiece that fits your tastes, but I'm also a serial killer? Would you buy it?Don't care….when it comes games, the only thing I care about is if the game is for my taste or not…..all other thing outside of that is just noise.
Why are you upset about the term?"A fascist is an adherent of fascism, a political ideology and mass movement characterized by extreme nationalism, authoritarianism, and a dictatorial leader. Fascists reject democratic and liberal values and often prioritize the perceived interests of the nation or race above individual rights."
Just so we're all clear on what terms we're upset about. Do we have to change it to something less offensive, like democratically challenged?
I would say the serial killer should be arrested but………I still buy that game.What if I made a game you like, a masterpiece that fits your tastes, but I'm also a serial killer? Would you buy it?
Purely hypothetical. I don't make games![]()
I'm not?Why are you upset about the term?
Fair enough. That's a consistent position.I would say the serial killer should be arrested but………I still buy that game.
You kind of implied "youse" were/was.I'm not?
Just a figure of speech, but yeah fair enough.You kind of implied "youse" were/was.
Why are you upset about the term?
Well rightly so, they fired the dev. A stated condemnation at this point would be nice, but ultimately insubstantial. Unless you expect PS to sweep the entire organization of far leftists tomorrow, you should understand that the words are mostly PR.
I wish we could focus solely on the fact that people won't buy Ghost of Yotei because it looks lame af.