Seems like people are unhappy with how Payday was portrayed in the QL.
I have not played either Payday, so maybe I'm making some incorrect judgements here, but Payday 2 really seems like a game you need to play coop with friends, or at least people you can communicate with via a mic. It also seems you need to play a mission a few times before you find out what the best approach is, and then strive to excecute it as quickly and efficiently as possible.
Reviewing these types of games is always hard (same as fighting games) - because you need to play them for at least a week or so to see if the higher-level systems hold up and it's still fun at that level - but shooting a Quick Look after having minimal experience with the game sounds especially bad. At that point, I think if nobody is interested in investing time learning the game, they should just not QL it. It will not give viewers a well-informed perspective on the game, which is the function of QLs (besides entertainment).
Of course I'm away from my computer the day they'll be doing a press conference live stream![]()
They did one? Can't wait to watch the archive.
hasn't happened yet, but I think it'll be soon. 30 minutes?
TL;DR: If the GB crew can't give a well-informed perspective on the game, they should consider not Quick Looking it at all.
Oh, thought he was referring to EA presser.
Seconded. They should play whatever games they want lol.Fuck that.
Well informed and thorough opinions are for reviews.
Playing a game for 20-60 minutes and just reacting to how far you are along at that moment early or late is perfectly acceptable.
There is plenty of stuff in the QL that won't "get better" with communication/leveling up.
Glad I saw the QL considering I was on the fence about the game.
There is plenty of stuff in the QL that won't "get better" with communication/leveling up.
Glad I saw the QL considering I was on the fence about the game.
Preparing for snark.
liar
It's on!Try again
Fuck that.
Well informed and thorough opinions are for reviews.
Playing a game for 20-60 minutes and just reacting to how far you are along at that moment early or late is perfectly acceptable..
Of course it would go live after my post lol
It's on!
wow Pay Day 2 looks terrible
Demoing a coop focused game in SP doesn't really help
Exactly. That's the whole point of the Quick Look.
Seems like people are unhappy with how Payday was portrayed in the QL.
I have not played either Payday, so maybe I'm making some incorrect judgements here, but Payday 2 really seems like a game you need to play coop with friends, or at least people you can communicate with via a mic. It also seems you need to play a mission a few times before you find out what the best approach is, and then strive to excecute it as quickly and efficiently as possible.
Reviewing these types of games is always hard (same as fighting games, or stuff like Monster Hunter) - because you need to play them for at least a week or so to see if the higher-level systems hold up and it's still fun at that level - but shooting a Quick Look after having minimal experience with the game sounds especially bad. At that point, I think if nobody on the crew is interested in investing time learning the game, they should just not QL it. It will not give viewers a well-informed perspective on the game, which is the function of QLs (besides entertainment).
TL;DR: If the GB crew can't give a well-informed perspective on the game, they should consider not Quick Looking it at all.
Quick Looks aren't about well-informed perspectives of the game. Most of the time the QL's they do they have only put a little time in the game. It's more so there to show people the game and have fun with it.Seems like people are unhappy with how Payday was portrayed in the QL.
I have not played either Payday, so maybe I'm making some incorrect judgements here, but Payday 2 really seems like a game you need to play coop with friends, or at least people you can communicate with via a mic. It also seems you need to play a mission a few times before you find out what the best approach is, and then strive to excecute it as quickly and efficiently as possible.
Reviewing these types of games is always hard (same as fighting games, or stuff like Monster Hunter) - because you need to play them for at least a week or so to see if the higher-level systems hold up and it's still fun at that level - but shooting a Quick Look after having minimal experience with the game sounds especially bad. At that point, I think if nobody on the crew is interested in investing time learning the game, they should just not QL it. It will not give viewers a well-informed perspective on the game, which is the function of QLs (besides entertainment).
TL;DR: If the GB crew can't give a well-informed perspective on the game, they should consider not Quick Looking it at all.
That's the games fault. Mediocre games will always show mediocre. It just so happens that it riffs off of a well known and well honed multiplayer gameplay style.That mission just looks bad. I watched someone on youtube play it much better and with actual people and it still looked mediocre.
Sorry if this has been mentioned in another part of the thread, but what are the specs of the PC they were running saints row 4 on? that shit looked amazing.
Just wanted to tell anyone in this thread: I bought Saint's Row 4 on PS3 and from the hour I've played so far it feels completely serviceable, as long as you haven't seen the PC version in action.