It's called ugly.mckmas8808 said:It's called luxary. Which doesn't belong in this thread anyway.![]()
It's called ugly.mckmas8808 said:It's called luxary. Which doesn't belong in this thread anyway.![]()
reilo said:It's called ugly.
mckmas8808 said:It's called luxary. Which doesn't belong in this thread anyway.![]()
quoted for new pageThe Lamonster said:So can you go out and buy this car now? Wikipedia says they're filling pre-orders till October. Anyone know if this is true?
The Lamonster said:quoted for new page
Are these available now? What is the status?
The Lamonster said:quoted for new page
Are these available now? What is the status?
Cool, thanks. Unfortunately I don't think I can wait. I've got the 'new car bug.' Looking at the Dodge Charger but trying to decide if AWD is worth another $3-4k...mernst23 said:There were 13,500 preorders. Production started March 16th. There was a 10 day inspection on the first batch of cars. The first day's cars were mostly SS's which started arriving to dealers this Monday. (Most of these are going to be test drive/show room cars) The first few preorders are going to be winding up in people's hands by the end of this week or early next week. My local dealer told me I won't be able to test drive a v6 until the end of this month (at which point I can get my deal in writing and then play the waiting game with production). All in all, if you haven't preordered, be happy if you can get one by early June-July.
Elfforkusu said:I think it looks pretty good. But... 17 mpg city? :|
MorisUkunRasik said:white guy love for the camaro never ceases to amaze me. Also White guy love for corvettes is weird too.
You kidding me?MorisUkunRasik said:white guy love for the camaro never ceases to amaze me. Also White guy love for corvettes is weird too.
Same, though I plan on going with either Blue or Titanium.eznark said:I'm thinking of picking up a Challenger this summer. Car is so rad. HEMI orange
Yes.FlightOfHeaven said:Aren't Challengers manufactured by Chrysler?
minx88 said:I don't understand some of the people on this board. $22,000 for 304hp v6 that gets decent gas milage and a 5.9 0 to 60. $31,000 for a 422hp car that blasts from 0 to 60 in 4.6 seconds. All you haters are right, what the hell was GM thinking? :lol Holy hell this car is slow.
golem said:no one tells Ford to stop making the Mustang and I think the Camaro is a much better effort than the Challenger. It seems like a solid enough car, I don't think you can expect any one car to be GM's savior.
YuriLowell said:I saw a couple of these the other day around town.
Must say its kinda gaudy looking in person.
The back end looks atrocious.
mernst23 said:Must be in the minority then because anyone I've talked to about the car loves the look.
Lakedaimon said:The Camaro certainly wins when it comes to hp for your $, but I dont really care for the styling. If Chrysler shows signs that they are righting the ship over the next couple months I may order a 2010 Challenger. I dont care about quarter mile times or any of that crap I just think its the best looking of the current generation of muscle cars.
VPhys said:I like this car, might pick one up.
El_TigroX said:Why does everyone think that 25 mpg is somehow incredible? When that's touted as an amazing feature it's ridiculous. Cars around the world, from Europe to Japan, LAUGH at that mpg rating. It's depressing...
Anasui Kishibe said:five pages over this classless piece of ass car?
![]()
Onix said:There aren't may 300+ horsepower cars getting that kind of MPG.
Boogie said:I think the Camaro is the best looking out of it, the Mustang, and the Challenger these days, and just don't understand the hate for it.
OuterWorldVoice said:But there are plenty of better cars getting better mpg.
OuterWorldVoice said:Aesthetics are subjective and the best reason to like the Camaro. Every other reason needs a LOT of justification. On a dollar for dollar basis it's a terrible idea.
Onix said:There aren't may 300+ horsepower cars getting that kind of MPG.
Sure, but no car is best at anything. Cars with better gas mileage don't have as good of performance. Cars that have a better ride or better handling are more expensive. What do you want them to do?OuterWorldVoice said:Some people like encouraging US Auto to burn its own pubic hair.
But there are plenty of better cars getting better mpg. Faster, better ride, better handling, etc., etc. This is like the special olympics.
aznpxdd said:S4 with a chip goes to 400+ whp and gets 28mpg.
OuterWorldVoice said:But there are plenty of better cars getting better mpg. Faster, better ride, better handling, etc., etc. This is like the special olympics.
ascii42 said:Sure, but no car is best at anything. Cars with better gas mileage don't have as good of performance. Cars that have a better ride or better handling are more expensive. What do you want them to do?
Onix said:That really has nothing to do with my point.
OuterWorldVoice said:It's an interesting point, but it's meaningless, thanks to the crappy average and poor city mileage.
Onix said:And that still really has nothing to do with my point :lol
OuterWorldVoice said:Now, on the other end of the Chevy spectrum - the current Corvette is a Ferrari-slapping fucking masterpiece and should be the blueprint for ALL American cars. Technology and amazing engineering, with real focus.
Compared to what, exactly? What cars in the Camaro's class get significantly better gas mileage?OuterWorldVoice said:Your point was that it gets barely reasonable highway mileage, while pumping 300 horses. I addressed that by noting it only does that at highway speeds and its actual mileage - the combined average, is not good at all.
Boogie said:Gawdamn right it is.
Of course, I'll never be able to afford one.
Here's a question for you: what would you recommend for someone looking for a fun/sporty/badass car for under, say, $36k?
OuterWorldVoice said:Under 36k? Easy.
![]()
Subaru Impreza WRX STIBoogie said:Gawdamn right it is.
Of course, I'll never be able to afford one.
Here's a question for you: what would you recommend for someone looking for a fun/sporty/badass car for under, say, $36k?