• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Going from COD to Battlefield is a pretty shocking change

COD used to have that 'Hero' effect. BF has that, 'Don't be a Hero, Dumbass! Cover your squadmate...'

Also, i transitioned from COD to BF3 and the first really difference I caught on was how much more bullets it takes to drop a guy in BF3/4 (well, until you get hit by BF's magic bullets)
 
It's meant to be heavier, though. For what it is, it's incredibly tight. Guns feel great and have weight which varies per weapon, and recoil and weapon sway is great too. Not KZ2 great, but great nonetheless.

I didn't say it was bad for being heavier and looser. I just think it's heavier and looser.
 
It's the Coke vs Pepsi argument for me, I hardly see a enough of a noticeable difference to call the other game the cancer that's killing the industry while hailing the other one as a masterpiece. Go play Quake Live instead.
9872_884f_960.jpeg

The only people that are going to complain about this image are Battlefield fanboys.
 
COD used to have that 'Hero' effect. BF has that, 'Don't be a Hero, Dumbass! Cover your squadmate...'

Also, i transitioned from COD to BF3 and the first really difference I caught on was how much more bullets it takes to drop a guy in BF3/4 (well, until you get hit by BF's magic bullets)

Try hardcore mode you die fast.
 
So I am one of those people that complains about COD every year. I harp on how stagnant it has become and how bored I am of the series yet I still buy the game and prestige at least twice. Finally with Ghosts the mediocrity of the franchise has caught up to how I have felt all along and I sold it before even hitting the half way point on my first prestige.

Seeing how much everyone talks about BF me and my brother decided to give 4 a try and figured hopefully EA had sorted out all the server issues. Prior to this the only other time I had played the series was BF2 which I liked but it came out when COD, Counterstrike and Killzone had their hooks all firmly implanted in me and I just couldn't get into it.

Me and my brother spent all day playing BF4 today and it is a fantastic, phenomenal change of pace. A shocking change of pace but a great one in many ways.

In the first place I have always been really competent in FPS games. I think the lowest my KD has ever been is 1:1 and its something I feel like I can pick up really quickly.

That has all changed with BF.

The first 3 games my KD was absolutely horrendous. I think my first game was something like 1 | 16. I can't believe how hard this game is! It is so hard and people all seem to know what they are doing and even if I got the drop on them more often then not they are going to casually turn around clip their toe nails and then pop me in the dome.

I love how even though there is some aim assist happening it really doesn't help you zero in on people unless you actually get your crosshair on them. It was so nice to play something so immediately challenging.

The game is so EPIC. Skyscrapers are falling, Battleships are charging islands everything is just so HUGE it almost overwhelms you. The first time I was getting shot at by a 50cal the sound and impact of the bullets was so intense I just ran and ran and ran. I have never had a game jar me like that before. When tanks are blowing buildings to bits or a jet comes crashing down in front of you I am almost stunned by the spectacle of it all. It is so appropriate that you can now record your footage so easily and share it with people because in just this day there must have been 10 moments that me and my brother were both laughing hysterically at or were blown away by.

Going to the top of a skyscraper and securing the position only to then jump off and parachute to the ground landing and immediately resuming the fight is so amazing.

After all the games I have played on the new systems this is the only one that feels Next Gen. It feels like a whole new experience.

I think a lot of why I love this game so much is because it seems to take all the ideas MAG had and executes them in a much more creative and satisfying way.

Anyway goodbye COD and hello BF. I should have made this change ages ago.

Welcome to the Battlefield. When you play Conquest 32 vs 32 it sometimes feels like you are in a real war. If you have a great Suround System it even makes the experience better.
 
Thanks for making this thread OP. I instinctively bought CoD year after year since MW2 and had a lot of fun with it. I bought Ghosts when it came out for last gen and even bought it for the new gen thinking that the upped player count would make a difference. I was still getting spawn camped and still chasing my tail on maps that didnt make any sense and got fed up with the whole experience.

Then, I started watching twitch streams of Battlefield multiplayer and I went right to Gamestop and traded it in for Battlefield and I was amazed. The shooting took some time to get used to but once I adjusted and learned to use my classes and spawn points well, I felt like I was contributing regardless of my KDR. Learning how to fly helos is the last frontier for me in this game, and once I do, I may never go back to CoD.

There was one match when I dumb fired an RPG at a helo from what seemed like miles away and watched that bitch go down in flames with the points racking up on the bottom of the screen. I bought the premium pack right after that match and I dont regret it one bit.

When this game works.... sogood.gif
 
BF4 on PS4 was my first Battlefield experience.
I've never been a huge fan of shooters, played some Killzone and Halo, last COD I played was COD2.
And then BF4 came along. I started a Conquest match and I didn't know what the fuck was going on. I didn't expect the huge maps, the mayhem that was going on.
I took a few thing away from my first match:
1. My aiming is shit
2. I don't know what to do
3. I need to unlock weapons
4. This game is awesome

So I searched for a beginners guide online and found out basic stuff like spotting enemies. The classes and what you should do. They weapon classes and the differences between them and more.
I figuered that team deathmatch would be good to pratice my aiming. The fact that I spent nearly 60 hours in team deathmatch until I was satisfied with my aiming proves that this game is absolutely amazing.
Unfortunately I was on vacation for two weeks recently and wasn't able to play. WIthout constant practice my aiming went to shit again, but I'm quickly regaining my skills :D


The single player is shit and I really want to hate EA for delivering a broken game. But when it works its just one of the most fun I've ever had in a multiplayer game.
 
They are two really different experiences and I don't think you need to "go" from one to another.

CoD is an intensely satisfying, high intensity adrenaline rush. It's quick to jump into and provides a quick fix immediately. The constant leveling up provides hits of satisfaction. After dying you go right back in and rush again. You don't relate to the settings or world much, they are just a backdrop for action. Because it is so intense it produces more polarized emotions - from rage to rush.

BF is an immersive, motivating world with many roles to play in it. The pace is more deliberate and encourages thinking of the context of the current battle. The lack of direct respawn forces you to think where to spawn and what role to take - for example, 'take down that tank'. The satisfaction with BF sits on a deeper level of creating memories of epic moments in a memorable world.
 
zavodomddw.gif


Only on Battlefield 4

Haha daaaaaaammmmn

Welcome to the Battlefield. When you play Conquest 32 vs 32 it sometimes feels like you are in a real war. If you have a great Suround System it even makes the experience better.

If I had a great sound system I would like suffer from PTSD by now.

It's the Coke vs Pepsi argument for me, I hardly see a enough of a noticeable difference to call the other game the cancer that's killing the industry while hailing the other one as a masterpiece. Go play Quake Live instead.
9872_884f_960.jpeg

This is not true in the slightest. Only similarity between the two is I use a controller to play them and they have guns that shoot people.
 
Ghosts made me switch too - it's Camping Of Duty. I love camping but seriously everyone just works around the edge of the maps now, which are too big for the team sizes.

BF4 really is a great game - just a shame about 900P and the many many bugs, and yes it's pretty harsh even if you were decent at BO2 the skills just don't translate that well. Having gone through the very early suffering I'm trying to claw my way to a 1 k/d...
 
Only similarity between the two is I use a controller to play them and they have guns that shoot people.


...and everything else displayed in the image.

I also feel like it's Coke vs Pepsi. At times, the fast matches of CoD just fit into my gaming schedule much better compared to 30+ minute BF games. Not having to wait and respawn in CoD is preferred over the waiting spawns in BF. Other than that, I have no preference at all really. Both games are pretty damn fun.
 
I bought the last one for 360 and also bought another copy for my brother in law for Christmas, him being a big COD guy. That's all he plays on his console. We tried getting into it but one thing that annoyed us is the controls are different to COD. He's older so that was a big hurdle for him. I don't mind as much but all my friends played COD, so never put the time into it. Is there a way to make the controls the same as COD on the consoles? I don't think there was with the last one. This would be a big help for me. Thanks
 
Few people saying CoD is fast compared to BF4. Have any of you played Ghosts? At one point I wandered the map for a full 3 minutes without coming across enemies to fight. It's not even vaguely close to BO2 in gameplay terms, slowed right down. Matches timing out instead of ending on kill totals is common, very rarely happened at all in BO2. I'm finding BF4 to be a much faster pace.
 
How do you find the length of games. One of the reasons I've never been able to get into Battlefield is that rounds take an eternity.

It's ok, Domination matches tend to take around 15 for me and conquest around 30-45. But it's awesome! Just wish people would focus on helping the team instead of only looking at their killstreaks.
 
Just wait until you learn to pilot the helicopters. Pro Tip: change the button layout to original(Triggers control throttle). I went from using the helicopters as to crash on a spot I wanted to get to, to death incarnate from above.
And if you miss the COD style action try squad death match. Tight maps with small squads vs several other squads.
 
More players doesn't mean better game.
A lot of accessories for guns and vehicles doesn't impy it either.
Neither does the hollywood style.

When you get used to it like you got used to CoD mechanics then it becomes more of the same.

And in that case, the fast pace and intense gameplay from CoD takes the lead for me...
despite the childish community that freaks everyone out. Because in BF, or you are in the middle of a bullet madness, or flying around the map without caring about the others, or you are going by foot to the other corner of the map. You move more than you shoot.
I find CoD far more balanced.


Also, its matter of the time you have to play. I cant stand a 40 minutes BF match anymore, and if you leave before the game ends, because you are bored or you cant play more, you just lose everything. Also BF have a higher learning curve.

So, I really cant avoid having much fun in CoD that in BF3/4.
 
The only people that are going to complain about this image are Battlefield fanboys.

Calling Battlefield realistic is pretty stupid. Saying it's the same as COD is alot more stupid though.


And I really don't get comments that CoD gunplay is better, I can understand how you can call it more of a twitch shooter then BD is, but better? All the weapons have close to no recoil, they all sound like pea shooters, there's no bullet drop/travel, animations are terrible.

Gunplay in BF is soooo much better.

More players doesn't mean better game.
A lot of accessories for guns and vehicles doesn't impy it either.
Neither does the hollywood style.

All by themselvs they don't mean much, in a battlefield game, they do. It is a better game because of all of that.

You move more than you shoot.
I find CoD far more balanced.
Play with your squad and stop spawning in the wrong places.

Also, its matter of the time you have to play. I cant stand a 40 minutes BF match anymore, and if you leave before the game ends, because you are bored or you cant play more, you just lose everything. Also BF have a higher learning curve.

That's not true, you don't loose anything, you just have to wait for the round to end on the server side for stats to get uploaded to the master servers.

And if you don't like long round, join servers with shorter rounds. If you don't like big maps, or lots of players, join servers with short maps and less players.

Can't talk about balance as I never played a CoD long enough to judge on it.
 
...and everything else displayed in the image.

I also feel like it's Coke vs Pepsi. At times, the fast matches of CoD just fit into my gaming schedule much better compared to 30+ minute BF games. Not having to wait and respawn in CoD is preferred over the waiting spawns in BF. Other than that, I have no preference at all really. Both games are pretty damn fun.

So your saying that if similar sports keep track of the same type of stats and have defined innings or periods that they are the exact same? This makes no sense to me. Of course its going to keep track of similar stats on a fundamental principle the game is about shooting people. You really can't carry any skills from one to the other though which doesn't make it a Coke vs Pepsi at all. Its more like Coke vs Sprite.
 
Calling Battlefield realistic is pretty stupid. Saying it's the same as COD is alot more stupid though.


And I really don't get comments that CoD gunplay is better, I can understand how you can call it more of a twitch shooter then BD is, but better? All the weapons have close to no recoil, they all sound like pea shooters, there's no bullet drop/travel, animations are terrible.

Gunplay in BF is soooo much better.

I think it's because they prefer hitscan than actual projectiles and they prefer no recoil. The extremely high bullet damage is icing on a cake for them. Extremely low skill ceiling for an FPS.

Sadly, BF4 is moving closer to no recoil with some of the weapons and attachments.
 
How can I tell when my team leader is giving orders? Are his the ones that pop up in green "ATTACK"

Also I was in the test range and was messing with some of the sniper rifles where you adjust the meters of the target now this is going to be a dumb question but I assume you change the distance depending on how far the target is and that makes it more accurate correct?
 
How can I tell when my team leader is giving orders? Are his the ones that pop up in green "ATTACK"

Also I was in the test range and was messing with some of the sniper rifles where you adjust the meters of the target now this is going to be a dumb question but I assume you change the distance depending on how far the target is and that makes it more accurate correct?
Yes to both.

BTW, what are you playing it on? =3
 
How can I tell when my team leader is giving orders? Are his the ones that pop up in green "ATTACK"

Also I was in the test range and was messing with some of the sniper rifles where you adjust the meters of the target now this is going to be a dumb question but I assume you change the distance depending on how far the target is and that makes it more accurate correct?

yes
 
So your saying that if similar sports keep track of the same type of stats and have defined innings or periods that they are the exact same?

It depends on how similar the sports are. BF and CoD are like softball and baseball or floor hockey and ice hockey. They are a hell of a lot more similar than they are different and those differences are not nearly as huge as the fan boys of either series would have outsiders believe.
 
Both franchise are really different even though they are quite similar too. Similar in a way that they're both FPS military games. But what's different is the community. I always prefer BF > COD because of the community.

BF is designed in such a way that teamwork is important while in COD it's more of a arcade shooter. If your're pro in COD you can dominate the whole game, especially with the overpowered perks. But not in BF, it's in a more realistic gameplay style where even though you're really pro if your team has no teamwork you will still lose the match. It's that simple.
 
Both franchise are really different even though they are quite similar too. Similar in a way that they're both FPS military games. But what's different is the community. I always prefer BF > COD because of the community.

BF is designed in such a way that teamwork is important while in COD it's more of a arcade shooter. If your're pro in COD you can dominate the whole game, especially with the overpowered perks. But not in BF, it's in a more realistic gameplay style where even though you're really pro if your team has no teamwork you will still lose the match. It's that simple.

That is simply not true. In any objective based mode you NEED teamwork. No matter how good one person is, no matter his/her 3.00 or up K/D. If he's just playing it as a TDM and not helping capturing points etc. you still aren't going to win the match.
If you play FFA or TDM in COD sure, you'll dominate if you're really good, who wouldn't in any game?
 
So I am one of those people that complains about COD every year. I harp on how stagnant it has become and how bored I am of the series yet I still buy the game and prestige at least twice. Finally with Ghosts the mediocrity of the franchise has caught up to how I have felt all along and I sold it before even hitting the half way point on my first prestige.

Seeing how much everyone talks about BF me and my brother decided to give 4 a try and figured hopefully EA had sorted out all the server issues. Prior to this the only other time I had played the series was BF2 which I liked but it came out when COD, Counterstrike and Killzone had their hooks all firmly implanted in me and I just couldn't get into it.

Me and my brother spent all day playing BF4 today and it is a fantastic, phenomenal change of pace. A shocking change of pace but a great one in many ways.

In the first place I have always been really competent in FPS games. I think the lowest my KD has ever been is 1:1 and its something I feel like I can pick up really quickly.

That has all changed with BF.

The first 3 games my KD was absolutely horrendous. I think my first game was something like 1 | 16. I can't believe how hard this game is! It is so hard and people all seem to know what they are doing and even if I got the drop on them more often then not they are going to casually turn around clip their toe nails and then pop me in the dome.

I love how even though there is some aim assist happening it really doesn't help you zero in on people unless you actually get your crosshair on them. It was so nice to play something so immediately challenging.

The game is so EPIC. Skyscrapers are falling, Battleships are charging islands everything is just so HUGE it almost overwhelms you. The first time I was getting shot at by a 50cal the sound and impact of the bullets was so intense I just ran and ran and ran. I have never had a game jar me like that before. When tanks are blowing buildings to bits or a jet comes crashing down in front of you I am almost stunned by the spectacle of it all. It is so appropriate that you can now record your footage so easily and share it with people because in just this day there must have been 10 moments that me and my brother were both laughing hysterically at or were blown away by.

Going to the top of a skyscraper and securing the position only to then jump off and parachute to the ground landing and immediately resuming the fight is so amazing.

After all the games I have played on the new systems this is the only one that feels Next Gen. It feels like a whole new experience.

I think a lot of why I love this game so much is because it seems to take all the ideas MAG had and executes them in a much more creative and satisfying way.

Anyway goodbye COD and hello BF. I should have made this change ages ago.

BF is much better this year. I don't know what happened to make Call of Duty awful.. For some reason there are times, more often than not that I will be re spawned right by enemies. Literally, there have been so many times I have died 2-3 seconds after re spawning. The maps are also atrocious and overly big. Battlefield may have big maps but it isn't the same kind of game Call of Duty is and there is also more than 12 players in games.. The only reason I still play it is because I cannot do split screen online with my girlfriend in BF.
 
The thing I love about BF is that you don't have to be running around with a massive KD ratio. I like working as part of a team dropping down medic packs, reviving, taking down choppers and spot, spot spot!


Operation Locker and Siege of Shanghai are 2 epic maps on BF4, love playing them.
 
I have to agree with you OP, CoD has been my go to shooter since MW1.

I tried BF3 and hated it (though I enjoyed Bad Company 2), but with BF4 I decided to give it a go on the X1 as Ghosts seems dull to me and stale.

Yes it's a massive change of pace ( I play 64 player conquest) bit after nearly 20 hours I've adapted and I don't think I can go back to 6v6 CoD especially with all the bullshit in CoD these days.

It's a breath of fresh air not to have load outs with perks to combat thermal scopes/kill streaks etc you just pick your loadout and roll into battle. People also seem to play the objective and not just go for the 1080 no scope from the back of the map like CoD.

For years I've had friends telling me to switch but I was always hiding out for the 64 player stuff as I do not own a gaming PC and boy does it feel good.
 
So I am one of those people that complains about COD every year. I harp on how stagnant it has become and how bored I am of the series yet I still buy the game and prestige at least twice. Finally with Ghosts the mediocrity of the franchise has caught up to how I have felt all along and I sold it before even hitting the half way point on my first prestige.

Seeing how much everyone talks about BF me and my brother decided to give 4 a try and figured hopefully EA had sorted out all the server issues. Prior to this the only other time I had played the series was BF2 which I liked but it came out when COD, Counterstrike and Killzone had their hooks all firmly implanted in me and I just couldn't get into it.

Me and my brother spent all day playing BF4 today and it is a fantastic, phenomenal change of pace. A shocking change of pace but a great one in many ways.

In the first place I have always been really competent in FPS games. I think the lowest my KD has ever been is 1:1 and its something I feel like I can pick up really quickly.

That has all changed with BF.

The first 3 games my KD was absolutely horrendous. I think my first game was something like 1 | 16. I can't believe how hard this game is! It is so hard and people all seem to know what they are doing and even if I got the drop on them more often then not they are going to casually turn around clip their toe nails and then pop me in the dome.

I love how even though there is some aim assist happening it really doesn't help you zero in on people unless you actually get your crosshair on them. It was so nice to play something so immediately challenging.

The game is so EPIC. Skyscrapers are falling, Battleships are charging islands everything is just so HUGE it almost overwhelms you. The first time I was getting shot at by a 50cal the sound and impact of the bullets was so intense I just ran and ran and ran. I have never had a game jar me like that before. When tanks are blowing buildings to bits or a jet comes crashing down in front of you I am almost stunned by the spectacle of it all. It is so appropriate that you can now record your footage so easily and share it with people because in just this day there must have been 10 moments that me and my brother were both laughing hysterically at or were blown away by.

Going to the top of a skyscraper and securing the position only to then jump off and parachute to the ground landing and immediately resuming the fight is so amazing.

After all the games I have played on the new systems this is the only one that feels Next Gen. It feels like a whole new experience.

I think a lot of why I love this game so much is because it seems to take all the ideas MAG had and executes them in a much more creative and satisfying way.

Anyway goodbye COD and hello BF. I should have made this change ages ago.

Welcome to Battlefield, OP! As a quick reminder, please spam the spot button, always dole out med and ammo packs, repair nearby vehicles, sacrifice yourself for an objective, don't camp 1,000 yards away from the objective and don't steal vehicles.

I admit, I used to be in the same boat. I played a ton more Call of Duty MP since I thought BF was "too slow," or some other bullshit. Once I learned the ropes, though, I never looked back.

Tons of stuff to do that playing CoD MP now seems a bit stale. But they both have their strengths, I won't deny that but overall, BF just seems a grander scale of war that playing 6 vs. 6 seems pitiful.

Just annoying that BF4 shipped the way it is. Not sure with everyone here, but the PS4 version is (finally) stable. I've been playing since launch, and the last few weeks, I experienced the CE error maybe twice or thrice at the most.

I'll repeat what others said, when the game works, it's unparalleled now. I've logged in close to 232 hours on BF4 so far and aside from the bugs, it's a blast.

Anyhoo, congrats on the new experience, OP! Record some of your "Battlefield Moments" and share it here with us. =)
 
How can I tell when my team leader is giving orders? Are his the ones that pop up in green "ATTACK"

Also I was in the test range and was messing with some of the sniper rifles where you adjust the meters of the target now this is going to be a dumb question but I assume you change the distance depending on how far the target is and that makes it more accurate correct?
For the sniper you usually have to adjust for (i'm not sure what its actually called but..) bullet drop. The farther away you are the higher up you have to aim. When you adjust the sniper for distance you don't have to aim higher. If the target is running make sure you aim where they will be by the time the bullet reaches them.
 
If you're riding in the gunner seat of a tank and you don't repair. I swear to Christ I will find you.

Every time I get out to repair the driver of the tank takes off without me before I can fix it or I get blown up while I'm trying yo repair it.
 
I always see people saying Battlefield is very slow, and while it might not be as always in your face as CoD there can be quite a bit of action when played correctly.

About 1 minute of gameplay from last night with some PTFO action.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcVs-Ka-bPI

Thats just the infantry gameplay. Nothing quite like taking a Little Bird around mowing down people diving behind buildings, hills, and trees trying to avoid missiles. Or rolling up in a tank with a hope to kill enough of them and distract them for long enough to get them to plant a MCOM. Getting your first heli or jet kill with a rocket/tank shell as they are screaming by also is still exhilarating even though I've done it probably 100 times. Oh and grabbing the bomb in Obliteration, you are the center of attention.
 
How can I tell when my team leader is giving orders? Are his the ones that pop up in green "ATTACK"

Also I was in the test range and was messing with some of the sniper rifles where you adjust the meters of the target now this is going to be a dumb question but I assume you change the distance depending on how far the target is and that makes it more accurate correct?

I posted this in the OT. It's what occured to me when I got better at sniping (being able to semi-consistently hit moving target in the head at range).

It took me awhile, but I figured out sniping.

DICE are a devious lot, indeed. Do read if you've been having trouble adapting to sniping coming from Bad Company 2 or Battlefield 3.

How sniping has changed.

More so than Bad Company 2 or Battlefield 3, sniping takes skill in Battlefield 4. Bullets in the former two games would travel in a predictable arc, and therefore you would aim slightly higher than the intended target the further away you are, and lead shots to account for bullet travel time. That shit's changed.

In Battlefield 4 bullets reach a distance after which they seem to lose effectiveness. There's an arc, but after a certain distance the bullet plummets exponentially to the additional distance travel. Also, at least it seems, different weapons have a more diverse spread of bullet travel times, also complicating sniping.

You need to learn how to effectively zero your scope. Sniping from one flag to another is usually a distance of 200m, so you should have your scope set to that. If your target it closer than 200m, then you should aim accordingly below their head to hit it. If they are further than 200m, then you should aim above their head to hit it. This is the usually engagement range. 400m is useful for targets that are barely visible unscoped, and I've yet to make a 1000m shot. Make not of the flag distances, they are shown when you aim at the letter representing them. Eventually you'll be able to gauge distances independently.

So, if you are sniping at someone fairly close (where the target is less than a flag away) no zeroing is necessary. A fairly distant target should have the sights aimed just above their heads for a headshot. At most close ranges (below 100m) just aim at the head to hit it, and try to hit the head rather than hit the body. You need to kill them before they kill you, so stand still if your target is aware of you and take cover when possible. Strafing will make a sniper's job more difficult, but it won't significantly make someone with an automatic weapon have a hard time with you. It also makes you less accurate when you move and shoot, for all weapons. For all weapons stand still, engage your target, move (especially high fire rate weapons like LMG's and SMG's).

Typical sniping distances necessitate a zeroing range of 200. Really distance targets (such as one who you need to zoom to see the features of) should usually be sniped at 400m. Those are the most useful ranges. Bullet travel time is fairly linear, and something you'll get a feel for after sniping for a while. Typically, to hit a 200m target moving horizontally I'll aim at where they'll be in a just under a second. For 400m, 2-3 seconds.


Not having a spotter, as a real sniper would, makes these realistic additions to sniping more difficult to contend with. You need to calculate the ranges, and adjust your own shots. However once you get the hang of it, and realize that zeroing your scope is necessary, it becomes quite natural.

The bold is the most relevant to you.
 
I posted this in the OT. It's what occured to me when I got better at sniping (being able to semi-consistently hit moving target in the head at range).



The bold is the most relevant to you.

Good lord that is so outside of my pay range. Can't I just Q,Q and quick scope to make up for all that stuff :P
 
Good lord that is so outside of my pay range. Can't I just Q,Q and quick scope to make up for all that stuff :P

There is little that is more satisfying that headshotting a moving target who is 500m away from you. But it does take calculation.

Even 360 drag scoping can't compare.
 
It's good but i don't like that many players and huge maps for some reason..

Tired of CoD though.

I find Team Deathmatch and Domination in Battlefield 4 more fun than Ghosts' variations, certainly. Being compacted with 19 other players in a much smaller area that Conquest permits really highlights the destruction. It really is awesome when you tactically demolish an aspect of the map.

There's also Defuse. Apparently it's good, but I haven't tried it (30 hours in).
 
Top Bottom