Escalation
Member
Any place to get the trailer in PS3 compatible form?
-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Gran Turismo 5 Prologue screens
- Thread starter SolidSnakex
- Start date
dammitmattt
Banned
Escalation said:
Maybe on blim's site, or it will hopefully show up on PSN this week...
disappeared
Banned
SolidSnakex said:
Dear sweet crimminy christ in holy heaven.
DantesWrath
Member
Why does the grass and road look better than real life in this pic
But not so sexy in others? Is this really an in game pic of GT5 or just a regular picture of a car?
But not so sexy in others? Is this really an in game pic of GT5 or just a regular picture of a car?
Crayon Shinchan
Aquafina Fanboy
Yo Gotti said:
:lol
nelsonroyale
Member
Yo Gotti said:
it looks really great, but going by the trailer, GT5 looks more impressive I would say
BobTheFork
Member
It can't possibly look like that can it? can it? I really dont know what to say. I guess im just waiting for the other show to drop. IN-****ING-CREDIBLE
Goldrusher
Member
MassiveAttack said:
Actually I have, many times. Just never paid attention to the more modern buses...
Anyway, in the two (Getaway & GT5) screenshots posted, nothing is identical. Nothing.
Not even the street lights (in GT5, they're missing little "spikes" at the top).
They could've edited some of the models though. Also, both screenshots show two totally different locations.
joshcryer said:
Shaders? :lol
:lol
To answer the question, the texture was taken from a reference pic, that was taken directly above the grass. Looking at that texture from any angle other than directly above and it doesn't look as good. For a game like this, the main thing is to get the colors right. Most racers aren't looking at the grass, and besides there are sprites to help make the grass look 3D, if one decided to look at the grass.
sleeping_dragon
Banned
honestly how on earth they are gonna to improve on this for GT5?
frAntic_Frog
Member
sleeping_dragon said:
addition of skidmarks......
just kidding....but skidmarks BETTER be in PROLOGUE
LOL @ people thinking these are actual Gran Turismo 5 screenshots :lol
People...THESE ARE SCREENSHOTS OF REAL LIFE!!!! There is NO WAY a videogame will EVER look this real!! Wake up people you've been had!!!!!
People...THESE ARE SCREENSHOTS OF REAL LIFE!!!! There is NO WAY a videogame will EVER look this real!! Wake up people you've been had!!!!!
Still can't believe it. Looks amazing. The lighting in this game is incredible, and the normal mapped cars look so smooth and... non game like :lol
They must have some sort of individual lighting engineers working on the engine, like bioshock have with water, to get it looking that good.
DO WANT!
They must have some sort of individual lighting engineers working on the engine, like bioshock have with water, to get it looking that good.
DO WANT!
eso76
Member
PGR4 and GT5 are very different, from what i've seen i tend to consider PGR4 very, very, very impressive from a technical pov (that is, assuming the trailer entirely consists of realtime graphics, and the game has the same IQ). It really looks like good CG at times.
GT5 on the other hand is much much more photorealstic. However i wouldn't consider this 'universally better' nor directly related to better technical performances.
I would put them roughly on the same technical level, point is they use resources for very different purposes.
Amen.
And well, Forza 2 on the other hand could have looked much better : P
GT5 on the other hand is much much more photorealstic. However i wouldn't consider this 'universally better' nor directly related to better technical performances.
I would put them roughly on the same technical level, point is they use resources for very different purposes.
Amen.
And well, Forza 2 on the other hand could have looked much better : P
!!??nelsonroyale
Member
eso76 said:
Hmmm, the city track in the vid look probably even more impressive than in the forza games, but it will remain to be seen how it looks when playing...as for weather effects, I though GT 5 was going to have those
peace
nelsonroyale
Member
ourumov said:Quite frankly... The yellow Dodge Viper screenshot looks pretty meh too me. I don't see the good lightning everybody claims. Nice DOF effect...
The other ones look really good
ourumov said:Quite frankly... The yellow Dodge Viper screenshot looks pretty meh too me. I don't see the good lightning everybody claims. Nice DOF effect...
The other ones look really good
The Dodge Viper screenshot looks like one of the only shots taken from gameplay (notice the shadow artefacting under the side mirror missing from other shots). Take off some of the post processing and AA and you'd have a realistic idea of how the game looks at the moment.
PjotrStroganov
Member
Nozi said:
The problem with that shot that it gives no sense of speed. That's all.
PjotrStroganov
Member
Damn, owned:lol
dammitmattt
Banned
PjotrStroganov said:
It also displays the awesome 2D grass
Most of the shots are taken in a way that they minimise or shouldn't have any self shadowing, probably on purpose. However, if you want to go by that logic, here are screenshots which also have shadow artefacts:Nozi said:
Check the yellow Elise
Pretty obvious on the F430
Back seat
Check the font grille on the Skyline
In the press pack there are three types of screenshot. (1) 3840x2160 captures likely the same type of replay source material for the trailer, (2) 1080p captures probably photo mode includes; White F430, Mustang and Z4, (3) 1080p car select framebuffer screenshots. All 3 types feature shadow aliasing in at least one of their images. Not that it's worth mentioning, but also check the fences in pretty much every shot. Polyphony basically made a rolling press shot.