Bully someone, they fight back, blame the bullied for starting a fight.
Standard school yard shit and lots of suckers are falling for it. Marcus is a despicable bottom scraper for even attempting to justify his schtick.
I agree with this.
Bully someone, they fight back, blame the bullied for starting a fight.
Standard school yard shit and lots of suckers are falling for it. Marcus is a despicable bottom scraper for even attempting to justify his schtick.
How is this going to work when he wants to sue Marcus for libel again?
I find it really sort of weird that saying "You should end your life because you're worthless and will never be able to create anything good" is just sort of dismissed as okay because someone was mean to him.
I have some unfortunate news.Where can I preorder Fez 2?
This is not fucking binary.Yep, keep on blaming the bullied for retaliating.
It's a parody account called Gamer Hivemind. If I'm to take that as a legitimate source then I obviously don't know what I'm doing on the internet anymore.
You don't get to just dump all retaliation in to piles of "okay" or "blame the victim." Parsing it like that is so goddamn immature that I can't believe you're seriously implying that response is in any way okay.
He references Futurama a lot (Bender in this case). It was just a really stupid time to do it.I find it really sort of weird that saying "You should end your life because you're worthless and will never be able to create anything good" is just sort of dismissed as okay because someone was mean to him.
haha that is kind of a weird response.I don't know how we could determine whether or not this source is legitimate, the name of the account wouldn't be a factor though. I just find it strange that Fish replied several times, and basically went from "Who are you, you're lying" to "none of your fucking business". There was another one like ""Fuck you" is not a threat" or something like that. This was his last reply, he locked his account minutes later:
Just keep on focusing your rage on the bullied retaliating and not the bully himself for causing the conflict and everything will be OK.
I think the idea that they're obligated to comment on this shit just because they get coverage on their games is fucking ridiculous. They're not. Hell, they've got a right to be sick of being asked all the damn time. Must be obnoxious. Am I supposed to side with the guy whining because he didn't get what he wanted like a kid who opened up a present full of clothes on Christmas?
It's the most pretentious game ever made.
Jim Sterling said:Phil Fish ragequit Twitter. Your thoughts?
I am fond of both Phil and Marcus, the latter of which I would consider a pretty solid media chum at this point. Speaking as a guy who used to get into the same kind of twitter fights those guys get into, all I could say is I hope they mellow out, the pair of them, because there's no long-term satisfaction or happiness to be gained from one-upping people on Twitter. You just get more frustrated, lash out more, and make more people have fights with you.
Neither of them need my advice, but again, speaking as a guy who used to get himself into these sort of slanging matches on the regular, all I can say is I'm 100% happier and less stressed out professionally now that I go out of my way to avoid people who want to have fights (or just retweet the funny ones so *other people* go and fight them while I block them). It can be difficult not to bite back, and I still even find myself engaging it for a while now and then, but on the whole, mellowing out and learning not to step into the shit heap when I know, deep down, that's exactly what I'm stepping into (and you always *really* know), was one of the best things I did for my long-term job satisfaction and overall happiness in what I do.
In any case, I wish the best for Phil and Marcus both. I've never had cause to dislike either of them personally and it's a shame they used their weekend for this.
Phil Fish ragequit Twitter. Your thoughts?
I am fond of both Phil and Marcus, the latter of which I would consider a pretty solid media chum at this point. Speaking as a guy who used to get into the same kind of twitter fights those guys get into, all I could say is I hope they mellow out, the pair of them, because there's no long-term satisfaction or happiness to be gained from one-upping people on Twitter. You just get more frustrated, lash out more, and make more people have fights with you.
Neither of them need my advice, but again, speaking as a guy who used to get himself into these sort of slanging matches on the regular, all I can say is I'm 100% happier and less stressed out professionally now that I go out of my way to avoid people who want to have fights (or just retweet the funny ones so *other people* go and fight them while I block them). It can be difficult not to bite back, and I still even find myself engaging it for a while now and then, but on the whole, mellowing out and learning not to step into the shit heap when I know, deep down, that's exactly what I'm stepping into (and you always *really* know), was one of the best things I did for my long-term job satisfaction and overall happiness in what I do.
In any case, I wish the best for Phil and Marcus both. I've never had cause to dislike either of them personally and it's a shame they used their weekend for this.
God damn it Phil. Second tweet was enough. Third one is overkill.
They're both dicks but that does not at all warrant saying what he did. You can be offended without being disgusting.
Just keep on focusing your rage on the bullied retaliating and not the bully himself for causing the conflict and everything will be OK.
"They're both bad" is not the ideal and solves nothing. Muckrakers, bullies and instigators like Marcus need to be weeded out and discarded, and stern patience given to those he abuses.
"They're both bad" is not the ideal and solves nothing. Muckrakers, bullies and instigators like Marcus need to be weeded out and discarded, and stern patience given to those he abuses.
"They're both bad" is not the ideal and solves nothing. Muckrakers, bullies and instigators like Marcus need to be weeded out and discarded, and stern patience given to those he abuses.
I haven't seen the video yet, but Fish's tweets seem bang on to me. All these changes ARE reactionary from Microsoft, if they could get away with it they would.
Look at me, haven't got the facts yet but I'm commenting anyway. I'm practically a video game journo.
The bottom line of this (not going into Phil ragequitting twitter or twitter catfights) is that Shitty Gaming Journalism won again in their battle of using social media a proper tool to his job even if it ends of misinformation, poor journo ethics or downright lazyness in their job.
This will end with a story of Phil Fish mental breaking instead of the real problem here, in which he was absolutly right.
I do admit to two things: One, Blow is not a hipster. I was corrected on the show and accept that.
Two: If I called myself a journalist then that is pretty stupid. I am part of the games media, but I don't have skills to do what some of these folks do. I am an 'opinionist' I guess?
Did Marcus say they were obligated to comment? I think the point was the prima donna attitude in response to being asked the question when they could have said "no comment".
What the fuck. How do you make a game in a pretentious manner anyway?It's the most pretentious game ever made.
"They're both bad" is not the ideal and solves nothing. Muckrakers, bullies and instigators like Marcus need to be weeded out and discarded, and stern patience given to those he abuses.
What, I'm not allowed to hate Fez?
It's the most pretentious game ever made.
What, I'm not allowed to hate Fez?
There is always the option of just not commenting. But I guess the drama queens needed some exposure.
What, I'm not allowed to hate Fez?
Though I must say that making a public video berating people and putting it out as a contributor on gametrailers is particularly vicious compared to the usual lazy trolling/flaming tweets Fish and Blow get.I kinda feel sorry for Fish. This non-story is now about him because people know how push his buttons. It's pretty shitty that people dogpile him just to get a reaction, any reaction, about anything.
It's good that Beer has been called out for this shit, but as you said, I fear Fish having a meltdown will turn out to be the takeaway (well, of course it's more relevant what happens to Fish compared to Beer, but still), and it'll end up overshadowing Beer's shitty behaviour, and probably even encourage him to do something like this again. I'm sure people are clicking on his video to see the slander that made Fish so mad in the first place. :/The bottom line of this (not going into Phil ragequitting twitter or twitter catfights) is that Shitty Gaming Journalism won again in their battle of using social media a proper tool to his job even if it ends of misinformation, poor journo ethics or downright lazyness in their job.
This will end with a story of Phil Fish mental breaking instead of the real problem here, in which he was absolutly right.