What about Lucas? that fucker isn't being ethical.Manos: The Hans of Fate said:It's the ethical thing to do if one was to hypothetically own one of Harmys Special Edition.
What about Lucas? that fucker isn't being ethical.Manos: The Hans of Fate said:It's the ethical thing to do if one was to hypothetically own one of Harmys Special Edition.
Yeah, but I never owned it on DVD or VHS, so I can't grandfather it in. Plus people besides Lucas got money and royalties for the sale of Blu-rays.equap said:What about Lucas? that fucker isn't being ethical.
Anth0ny said:There is of course more compression (which in this case is more prominent and noticeable in a still picture) but in terms of detail, there isn't really much of a difference, so I'd agree that it looks less good than the BD but I wouldn't say it looks bad compared to it.
And if a different picture was chosen, like those in post 240, there would probably be almost no difference at all (except that mine would have better colour ;-D ).
JB1981 said:man for someone who is not internet savvy this shit is so hard to figure out. anyone want to help me?![]()
Marty Chinn said:What's your problem?
DittoQuick said:Can I also get instructions via PM? Or the links without going to the forum mentioned in Harmy's original post?
Can't Handbrake convert ISOs to something streamable? Discs are so old-fashioned.JB1981 said:what are mac users using to burn to dvd-9? i can't use imgburn?
I don't really feel the need to add a fourth box set to my collection to justify a fan edit.Manos: The Hans of Fate said:It's the ehtical thing to do if one was to hypothetically own one of Harmys Special Edition.
Gary Whitta said:Can't Handbrake convert ISOs to something streamable? Discs are so old-fashioned.
What does that mean, put them in a different container ??mattp said:they're just h.264 mpeg video so you shouldn't even need to reencode them. just put them in a different container
I am able to play with VLC. Should I just be a me to stream to PS3 without doing much else? Sorry for stupid questions, plus right now I'm in class!alr1ghtstart said:You should be able to just open the iso (with winrar) and extract the stream.
JB1981 said:I am able to play with VLC. Should I just be a me to stream to PS3 without doing much else? Sorry for stupid questions, plus right now I'm in class!
prolly just change the file type to something elseJB1981 said:What does that mean, put them in a different container ??
JB1981 said:What does that mean, put them in a different container ??
There will only be one. And it won't be what I would call the "rough cut", it'll be the "final cut". The other one will be some sort of interesting artifact that people will look at and say, "There was an earlier draft of this." The same thing happens with plays and earlier drafts of books. In essence, films never get finished, they get abandoned. At some point, you're dragged off the picture kicking and screaming while somebody says, "Okay, it's done." That isn't really the way it should work. Occasionally, [you can] go back and get your cut of the video out there, which I did on both American Graffiti and THX 1138; that's the place where it will live forever. So what ends up being important in my mind is what the DVD version is going to look like, because that's what everybody is going to remember. The other versions will disappear. Even the 35 million tapes of Star Wars out there won't last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you'll be able to project it on a 20' by 40' screen with perfect quality. I think it's the director's prerogative, not the studio's to go back and reinvent a movie.Snaku said:It's sad commentary that after 14 years these despecializations are even necessary. Does Lucas really intend to go to the grave having never given the original OT a proper digital release? What a sad old douche.
EmCeeGramr said:There will only be one. And it won't be what I would call the "rough cut", it'll be the "final cut". The other one will be some sort of interesting artifact that people will look at and say, "There was an earlier draft of this." The same thing happens with plays and earlier drafts of books. In essence, films never get finished, they get abandoned. At some point, you're dragged off the picture kicking and screaming while somebody says, "Okay, it's done." That isn't really the way it should work. Occasionally, [you can] go back and get your cut of the video out there, which I did on both American Graffiti and THX 1138; that's the place where it will live forever. So what ends up being important in my mind is what the DVD version is going to look like, because that's what everybody is going to remember. The other versions will disappear. Even the 35 million tapes of Star Wars out there won't last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you'll be able to project it on a 20' by 40' screen with perfect quality. I think it's the director's prerogative, not the studio's to go back and reinvent a movie.
George Lucas, "An Expanded Universe", American Cinematographer magazine, February 1997.
it's not so much individual things as it is all of them as a whole constantly being pushed in your face and you notice it like "oh, theres some new, badly done, cg. womp" and it takes you out of the movieMadrical said:As someone who watched the videos to death as a kid but hadn't seen them until I bought the bluray the other day, what am I missing here? I watched A New Hope, and while the addition of CGI sucks ass, is there anything else that 'ruins' the film for someone who isn't a die-hard fan?
I hated CGI Jabba, really not looking forward to watching him more in the sequel, even though he was one of my favourites as a kid.
You can stream to PS3 without doing anything.JB1981 said:I am able to play with VLC. Should I just be a me to stream to PS3 without doing much else? Sorry for stupid questions, plus right now I'm in class!
http://www.dvdactive.com/editorial/articles/star-wars-the-changes-part-one.htmlMadrical said:As someone who watched the videos to death as a kid but hadn't seen them until I bought the bluray the other day, what am I missing here? I watched A New Hope, and while the addition of CGI sucks ass, is there anything else that 'ruins' the film for someone who isn't a die-hard fan?
I hated CGI Jabba, really not looking forward to watching him more in the sequel, even though he was one of my favourites as a kid.
Ahahahahaha!EmCeeGramr said:"A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you'll be able to project it on a 20' by 40' screen with perfect quality."
Van Owen said:You can stream to PS3 without doing anything.
The Han/Greedo and Han/Jabba confrontations are the most egregious changes in ANH. All the rest is just silly CG frippery that doesn't need to exist, feels kinda out of place with the look of the rest of the movie but isn't particularly offensive otherwise. But the awesomeness of the Han/Greedo scene, a key character-establishing moment for one of the major characters in the trilogy, is hugely diminished (not to mentioned rendered utterly absurd) in the new version. As for the Jabba scene, it's a note-for-note recreation of the scene we just saw with Greedo, and it blows the reveal of Jabba in ROTJ, oh and CG Jabba looks like shit, so the original versions without this pointless addition are preferable.Madrical said:As someone who watched the videos to death as a kid but hadn't seen them until I bought the bluray the other day, what am I missing here? I watched A New Hope, and while the addition of CGI sucks ass, is there anything else that 'ruins' the film for someone who isn't a die-hard fan?
I hated CGI Jabba, really not looking forward to watching him more in the sequel, even though he was one of my favourites as a kid.
Yeah, my computer couldn't handle 1080p in After Effects (it is hellishly slow on 720p already) and it would mean redoing every single shot from scratch and from the comparisons I've seen between the Blu-Rays and the highest quality HDTV captures, the difference is so small (being the same resolution from the same master) that it wouldn't be worth it.
Actually most of the despecializations are visible when you know about them and are looking for them but if you showed it to someone who's never seen SW or is just a casual viewer and they were watching it for the story, I'm quite confident that in 99% of cases they wouldn't notice anything at all. And a big part of why I wanted to make an edit like this was exactly that - being able to introduce new people to SW without having to decide whether to show them a butchered version in high quality or an original version from an mpeg2 encoded 1993 LD master - I think I actually first got the idea when I was showing SW to my exGF who's never seen it before and had to face that problem. I ended up showing her the GOUT but I wasn't very happy about it.
I hope you're younger than George Lucas, because I have a (bad) feeling that it isn't happening until after he's been in the grave for a while.Gary Whitta said:Hopefully Lucas finally does the right thing and gives us REAL, OFFICIAL 1080p restorations of the originals before we're all fucking dead. I'm not holding my breath though.
save your money for lotr extended, if you like that. or something else.ShaneB said:Seeing the blu-rays at the store the other day, and wanted to give in buy it, but made the smart choice and will be avoiding that mess.
Will be checking these out asap to get my ultimate star wars fix!
Thanks Harmy!
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=harmygrkazan12 said:I'm really sorry, but is it hard to find these versions of trilogy?