GeoramA said:Meh. Still gonna buy it for the trophies... :/
trophy whoring begins....
GeoramA said:Meh. Still gonna buy it for the trophies... :/
Doc Evils said:Who mentioned Halo?
N30RYU said:Haze Dev talk about IGN review (maxconsoles)
Rob Yescombe of Free Radical has responded to IGN's 4.5/10 review score for Haze. "My thoughts are "Owch". No, wait - MEGAowch. Haze has had mixed reviews, but even GoldenEye got a 4/10 when it first came out. With a 9/10 in the Italian PSM, and an extremely positive review in Famitsu, we're looking forward to people playing Haze and making a judgment for themselves." said Rob
Brashnir said:Total pixels: (difference in parentheses)
640x480 = 307,200 ( -282,624) NTSC Standard Definition
720x576 = 414,720 ( -175,104) Pal Standard Definition
1024x576 = 589,824 Haze's Resolution
1280x720 = 921,600 ( +331,776) 720p HD
.
nib95 said:Someone post that demo direct capture shot. It still looks great, and is definitely not close to a 4. I have a hard time believing it's glitchy enough to warrant that kind of score for visuals when other games have been worse and given a pass.
sprocket said:seriously you people need to die.
sajj316 said:Here ya go ...
Me personally, GAF should just ban bullshots!
Doc Evils said:Who mentioned Halo?
Ryuuga said:I wonder how AltogetherAndrews is taking this news.
urk said:Free Radical's script writer, Yescombe compared Haze to Halo in terms of maturity, going as far as to call Halo 3 "brilliant," but stating that Haze's story would deal with more serious, adult themes.
Online publications ran with leads like "Free Radical: "Halo 3 Is Child's Play" and "Haze: Like Halo 3, But For Adults."
N30RYU said:surely you all have alredy seen the video with the Haze graphics issues... in the final release.
If not... here it is
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20OnIZZ3aVc
With this video, i don't need any more reviews whatever famitsu said... I'm not gonna buy it to shorten the wait for MGS4.
Doc Evils said:Silly thing to do. :/
Ok, let's compare a multi-million budget AAA(?) title with a port of an arcade game.nib95 said:Exactly, now compare that to the Time crisis 4 shots.
Doc Evils said:Silly thing to do. :/
Lord knows what would have happened if the IGN PS3 channel had to review Mass Effect.
:lol :lol And with that I need to go to bed. What a night...yeesh.VibratingDonkey said:My copy has already been shipped.
methane47 said:especially considering the collective hard-on that the gaming press has for it.. Anyways... That was the beginning of the end for them... I never thought that Haze would have gotten a fair shake... But doesn't matter too much for me since I never intended to buy it.
probably right on this one. Seems to me like graphics of a ps3 game have super lofty expectations.. which is understandable.... but because of that... reviewers penalize the game in every area... I mean.. seriously.. a 5 for Sound? come on now.. thats really pushing it.. There are plenty other games that have equally crappy voice work, with equally generic sound tracks but have done better in the Audio category...
besada said:The Haze marketing campaign has been the epitome of "silly thing to do" pretty much from the beginning. You've got Yescombe hyping his own writing to the heavens and namechecking Halo, Korn, Ubisoft's "when will it release" game, Ubisoft's "is it an exclusive" game, etc.
VibratingDonkey said:whaa...wow
My copy has already been shipped.
VibratingDonkey said:whaa...wow
My copy has already been shipped.
VibratingDonkey said:My copy has already been shipped.
http://i25.tinypic.com/15s32mr.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
:lol :lol
Hard to make out much from that video. I can see some texture pop-in, low res textures (no worse than COD4's copy machine), and shitty fast-trees (oblivion-like). It looked like it had a decent amount of geometry in some of these levels, however. Then again, video is so shitty, it's hard to see much. On top of that, it's hard to generalize from a few examples to the overall quality of the game.N30RYU said:surely you all have alredy seen the video with the Haze graphics issues... in the final release.
If not... here it is
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20OnIZZ3aVc
With this video, i don't need any more reviews whatever famitsu said... I'm not gonna buy it to shorten the wait for MGS4.
Awesome gun textures?nib95 said:How does IGN give this a 7.5 in graphics....
Ultimately, Haze is still sitting in the wake of Call of Duty 4, and falls into that category of being just another FPS. The game tries to include different content with Nectar abilities and rebel dynamics, but a confused story, lacking gameplay elements and technical bugs bog the game down from being a stellar PS3 exclusive. Its worth a rental, but know that Haze isnt a name you want throw out there next time youre having a console-focused debate.
Hell yeah:
+ Bots in online play ensure you always have 16 players
+ Great animations give characters a realer feeling
+ Tries to death with the philosophical/ideological dilemma of war
Oh, hell no:
- Short campaign, without the ability to skip in-game cinematics
- Overacted, Huh? plot
- Mantel-Rebel dynamic misses the mark
not entirely true. the game was an exclusive, Sony helped Epic with the engine, and it was eventually featured in the 'Ladies and Gentlemen' advert along with Burnout Paradise.industrian said:Sony had nothing to do with UT3. If you want to have a little bitching session regarding UT3, then aim it towards Midway.
But infinite knife!Fistwell said:Awesome gun textures?
nib95 said:Exactly, now compare that to the Time crisis 4 shots. Like I said, IGN PS3 channel are losing touch. They complained about similar things with Uncharted, where the tinciest bit of screen tear and texture pop in (it occurs in the game rarely) got it a 9/10. Similar reasons for GT5P getting a 9/10 for visuals. Lord knows what would have happened if the IGN PS3 channel had to review Mass Effect.
drakesfortune said:To say that this game is worse than blacksite is truly hard for me to believe. I think Blacksite deserved a 2/10, but still. I really do think this game is going to get crazy 4.5's mainly because they hyped it so hard early on. If you're going to hype a game like that, you have to deliver.
It's so ridiculous because it's true.dammitmattt said:Why do you care so much about one tiny metric in their reviews?
Also, this game would go unnoticed and uncared about like Timeshift if it weren't exclusive. Now it's got a comprehensive official thread and a boatload of defenders. Amazing...
You wouldn't have to ask this question if you frequented the PS3Gb on IGN. This is one of the reasons why I signed up here but lo and behold some of IGN's finest posters are here as well. Oh well....dammitmattt said:Why do you care so much about one tiny metric in their reviews?
Also, this game would go unnoticed and uncared about like Timeshift if it weren't exclusive. Now it's got a comprehensive official thread and a boatload of defenders. Amazing...
dammitmattt said:Based on the demo and my limited experience with Blacksite (2 shitty hours), I would tend to agree, but unless they are the same reviewer, it's not really a fair comparison to make.
Blacksite was incompetently mediocre while Haze at least seems to be competently mediocre with co-op, which is at least worth something.
dammitmattt said:Based on the demo and my limited experience with Blacksite (2 shitty hours), I would tend to agree, but unless they are the same reviewer, it's not really a fair comparison to make.
Blacksite was incompetently mediocre while Haze at least seems to be competently mediocre with co-op, which is at least worth something.
Absolutely nailed it. This happens all the time, too. Mediocre exclusive games get hyped because they're, well, exclusive. If it was multi-plat, it would've been totally ignored like TimeShift, which by the way is actually a pretty damn good game. The gfx in that game are seriously some of the most technically impressive I've seen in an FPS. Getting too off-topic.dammitmattt said:Why do you care so much about one tiny metric in their reviews?
Also, this game would go unnoticed and uncared about like Timeshift if it weren't exclusive. Now it's got a comprehensive official thread and a boatload of defenders. Amazing...
tahrikmili said:wtf is up with the sudden flood of juniors in this thread?
drakesfortune said:To say that this game is worse than blacksite is truly hard for me to believe.
I played Blacksite on the PC and actually enjoyed it somewhat. It was a buggy game, but there were still some good segments in there and the shooting felt good.drakesfortune said:To say that this game is worse than blacksite is truly hard for me to believe. I think Blacksite deserved a 2/10, but still. I really do think this game is going to get crazy 4.5's mainly because they hyped it so hard early on. If you're going to hype a game like that, you have to deliver.
I think TC4 received a better visual score simply due to its framerate. From the quick demo I saw, the game was running at 60 fps (I don't know if there is slowdown, however). It also runs at full 720p.How does IGN give this a 7.5 in graphics....
kbear said:I'm stunned at the score... even my lowest expectation weren't that low, lol.
Absolutely nailed it. This happens all the time, too. Mediocre exclusive games get hyped because they're, well, exclusive. If it was multi-plat, it would've been totally ignored like TimeShift, which by the way is actually a pretty damn good game. The gfx in that game are seriously some of the most technically impressive I've seen in an FPS. Getting too off-topic.
tahrikmil said:wtf is up with the sudden flood of juniors in this thread?
FFObsessed said:
VibratingDonkey said:whaa...wow
My copy has already been shipped.
JEHUTYj said:When will the other members in thread catch a break from the trolling junior members like me? :lol
tahrikmili said:wtf is up with the sudden flood of juniors in this thread?
sajj316 said:Thanks for the link!
4 GB install and still textures pop-in and out based on proximity? I hope thats not the final release .... I stress hope because if so ... that is VERY poor.