• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Hey NeoGaffer, you could be a rapist

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nobody is understanding the video. It isn't "feminazi misandrist bullshit". This is a video put out by some sort of Men's Rights Organization, making the ridiculous claim that, if you see somebody being assaulted, you should do nothing. The makers of this video are pushing some kind of MRA agenda, saying that "feminists can accuse any man of rape".

The (bullshit) message of the video is that even if he's innocent, a man could be accused of rape. An innocent man of any profession could be accused of raping a woman, if he's in the wrong place at the wrong time. This video is intended to deligitimize feminism and paint it as a movement that is inherently anti-male.

It's no accident that the video diminishes rape. The video is not about victims or intended for victims. It's meant to further an MRA agenda, that evil feminists can accuse men for rape whenever they want.

Got any source for that? Reading the guy's tweets there doesn't seem to be some hidden agenda.
 
In the US I believe the number is more like one in six women will be raped in her lifetime, but that's still terrifying.

I can promise you there are at least 10 active posters in the OT that have been raped, male and female.

Thinking about that and how many people just don't talk about it, I imagine the number of victims we have on the forums here is much greater.

Apparently the middling age for girls to be raped is between 16 and 19 (at 4 times the likelihood during any other point in their lives). Is that roughly the case with those you know of, if that's not inappropriate to ask?
 
Nobody is understanding the video. It isn't "feminazi misandrist bullshit". This is a video put out by some sort of Men's Rights Organization, making the ridiculous claim that, if you see somebody being assaulted, you should do nothing. The makers of this video are pushing some kind of MRA agenda, saying that "feminists can accuse any man of rape".

The (bullshit) message of the video is that even if he's innocent, a man could be accused of rape. An innocent man of any profession could be accused of raping a woman, if he's in the wrong place at the wrong time. This video is intended to deligitimize feminism and paint it as a movement that is inherently anti-male.

The mirror is included in the video to suggest that you the innocent male viewer could be wrongfully accused of rape. It's a ridiculous, pretty offensive claim, and the message is "do not help people".

What the hell are you talking about?

The Dude that Made the Video said:
many people after watching the video took offense to the writing on the wall and thought it was saying, "LOOK IN THIS MIRROR. YOU ARE A RAPIST." no, no, no. in today's society, to be a "rapist" is to be some sort of "other" person who has issues within themselves and isn't an everyday normal civilian. but that isn't the case. the mirror was saying, "look at how you look in this mirror. a rapist could look EXACTLY like you." meaning, it could be anyone. no matter what they look like or what they struggle with they are capable of rape. and yes, same goes with "terrorist, murderer, thief" so on and so forth. these labels don't have faces. they don't have characteristics. they don't have color, language, beliefs etc. it could be an everyday civilian, JUST LIKE YOU.

the misunderstanding of that message went so far left field that everyone walked away thinking, "OMG how could you call a hero a rapist." i'd like to address that each person who burst through that stall was spoken to and had the victims story, the vision behind the mirror, the wall and experiment explained to them thoroughly. they were 100% on board and supportive of the message. they didn't go home with no one speaking to them thinking, "awe man, i just got called a rapist." as a lot of people who didn't understand the vision thought.
 
Statistics is tough.

Certainly wasn't trying to diminish the problem, but had to jump on that mate.

Anyway, from his Youtube description:

"After release: I really wish the purpose of the video wasn't lost behind the misunderstanding of what the mirror and the message on the wall represented. In no way shape or form did I say all men are rapists or say the men who barged in to help were rapists. There's something far deeper in the context and I don't want to openly say what MY vision was behind it because I'd much rather it be discussed amidst the conversation sparked from the video."

Uhuh.
 
I don't recall saying any of that.

I just think it's unbelievable that someone would criticize a rape statistic like that

I mean rape has always had a history of being under reported. So it just blows my mind that someone would think the statistics were being artificially inflated by included cases that "are not necessarily rape"
 
Apparently the middling age for girls to be raped is between 16 and 19 (at 4 times the likelihood during any other point in their lives). Is that roughly the case with those you know of, if that's not inappropriate to ask?

Most of the people I know who've been raped were raped as children by family members. So mostly younger than ten :/

I know a few who were raped as teens, by friends or family, and a few who raped as adults, by people they knew.

I don't know anyone who was raped by a stranger.
 
I just think it's unbelievable that someone would criticize a rape statistic like that

I mean rape has always had a history of being under reported. So it just blows my mind that someone would think the statistics were being artificially inflated by included cases that "are not necessarily rape"

The first part of that and the second part of that do not correlate.

And, I also didn't say anything was being "artificially inflated" - although by definition including other non-rape things which have a non-zero chance of happening are going to lead to an increase in the percentage,

Yes, rape is under-reported.
Yes, rape is a huge problem.

But, a statistic showing a rate for combination of 2 things that are rape and 2 things that are not rape is not on its own a statistic for rape.
 
The first part of that and the second part of that do not correlate.

And, I also didn't say anything was being "artificially inflated" - although by definition including other non-rape things which have a non-zero chance of happening are going to lead to an increase in the percentage,

Yes, rape is under-reported.
Yes, rape is a huge problem.

But, a statistic showing a rate for combination of 2 things that are rape and 2 things that are not rape is not on its own a statistic for rape.
I wasn't posting a definitive statistics fact. There are thousands of general sites and sources anyone can go to to get similar stats. I just posted the easiest one. Playing a semantics game here is pointless. In the end, a whole lot of women deal with a whole fucking lot of trauma.
 
I think squabbling over the specific frequency of rape is a lot less important than the absolute fact that many rape cases go unreported, unresolved, or ignored.
 
In the end, a whole lot of women deal with a whole fucking lot of trauma.

This is true, of course - and is a horrible thing, and should be addressed.
Of course, there are men who have to "deal with a whole fucking lot of trauma" as well

I wasn't posting a definitive statistics fact. There are thousands of general sites and sources anyone can go to to get similar stats. I just posted the easiest one. Playing a semantics game here is pointless.

But, I wasn't "playing a semantics game," I was pointing out an issue with the statistic used and the purpose that it was used for.

Other statistics were posted later, and did a better job of addressing the issue at discussion.
 
Fousey should be outright banned on GAF. We have lots of banned sites, why not add a YouTube channel to the list? It's amazing how he forgot that women can also be rapists, that shows how much he understands of the subject he's talking about.
 
I am curious how the "1 in 3,5,6" stats translates into percentage of men who commit such crimes. I've ran into some creeps in my day, heard stories from girls. Guys I knew who groped girls passed out at parties, etc. Shit always made me rage but the other disturbing aspect being the guys who would put up with these guys. Like no biggie... Jesus.

Statistics is tough.

At least you tried.
 
Fousey should be outright banned on GAF. We have lots of banned sites, why not add a YouTube channel to the list? It's amazing how he forgot that women can also be rapists, that shows how much he understands of the subject he's talking about.
He probably never thought about it, which is part of the problem in addressing female on male rape. It's commendable that he wants to bring awareness to an issue, but he needed to think it through a little more
 
Stupid video and only hurts the cause.

Slightly off topic: The moment when I really realized that coercion is basically rape was life changing, I started to realize that so many people I knew had been sexually coerced (including myself, which made me sickened by myself for years) and it really disgusted me. People are terrible to each other, no one deserves to be forced into sex whether physically or through words.
 
I wasn't posting a definitive statistics fact. There are thousands of general sites and sources anyone can go to to get similar stats. I just posted the easiest one. Playing a semantics game here is pointless. In the end, a whole lot of women deal with a whole fucking lot of trauma.

People deal with a whole lot of trauma, the page you posted is basically just saying life sucks. It's good for people who may not be aware of abuse in general, but in a thread about rape and sexual abuse specifically, it's not very useful because it includes violence of a non sexual nature.

I mean shit, EVERYONE has a shitty odds of being the victim of violence, sexual or otherwise:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domest...ates_of_male_victimization_and_reporting_data
The American Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found in a 2013 report that a large number of men reported being victimized by a partner. To be precise, about 26% of homosexual men, 37% of bisexual men, and 29% of heterosexual men described being a domestic violence victim. Their analysis looked at 2010 data of over 16,000 U.S. adults.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence#Epidemiology
Forms of violence such as child maltreatment and intimate partner violence are highly prevalent. Approximately 20% of women and 5–10% of men report being sexually abused as children, while 25–50% of all children report being physically abused.[110] A WHO multi-country study found that between 15–71% of women reported experiencing physical and/or sexual violence by an intimate partner at some point in their lives

No group is immune.

Not really making a grand point, just that it didn't seem like a semantic game to me either, the page you provided has numbers that are not only about what the video in the OP is talking about.
 
Message received. Stop dressing like a rapist and rape will go away.

well this wife beater shirt, short pants, and angry scowl are great for running off door-to-door salesmen. They think "not only will I not be able to sell this guy anything, if I go inside his house, he may rob me.... or worse."
 
Stupid video and only hurts the cause.

Slightly off topic: The moment when I really realized that coercion is basically rape was life changing, I started to realize that so many people I knew had been sexually coerced (including myself, which made me sickened by myself for years) and it really disgusted me. People are terrible to each other, no one deserves to be forced into sex whether physically or through words.

Coercion means to persuade by force or threat.

What else did you think rape meant?

I feel like people are misconstruing the word coerce in the 2 current rape related threads. It doesn't mean you can't argue for sex.
 
Coercion means to persuade by force or threat.

What else did you think rape meant?

Because of education in general, there are a ton of people that aren't aware that rape can happen when it's not violent. Which is why when most people think of a rapist, they think of the back alley stereotype.

The fact that people are getting educated shouldn't be cause to sorta insult them though.
 
Coercion means to persuade by force or threat.

What else did you think rape meant?

I feel like people are misconstruing the word coerce in the 2 current rape related threads. It doesn't mean you can't argue for sex.

A lot of people seem to think that coerce is broader than that.
 
GAF has a total of 130,000 members.
Approximately 30% of them will at some point in their life commit either rape or sexual assault.

That's close to 40 thousand gaffers.
It is guaranteed that someone in this thread has or will at some point sexually assault or rape a fellow human being.
Usual conflation of rape and sexual assault. Both are obviously bad, but they aren't the same and the methods that arrive at that figure for sexual assault are suspect.
 
Usual conflating of rape and sexual assault. Both are obviously bad, but they aren't the same and the methods that arrive at that figure for sexual assault are suspect.

In some places, according the law, sexual assault is rape, just varying degrees (first, second, third, etc). Lots of states are moving away from using the word rape when in comes to the law, since no one can agree what constitutes rape (the whole 'rape-rape' bullshit)
 
Because of education in general, there are a ton of people that aren't aware that rape can happen when it's not violent. Which is why when most people think of a rapist, they think of the back alley stereotype.

The fact that people are getting educated shouldn't be cause to sorta insult them though.

Exactly, when I was young I never really thought of things like guilting or emotional threats as being related to sexual abuse because I was never taught that it was. I always thought it was despicible but I hadn't made a real tangible connection. I mean I won't say the fact that I've been guilted and humilated and emotionally threatened into sex is as bad as being violently raped, but it certainly did a lot to damage me.
 
I'm fine with the text. Rapists aren't some "other" strangers, they're usually someone you know. I can personally confirm that. The mirror is the most blunt and direct way he could address that fact. He used his platform to give out an important message that people still don't realise. To the educated people here, it would be preaching to the choir but to people on youtube, it might not. Rape is not some villainous act that only someone in a mentally unstable state would do.

The execution wasn't ever going to satisfy everyone, and if people want to take it as sexist, that's understandable but I feel distracting.
 
The whole thing looks awfully motivational, and the mirror lol.

"This is what a rapist could look like!"

"With some effort put in, you could be a rapist too!!"
 
I get the point, but this is essentially punishing decent people just for caring.

Yeah this is how I felt about it too, you can tell they all opened the door and looked at the mirror and were just like "yo what the fuck is going on here?"

Especially the first dude, he was ready to lay the smack down you could tell he hyped himself up, he was out for blood, but then he was the rapists.

No one likes to be accused, no one likes to be treated like they're a criminal waiting to get caught.

But whatever, I guess they got the point across.
 
In some places, according the law, sexual assault is rape, just varying degrees (first, second, third, etc). Lots of states are moving away from using the word rape when in comes to the law, since no one can agree what constitutes rape (the whole 'rape-rape bullshit)

RAINN casually conflates the two terms though, and at times seems to use them interchangeably. Both rape and sexual assault are terrible, but I don't believe that this conflation serves the intended purpose. While it allows some advocates to paint a picture of an America in which 30 percent of all men are rapists, it also causes others to question what by all means should be an unquestionable agenda. In fact, a smaller minority commits the majority of sexual assault.
 
The mirror is included in the video to suggest that you the innocent male viewer could be wrongfully accused of rape. It's a ridiculous, pretty offensive claim, and the message is "do not help people".

No ...
According to the guy who made it the original message was "You just saved a life" ontop the mirror .. which is strange cause the guys who left could have been trying to get help.

They changed it for the last bit to make a point that "anyone could LOOK like a rapist" for the viewer ...

Not saying they were successful with it or anything but it was not a "You shouldn't help" thing.
 
RAINN casually conflates the two terms though, and at times seems to use them interchangeably. Both rape and sexual assault are terrible, but I don't believe that this conflation serves the intended purpose. While it allows some advocates to paint a picture of an America in which 30 percent of all men are rapists, it also causes others to question what by all means should be an unquestionable agenda. In fact, a smaller minority commits the majority of sexual assault.

I don't understand why it's such a big deal to lump the two together when people can't even fucking agree what 'rape-rape' is. Both come from the same motivations. Both are mentally and physically damaging. Both are horrible and occur far to often in modern society. A lot of states, as I said, treat them as the same thing with varying degrees. Just because someone doesn't think it's rape if there is no violence involved doesn't make it any less damaging to the person that was raped.
 
He used his platform to give out an important message that people still don't realise. To the educated people here, it would be preaching to the choir but to people on youtube, it might not. Rape is not some villainous act that only someone in a mentally unstable state would do.

I'm not entirely sure that's the message. I think it's more "rapists fit no particular demographic."

You have an interesting take. I don't really agree. Rape isn't a villainous act? I get what you mean but I personally think it is. A rapist could otherwise be someone who doesn't appear villainous or unstable, but the act is.
 
The mirror is the most blunt and direct way he could address that fact. He used his platform to give out an important message that people still don't realise. To the educated people here, it would be preaching to the choir but to people on youtube, it might not. Rape is not some villainous act that only someone in a mentally unstable state would do.

This is how I interpreted it as well. The delivery is easily misinterpreted, unfortunately, but the message is sound.

Rapists are not monstrous "others" who are noticeably different from everyone else, they're ordinary people, even star athletes and acclaimed directors. Understanding this can help people internalize that sexual assault is a serious problem that's closer than they realize.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom