• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Hi-res Crysis screenshots (IGN)

Saviour said:
Your point was that it was obvious a console with a life span of five years would one day eventually outshine a then dated pc game. My point was, we won't have to five years, Metal gear solid already outshines it.

I don't know if ps3 will be better or worse at all

but surely the MGS4 demo has the worse textures, colors (all is green) and alias of this generation
the demo of crysis is 10x better, easly
 
Blackie{BA} said:
I don't know if ps3 will be better or worse at all

but surely the MGS4 demo has the worse textures, colors (all is green) and alias of this generation
the demo of crysis is 10x better, easly

Do you think Crysis has better lighting? Just look at the Hal scene. It's superb.

I agree the texture work could do with some work, mainly it could be slightly higher res. But I suppose with a next gen ps3 game you're fighting for memory, especially when as kojima said, he wants to focus on the elements you cannot see.

I'd still buy crysis if it came out on the ps3, no point in trying to run it on my pc, would be a slidehow.
 
Thats a joke?

FOr me the mgs demo was far better in screen & movie

Just looked the crysis video , its good looking indeed , but what the fuck is the popup ? unbearable

and dont say it will change , coz ill say mgs4 texture will also change

if i look the 2 vidéos , for me mgs4 one was better
 
That vid is sick, PC stays ahead. If PS3/360 can handle, which I have a feeling they can. It makes choosing one over the other alot more difficult. If Halo3 looks like, 360 its a lock. Fuck it I'll just have own all three.
 
f@luS said:
Thats a joke?
FOr me the mgs demo was far better in screen & movie

oh yes, mgs4 is far better than crysis, of course..

no wait, maybe no

mgs_4_10.jpg

cryspcscrnm1e9ep.jpg



mgs4_007.jpg

crysis-20060327065422577.jpg
 
Blackie{BA} said:
oh yes, mgs4 is far better than crysis, of course..

no wait, maybe no

mgs_4_10.jpg

cryspcscrnm1e9ep.jpg



mgs4_007.jpg

crysis-20060327065422577.jpg


How about you don't compare two low res screens from the MGS4 trailer (including the one frame that's always used by trolls because of its low-res tank texture) to a crytek tech demo screen and a 720p trailer screen.

Anyway, MGS4 is taking a stylized approach to its character designs, whereas crysis is going for realism.
 
PS3 and Xbox 360 arent that great technically as PS2 and Xbox were. I think its because of the sudden competiton between Nvidia and ATi. We dont even need these new cards they are constantly coming out with each month, as SM4 is on the way for games like Crysis. But what it does is bring the prices down for other cards and lets the other side boast they have the best card ;) Which is a good thing. You could spend the left over money on a X-fi for example. :)
 
mckmas8808 said:
Why are MGS4 pics in this thread?

I hate that shit. Every fucking thread someone does this. WTF? Only a matter of time before some other fanboy puts up Gears Of War shots......Next gen whore FTL.


Lame.
 
EviLore said:
How about you don't compare two low res screens from the MGS4 trailer (including the one frame that's always used by trolls because of its low-res tank texture) to a crytek tech demo screen and a 720p trailer screen.

Anyway, MGS4 is taking a stylized approach to its character designs, whereas crysis is going for realism.
Indeed, in addition to that they're still experimenting with the models. Snake's skin folds accordingly and so too, I'd believe, would any clothing he wore, unlike what I saw in crysis(static sticker normal map clothing, and probably static skin without dramatic skin folding deformations.). The crysis models probably have less verts than those used to simulate snake's hair, but the texture is of a more realistic style(SSS in particular, which may be implemented in the snake model too, depending on kojima's intent). I'll wait for the final product, but right now in geometry and animation(hairs, skin, etc.), snake is superior.
 
Just took a few shots of Crytek's X-Isle Tech Demo 1 from 2000. You know... just for kicks and nostalgic value :)

 
Crysis looks awesome. WTF can't we just accept it for what it is? WTF do consoles have to do with this other than the engine being ported? Seeing as this game is coming out early in the next-gen for consoles, I have no doubt both machines can handle a game of this visual quality. Come 07 and on, we're gonna probably start seeing the PC outpace them both. Then again, a single card costs about 50% more than and entire console. So no fucking shit, it's an inevitability. And WTF does MGS4 have to do with this game? The end is extremely fucking nigh for this forum. Break out your life preservers. This forum is going down come E3. PEACE.
 
-SD- said:
Just took a few shots of Crytek's X-Isle Tech Demo 1 from 2000. You know... just for kicks and nostalgic value :)



Wow the PS2 crushes that easily. So does that mean what we are seeing from Crysis 2007 will be crushed by the PS3 and X360 easily too???


Hmmm....
 
This game looks damn good, I really don't understand the bickering. I personally don't think it's the best looking game demonstrated so far (regardless of platform), but no one can deny it isn't very, very close; the foliage is incredible!

I only skimmed the thread and didn't see anything, but are there console versions of this game planned? 360 & PS3, or just one of the two? I've no interest in spending as much as I'd need to for a rig capable enough, so I'd much prefer a console version. If there are no plans as of yet, do you guys think an eventual port will be likely?
 
Heian-kyo said:
This game looks damn good, I really don't understand the bickering. I personally don't think it's the best looking game demonstrated so far (regardless of platform), but no one can deny it isn't very, very close; the foliage is incredible!

And what looks better may i ask?

I only skimmed the thread and didn't see anything, but are there console versions of this game planned? 360 & PS3, or just one of the two? I've no interest in spending as much as I'd need to for a rig capable enough, so I'd much prefer a console version. If there are no plans as of yet, do you guys think an eventual port will be likely?

What makes you think the console versions are worth getting? The lack of keyboard mouse? The dumbed down mapmaker? Worse graphics and Sound?
 
Deg said:
What makes you think the console versions are worth getting? The lack of keyboard mouse? The dumbed down mapmaker? Worse graphics and Sound?
What in the hell are you talking about? I could give a rat's ass how much better the PC version is. I'm buying a PS3 regardless, and quite possibly a 360 eventually as well, and both will still cost me less than half of what it would to completely overhaul my PC to play this. It comes down to money and the lack of desire to game on my PC for me, plain and simple man. Ease up on the defensiveness...
 
Heian-kyo said:
What in the hell are you talking about? I could give a rat's ass how much better the PC version is. I'm buying a PS3 regardless, and quite possibly a 360 eventually as well, and both will still cost me less than half of what it would to completely overhaul my PC to play this. It comes down to money and the lack of desire to game on my PC for me, plain and simple man. Ease up on the defensiveness...

Sure a whole year for the game so we have yet to see the spec requirements. What game did you think looked better?
 
Deg said:
And what looks better may i ask?



What makes you think the console versions are worth getting? The lack of keyboard mouse? The dumbed down mapmaker? Worse graphics and Sound?

Fuck The What?

How would the sound be worse? Have you seen the console versions?
 
You're going to need a supercomter to run that thing, i'll be waiting a while but the day will come(PC's have the best Backwards Compatability). But still it holds true, pc's will always be ahead, you pay more you get more. Imagine what sony or ms would give you if they charged you $1200 for the console.
 
Top Bottom