RandyBobandy
Banned
Considering it's current sales you can see why
That he doesn't want to spend hundreds of dollars on a new console just for the game doesn't mean he's not a fan.
Many gamers have turned it down too. Funny how that works
Bayonetta 2 is owned by Nintendo; the IP in general is not.
That's a bizarrely elitist and exclusionary distinction. Current-gen consoles are a notable expense for most people and so naturally there's a desire for a value proposition stronger than just one game. Like, I adore the Uncharted series but you can bet that I'm not going to pick up the inevitable Uncharted 4 + console bundle if there hasn't been a price drop by Q4 next year as there are few other games that I'd like to play.
Nothing weird about it thought,first party is made by studios owned totally by the company,second party is when you pay another developer you don't own to develop your game,third party is just when someone decides to put his game on your console.Second-party is a weird fan definition that casual Internet users started to use to categorise things.
It doesn't have a clear meaning and it's inconsistent.
Nintendo doesn't use it. Publishers don't use it. So I don't bother, honestly.
I prefer this very simple definition:
"First-Party Game" = Nintendo funded or co-funded the game's development.
"Third-Party Game" = Nintendo did not fund the game's development.
That's a bizarrely elitist and exclusionary distinction. Current-gen consoles are a notable expense for most people and so naturally there's a desire for a value proposition stronger than just one game. Like, I adore the Uncharted series but you can bet that I'm not going to pick up the inevitable Uncharted 4 + console bundle if there hasn't been a price drop by Q4 next year as there are few other games that I'd like to play.
Do you mean the copyright on the specific content? I don't know about that so can't really comment. However, I still think this is a pretty unusual scenario for a first party platform holder, and we can't really make definitive comments on supposed exclusivity without knowing the terms of the deal between Sega and Nintendo.
That's a bizarrely elitist and exclusionary distinction. Current-gen consoles are a notable expense for most people and so naturally there's a desire for a value proposition stronger than just one game. Like, I adore the Uncharted series but you can bet that I'm not going to pick up the inevitable Uncharted 4 + PS4 bundle if there hasn't been a price drop by Q4 next year as there are few other games that I'd like to play.
It's just a licensed game,a game made from the bayonetta franchise owned by sega but funded by nintendo.look at it like goldeneye 64,the ip was owned by whoever makes the 007 films,but fully funded by nintendo and developed by a studio they hired.Do you mean the copyright on the specific content? I don't know about that so can't really comment. However, I still think this is a pretty unusual scenario for a first party platform holder, and we can't really make definitive comments on supposed exclusivity without knowing the terms of the deal between Sega and Nintendo.
Buying a Wii U isn't going to be expensive forever. Even if you don't want one in the near future you can still pick one up and play the game much further down the line when you can get them for cheap. Much better alternative than the game never seeing the light of day.
Put it this way.Boss★Moogle;132408002 said:I get that they really wanted to release Bayonetta 2 and Nintendo were the only ones that wanted it. But none of that matters to the most of Bayonetta fan base like me that don't own a Wii U and don't plan on buying one to play Bayonetta 2.. All Bayo 2 on Wii U is gonna do is put the final nail in that franchise's coffin because sales will be so abysmal (and they already are in Japan) that nobody will dare ever want to touch it again on any system.
except bayo 1 didn't bomb,it didn't set the charts on fire either,but 1.4 mln copies worldwide it's hardly a bombHello there Mr. Publisher, can I have a lot of money for my game? Unfortunately it will bomb like all the previous ones.
You'd be surprised.
![]()
except bayo 1 didn't bomb,it didn't set the charts on fire either,but 1.4 mln copies worldwide it's hardly a bomb
And yet he is right.
Fans, by definition are those who are willing to go the extra mile, simple as that. The 'i liked the first game but i'm not buying another console to play the sequel' is the literal definition of someone who liked the game but is no fan.
Also, you said about a value proposition of more than one game. Nintendo consoles always have a couple or more games in the GOTG top ten, so i doubt there is only one game of worth in the console, and even if you don't like Nintendo games, which by definition is wrong as 'Nintendo games' is not a genre, then there are two PG games already on the platform plus the definite version of Bayonetta.
except bayo 1 didn't bomb,it didn't set the charts on fire either,but 1.4 mln copies worldwide it's hardly a bomb
So the 'fanbase' of said game does not want to buy the hardware to play said game. I'm terribly sorry but that's not how logic works at all.
We're only interested/getting hyped about games that are on our beloved box, not the other way around.
It pretty much is.
Most of these copies were sold at bomba prices and in multiples per customer. The Bayonetta fan base is a lot smaller than a million, you can bet on that.
The only PG game that can be considered not bombing was MGR, and that's because of the brand name and the later Steam port that expanded the userbase but also resold to console owners as well.
except bayo 1 didn't bomb,it didn't set the charts on fire either,but 1.4 mln copies worldwide it's hardly a bomb
And yet he is right.
Fans, by definition are those who are willing to go the extra mile, simple as that. The 'i liked the first game but i'm not buying another console to play the sequel' is the literal definition of someone who liked the game but is no fan.
Also, you said about a value proposition of more than one game. Nintendo consoles always have a couple or more games in the GOTG top ten, so i doubt there is only one game of worth in the console, and even if you don't like Nintendo games, which by definition is wrong as 'Nintendo games' is not a genre, then there are two PG games already on the platform plus the definite version of Bayonetta.
The holy trinity of false believes in gaming forums:
Bayonetta 2 will come to a non Nintendo console.
Second parties do exist.
Pokemon is not owned by Nintendo.
Amen.
Hello there Mr. Publisher, can I have a lot of money for my game? Unfortunately it will bomb like all the previous ones.
This is possible but not in this gen.
The holy trinity of false believes in gaming forums:
Bayonetta 2 will come to a non Nintendo console.
Second parties do exist.
Pokemon is not owned by Nintendo.
Amen.
This is possible but not in this gen.
This entire thread explains why it's notThis is possible but not in this gen.
There only seem bad blood between Sakaguchi and Sony, maybe someone can explain why.
I still don't get why you think it's possible?This is possible but not in this gen.
Hmm, I'd have thought MS or Sony would jump at the opportunity, but I guess not.
Good on Nintendo for saving the game though.
I think sony should have take te franchise...sony's fans are pretty 'loyal',and buy pretty much anything if it's exclusive...even knack was million seller,bayo2 would have made no exception
He said quite explicitly that he doesn't want to buy a Wii U for Bayonetta 2, which, like it or not, is a perfectly reasonable stance considering that the console is still $200 at the absolute least (and that's only if one lives in the US). You can't presume to know what he likes and use it to prop up the questionable argument that fans who don't want to pay hundreds of dollars just to get their hands on something are not actually fans. I mean, by that logic you could also call into question those who buy $60 standard editions as opposed to $150 Collector's Editions -- sure, they're showing their support, but in opting for the cheapest route they're not going that "extra mile", are they?
Fixed.
Platinum games are a big example of this:
Nintendo fanboys didn't give a fuck about Platinum games until TW101 & Bayo 2 were announced (getting a PS3 or a 360 for Bayo 1, Vanquish & Anarchy Reigns? no way man!), then suddenly OMFG! Kamiya & Platinum are gods! system sellers you guys!
MS fanboys were meh about Bayo 2 & TW101 until Scalebound was announced, now it's all about Kamiya baby!Sony fanboys? there is no exclusive game planned for the PS4 so they are just "lol, Platinum games are bombs, lol" but at the same time they stealh port beg Bayo 2 and they can't wait for Rising 2!Nintendo & Sony fanboys are not amused though since Scalebound will be a rushed, dumbed down piece of shit for casuals because you know MS and all.
I really can't wait for a PS4 exclusive to get announced to see this continue.
Are you the spokesman for the whole Bayonetta fan community or where do you get your "Bayo fan base is >1mil" stuff from?
We're not talking about a special edition here, we're talking about a dedicated fanbase.
The fans of Steelbattalion games bought that shitty game on Kinect and even got a Kinect for that.
If you're not willing to buy Bayonetta 2 you're not a fan of the IP, you're merely a fan of the 1rst game.
I think sony should have take te franchise...sony's fans are pretty 'loyal',and buy pretty much anything if it's exclusive...even knack was million seller,bayo2 would have made no exception