• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Hillary Clinton officially launches presidential campaign

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lets take a look at her claims to fame:

  • Got cheated on by Bill
  • Voted for war in Iraq
  • Failed presidential campaign
  • Failed tenure as Secretary of State (Kerry has blown her away 15 times over)
  • Endless pro-nanny state policies
  • Endless pro-Wall Street policies

Oh, but hey, shes a woman, so forget all that and let's make history!


...but the voters in Massachusetts and Maryland showed us all last election that a sham candidate = Republican win. Choakley proved it not once, but twice.

yeah i rather vote for Hilary than the evil republican party
 
So Florida goes Bush, if Bush picks Sandoval, give him Nevada.Give him Ohio just for fun.+ Lets add New Hampshire to make papa Bush happy.

Hillary still wins
 
Nader was a nonfactor, do your research please.

By the final certified results, Bush had a lead of around 500 votes, over 90k left-leaning people voted for Nader. Maybe you should do some research.

Those people who selfishly voted for Nader changed history forever for the worse.
 
yeah i rather vote for Hilary than the evil republican party
You can vote for other evil parties too!

By the final certified results, Bush had a lead of around 500 votes, over 90k left-leaning people voted for Nader. Maybe you should do some research.

Those people who selfishly voted for Nader changed history forever for the worse.
The Democratic Party was supposed to drop the idea of owning people like 150 years ago breh.
 
Where does Hillary lose? I can't see it anywhere. I'd love to see what pickups conservatives think they can get though. :)

map_zps95j4ds7e.jpg
Based on polling right now (which doesn't mean much this far out but still), they would need to win Florida and Ohio for sure, which is doable enough in a close race. Obama barely won Florida and didn't win Ohio by a much larger margin. They'd also need to hold North Carolina - again, if the popular vote is close they probably would.

Hillary isn't polling very well in Iowa or Colorado for one reason or another, so we could give those to the GOP, I guess (I don't think she'll lose them). But that still gives Hillary exactly 270 electoral votes. There's Virginia, but Democrats have been doing remarkably well there in recent elections and polls for how solidly red it used to be.

Put it this way - if you gave Hillary every state the Democrats have won in six of the past six presidential elections, she'd start out with 242 electoral votes. Add to that New Hampshire (only Gore lost), Iowa and New Mexico (only Kerry lost) and that goes up to 257. Nevada I don't think many people expect to flip red anytime soon and Democrats have won it 4 out of the past 6 elections (Gore and Kerry lost) - which bumps them up to 263.

From there Hillary would just need one of:

- Colorado
- Virginia
- Ohio
- Florida
- North Carolina
- Some surprise swing state like Georgia or Arizona

And she's in.
 
By the final certified results, Bush had a lead of around 500 votes, over 90k left-leaning people voted for Nader. Maybe you should do some research.

Those people who selfishly voted for Nader changed history forever for the worse.

So not only in your little world do people have to vote for the lesser of two evils, they have to be soothsayers as well.
 
In a more perfect world it would be Elizabeth Warren getting so much support. But I understand how politics work. Hillary has the financial backing and the name.

To be honest, outside of healthcare, I have no idea what Clinton actually stands for. She comes off as a total career politician, and I am tired of such people.
 
If you give Hillary only the states Bill got 49% or more of the popular vote in, then it's a 269-269 tie, which goes to the House, which is GOP held, therefore the next President will be Scott Walker.
 
Where does Hillary lose? I can't see it anywhere. I'd love to see what pickups conservatives think they can get though. :)

How can she lose?



She can lose against a formidable Republican or under the right political conditions. Her benefit is that the electoral map favors the Democrats. Dems start with at least 240-250 electoral votes.
 
If you give Hillary only the states Bill got 49% or more of the popular vote in, then it's a 269-269 tie, which goes to the House, which is GOP held, therefore the next President will be Scott Walker.

Jesus, that's terrifying. I'd take Rubio or Bush. Please don't let Walker get anywhere near the White House...
 
How can she lose?



She can lose against a formidable Republican or under the right political conditions. Her benefit is that the electoral map favors the Democrats. Dems start with at least 240-250 electoral votes.

There is absolutely no way a republican (under normal circumstances) can carry ALL swing states: OH, FL, VA, IA, CO and NC. One or two maybe. Even if we give GOP FL, NC, VA and OH, they still lose. Don't forget, CO's hispanic turnout is heavily in Dem's favor.
 
There is absolutely no way a republican (under normal circumstances) can carry ALL swing states: OH, FL, VA, IA, CO and NC. One or two maybe. Even if we give GOP FL, NC, VA and OH, they still lose. Don't forget, CO's hispanic turnout is heavily in Dem's favor.

Hey, I said under the right conditions. They swept all the major contested Senate races sans 1 or 2 in 2014 in a low turnout election. Anything is possible. I don't want to underestimate the GOP attack machine or overestimate Clinton's campaign. But, as a Democrat, looking at the map, I feel good about fielding any Democrat against a Republican. I just don't want to say we have it in the bag until all the votes are counted.

Something something Ross Perot.

I so want Bush to win the nomination and a third party conservative candidate to run. 1992 all over again.
 
I so want Bush to win the nomination and a third party conservative candidate to run. 1992 all over again.
Ross Perot wasn't a "conservative" candidate.

Pro-choice, pro-gun control, pro-limited campaign finance, anti-free trade agreements, for highly progressive tax increases. He had moderate Democrat positions on energy/environment/education/foreign policy/health care. At the same time he wanted a balanced budget, a greater war on drugs, vastly tighter immigration controls, no affirmative action and to change welfare to workfare.

In a way, Ross Perot won the election.
 
Ross Perot wasn't a "conservative" candidate.

Pro-choice, pro-gun control, pro-limited campaign finance, anti-free trade agreements, for highly progressive tax increases. He had moderate Democrat positions on energy/environment/education/foreign policy/health care. At the same time he wanted a balanced budget, a greater war on drugs, vastly tighter immigration controls, no affirmative action and to change welfare to workfare.

In a way, Ross Perot won the election.
Also, Ross Perot took pretty much the same amount of votes from Clinton as he did from Bush, that whole "Perot won Clinton the election" narrative started by shocked beltway insiders and GOP campaign "experts" who could not believe someone like Clinton could beat someone like Bush.
 
The mere possibility of a republican president/congress seating new SCOTUS judges frightens me. At least the gay marriage issue will be resolved (hopefully for the better - equal rights) before the next election.

I expect the barrage of negative ads to be relentless.

Here's hoping the next President is a democrat. Any of the republican candidates would set us back decades.
 
Ross Perot wasn't a "conservative" candidate.

Pro-choice, pro-gun control, pro-limited campaign finance, anti-free trade agreements, for highly progressive tax increases. He had moderate Democrat positions on energy/environment/education/foreign policy/health care. At the same time he wanted a balanced budget, a greater war on drugs, vastly tighter immigration controls, no affirmative action and to change welfare to workfare.

In a way, Ross Perot won the election.

Unfortunately your absolutely right. We're living in a ross perot America.
 
He was too late to stop NAFTA, and some of that stuff was passed (campaign finance, tax increases, etc.) and then repealed/struck down but Clinton/W. Bush and Congress passed like half his platform on their own lol

Had he won they would have sat on their hands rather than do any of it.
 
By the final certified results, Bush had a lead of around 500 votes, over 90k left-leaning people voted for Nader. Maybe you should do some research.

Those people who selfishly voted for Nader changed history forever for the worse.
are we gonna keep perpetuating this bullshit? Florida democrats overwhelming voted for Bush over Nader.

Or blame the 50 million Americans that voted Bush ¯_(ツ)_/¯
 
1984 was almost like that minus Minnesota and DC
1956-1984 saw five of eight of the elections have one candidate win 40+ states and another win less than ten including D.C. It hasn't happened once since. (1988-2012) H.W. Bush got exactly 40 vs. Dukakis getting exactly 10 + D.C.

It happened in all three elections of the Great Depression Era: 1928, 1932 and 1936.
 
Just wait until she starts campaigning. She's an extremely conservative politician scarred from the brutality of 90's political combat. She focuses so intensely on not making mistakes she barely says anything at all. The problem is she has no philosophical core other than a vague commitment to neoliberalism and internationalism, so she's a very inauthentic politician, a lot like Romney.
I hadn't thought about the Romney comparison. but it's a good one. We know nothing about her other than she's the dotcom bubble guy's wife.
 
It's either a Clinton or a Republican president*.

*A Republican president driven to crazy town by the Tea Party, Fox News, and Right Wing radio.

The choice is pretty clear.
Right? Call it a shit sandwich if you want. Just so long as you acknowledge that the alternative is a turd without the bread.
 
When i went to get dinner i turned on talk radio. Some guy ive never heard of (during his intro it said "Constitution in one hand, bible in the other") was going on how Hillary was a "Luciferion."

This is election is gonna be something.
 
How can she lose?



She can lose against a formidable Republican or under the right political conditions. Her benefit is that the electoral map favors the Democrats. Dems start with at least 240-250 electoral votes.
so the GOP just needs to win every swing state, great!
 
God-King Washington with dat unopposed 100%
Back-to-back two time undefeated champion yo

He once put his opponents wifes hand in a jar of acid.

At a party.

Also, Ross Perot took pretty much the same amount of votes from Clinton as he did from Bush, that whole "Perot won Clinton the election" narrative started by shocked beltway insiders and GOP campaign "experts" who could not believe someone like Clinton could beat someone like Bush.
I've always thought the most likely scenario was that Perot hoovered up the Reagan Democrats who never really liked Bush and were still leery of going back to the Democrats after Mondale/Dukakis.
 
Hey, I said under the right conditions. They swept all the major contested Senate races sans 1 or 2 in 2014 in a low turnout election. Anything is possible. I don't want to underestimate the GOP attack machine or overestimate Clinton's campaign. But, as a Democrat, looking at the map, I feel good about fielding any Democrat against a Republican. I just don't want to say we have it in the bag until all the votes are counted.
Midterm elections are awful predictor of general elections. Low turnout always favors GOP, as the most reliable voting bloc are old white people.
 
also, Monroe with dat random 99.5%
Because one of the electors hated him over like 20 year old shit and thought his VP was mentally challenged. Whose descendants then rather successfully spun the story into "oh, he just wanted to preserve Washington's legacy as the only one with a perfect score!"
 
Think Virginia is basically blue. Nova, Richmond, and Norfolk trounce the rurals.

We'll see a lot of her near me in Fairfax/Loudoun areas in 2016. Money here and need for those 13 swing EVs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom