• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Hillary Clinton Regains Momentum Against Donald Trump: Poll

Status
Not open for further replies.

studyguy

Member
It's telling when at best Donald Trump can only match Clinton during her absolute worst week of the campaign so far.
 
the debates will be so key, way more than in the last few elections I think. they'll try and make sure she doesn't look like death warmed up and monotonous and they'll try and make sure he looks vaguely presidential and doesn't spew his spontaneous verbal diarrhea and try and actually answer the questions put before him in some kind of coherent manner.
 
That's only one poll. Overall you could say that Hillary is maybe stabilizing, but not improving.

Also, Trump flipped Florida recently.

dt0FKvd.jpg


As it stands, right now, Trump would only have to flip NH to win.
State polling lags National polling. You will see upward tick in all the states by next week which will reflect this.
 
That's only one poll. Overall you could say that Hillary is maybe stabilizing, but not improving.

Also, Trump flipped Florida recently.

dt0FKvd.jpg


As it stands, right now, Trump would only have to flip NH to win.

Florida, Nevada and Ohio are super close, though. There's actually other aggregates showing Florida and NC for Hillary or at basically a tie with no clear lean one way or the other. 538 right now is actually somewhat of an outliner for Trump's overall chances, for what it's worth. Most places still put the odds solidly in Clinton's favor. Even in 538, Trump doesn't look like he has much of a chance to flip NH
 

Zackat

Member
I will try to be here provided I don't get killed for wearing my MAGA hat on campus on election day.
I'd like to read your posts in the thread about his charity but they are conspicuously absent. No consequences for those either. Other than maybe a little whiplash from trying to spin too hard.
 
I agree that now the debates will be make or break for HRC. And unfortunately for her supporters, Trump does really well on his feet. Granted, he's not going to actually SAY anything of substance, but he ended up on the favorable side of every debate during the Republican ones, destroying each of the Republicans in turn. HRC is way more qualified than those Repubs, and she'll be very well prepared, but anything can happen.
 

Xe4

Banned
Good to post aggregates, as others have, instead of single polls. I still fully expect her to gain in the polls because of regression to the mean.
 

Link

The Autumn Wind
I'd like to read your posts in the thread about his charity but they are conspicuously absent. No consequences for those either. Other than maybe a little whiplash from trying to spin too hard.
People who support a white nationalist purely for being a white nationalist have no interest in any other factors.
 

JABEE

Member
I can't believe Trump is doing this well. I didn't think it was possible. I remember watching him announcing his candidacy and think this was a joke. Another goofball GOP thing. For the first time, I think this country may actually elect this doofus.
 
Yup.

If Trump gains another 1% on her nationally it will put NH into play and get him to 270.

Are you serious with this...that is not how that works at all.


If there's one wild card aspect to Trump with the debates it's the involvement of Ailes. But I think the thing with that is that, despite what you may think, a lot of the candidates he coaches with those 'zingers' had solid footing in other ways. Reagan, Bush, Nixon were all real candidates with real abilities. Trump is not. No matter what Ailes does, he can't turn Trump into a real political force. That's why I'm still not super worried about it. A lot of people think one zinger is going to kill Hillary, but eh, I don't think one zinger will do it if the rest of the debates is mostly Hillary drilling Trump and Trump stumbling to give real answers is going to show a lot. People are also terrified of the media covering Trump positively no matter what, but that's mostly bullshit and fear-mongering. The media, in general, was pretty harsh to Trump's debate performances, and his debating has been almost universally seen as one of the big clinks in his armor.

And a lot of Ailes strategies depend on baiting your opponent with gotcha zingers, but you have to have a pretty sharp mind to deliver that properly. And Trump has shown, consistently, that he really doesn't have that. That's not a shot, either, that's just reality. He struggles to answer simple questions with simple answers that aren't needlessly convoluted or repetitive. There's a reason that Trump harped on the idea that the debates were rigged, and recently said he wanted debates that were not moderated. He knows it's probably his biggest weakness, and it the debates are, potentially, one of the biggest parts of an election.

I highly recommend that people look up Hillary debates, particularly her debates with Obama in '08. I get the feeling a lot of people really haven't seen her debate in these discussions. She's to debating what Obama is to speech-giving. She's probably the best debate in American politics right now.
 

Slayven

Member
I can't believe Trump is doing this well. I didn't think it was possible. I remember watching him announcing his candidacy and think this was a joke. Another goofball GOP thing. For the first time, I think this country may actually elect this doofus.

8 years under a black man has driven the racist into a fury
 
The comparison to electing Bush twice to a potential Trump election is almost as flawed as the comparison of this election to Brexit, to be honest. I hate how people just ignore context for the sake of fear-mongering comparisons sometimes.
 

Oriel

Member
That's what she did in August. It only works for so long. At some point, once you've been out of the spotlight long enough, people start to lose interest.

What happened was that she became the focus of the news media instead of Trump and therefore suffered in the polls. The conventional wisdom for this election cycle is that whoever is in the spotlight suffers as a result. Clinton should therefore embrace this and let Trump wallow at the centre of his own self-created shitstorms.
 

Gutek

Member
What happened was that she became the focus of the news media instead of Trump and therefore suffered in the polls. The conventional wisdom for this election cycle is that whoever is in the spotlight suffers as a result. Clinton should therefore embrace this and let Trump wallow at the centre of his own self-created shitstorms.

There was no major shitstorms since the Khans.
 

Morrigan Stark

Arrogant Smirk
because fivethirtyeight has the "let's include everything" approach in a year where almost everything is shit

aggregate of aggregates still has literally everyone else above 65% Clinton and the biggest substantive difference between them is only 538's including shit like those weird Ipsos polls where Vermont goes for Trump
Hmm, ok... wasn't fivethirtyeight 100% accurate for the last election? I thought their track record spoke for itself. They're suddenly not reliable anymore?
 
they're aight, i'm just wondering why everyone treats them like aggregate jesus when everyone else in the polling aggregation game was just as good for the last two cycles

(including PEC, which is literally just polls and one other prior and yet has the same track record as Nate Silver's Super Sophisticated Model)
 
because fivethirtyeight has the "let's include everything" approach in a year where almost everything is shit

aggregate of aggregates still has literally everyone else above 65% Clinton and the biggest substantive difference between them is only 538's including shit like those weird Ipsos polls where Vermont goes for Trump

Yeah, 538 is quoted a lot here, but it worth mentioning that they have been a pretty big outliner to actual percentage of a Trump win more or less since the general election starter. I don't say that to discredit 538, but I mean, it's kind of hard to ignore that they've consistently given Trump a higher chance than basically everyone else since generals officially started.
 

2MF

Member
That's only one poll. Overall you could say that Hillary is maybe stabilizing, but not improving.

Also, Trump flipped Florida recently.

dt0FKvd.jpg


As it stands, right now, Trump would only have to flip NH to win.

OK this is getting repetitive, but how the fuck is this so close? If the shitlord doesn't win this election, some other smarter shitlord will just win the next one?
 
Hmm, ok... wasn't fivethirtyeight 100% accurate for the last election? I thought their track record spoke for itself. They're suddenly not reliable anymore?

I mean, they were, but does that mean that they'll be 100% accurate for this one? It's worth mentioning that 538 also had Trump losing the primaries to Cruz I believe, despite the fact that everywhere else was reporting Trump as the clear winner. At some point, you have to acknowledge when someone is the outliner. Though, yes, it doesn't neccessarily discredit them.
 
Hmm, ok... wasn't fivethirtyeight 100% accurate for the last election? I thought their track record spoke for itself. They're suddenly not reliable anymore?

5 stages of grief.

Tons of HRC supports in denial about the Trump surge and are trying to discredit Nate Silver as a result.
 
That's only one poll. Overall you could say that Hillary is maybe stabilizing, but not improving.

Also, Trump flipped Florida recently.

dt0FKvd.jpg


As it stands, right now, Trump would only have to flip NH to win.

How did he "flip" FL? Today's Monmouth and Saint Leo U has her up +4 and +2, respectively.
 

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
Trump knows how to come up with zingers with or without Ailes. I doubt anyone was coaching him for the "only Rosie O'Donnel" quip.
 
Nice to have a polling thread that doesn't read like the world is ending. If the debates go well (and they should) I can't see her falling back again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom