• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Hogan’s holometer: Testing the hypothesis of a holographic universe

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lost Fragment

Obsessed with 4chan
oh god I'm so high right now

In 2008, Fermilab particle astrophysicist Craig Hogan made waves with a mind-boggling proposition: The 3D universe in which we appear to live is no more than a hologram.

Now he is building the most precise clock of all time to directly measure whether our reality is an illusion.

The idea that spacetime may not be entirely smooth – like a digital image that becomes increasingly pixelated as you zoom in – had been previously proposed by Stephen Hawking and others. Possible evidence for this model appeared last year in the unaccountable “noise” plaguing the GEO600 experiment in Germany, which searches for gravitational waves from black holes. To Hogan, the jitteriness suggested that the experiment had stumbled upon the lower limit of the spacetime pixels’ resolution.

Black hole physics, in which space and time become compressed, provides a basis for math showing that the third dimension may not exist at all. In this two-dimensional cartoon of a universe, what we perceive as a third dimension would actually be a projection of time intertwined with depth. If this is true, the illusion can only be maintained until equipment becomes sensitive enough to find its limits.

“You can’t perceive it because nothing ever travels faster than light,” says Hogan. “This holographic view is how the universe would look if you sat on a photon.”

Not everyone agrees with this idea. Its foundation is formed with math rather than hard data, as is common in theoretical physics. And although a holographic universe would answer many questions about black hole physics and other paradoxes, it clashes with classical geometry, which demands a universe of smooth, continuous paths in space and time.


“So we want to build a machine which will be the most sensitive measurement ever made of spacetime itself,” says Hogan. “That’s the holometer.”

The name “holometer” was first used for a surveying device created in the 17th century, an “instrument for the taking of all measures, both on the earth and in the heavens.” Hogan felt this fit with the mission of his “holographic interferometer,” which is currently being developed at Fermilab’s largest laser lab.

In a classical interferometer, first developed in the late 1800s, a laser beam in a vacuum hits a mirror called a beamsplitter, which breaks it in two. The two beams travel at different angles down the length of two vacuum pipe arms before hitting mirrors at the end and bouncing back to the beamsplitter.

Since light in a vacuum travels at a constant speed, the two beams should arrive back to the mirror at precisely the same time, with their waves in sync to reform a single beam. Any interfering vibration would change the frequency of the waves ever so slightly over the distance they traveled. When they returned to the beamsplitter, they would no longer be in sync.


In the holometer, this loss of sync looks like a shaking or vibrations that represent jitters in spacetime itself, like the fuzziness of radio coming over too little bandwidth.

The holometer’s precision means that it doesn’t have to be large; at 40 meters in length, it is only one hundredth of the size of current interferometers, which measure gravitational waves from black holes and supernovas. Yet because the spacetime frequencies it measures are so rapid, it will be more precise over very short time intervals by seven orders of magnitude than any atomic clock in existence.

“The shaking of spacetime occurs at a million times per second, a thousand times what your ear can hear,” said Fermilab experimental physicist Aaron Chou, whose lab is developing prototypes for the holometer. “Matter doesn’t like to shake at that speed. You could listen to gravitational frequencies with headphones.”

The whole trick, Chou says, is to prove that the vibrations don’t come from the instrument. Using technology similar to that in noise-cancelling headphones, sensors outside the instrument detect vibrations and shake the mirror at the same frequency to cancel them. Any remaining shakiness at high frequency, the researchers propose, will be evidence of blurriness in spacetime.

“With the holometer’s long arms, we’re magnifying spacetime’s uncertainty,” Chou said.

Hogan’s team liked the holometer idea so much they decided to build two. One on top of the other, the machines can confirm one another’s measurements.

This month, having successfully built a 1-meter prototype of the 40-meter arm, they will weld the parts of the first of the vacuum arms together.

Hogan expects the holometer to begin collecting data next year.

“People trying to tie reality together don’t have any data, just a lot of beautiful math,” said Hogan. “The hope is that this gives them something to work with.”

http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/bre...s-to-test-hypothesis-of-holographic-universe/

edit: just to get it out of the way since someone's probably gonna bring it up, Michael Talbot's book "The Holographic Universe" is new-agey bunk that takes liberties with theories that have been around for a long time. It has little to do with this.
 

Zaptruder

Banned
Shit blows my mind.

But I feel like even he 'proves' this, it makes little practical difference.

It's like the idea of consciousness as an emergent illusion.

That is to say, the nature of our consciousness is very different to the one we percieve and feel, such that it's not even reasonable to call it 'consciousness' anymore.

But there's still a system that allows for these feelings, just like there's going to be a system that allows us to safely without reprecussions continue interpreting our existence in this physical universe as 3D+Time.
 
Zaptruder said:
Shit blows my mind.

But I feel like even he 'proves' this, it makes little practical difference.

It's like the idea of consciousness as an emergent illusion.

That is to say, the nature of our consciousness is very different to the one we percieve and feel, such that it's not even reasonable to call it 'consciousness' anymore.

But there's still a system that allows for these feelings, just like there's going to be a system that allows us to safely without reprecussions continue interpreting our existence in this physical universe as 3D+Time.
It could also be said that the solidity of the physical universe is also an illusion. We are, as human beings, just trillions upon trillions of atoms bonded together and they themselves consist of smaller building blocks and empty space.
 

jambo

Member
FgZfJ.jpg
 

Big-E

Member
I still remember when the original article was posted here. Could not understand it then and can't really understand it now. Wish I understood it better. Hope that the experiment goes well for them.
 
Zaptruder said:
Shit blows my mind.

But I feel like even he 'proves' this, it makes little practical difference.

It's like the idea of consciousness as an emergent illusion.

That is to say, the nature of our consciousness is very different to the one we percieve and feel, such that it's not even reasonable to call it 'consciousness' anymore.

But there's still a system that allows for these feelings, just like there's going to be a system that allows us to safely without reprecussions continue interpreting our existence in this physical universe as 3D+Time.
MdUrx.jpg
 
Is this the same thing as the "universe is quartile, not fluid" thing? I don't remember exactly where I heard it but I think one of the examples were if you were running you don't gradually become tired like a gradual fluid graph line it's more like steps in a bar graph
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom