brandonh83
Banned
Of course, but do you need to be one to criticize someone's work? Nope. This is the laziest counter argument I've read so far and I actually can't believe someone went there.
The thing is, in order to address the absurdity of it, I'd need to go scene by scene and point by point to extrapolate it. It's simple to say "there's some plot and other similarities" (which I AGREE with because there ARE) but it takes the actual going into details and going through things point by point to dispel such an argument, when all you have to really do is watch the fucking movie and pay a shred of attention.
So yes, perhaps my counter-arguments are "lazy," but if they are, so are what I'm arguing against. I'm arguing that claiming that no creativity or imagination went into the movie is dumb, because it is, ten-fuckin' fold. There are plenty of creative elements unique to the six films that preceded it. Arguing otherwise is blatantly absurd.