• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

How much does censorship bother you?

It's not removing something though. It'd be a better example of they completely changed a character into a chibi or something.
What if they removed the original clothing completely?

Censorship doesn't always mean removal anyway. Editing can mean recontextualising something by adding.
 
See my question on the previous page though. The action of NOT purchasing the game actually hurts your chances of getting the next one uncensored (or even localized) doesn't it?.

Well, if they changed this one what would give anyone a warm fuzzy feeling that they won't change the next one in the same way? The genie is out of the bottle. It doesn't matter if you buy it and complain, because you still bought the changed version, thus endorsing the change. If you don't buy it then maybe they don't bring the next one over. But you already said that you didn't want it if they changed it.

So what is the option, really? The only options you have are to have find a way to play the original version, suck it up and buy the localized version, or don't buy anything at all.
 
So, why in 2015 does Nintendo feel the need to remove lingerie from a mature rated game? Kids shouldn't be playing it, and even if they are, they've likely seen more risque content in beer commercials and Victoria Secret ads.

And it apparently isn't to appease the feminists, since the Zero Suit Samus suit is still "objectifying".

It's unnecessary and stupid. But then, so is most censorship.
 
It is one of the worst things to plague westernized gaming period.

They'll give us shooter after shooter and gloat about explosions, but they're being deceived if they think keeping away anything else is somehow beneficial.

I cannot stand censorship.

We get the watered down version of lots of things. It's been know for decades now.

It's still a kid's hobby to some and censorship guarantees certain people continue to think that way.

I would cringe working for Nintendo anymore. Everyone wants to sing and dance in a gaming arena full of censorship. It's awful.

Nothing wrong with caring for kids, but they're obsessed with kids. Movies do better with censorship than video games do.
 
What if they removed the original clothing completely?

Censorship doesn't always mean removal anyway. Editing can mean recontextualising something by adding.

It doesn't, but your specific example wouldn't be perceived as censorship. It'd be seen as an added bonus. Within the context of a product, I think you'll find fewer people taking issue with added content.

If they removed the original clothing completely, then I'd say it could be censorship depending on what that outfit is or was intended to be.
 
So, why in 2015 does Nintendo feel the need to remove lingerie from a mature rated game? Kids shouldn't be playing it, and even if they are, they've likely seen more risque content in beer commercials and Victoria Secret ads.

And it apparently isn't to appease the feminists, since the Zero Suit Samus suit is still "objectifying".

It's unnecessary and stupid. But then, so is most censorship.
Because they are a business and they thought it was the smartest business move.

To suggest that they should not have the freedom to do this with their own game is ludicrous.

I for one would defend Nintendo's right to publish the game in whatever form they so choose.

I can't understand wanting to exert external control onto Nintendo in this instance.
 
It's on a per-game basis really.
Ultimately I really wish it would never happen.

As a simple example, censoring Tharja in Fire Emblem is really silly. A woman in a swimsuit in a T-Rated game is hardly some grand maturity-breaking barrier. It doesn't affect my gameplay at all, but I'm bothered that a censorship group told me what was OK to see and not see based on guesswork.

Another example; the fact that video game covers aren't allowed to show open cleavage in America via the ESRB. Once again, it makes no difference to the game at all, but I'm very bothered that something so harmless as the top shelf of breasts somehow is just too sensitive for my eyes or even for the eyes of your typical American shopper. It's bothersome to be told that we're not capable of handling something like that without issue.
 
Are western horror game fans really going to be that caught up on bikini costumes being replaced with Nintendo themed costumes?

Well, considering western fan's tastes in horror:
Jason+X+Holographic+campers.jpg

I would prefer companies have better self-censorship though. A lot of games, not just Japanese ones, don't have a lot of creative restraint, even when it's not exactly beneficial or progressive.

I never played Fatal Frame 1 and thought "you know what this game needs? Exposed butt-crack lingerie, boob jiggle, and wet T-shirts!"... and yet that happened somehow.
 
I just don't know what you're referring to with differing definitions of censorship and some "tumblr" crowd having a too limited definition and how this has caused conservative reactionaries, bigots, and insecure male nerds to think that criticism of their hobby is equal to censorship.

You'll have to elaborate, because I'm not familiar with what you are referring to. If you don't want to, that's totally fine, but I'm just saying I'm not getting your point because I'm the uninvited to it and the background.
I didn't say they caused the bigots etc. to think that way, but that they have their own extreme definition which in turn muddies the waters even more and causes people to have weird understandings of censorship in these discussions. Perhaps you just never ran into the crowd who follows the opposite extreme definition.

Are western horror game fans really going to be that caught up on bikini costumes being replaced with Nintendo themed costumes?
Probably not, but they also wouldn't have been caught up if they had left the costumes as they were. They could have saved the money they spend on replacing the costumes and changing a scene in the game.
 
So, why in 2015 does Nintendo feel the need to remove lingerie from a mature rated game? Kids shouldn't be playing it, and even if they are, they've likely seen more risque content in beer commercials and Victoria Secret ads.

And it apparently isn't to appease the feminists, since the Zero Suit Samus suit is still "objectifying".

It's unnecessary and stupid. But then, so is most censorship.

It's sexy outfits on underage characters. It was a business decision by Nintendo, and they're within rights to edit their games however they want for different releases.
 
Because they are a business and they thought it was the smartest business move.

To suggest that they should not have the freedom to do this with their own game is ludicrous.

Well sure, they have the freedom to censor their games, but I have the freedom to boycott it. You'd think NIntendo would have learned their lesson in the 90's, but hey, if they want to go back to the era of green blood, they can count me out on this game and their next console.
 
there hasn't been much in the way of removing religious references or even toning down violence in the united states recently. you don't see a lot of continued boycotts against namco for what they did with xenogears or even xenosaga (episode iii in particular).

recently i've been seeing opposition to 'censorship' in the context of underage girls in various states of undress. this is true of mugen souls, dungeon travelers, fatal frame, and criminal girls. i feel like whenever i see those argue that 'censorship' is the great evil in these cases, they're really trying to take a position of the moral high ground, because the alternative is they're arguing for underage girls in states of undress. i'm of the position that there are worse things than 'censorship', such as minigames where underage girls are abused sexually or images of them in vulnerable situations as a reward for the player. i'm of the position that we need less of this in the industry, and i would prefer these games never came over. i'm actually glad if people who oppose 'censorship' boycott these games due to their removal of pretty gross content because it decreases their chances for success and other games like them to be brought over or developed in the first place.

in the broader sense, i'm okay with it. yeah it's silly that alcoholic references that make people tipsy turn into strange juice that make people 'act funny' but i get the intent. it's not going to ruin the game for me. even the blood-in-the-hands scene in xenosaga iii came off as confusing instead of infuriating.
 
Well sure, they have the freedom to censor their games, but I have the freedom to boycott it. You'd think NIntendo would have learned their lesson in the 90's, but hey, if they want to go back to the era of green blood, they can count me out on this game and their next console.
You go ahead and protest your right to underaged characters in skimpy outfits.
 
Well, considering western fan's tastes in horror:


I would prefer companies have better self-censorship though. A lot of games, not just Japanese ones, don't have a lot of creative restraint, even when it's not exactly beneficial or progressive.

I never played Fatal Frame 1 and thought "you know what this game needs? Exposed butt-crack lingerie, boob jiggle, and wet T-shirts!"... and yet that happened somehow.

Japan has done better games with horror than the west period.

Western horror movies do better than the games do.

I'd take a Japanese made horror game and watch a western horror movie. That's just how it is.

I don't mind sex and violence. Anymore horror movies are about some sorta sexual relationship anyway. It's either a shower scene or people having sex in a tent.

Video Games get the worst form of censorship because it's something simple. Did Japan care about anime butt cheeks or Lolita's?

Is it because the west has such a blatant language? Our culture seems to make things much more kid friendly. Call of Duty doesn't even do anything controversial outside of shooting someone.

They curse, big deal.

Rockstar is the only delelopers I trust with the content and they still get slammed.

I wonder if Rockstar ever had to cut something out because of censorship outside of Hot Coffee. I think it's all crap that we cater with themes of death and sex. They exist to offend us. It's part of what it is.
 
Nobody liked Jason X, thats a terrible movie.
Sorry for being off topic but I remember how ridiculous that movie was and i remember the scene following that picture.

I'm not saying that Jason X is a good film.

I'm saying that, for a very long time, Western Horror has long had an infatuation with sex and death, titillation and terror. The whole slasher genre was always awash in sexy girls in bikinis (or less) being confronted by serial killers. It's practically an established trope.

And western horror films did that far more often than Japanese horror films did.

That's all I was saying.

Is it because the west has such a blatant language? Our culture seems to make things much more kid friendly. Call of Duty doesn't even do anything controversial outside of shooting someone.
I'm not against mature content. However, not all mature content makes sense for every medium. It can hurt the overall tone or mood of an experience. Just like I don't need random sexy topless ladies showing up in Saving Private Ryan, or just like how I don't need buckets of blood and gore in The Hangover or Bridesmaid. Not all mature content fits all mature mediums.
 
Japan has done better games with horror than the west period.

Western horror movies do better than the games do.

I'd take a Japanese made horror game and watch a western horror movie. That's just how it is.

I don't mind sex and violence. Anymore horror movies are about some sorta sexual relationship anyway. It's either a shower scene or people having sex in a tent.

Video Games get the worst form of censorship because it's something simple. Did Japan care about anime butt cheeks or Lolita's?

Is it because the west has such a blatant language? Our culture seems to make things much more kid friendly. Call of Duty doesn't even do anything controversial outside of shooting someone.

They curse, big deal.

Rockstar is the only delelopers I trust with the content and they still get slammed.
Watching jojo's bizzarre adventure showed me that smoking is terrible and should be censored but i can see an actual loli's butt with no reprecussions.

I'm not saying that Jason X is a good film.

I'm saying that, for a very long time, Western Horror has long had an infatuation with sex and death, titillation and terror. The whole slasher genre was always awash in sexy girls in bikinis (or less) being confronted by serial killers. It's practically an established trope.

And western horror films did that far more often than Japanese horror films did.

That's all I was saying.
You should try "It Follows" and i know you didnt say jason x was a good movie, i just posted an off comment about it because of how stupid it was.
 
It's sexy outfits on underage characters. It was a business decision by Nintendo, and they're within rights to edit their games however they want for different releases.

LOL, "underage".

Such an overused term on GAF and the rest of the internet... and relatively meaningless biologically and even legally, since there is no universal standard for what constitutes underage.

FYI, the average age of consent in North America is 16, not 18.
 
Watching jojo's bizzarre adventure showed me that smoking is terrible and should be censored but i can see an actual loli's butt with no reprecussions.

I saw that. That was stupid. People get arrested for owning mangas outside of Japan.

I think it's because Japan has put in a new initiative to stop some of that. It's just silly that they go that route with JoJo and Terra Formars in the west was terrible right?

Didn't they cut all the death out too?
 
You should try "It Follows" and i know you didnt say jason x was a good movie, i just posted an off comment about it because of how stupid it was.

Trust me, I'm a horror connoisseur (comes with being born on Halloween). Most of my favorite horror movies have very little actual sexy ladies in them (Jacob's Ladder, The Shining, The Exorcist, etc.).

Still need to check out "It Follows". Just been on the backburner.

LOL, "underage".

Such an overused term on GAF and the rest of the internet... and relatively meaningless biologically and even legally, since there is no universal standard for what constitutes underage.

FYI, the average age of consent in North America is 16, not 18.
I wouldn't go showing any naked pictures of 16 year olds to the police if I were you. Consent and possession aren't the same thing, and that includes media like movies, games, and comics.
 
LOL, "underage".

Such an overused term on GAF and the rest of the internet... and relatively meaningless biologically and even legally, since there is no universal standard for what constitutes underage.

FYI, the average age of consent in North America is 16, not 18.

the term is technically correct in a lot of jurisdictions stop censoring us
 
Then why don't bother other stuffs for you guys ?

WHY we does not have threads for the classic regional translations of ace attorney ?
The changed ballroom ?

ee4XkxW.png

yNbJcME.png


Do people, when they claim they want F-Zero GX HD, complain that they want the original

P0phtip.png


Instead of the "censored"

ZgOcPUT.png


Or the "censored"

SyC320L.png


to

TMq7ocl.png


?

I rarely even see people wanting to have Dictator become Vega again so that Mike Bison goes back to be Boxer !
And that creates a whole lot of useless confusion =P

Do people want a FF7 remake without Emerald and Ruby Weapon ????
Because that was a "censorship" in the international version =P

The number of available spaces for character names was increased from 6 to 9.
The random encounter rate was reduced in some areas
Diamond Weapon was made a into a boss rather than just appearing in a cutscene. This also made it possible to steal Yuffie's "Rising Sun" weapon, which was unused in the Japanese version.
The optional Emerald and Ruby Weapon bosses were added.
An FMV on Disc 2 was extended to show the new bosses.
The Underwater materia was made accessible.
Three items related to the Emerald/Ruby Weapons were added: The Guidebook, Desert Rose, and Earth Harp.
It was made easier to keep your body temperature up while climbing Gaea's Cliff.
The Temple of the Ancients' clock puzzle was simplified.
The mechanics of the Chocobuckle attack were changed from damage=(number of escapes)*(level of user) to just the number of escapes.
The animation for Safer Sephiroth's Super Nova attack was changed completely, bearing little resemblance to the original and being nearly two minutes long. Japanese Super Nova, US Super Nova. Additionally, the damage algorithm was altered. The original JP had a set spell power, while the US is (damage=current HP*15/16), or roughly 94% of a character's current HP, and it attempts to inflict multiple bad statuses.
A screensaver-like star field was added after the credits, similar to the end credits sequence of Final Fantasy IV.
The Test 0 enemy was removed.
Minor graphical changes to some backgrounds.

There are LOTS of games with regional diferences but the outrages is ALWAYS when they cut the sexy outfit of the 16 year old looking dragon =P
 
If it's removing or censoring mini-games from perverted Japanese games that involves groping 12 year old girls, I'm ok. Otherwise, I'm not so big on it.
 
Games advocating hate speech should eventually get some censorship but the rest shouldn't, especially anything falling like into the "I know what you should enjoy better than you do" group like fanservice. Use age rating, enforce it.
 
I saw that. That was stupid. People get arrested for owning mangas outside of Japan.

I think it's because Japan has put in a new initiative to stop some of that. It's just silly that they go that route with JoJo and Terraformers in the west was terrible right?

Didn't they cut all the death out too?

They blackened gruesome deaths. Terraformars though, there is a kotaku article on how silly that debacle was. But the reason from what i remember was that Jojo Stardust crusaders was on more stations and earlier than the first 2 arcs (which was on one iirc) But Blu-rays have taken out the censored stuff.
 
I don't mind when censorship is accounting for cultural differences/dissonance.
I generally agree with games imported from Japan that alter character's costumes/designs to try to give them a shred of dignity.

image.php


This little girl needs to put on some clothes.
 
It bothers me a lot. and most of the time it's just them treating their customers like idiots. I understand the reasoning, but it's more like desperately trying to sell more copies than actually adjusting to another culture.

I don't mind when censorship is accounting for cultural differences/dissonance.
I generally agree with games imported from Japan that alter character's costumes/designs to try to give them a shred of dignity.

image.php


This little girl needs to put on some clothes.

I know I'm digging myself to a hole here, but why does she? Because you're a perv?
 
I wouldn't go showing any naked pictures of 16 year olds to the police if I were you. Consent and possession aren't the same thing, and that includes media like movies, games, and comics.

And yet Hollywood has made tons of movies portraying "underaged" teens having sex. Porky's, Fast Times at Ridgemont High, Superbad, etc.
 

This is an M-rated game. The other games you mentioned are not. If the content was cut for being "inappropriate", i could understand if it was a T-rated game, but it's an M-rated horror game, in a landscape of horror games, all with far worse content.

The reason they cut it wasn't "localization" differences; it was because they felt it was offensive and inappropriate for us.

I don't even like the content, but I'm more shocked they made the changes and didn't tell people about it until the 11th hour (or after...).

Fatal Frame is a franchise for the uber-hardcore, not the Pokemon crowd. They know what they're getting. ... Well, they THOUGHT they knew what they were getting. Surprise, I guess.

And yet Hollywood has made tons of movies portraying "underaged" teens having sex. Porky's, Fast Times at Ridgemont High, Superbad, etc.
None portrayed by actual teens, though. There's a reason they always cast 20-somethings as teenagers and not actual, you know, 15 year olds.
 
Its crazy people use rating boards as a excuse

remember carmageddon 64 German edition

5O5ZI36.jpg


Its been a issue for myself with Vita, the only real game I can justify it on it recent times is monster monpiece and thats because they were clearly sexualizing 10 year old girls.
 
I don't mind when censorship is accounting for cultural differences/dissonance.
I generally agree with games imported from Japan that alter character's costumes/designs to try to give them a shred of dignity.

image.php


This little girl needs to put on some clothes.

They're fictional characters, they don't need any dignity and they feel no shame. That is the point, they aren't real.
 
Wow.

"It bothers me that that tiny girl is in a stripperiffic belly dancers costume."
"You're a pervert."

I... I don't even.

She's a belly dancer, shouldn't she dress like one? I'm fine with complaining about chain mail bikini, but that's an appropriate costume, she's happy with it and I'd think she doesn't have to worry about pervs in her world.

What, do you avoid going to the beach or pool because little girls in swimsuits bother you?
 
None portrayed by actual teens, though. There's a reason they always cast 20-somethings as teenagers and not actual, you know, 15 year olds.

But people are apparently offended about a 17 year old in lingerie, who is, you know, an artistic creation that does not actually exist?
 
They're fictional characters, they don't need any dignity and they feel no shame. That is the point, they aren't real.

You know what I mean.
I hate when I'm playing a game that I'm getting into and takes itself fairly seriously, and then suddenly there's a character like Tiki, the "1000 year old dragon" who just happens to look like a young girl trying to wear as revealing an outfit as possible.
It's such a completely obvious, greasy wink from the devs that just makes things feel gross.

I love *some* animes, and I play *tons* of Japanese games, but absolutely nothing makes me put down a game faster and leaves a bad taste in my mouth like "moe" "ecchi" "fanservice" crap.
 
No matter what it's form censorship is horrible, and I'll always speak out against it.

Living in Australia (or any country with similar censorship bodies) makes you pretty aware of the issue when even mainstream games like Fallout, South Park, The Last of Us, Saints Row, Left 4 Dead, and smaller titles like Hotline Miami and State of Decay all get censored or straight up refused classification.

It's bullshit.
 
Such an overused term on GAF and the rest of the internet... and relatively meaningless biologically and even legally, since there is no universal standard for what constitutes underage..

Well it's a good thing that, as a citizen of the United States of America, I only have to worry about USA's standards.

Under 18 = Underage, and sexualizing underage characters is creepy!
No matter what it's form censorship is horrible, and I'll always speak out against it.

Good thing putting more clothing on a child in a video game isn't censorship huh.
 
Top Bottom