How are those others measuring spanking though? Most of the people in here have said they have somewhat convoluted requirements when deciding to spank a child. Almost no one is saying that spanking alone is going to get a child to act right.There are very very very few studies that show any positive result from spanking - and the ones that do all usually have very convoluted requirements. One I saw said it was only effective on children around age 2, and only if done at a particular frequency while mixed with non-corporal punishment.
But literally... well over 90% of studies I've read have shown that non-corporal discipline is significantly better than corporal. They don't teach it in child psychology, it's not considered useful and the associated risks are great enough that it almost entirely abandoned in every professional setting.
There is no good reason to hit your kids. You can raise wonderful kids without ever hitting them, and if you believe that's true, there is good chance you can raise your child without ever hitting them.
http://www.apa.org/monitor/2012/04/spanking.aspx
http://www.acei.org/corporal-punishment/all.html
Are the distribution of beatings equal despite the sex of the child?
How about the types of beatings recommended?
Are belts okay? Buckle side or non-buckle side?
How about a long thin stick that stings and leaves markings like a whip?
What about pinning down a child under a pillow or body slamming them against a concrete wall?
Not enough to hurt them obviously but enough to teach them a lesson.
Are all those methods kosher with the beat kids crowd or are there more specific child beating methods they recommend?
Most states define spanking as an openhanded smack on the butt. That is it. If it is hard enough to leave a bruise, it isn't a smack, and is hitting. That is child abuse. Using anything other than an openhand is not a spanking, that is child abuse. Spanking them until their will breaks would also be viewed as child abuse. Some states view bare as child abuse (Maryland for example)That is the real problem, isn't it? Talk to ten different people and they have 10 different ideas on what a spanking is. One slap all the way to not even counting slaps and just "breaking the child's will". Implement or no implement? Bare or clothed? In private or public for others to see? Certain misbehavior are spankable offenses but others aren't? Mom or Dad the spanker or both? How young is too young? How old is too old? Can other family members spank such as grandparents, uncles, aunts, brothers, sisters, cousins? Babysitters? Teachers?
There are no good answers out there other then the overwhelming scientific data that says it's harmful.
Your right, I should mentally hit her. If you really want to see spanking stop in the US, you should probably choose your words better. When all you do is say that someone needs to improve their "general fucking parenting," people will tend to stop listening.The concept of physically hitting your children or causing them pain in any way is just absolutely bizarre to me. If you have to go to that level, you need to improve your general fucking parenting.
That's nice, I know people that never got spanked and ended up in jail because they felt that robbery was fine. And I got spanked and never ended up selling coke or hijacking(?) cars.lol at people saying cause they got spanked its ok, because there ok ha.
I was never hit as a Kid and im hardly Selling Coke and Hijacking cars.
do people not know difference between spanking and abuse?
Most of the parents literally are heart broken while they give any punishments to kids. I know my mother cried once after she shouted at me and hugged me right after. Spanking is fine if done right. That fear of consequence is important to teach at young age.
One instance where i was spanked. started throwing food everywhere as a young kid. was warned twice. third time my father just stood up from his chair with his eyes open and angry voice. I froze and collected all the shit from the floor like in five seconds lol
If your kid is 30 and you are still spanking them... That should be illegal.
Spanking is a form of child abuse in many countries.
I spank my daughter when she is doing something either very dangerous, or doing something that she has been told not to do multiple times (not necessarily all in one day) and still doing it. The dangerous thing is partly because it is the easiest and quickest way to get her to understand it is not good to do. Afterwards I'll explain why it was wrong and tell her possible outcomes..
So... what if your child is hitting other children?
If the child is very young then time out or some other kind of non physical punishment. Old enough to know its wrong then the same but with words that re-enforce why hitting others is wrong. Also try and discover why the child had resorted to hitting, for example the other child might not having been sharing properly so that would also need to be addressed, both the child for not sharing, and the child guilty of violence needs to learn that they should come to an adult and not take inappropriate action.So... what if your child is hitting other children?
I'll tell her stop and address the problem with her. If she wants me to explain the difference between me spanking her (open hand on the butt) and her hitting someone, I will. Right now, I don't believe that she kid hit someone with any amount of power that would hurt someone. If she was using a stick or something, probably go right over to her and spank her. The reason why is the shock from me actually spanking her seems to get an immediate response and, so far, seems to be something that she remembers long term.So... what if your child is hitting other children?
But that's the point spanking should be used as a last resort when a child is too young to understand why they shouldn't be doing what they're doing. If I'd have caught my son at the age of four sticking metal objects into a plug socket then I'd have spanked him, I would have wanted him to be scared of repeating the action. By the time he was older say six I'd be confident that I could explain and he would understand, so no spanking just words.Why not spank adults? Your girlfriend won't listen? Spank away! Your coworker is performing badly, 4-5 hits on the butt should resolve that.
It's so easy! It works.
But that's the point spanking should be used as a last resort when a child is too young to understand why they shouldn't be doing what they're doing. If I'd have caught my son at the age of four sticking metal objects into a plug socket then I'd have spanked him, I would have wanted him to be scared of repeating the action. By the time he was older say six I'd be confident that I could explain and he would understand, so no spanking just words.
Obviously the age when a child is ready to be treated differently will differ from child to child and only the parent should be able to determine when.
Thankfully I've never spanked my child but that doesn't mean I disagree with its use in specific circumstances. However some of you guys using phrases like 'beating' make me concerned, that implies a level of anger or loss of self control. That's abuse to me.
Well, you used to be able to. Think in so states they still allow smacking, but not sure.Why not spank adults? Your girlfriend won't listen? Spank away! Your coworker is performing badly, 4-5 hits on the butt should resolve that.
It's so easy! It works.
I've given you a couple examples of where I've spanked. I don't grab her and throw her over my knee and take my belt and wallop her until she has cried so much that she is dehydrated, but I do take my open hand and from about a foot away have it come into contact with her bottom. It doesn't take much for her to remember it, especially if you aren't always spanking them.I would love to hear the stories of what people did to deserve a spanking. Where they "really fucked up" and such.
I'll tell her stop and address the problem with her. If she wants me to explain the difference between me spanking her (open hand on the butt) and her hitting someone, I will.
Most states define spanking as an openhanded smack on the butt. That is it. If it is hard enough to leave a bruise, it isn't a smack, and is hitting. That is child abuse. Using anything other than an openhand is not a spanking, that is child abuse. Spanking them until their will breaks would also be viewed as child abuse. Some states view bare as child abuse (Maryland for example)
For some of your other questions, really? How young/old? That is the same question for all forms of discipline. Are you going to put your one-year old in a corner? They ain't staying, they got no clue what the fuck your doing. Or are you going to sit there and tell them why they shouldn't be doing something? Not effective, they can't understand you (I still did tell my daughter, always have talked to her). All the questions about who can discipline your child, same thing. I don't want anybody else putting my daughter in a corner. In school, they can remove her from class, but don't think you can put her in a corner. Don't try to take away her WiiU at home either. All those questions have to be decided by the parents for everything.
Your studies should be telling you what they are considering a spanking, other wise they might as well just be asking is abusing a child effective when raising a child. If they have a convoluted definition of when spanking is appropriate, good job, welcome to raising kids. There are many convoluted definitions for my actions as a parent. Wish sometimes that she came with a manual that I could refer to, but nope, I have to try to learn through reading and trial and error, and hope that I make very few errors.
So... what if your child is hitting other children?
Spanking is fine if done right. That fear of consequence is important to teach at young age.
You should probably give her a time out then and punish her by withholding sex, that's bound to workI can assure you, sometimes my wife really does not understand what I'm trying to tell her.
You raise your child however you want. That said, if she can understand the differentation between those two sorts of violence, she can understand more sophisticated methods of discipline. It comes off to me as hypocrisy, even moreso to a child.
"We don't solve problems with violence! Except a specific sort of violence which I dictate."
It shouldn't be violent to the point of emotional or physical scarring, but spanking is still an effective way to get your kid to realize when things are bad when trying to reason with a 3 year old doesn't exactly work out.
My dad didn't spank me too much, mostly slapped me as hard as he could on one of my hands. Shit stung, but it kept me in line within reason.
What's the best PROVEN alternative to spanking? That "go to your room for 5 minutes and think about what you've done? foolishness won't cut it.
I'm not trying to say that this is what all parents need to do. This is what I do when I spank and why you will see me say I spank my daughter and still be able to sleep at night.This is weirdly reminding me of debating religious people on whether or not it was okay to hit your wife as described in their religious teachings...
Anywho, the problem with what you've described is you are implicitly saying that the method of spanking you described is the proverbial red line for a misbehaving child that will finally get them to act right when all reasoning has failed. Maybe that works on your child, but who are you to say that other parents shouldn't resort to more extreme methods of corporal punishment if the method you described doesn't work for them? The line between what you call "abuse" and "spanking" isn't as clear cut as you seem to think it is.
lol at people using studies that don't have any clear controls for what they call something but saying that all of it is bad.:lol at how specific people are being when describing how they spank.
Like being calculated makes it ok.
I don't believe in hitting people and violence! I spank but only at an angle of 45 degrees and 13.5cm from the child's behind. Research shows that this coupled with a large area of palm leaves no bruise and hurts 60% less than normal hitting!
I People keep assuming that if your spanking, you must also be using a switch, or a belt. Or what was asked up above, pushing them into a wall with a pillow. I have one method of spanking, and that really does play into it.
It isn't that detailed. People keep assuming that if your spanking, you must also be using a switch, or a belt. Or what was asked up above, pushing them into a wall with a pillow. I have one method of spanking, and that really does play into it.
Virtually all of the scientific research done on spanking so far has concluded that not only doesn't it work, but it's actually damaging to relationships between kids and parents. Even if it didn't turn out that way for you, you'd be the statistical exception, not the rule.
I'm just glad I'm of the many exceptions. I have an awesome relationship with my parents.
I mean, I am too. But we have to be aware that just because we have our own anecdotal stories in which we can say we came out relatively unscathed, that such stories should not be used as a backbone to dish out viable real-world advice to how parents should punish their kids. Scientific research must be the backbone of such advice. And that research is clear.
I still find it fumy that some people dont understand spankings. And that is totally different than abuse.
Absolutely nothing worked on me as a kid except spankings. Only as a last resort and only when I absolutely did something that justified it.
All children are different and require different methods.
Talking and explaining works, well guess what sometimes it doesn't
Positive reinforcement works and guess what sometimes it doesn't.
Spankings work and guess what sometimes it doesn't.
Your kids aren't computers that can be programed to do exactly what you want, they have minds of their own. You can only do your best to teach them and guide them on their paths. They simply DO NOT HAVE TO DO THE RIGHT THING. They have wills of their own. We encourage it the best we can and will pretty much do anything in our power to make sure that we aren't allowing them to become bad people.
I say fuck these scientists and their charts. Shits way more complex than it seems. You cant lump sum all kids together and throw them on a pie chart. Shit, anything to do with children as individuals is nothing but and infinite loop of variables.
edit- And I'm not saying just go hit a child because he/she did something wrong. Of course explaining situations and things of that nature should always be your first course of action. And if you did spank your kid then yes you need to explain to them what they did wrong and why you did it. Parents dont do this for fun and they dont like doing it, but its for their own good. I can only imagine what kind of fuck up I would be right now if my mom didn't spank me. And maybe I wouldn't be a fuckup but still, I dont think I would be a better person than I am today. It did me good imo.
I say fuck these scientists and their charts. Shits way more complex than it seems. You cant lump sum all kids together and throw them on a pie chart. Shit, anything to do with children as individuals is nothing but and infinite loop of variables.
What about non physical form of punishment such as locking a dark closet. I know of many people who were punished this way in the past. It use to be fairly common. Is this abuse?
In actual fact is you can 'lump sump' all kids together and throw them on a pie chart and gleam incredibly accurate information about that subject. That's statistics for you.
Why is it that people so quickly want to abandon science, when it has consistently shown to be the most reliable method to human progress that has ever been thought up? Do you have some fucking alternative method of analyzing our world around us in such a successful and rigorous manner? Please, share with the class so we can understand what theory of the universe you subscribe to that has been even remotely as successful as science.
People should never spank their kids, it's an outdated and violent way to punish kids. Making it illegal is irrational though.
You mean false imprisonment? I still don't understand why parents think that providing a person with a place to sleep at night gives you a right to commit intentional torts against them.