Robot Pants
Member
Won't matter one bit. He's gonna keep on powering through.
But I'm not surprised at all that he doesn't
But I'm not surprised at all that he doesn't
Some of it sounds like good business tactics but that obviously won't leave a positive impressions on the public.
Screwing over small businesses with late payments is all too common, and one of the absolute biggest evils I've seen in the business world, unfortunately. A lot of companies collapse due to this.
It's a one-way street as well, if small businesses decided to withhold contracted goods and services due to issues, you bet types like the Trump Organisation would deploy swarms of lawyers in an instant.
Trump’s hotel there eight years ago, said the developer, Trump Ruffin, wouldn’t pay for additional work it demanded beyond the original contract. When Mr. Walters then refused to turn over some fabric, sheriff’s deputies burst into his factory after Trump Ruffin sued him. Trucks took the fabric away.
Mr. Walters said he never had payment problems with other casino or hotel clients. A review of Las Vegas court records showed no other legal disputes over payments involving him. Mr. Walters agreed to a settlement with Trump Ruffin that was about $380,000 short of what he said he was owed, court records show. He settled, he said, because “they were going to drag it on for many, many years.”
If anything his polls fall. I guarantee that will happen in response to the university BS. I really hope he continues with it cause he's Trump, not cause of his campaign."Poll bumps" for Trump haven't really been a thing since he became the presumptive nominee. He's done coasting.
If it saves the company money, yes it's good business tactics. Of course there's other stuff like public perception to worry about.
What's going on? Why is WSJ in sync with USA Today? Different author and article, less than half an hour apart or something
http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trumps-business-plan-left-a-trail-of-unpaid-bills-1465504454
He wanted Mexico to pay for it.
It's Mexico's fault.
I mean, this could very well be a deliberately timed story. Just after everyone starts talking about how "Trump doesn't have enough money to self fund and will need outside funding to run his campaign" a few news outlets run stories saying "every person who tries to do business or lend money to Trump gets screwed." Could be they're trying to scare off donors.
Because now that the nominations are decided it's open season on Trump and his long history of not paying bills is probably the lowest hanging fruit.
Trump has lots of bills. He has great ones. Absolutely the best bills. Trump does not pay those bills. But they are the best bills.
What's going on? Why is WSJ in sync with USA Today? Different author and article, less than half an hour apart or something
http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trumps-business-plan-left-a-trail-of-unpaid-bills-1465504454
Delinquent Donald.
As LOLGOP said on twitter, Should we know their ethnicity before we comment on if these suits are legit?
/donald'sracistlogic
Its probably coming from the Clinton Camp. I imagine this is the first real sustained shot as its greatly resembles the Bain Capital stuff in 2012. Define him early beyond being a racist. Take away his "great businessman label" paint him as a ruthless business man who isn't getting ahead because he's smart, he's getting rich by fucking over small businesses and his workers.
Trump finally responded. Claims it's false, then literally admits in the same sentence to doing what this article accuses him of doing. Just because you claim it's shoddy work doesn't mean it's true! That's a huge part of the article.
![]()
Trump finally responded. Claims it's false, then literally admits in the same sentence to doing what this article accuses him of doing. Just because you claim it's shoddy work doesn't mean it's true! That's a huge part of the article.
![]()
So you didn't pay... So I assume if those people did a poor job, then why not go through the proper channels and dispute the charges?
If it saves the company money, yes it's good business tactics. Of course there's other stuff like public perception to worry about.
As LOLGOP said on twitter, Should we know their ethnicity before we comment on if these suits are legit?
/donald'sracistlogic
Its probably coming from the Clinton Camp. I imagine this is the first real sustained shot as its greatly resembles the Bain Capital stuff in 2012. Define him early beyond being a racist. Take away his "great businessman label" paint him as a ruthless business man who isn't getting ahead because he's smart, he's getting rich by fucking over small businesses and his workers.
Trump finally responded. Claims it's false, then literally admits in the same sentence to doing what this article accuses him of doing. Just because you claim it's shoddy work doesn't mean it's true! That's a huge part of the article.
![]()
Trump finally responded. Claims it's false, then literally admits in the same sentence to doing what this article accuses him of doing. Just because you claim it's shoddy work doesn't mean it's true! That's a huge part of the article.
![]()
Well I can't disagree with him. Why should he have to pay for shoddy work?
Well I can't disagree with him. Why should he have to pay for shoddy work?
Yeah, unless you can show that something was installed improperly or not to manufacturer specification you can't just withhold pay.PartTimeWarrior
FullTimeStruggle
Because he ordered it; your level of satisfaction doesn't allow you to arbitrarily lower the price.
Email lists. You don't really expect journalists to be actual journalists do you?What's going on? Why is WSJ in sync with USA Today? Different author and article, less than half an hour apart or something
http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trumps-business-plan-left-a-trail-of-unpaid-bills-1465504454
If it saves the company money, yes it's good business tactics. Of course there's other stuff like public perception to worry about.
I mean, the guy espouses bankruptcy as a legitimate business tactic to avoid paying your bills. He literally bragged about it during a debate. This won't change anyone's mind, just reaffirm what we all knew.
Well I can't disagree with him. Why should he have to pay for shoddy work?
Well I can't disagree with him. Why should he have to pay for shoddy work?
Will do this when I order pizza now.Well I can't disagree with him. Why should he have to pay for shoddy work?