• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

I kinda hope the Mario popularity crashes soon

have you seen wreck it ralph? I think Mario is just like
Turbo
, so it is not Nintendo's fault

Also Mario is the biggest charakter in gaming and is recognised by nearly everybody, his popularity won't stop in the next years and that is a good thing. The different Mario games are in different genres and I rather see Mario characters in Nintendo's sport games than some generic anime characters or unlicensed realistic players
 
I don't play any Mario games. I just ignore them.

But I wouldn't wish death for the mascot, he makes people super happy.
 
Nintendo ought to make games starring toads. A Mushroom Story: Toads on the Road.

You play as a tough gang of biker Toads who go around solving lots of weird shit in the Mushroom Kingdom. How's that for different, op?

As much of a joke-post this was. I actually find myself wondering why Nintendo haven't made a game starring toads. Love the little guys.
 
I'm denying you of the Mario overlay of said games. If you're up in arms about if the character in your favorite game has a red cap or not, you need to reevaluate why you play games in the first place.

Couldn't have said it better... you really should reevaluate why you play games if you are so up in arms about Mario starring in these games, that you feel compelled to start a thread complaining about a character wearing a red cap
 
As I said in the other, identical thread, today Nintendo showed

-A puzzle action game in a haunted mansion with clever graphic effects and use of tools
-A new Hot Shots Golf type game by Camelot
-A new turn based JRPG
-A genre-breaking puzzle game that maaaybe has some shades of Lemmings or something

Those four games all have Mario skins, though, so some people see them and immediately dismiss them immediately as "Mario Games". But on the other hand, if they just made those all into other IPs they would definitely sell less. So who cares? They're going to be good games either way.


And also, "The Mario Popularity" is actually NOT going to crash anytime soon. It's Been almost 30 years. And of the early 85-87 NES games, he was in: SMB, Donkey Kong, Golf, Punch Out, Wrecking Crew, DK Jr, Mario Bros and other stuff I'm sure I'm forgetting. Again, that was three decades ago. Nintendo games have Mario in them across a variety of genres, and tend to be good games. It's not going to change.

Some people believe aesthetics are an important part of the game, and tied to said game's quality. These people would rather new games establish their own identity and not have Poochy slapped onto everything.
 
I'm denying you of the Mario overlay of said games. If you're up in arms about if the character in your favorite game has a red cap or not, you need to reevaluate why you play games in the first place.[/QUOTE]

Couldn't have said it better... you really should reevaluate why you play games if you are so up in arms about Mario starring in these games, that you feel compelled to start a thread complaining about a character wearing a red cap

oh damn you beat me to it
 
Couldn't have said it better... you really should reevaluate why you play games if you are so up in arms about Mario starring in these games, that you feel compelled to start a thread complaining about a character wearing a red cap

I'm not up in arms tho, it would be nice for a change, that's all.
 
Yes, it's Luigi's time to shine!
180px-TooBadWaluigiTime.jpg
 
as long as

A) the games are consistently high quality
B) the releases of the "same" mario games are appropriately spaced out (9 years since last mario golf, 12 years since the original luigi's mansion, 4 years since the last mario+luigi RPG, etc)
C)nintendo continues to create and explore new gameplay, new characters, and new IP (look at their original 3ds e-shop content: pushmo/crashmo, dillon's rolling western, sakura samurai, tokyo crash mobs, ketzal's corridors, kerploosh, denpa men)

then they can continue creating mario games forever as far as I'm concerned.

I could understand getting burned out if say, 3D mario platformers were some annualized thing, but as long as they continue to be released once (or maybe twice if you're lucky, in the case of galaxy) in a platforms entire life cycle I'm still going to look forward to them.
 
Games like

Mario RPG
Luigi's Mansion
Wario Ware
Mario Kart

could easily work with other characters and are unique experiences.

They are obviously using characters from the Mario universe to bring more attention to the games.

The only drawback is people accuse Nintendo of making too many Mario games....even though a game like Luigi's Mansion plays totally different than a Mario game (and was a new experience on Gamecube) just because it has a character from the Mario universe.

Someone sees the above list and lumps it as more Mario....when each gameplay experience is totally different.
 
lol. Sour about life. "I don't like this, no one else should have it."
 
Reminds me of my friend complaining about the overuse of Mario in the Gamecube days. Something about "tarnishing the brand" and how "the spin-offs affect the mainline Marios" in someway. I'll tell you what I told him, stop worrying about games you don't ever plan on buying or playing (whether it has Mario in it or not).
 
we are ahaving the right amount of Mario...

on the other hand; I agree that they should push their other IP's a little more.
 
I do agree, in a way.
Hell, most Mario games recently released haven't even been up to standard. NSMB2 and NSMBU were stale, bland, and evidence of milking the franchise. Sticker Star... well, I don't even wanna know what happened to that one.
Mario Kart needs to become Nintendo Kart. I'd rather play as Link than a generic Koopa, and I'd rather race in Dreamland than generic Luigi Circuit no.9820283, but that's messing with Nintendo's stale formula, and god forbid that happens. I love the company, I really do, but they DO need a shake up.
 
I wish Zelda and Metroid would get milked as much as Mario does, but I guess these games are easier to pump out I guess.

Zelda and Metroid have too much fictional baggage to just throw them into situations like golfing, go-karting, or self-referential comedic RPGs. Plus, sadly, Metroid as a property is not as bankable as we think it is.
 
Paper Mario is over a decade old as a franchise, as is Luigi's Mansion. Mario RPGs are over 20 years old.

So they're making sequels. So? Is their existence offensive?
 
Nintendo do rely too much on Mario. They're so scared of investing time and money in anything unless Mario is involved that the company is lacking new IPs and neglecting popular ones like F-Zero and Star Fox. Punch-Out Wii reached a million but when any old Mario game makes two or three times that at minimum will we likely see a PO sequel any time soon?

In the short run throwing Mario-related games out there regularly and raking in guaranteed cash is understandable from a business point of view. But when Mario is burned out and the other IPs are all but forgotten they could be in big trouble.

Did NSMB 2 and NSMB U need to come out in the same year? No. For Wii U it made sense, but 2 on 3DS was so strangely timed in the grand scheme of things. Why did we get about five Mario-titled games on 3DS before a single Luigi, Animal Crossing, Pokemon, Metroid, original Zelda, Kirby or Fire Emblem game? So much overkill. Now there's even more coming this year.

Mario is popular, I get it. My issue is with the spacing over a generation. I would like to see more non-Mario IPs released between the Mario titles. I'm a huge Mario fan but the thought of twenty titles featuring the plumber on Wii U and 3DS by next gen and not a single original entry from Wave Race, F-Zero or Star Fox is a depressing state of affairs.
 
That doesn't work

how many films star mickey in 1 year , how many bond films do we get. Mario appears in 2 to 3 games roughly 1-1.5 years.
Games aren't films. Mario games come in different genres, from different developers, on different systems. Play only the games that interest you.

Also, do you people realize the people making these Mario games *might* not be the people in charge of a new Zelda or a new Metroid? We just got a new Fire Emblem and a new IP (Push/Crashmo) from Intelligent Systems, and that's a studio that already made a Mario game anyway.
 
I'm personnaly tired of the mushroom kingdom/sand/ice settings, i only buy a mario game when i want to ! (Last one was mario 3d on the 3ds next one wil be luigi's mansion)

I can understand the complains tho , N should focus on creation new characters with interessting settings !

Agreed. I think Nintendo is talented to create another branch of the extended Mario universe. They just have to want to.

Games like

Mario RPG
Luigi's Mansion
Wario Ware
Mario Kart

could easily work with other characters and are unique experiences.

They are obviously using characters from the Mario universe to bring more attention to the games.

The only drawback is people accuse Nintendo of making too many Mario games....even though a game like Luigi's Mansion plays totally different than a Mario game (and was a new experience on Gamecube) just because it has a character from the Mario universe.

Someone sees the above list and lumps it as more Mario....when each gameplay experience is totally different.

Eh out of those games, I think Mario Kart has gotten stale but it doesn't matter because it sells and the general public doesn't mind. Like someone mentioned, it could very well be the aesthetics. I think they could benefit from create something else like a Wario Land or even Luigi's Masion to expand the universe.
 
I can see tiring of the same old games, but focusing on just the Mario aspect strikes as a rather pointless observation. If, for instance, the problem is that I want Camelot to do something other than make a golf game I guess I can see that. If the problem is that it uses Mario characters instead of original designs -- with the implication that it suffers from being another Mario game -- then I don't really agree with the criticism.
 
What is wrong with GAF? Who are you people?
"Yeah!! lets play gears of War and Call of Duty forever! Screw Mario!"

Have you forgotten what good games are?

The most likely explanation is this place is getting flooded with 16 year olds who are out to prove how grown up they are by rejecting Nintendo games and playing ultra violent stuff.
 
I won't deny that mario is being a tad overused and I would love other characters to get their time to shine, but his games are almost always good so he can stick around as much as he likes.
 
It sure sucks seeing Mario everywhere while other Nintendo franchises like F-Zero are completely ignored, but what are you gonna do?
 
I don't hope Mario crashes, but I personally don't care for the brand he represents, as this isn't the 80's-90's any longer.

He's the symptom of a larger problem with Nintendo: that they do not innovate or push the boundaries of their aesthetics and brand perception, but instead rely on the same thing for decades and decades.

If Nintendo wanted to expand their market a bit more they would try to go for several directions. Instead they remain complacent.

This old argument falls apart when you see what happened with the Wii.

People seem unaware that Nintendo makes lots of non-Mario games, lots.
 
Top Bottom