Things you like that I don't like:
The Walking Dead
Breaking Bad
Sriracha sauce
True Detective
I'm an unique snowflake.
Wish I didn't see this before watching the finale. Thanks!!!How I feel about this thread...
![]()
It most certainly is, op, and while we are on the subject of overrated shows, the wire is high up there, IMO.
The wire's overrated but still a good show
Wish I didn't see this before watching the finale. Thanks!!!
I just wanted the finale to implicate more people. Otherwise it was well written, well shot, and well acted.
That isn't how things are in real life.
Marty and Rust even mention how didn't catch everyone involved.on the tape
Boston Globe TV Critic link
Not to throw cold water on NeoGAF's rabid True Detective fanbase, but I'm in full agreement with Matt Gilbert. There are shows more deserving of mass hysteria.
Just wondering if there are a few folks out there feeling the same way.
This is sacrilege around these parts:
So many plot threads left unaddressed or left on the cutting room floor.
It's pretty terrible. Now that I've had years to reflect on it, it just doesn't compare to modern shows.
I want satisfaction; everyone does.Did you want realism or resolution?
Please don't respond with "why not both"
I want satisfaction; everyone does.
Why include the subplots involving the daughters or involving the metaphysical philosophical waxing if none of it leads anywhere? Saying that a film or series can't be criticized because "life has unresolved threads too" is a fucking terrible excuse to include padding and fluff dialogue.
Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed the series a ton, but turning a blind eye to some of the patchy writing/editing is being a bit naive.
I want satisfaction; everyone does.
Why include the subplots involving the daughters or involving the metaphysical philosophical waxing if none of it leads anywhere? Saying that a film or series can't be criticized because "life has unresolved threads too" is a fucking terrible excuse to include padding and fluff dialogue.
Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed the series a ton, but turning a blind eye to some of the patchy writing/editing is being a bit naive.
Why include the subplots involving the daughters or involving the metaphysical philosophical waxing if none of it leads anywhere? Saying that a film or series can't be criticized because "life has unresolved threads too" is a fucking terrible excuse to include padding and fluff dialogue.
It got several scenes dedicated to it and what does it bring to the plot? How does it demonstrate the themes of the narrative? How does this reinforce Hart's character arc?Girl was sexually curious. End of story. Why is this somehow something that needs to be explained?
There was never any metaphysical subplot. Rust just occasionally spouted some philosophy. And Rust never believed in the supernatural at all until the very end.
There was never any metaphysical subplot. Rust just occasionally spouted some philosophy. And Rust never believed in the supernatural at all until the very end.
It got several scenes dedicated to it and what does it bring to the plot? How does it demonstrate the themes of the narrative? How does this reinforce Hart's character arc?
I have yet to hear any responses that actually answer my questions. "It exists for the sake of existing" isn't acceptable, it's wasting the viewers time. Films get eviscerated by critics for directionless plot threads and inconclusive side stories all the time, I see no reason why True Detective should get a pass just because "derr, life is inconclusive man". If I'm forking over 8 hours of my life to a story then I want it to earn its' length, not fill it with a bunch of half-baked threads.
Lol at the Americans being mentioned in the same breath as Breaking Bad.
So many plot threads left unaddressed or left on the cutting room floor.
I would argue he still doesn't believe in the supernatural. All he felt was the overwhelming love if his daughter - in the deeper darkness that he was drifting towards. If you let Rust explain it, he would likely tell you that it was all a construct of the purity of his focused senses as his brain began to shut off functions one by one, like a vast department store snapping off banks of light in succession. His final thoughts rested on the singular concept of his daughter and the unquenchable love he had for her. As he slipped into nothingness, he held on to that and discovered that the love he was hanging onto enveloped him, as if it was reflected back towards him, or returned.
At that moment, he fully experienced what he had seen in the eyes of all those photos of dead bodies he'd been staring at for days on end... That they welcomed it, in that last moment. To him, I imagine, it finally clicked. The reason they all welcomed the darkness was because that void was actually filled with the love of those that they themselves loved above all - they filled that void with what they brought with them, what they most cherished.
To me (a believer in God), none of what he described evoked anything of the supernatural... More like what you would sense if you overdosed on sedatives or an anaesthetic. A chemical manipulation of neuronal signaling making you sense something like euphoria. Beautiful in its own way. But not a literal religious experience.
I think his shear turn towards any kind of optimism was the big character development revealed at the end - the dark vs light line.
Edit: What blainethemono said in much fewer words (next post)
Going by what the writer has said about Rust's new worldview being entirely based on physics, I think he still doesn't believe in anything supernatural in the end. He went from having an incredibly pessimistic view of the universe to looking at it in an entirely different light
Alright, that's a pretty solid explanation of that subplot. I feel better about that part of the narrative now.It served the purpose that Marty's home life was slowly falling apart because he was too busy involving himself in self serving behavior. His daughter's chaotic antics actually clear up and get you your resolution by the show's end. She has a career and her mother says as much. Marty didn't even know because he had been out the picture, presumably for a long while.
It pays off at the end of the show. Marty finally gets his moment of redemption with his family. A taste of what could have been, if you will.
Alright, that's a pretty solid explanation of that subplot. I feel better about that part of the narrative now.
My biggest issue though was with the main plotline involving the cultist murders. The show spends much of episodes 5-7 hinting that these cult murders and ritualistic rapes are part of a larger conspiracy that implicates several politicians and goes far and beyond the inbred Scooby Doo villain they end up confronting. The only reference to this after the climax is a throwaway line on the news that mentions how the politicians implicated throughout the season won't be charged. Maybe that's supposed to be the point, highlighting how those who were really pulling the strings got away with it in the end. Or maybe you could argue that the series is supposed to be a character study and that plot specifics aren't the message you should be taking away from the story (or the "Lost Defense" as I like to call it). Either way, it seems weird to spend all that time at the university and all that time having Rust draw family trees just to have it all get resolved after a single psycho hillbilly meets his end. It also seems strange that the two main characters make no mention of the greater conspiracy that didn't get resolved after the climax. It felt to me like they were repeating the same mistake of "we killed a guy so mystery solved then" that they made with Reggie.
Alright, that's a pretty solid explanation of that subplot. I feel better about that part of the narrative now.
My biggest issue though was with the main plotline involving the cultist murders. The show spends much of episodes 5-7 hinting that these cult murders and ritualistic rapes are part of a larger conspiracy that implicates several politicians and goes far and beyond the inbred Scooby Doo villain they end up confronting. The only reference to this after the climax is a throwaway line on the news that mentions how the politicians implicated throughout the season won't be charged. Maybe that's supposed to be the point, highlighting how those who were really pulling the strings got away with it in the end. Or maybe you could argue that the series is supposed to be a character study and that plot specifics aren't the message you should be taking away from the story (or the "Lost Defense" as I like to call it). Either way, it seems weird to spend all that time at the university and all that time having Rust draw family trees just to have it all get resolved after a single psycho hillbilly meets his end. It also seems strange that the two main characters make no mention of the greater conspiracy that didn't get resolved after the climax. It felt to me like they were repeating the same mistake of "we killed a guy so mystery solved then" that they made with Reggie.
The only unresolved thread that bothered me was whether or not that task force that was supposed to take over investigating the original murder was really part of a larger plot from the cultists to sweep the murder under the rug.
It got several scenes dedicated to it and what does it bring to the plot? How does it demonstrate the themes of the narrative? How does this reinforce Hart's character arc?
I have yet to hear any responses that actually answer my questions. "It exists for the sake of existing" isn't acceptable, it's wasting the viewers time. Films get eviscerated by critics for directionless plot threads and inconclusive side stories all the time, I see no reason why True Detective should get a pass just because "derr, life is inconclusive man". If I'm forking over 8 hours of my life to a story then I want it to earn its' length, not fill it with a bunch of half-baked threads.
...When a critic gets his balls in a vice over a little thing like this, they ussually don't like the show at all and are just searching for any tiny reason at all to justify their opinion. Other than the fact that art is subjective, that is.
I want satisfaction; everyone does.
Why include the subplots involving the daughters