speculawyer
Member
Is that lion-headed god holding a laser pistol in its top left hand?
Is that lion-headed god holding a laser pistol in its top left hand?
I was going to respond directly to the points raised, but it appears that the OP just wants someone to justify his baseless beliefs.
I don't think you are interested in truth,; only in getting your own opinion affirmed.
I suspect that religion can be something of a reflection of human psychology and the mentalities of cultures as they were advancing, which is more fascinating than just the idea there's some entity or entities that feel like leaving crap around and telling people how to live their lives.I don't even like to pull the SCIENCE/ATHEISM card on stuff like this. I just think people need to study other religions besides Christianity and realize how brainwashed it is to believe only the recent religious tradition imposed on European culture by the Roman elite.
You people have had 2000 years of talking, the rest of us are pretty over it.Im not here to argue what others believe at all. Its ok to disagree with me 100%. Im cool with it. I was just basing what I said on what Ive seen.
When each of us who are not willing to give anything a chance talk. It gets nowhere.
Im not here to argue what others believe at all. Its ok to disagree with me 100%. Im cool with it. I was just basing what I said on what Ive seen.
When each of us who are not willing to give anything a chance talk. It gets nowhere.
Its ok to disagree with me 100%.
What have you seen?
every person who reads this has to make that decision to
Believe or Not Believe
1. The Universe and Science
2. The Written Word (The Bible)
3. The Morality of Mankind
4. The Person of Jesus Christ (God in Man)
5. Personal Experience through Faith (which cannot be measured, weighed, studied by Science)
The Bible which is known to be God's word to man.
I suspect that religion can be something of a reflection of human psychology and the mentalities of cultures as they were advancing, which is more fascinating than just the idea there's some entity or entities that feel like leaving crap around and telling people how to live their lives.
One side argues for evidence and the other discredits it or vice versa.
It really just brings it back to the first statement.
What have you seen?
Your side has no evidence. None. You literally bring nothing to the table.One side argues for evidence and the other discredits it or vice versa.
It really just brings it back to the first statement.
I don't have a god in this fight but "evidence" isn't what religious people go on, it's faith.
That both sides argue against what is and isnt evidence.
What have you seen?
I don't have a god in this fight but "evidence" isn't what religious people go on, it's faith.
If a person who believes in "the universe, the bible or whatever" as evidence. And you say it is not.
What is it?
If a person who believes in "the universe, the bible or whatever" as evidence. And you say it is not.
What is it?
Your side has no evidence. None. You literally bring nothing to the table.
If a person who believes in "the universe, the bible or whatever" as evidence. And you say it is not.
What is it?
Is a Batman comic evidence of the existence of Bruce Wayne?
It's just the universe, the bible or whatever. It's still not evidence.
I saw a lady who got run over by a truck but we prayed and we prayed and the doctors were able to save one of her legs!
Thats exactly what I meant by the thread. If you see it as no evidence and I say it is. Then by your terms what is it exactly if I say "the universe, the Bible, Jesus etc is evidence"
What is it in your terms exactly other than evidence?
There's a reason that the universe and the bible aren't accepted as evidence. It's not like they are being rejected for the sake of it.
Do you misunderstand the term "evidence"? Something that is tangible and can be empirically proven, or that very least come close to proving a fact?Thats exactly what I meant by the thread. If you see it as no evidence and I say it is. Then by your terms what is it exactly if I say "the universe, the Bible, Jesus etc is evidence"
What is it in your terms exactly other than evidence?
I'm all for mystic experience but it's impossible to experience God, and by that I mean God the supreme being. You can have a sensed presence experience, or an experience of boundlessness, etc, but it's a huge and unexamined leap to go from that to assuming that your experience is pointing to God, that is just a meaning that we're bringing to it, it's undisciplined and it's poor mysticism. You have to treat mysticism like handling snakes, if you're not able to put in the care to grab it the right way you'll be bitten, in which case it's best to not bother attempting it.
But who knows, maybe there are beings with vast powers beyond our comprehension that we could call 'gods', but it seems pointless to worship them unless they're the absolute. However the absolute is beyond our experience and therefore means nothing to us.
I'm all for mystic experience but it's impossible to experience God, and by that I mean God the supreme being. You can have a sensed presence experience, or an experience of boundlessness, etc, but it's a huge and unexamined leap to go from that to assuming that your experience is pointing to God, that is just a meaning that we're bringing to it, it's undisciplined and it's poor mysticism. You have to treat mysticism like handling snakes, if you're not able to put in the care to grab it the right way you'll be bitten, in which case it's best to not bother attempting it.
But who knows, maybe there are beings with vast powers beyond our comprehension that we could call 'gods', but it seems pointless to worship them unless they're the absolute. However the absolute is beyond our experience and therefore means nothing to us.
"the universe, the Bible, Jesus etc is evidence" is a factually and grammatically incorrect sentence.
Jesus etc is however a pretty good song.
If you really are seeking an answer, ask yourself: why are other religious texts not evidence that those gods exist?Thats my question. I really am seeking an answer.
If they are not evidence and they exist and are a physical part of the universe. What sort of evidence or term do you call it?
Shame the rest of her didn't make it!
*rimshot
*booed off stage
Seriously what is it that you call it? If I say The Batman comic is evidence and you say it is not.
The Batman comic is a physical based object, part of the universe and you do not accept it as evidence. Or disagree that is evidence.
What is it? If its not evidence to Batman even though it clearly is related to the subject matter of Batman.
Seriously what is it that you call it? If I say The Bible is evidence and you say it is not.
The Bible is a physical based object, part of the universe and you do not accept it as evidence. Or disagree that is evidence.
What is it? If its not evidence to God even though it clearly is related to the subject matter of God.
Seriously what is it that you call it? If I say The Bible is evidence and you say it is not.
The Bible is a physical based object, part of the universe and you do not accept it as evidence. Or disagree that is evidence.
What is it? If its not evidence to God even though it clearly is related to the subject matter of God.
Hmmmmmm Im lost.
Those are all physical based objects, entities, constructs.
Are you saying that I need an evidence that is not that?
Do you misunderstand the term "evidence"? Something that is tangible and can be empirically proven, or that very least come close to proving a fact?
How exactly does the bible prove anything?
Seriously what is it that you call it? If I say The Bible is evidence and you say it is not.
The Bible is a physical based object, part of the universe and you do not accept it as evidence. Or disagree that is evidence.
What is it? If its not evidence to God even though it clearly is related to the subject matter of God.
Im trying to understand this.
If someone in court presents an object as evidence. The judge does not say to the court. That this object is not evidence just because he says so. It is still evidence regardless of what the judge says right?
Seriously what is it that you call it? If I say The Bible is evidence and you say it is not.
The Bible is a physical based object, part of the universe and you do not accept it as evidence. Or disagree that is evidence.
What is it? If its not evidence to God even though it clearly is related to the subject matter of God.
Please provide us with Noah's Ark, the Ark of the Covenant, the Holy Grail, or something that's actual evidence rather than the bible which is basically hearsay.
The Bible is a physical based object, part of the universe and you do not accept it as evidence. Or disagree that is evidence.