I'm merely stating I understand why the media side feels like their hands are tied, as shitty as it may be. It's not like the gaming press is actively lying about things. They are at worst lying by omission due to NDAs or assumptions that stuff will get fixed before games hit the shelves. Putting the uncut "truth" may end up with dated reviews that may hold no value at all at launch, and people calling them out on inaccuracies and potential biases. Again, doesn't excuse the relationship the media has with publishers, but unless they try to chase independent funding and don't mind reviewing games later than their peers, this relationship appears to be unavoidable in this industry. I do expect them to do their part in following-up on the state of these games though. If a game ends up having launch issues, or gameplay hindering bugs that were shipped, it's their duty to report on them. I'm not sure if they already do this or not though.
The consumer on the other hand gets to experience the games as they are when money is expected to put down for them. They are the ones getting exploited, and if they don't learn a lesson from past exploitations, I don't know who else to blame. Your Fox New analogy is not a bad one, though I think the publisher is probably the Fox News. Viewers give channels like that its power, and if they probably shouldn't tune in if they ever want them to change.