• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

INCEPTION |OT| Movie of the Forever

Status
Not open for further replies.
I like Solo. But also think he is kinda sad.

I avoided this thread and others like it on the internet until I watched the flick. I recommend most people do that from now on.
 
http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2010...cial-effects-helped-joseph-gordon-levitt-fly/
Interesting read about the visual effects used in
the hotel scene.

One particular challenge for the sequence was a scene
in which Arthur takes five weightless sleeping bodies, wraps a chord around them, and floats them down the hall into an elevator.
“How did we do it?” says Corbould. “Chris has sworn ourselves to secrecy on that one.”
Son of a bitch :lol .

That whole scene was just mind blowingly awesome. It looked so freaking real. I hope more film makers throw away the total dependence on CG to make such great and complex sequences. It never looks convincing.
 
rhino4evr said:
Actually birdie I'm making fun of solo. I understand you're criticism even if I don't agree with it at all.

Attempting to make fun of Solo only makes him stronger. I learned that the hard way a long, long time ago.
 
rhino4evr said:
Actually birdie I'm making fun of solo.


And failing miserably. If you knew anything about me you'd know Im the last person who is looking for someone to make up their mind on something/validate it for them. I have my own opinions and am comfortable with them. Ben not liking the movie has no bearing on how I'll feel about it.

When the hivemind arrives, thats when the party really begins for me!
 
Gomu Gomu said:
http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2010...cial-effects-helped-joseph-gordon-levitt-fly/
Interesting read about the visual effects used in
the hotel scene.


Son of a bitch :lol .

That whole scene was just mind blowingly awesome. It looked so freaking real. I hope more film makers throw away the total dependence on CG to make such great and complex sequences. It never looks convincing.

Agreed, I just couldn't believe what I was seeing. There were only a few section where his face is a little strained from bloodflow, but it was otherwise flawless.
 
Solo said:
What the shit? Nameless?! This is now a LOST thread.

I'm on the last five episodes of Season 6. I swear to God, if you fuckers spoil Lost for me in this goddamn thread, I will rain fiery death upon all of you.
 
Skiptastic said:
I'm on the last five episodes of Season 6. I swear to God, if you fuckers spoil Lost for me in this goddamn thread, I will rain fiery death upon all of you.

LOST ends with credits
 
Solo said:
And failing miserably. If you knew anything about me you'd know Im the last person who is looking for someone to make up their mind on something/validate it for them. I have my own opinions and am comfortable with them. Ben not liking the movie has no bearing on how I'll feel about it.

When the hivemind arrives, thats when the party really begins for me!
Yeah but that is really the insult..the fact that you think that the rest of GAF is nothing but some "hive mind" and that you are some what above it all is more ridiculous then any earned praise this film receives.

But I digress, I hope you enjoy the film as much as the majority of us. As it's truly one of better movies to come out of Hollywood in a long time.
 
StuBurns said:
And a series of images which the showrunners didn't even approve. For shame.


And then fallout for the misinterpretation of said images by the media/many viewers.....priceless :lol :lol :lol :lol
 
Saw it in IMAX last night (a recommendation I wholeheartedly support) and found it to be a rather wonderful film. It's been a while since I've seen any sort of film that's displayed this much creativity and was able to "land it." My biggest issues do echo some of the complaints that have been raised: a couple of clunky expository bits near the beginning and during the second act hurt the otherwise smooth pacing of the film and, for the most part, the various plot details are neatly handed to you. This second point may not apply to everyone, judging by the discussion at the end of the film from some of the exiting audience having a very confused tone. :lol

I don't know for sure if it's Nolan's best film, but he's definitely proved his worth and he's destined for even greater things. For now, it's a thrilling and smart art film that plays with a blockbuster budget; we could use a few more of these.
 
Solo said:
And then fallout for the misinterpretation of said images by the media/many viewers.....priceless :lol :lol :lol :lol
It was unthinkably stupid really. I'd love to hear them explain how it happened. I don't think a tone setter in anticipation for the news is a good enough reason.
 
I'm genuinely curious to see what happens with Nolan post-Batman 3. Inception was a carte-blanche $200M reward-for-BB/TDKs-revenue-generation project from WB to Nolan. If Inception doesnt light the box office on fire, it will be interesting to see what kind of budgets he is handed, and how much freedom he is given post-Batman 3.
 
Gomu Gomu said:
http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2010...cial-effects-helped-joseph-gordon-levitt-fly/
Interesting read about the visual effects used in
the hotel scene.


Son of a bitch :lol .

That whole scene was just mind blowingly awesome. It looked so freaking real. I hope more film makers throw away the total dependence on CG to make such great and complex sequences. It never looks convincing.

What about the explosions. Were they real? I mean
the explosions in Ariadne's first dream, when it's collapsing
.
 
Solo said:
I'm genuinely curious to see what happens with Nolan post-Batman 3. Inception was a carte-blanche $200M reward-for-BB/TDKs-revenue-generation project from WB to Nolan. If Inception doesnt light the box office on fire, it will be interesting to see what kind of budgets he is handed, and how much freedom he is given post-Batman 3.

Wouldn't a lot of that depend on other factors too? Like how well Batman 3 does, how Superman progresses and how much of a role he (or his brother) has in it, what other WB IPs he might be interested in, etc. Even if Inception doesn't set the box office on fire, I think there are enough reasons for WB to want to keep Nolan close and on good terms.
 
Solo said:
I'm genuinely curious to see what happens with Nolan post-Batman 3. Inception was a carte-blanche $200M reward-for-BB/TDKs-revenue-generation project from WB to Nolan. If Inception doesnt light the box office on fire, it will be interesting to see what kind of budgets he is handed, and how much freedom he is given post-Batman 3.
If inception is a hit..and I think it will be, Nolan is Hollywoods new golden boy..move over speilberg.

Also..I don't think Batman 3 will have a chance at making the same amount of money as TDK..a lot of that money is all Ledger.
 
rhino4evr said:
If inception is a hit..and I think it will be, Nolan is Hollywoods new golden boy..move over speilberg.

Thanks for jinxing this movie and Nolan!

mnight_newsweek.jpg
 
Littleberu said:
What about the explosions. Were they real? I mean
the explosions in Ariadne's first dream, when it's collapsing
.

Pretty certain that most of them were. Someone posted a shot with wires attached to everything that gets
"blown away"
, so a lot of it seemed practical.
 
duckroll said:
Wouldn't a lot of that depend on other factors too? Like how well Batman 3 does, how Superman progresses and how much of a role he (or his brother) has in it, what other WB IPs he might be interested in, etc. Even if Inception doesn't set the box office on fire, I think there are enough reasons for WB to want to keep Nolan close and on good terms.

Well, Im assuming that Batman 3 will be a big hit, obviously (I expect a reduced domestic box office and an increased overseas box office compared to TDK, with the WW take being about the same as TDK's).

And what Im trying to say isnt that WB and Nolan will go separate ways. Any studio worth their salt would retain him. Im just saying that the days of $200M budgets for his own concepts and complete freedom may go away, and he may be reduced to reasonable budgets and studio notes, like everyone else.
 
Littleberu said:
What about the explosions. Were they real? I mean
the explosions in Ariadne's first dream, when it's collapsing
.

Yeah, that scene looked great too. I hope the bluray is filled with content. TDK BD releases was a major disappointment to me.
 
Solo said:
Well, Im assuming that Batman 3 will be a big hit, obviously (I expect a reduced domestic box office and an increased overseas box office compared to TDK, with the WW take being about the same as TDK's).

And what Im trying to say isnt that WB and Nolan will go separate ways. Any studio worth their salt would retain him. Im just saying that the days of $200M budgets for his own concepts and complete freedom may go away, and he may be reduced to reasonable budgets and studio notes, like everyone else.

I think Inception is a big movie which Nolan has wanted to do for a very long time. The other one obviously would be his Howard Hughes movie. Aside from these two concepts, I don't see him itching to do 200 million dollar blockbusters every other year. Honestly, after Batman 3 I expect another lower budget film like Prestige from him.
 
solo acts like he's too cool to get excited for a nolan film yet i saw him blow his load over the dumbest things in lost.. it's pretty funny.
 
Jason's Ultimatum said:
Tim Burton to direct Batman 3. Johnny Depp as Bruce Wayne/Batman.

I'm trying to decide if this would be better or worse satire if he hadn't already directed two Batman films sans Depp.
 
Caught the midnight viewing. The movie is awesome and the facts are that the haters are wrong or someone planted the idea in their head to hate it at some point.
 
Jeff-DSA said:
Caught the midnight viewing. The movie is awesome and the facts are that the haters are wrong or someone planted the idea in their head to hate it at some point.

Please don't do this...

Inception is by no means a perfect film, far from it, and not finding it as such is a perfectly justifiable position.
 
harSon said:
Please don't do this...

Inception is by no means a perfect film, far from it, and not finding it as such is a perfectly justifiable position.
I don't believe there is such a thing as a perfect film. Even my favorite film (Vertigo) has easy to spot flaws. The question should never be is this movie without fault, it should be given the films content do the faults really matter and do they actually effect your enjoyment of the film?
 
harSon said:
Please don't do this...

Inception is by no means a perfect film, far from it, and not finding it as such is a perfectly justifiable position.

SPOILER.
I was just making a joke about the implanted idea.
END SPOILER.
 
I didn't know there were going to be midnight showings. My prediction for the weekend is $70-75 million, with Solo suitably declaring that to be a BOMBA and that Nolan will never find work in Hollywood ever again!

higher than 80 and Solo will have to be put on suicide watch :(
 
rhino4evr said:
Help me...is this good or bad?

Good for an original movie. I think Avatar made around $3.5 mil midnights, since thats the only original movie I can think of for midnights. Everything else is usually a well known franchise.

Now if this was Batman 3, WB would have to be talked off the ledge.
 
The special effects in this movie, 90% of the time we real enough looking to never make me question their authenticity. No other movie has attained that for me. In fact, the entire time I was watching Avatar or similar blockbusters, I couldn't help thinking "all of this is faaaaaakkkkeeee". Never had those moments with this movie.

Acting all the way around was phenomenal, music was intense, cinematography and pacing was awesome as well. Ambiguous and defined in all the right places.

Christopher Nolan is the best modern director.
 
jett said:
I didn't know there were going to be midnight showings. My prediction for the weekend is $70-75 million, with Solo suitably declaring that to be a BOMBA and that Nolan will never find work in Hollywood ever again!

All I saw was "if this doesn't perform well he might have to work with a reduced budget on Batman 3." Did he say some stuff before that? Thread moves fast.
 
Solo said:
Ive seen Benjamin Birdie, Amirox, and Cheebs give it poor/mediocre reviews.
Well, that just about assures I'm probably going to enjoy this movie quite a bit. Good to know, Thanks!
 
AlteredBeast said:
The special effects in this movie, 90% of the time we real enough looking to never make me question their authenticity. No other movie has attained that for me. In fact, the entire time I was watching Avatar or similar blockbusters, I couldn't help thinking "all of this is faaaaaakkkkeeee". Never had those moments with this movie.

Acting all the way around was phenomenal, music was intense, cinematography and pacing was awesome as well. Ambiguous and defined in all the right places.

Christopher Nolan is the best modern director.

Let the hyperbole continue!

Fuck waiting a few months, hell - even a few weeks after seeing the film. Lets just spout these statements while we're still on a movie high!

I still love you beast, but best modern director is a BIG call to make.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom