polyh3dron said:Estimates are moving up... Nikki Finke had it at $55 mil for the weekend this morning but now it looks like it'll rake in $62.1 mil.
CoolTrick said:It's not that I COMPLETELY agree with brandonoh.
mYm|17| said:Just saw it and damn was it good stuff.
Arthur and Eames were my favorite in the movie.
62 mil is EXACTLY what I predictedDMczaf said:"What an impressive start for the Warner Bros/Legendary Pictures mind-bending scifi thriller from 3,792 theaters, with Friday's $21.6 million (including $3M midnight shows in 1,600 locations) and Saturday's $22.5 million. The weekend opening should be $62.1M, solid for a 2D films, against a $150M budget. Audiences rated it an overall "B+" Cinemascore, with the under-25 crowd giving it an "A"."
Wow, it actually increased over Friday. Usually movies drop or stay flat after opening day. Hopefully this is a good sign.
Dead said:62 mil is EXACTLY what I predicted
feelsgoodman.gif
Inferno313 said:Watch out Avatar, here we come. :lol :lol :lol /sarcasm
SamuraiX- said:
BobsRevenge said:Spoiler thread got tired. This place is happening. I go to where the party is.
You forgetting about Tom fucking Berenger is in this movie?teiresias said:Loved the movie, and it's good too see Tom Hardy is getting work again after that embarrassing role in the Star Trek franchise.
I don't know how you thought to mention Stephen Soderbergh in this thread, but yes. Yes he is significantly better than Nolan as a director.polyh3dron said:
Only enjoyable films he's ever made are The Good German and Che, and that got a bit tiring after the first 3 hours.BobsRevenge said:I don't know how you thought to mention Stephen Soderbergh in this thread, but yes. Yes he is significantly better than Nolan as a director.
What does Tom Berenger have to do with what I said? Unless he's also had the misfortune to play a badly scripted clone of Captain Picard then why even mention him in relation to my post?Sanjuro Tsubaki said:You forgetting about Tom fucking Berenger is in this movie?
I haven't seen Che or The Good German. I feel like I really ought to though. I'm a huge fan (should be obvious by the fact that I have him from a scene in what is probably his most obscure movie as my avatar).Veidt said:Only enjoyable films he's ever made are The Good German and Che, and that got a bit tiring after the first 3 hours.
Disclaimer: This is just an opinion.
Rapping Granny said:This.
Eames completely stole the spotlight for me, just like Joker in TDK.
Yeah, Ocean 11 was rather fun to watch to be honest.BobsRevenge said:I haven't seen Che. I feel like I really ought to though. I'm a huge fan (should be obvious by the fact that I have him from a scene in what is probably his most obscure movie as my avatar).
Don't know how you can call Ocean's 11 unenjoyable though! That's quite possibly the slickest, most genuinely entertaining Hollywood movie released in the last decade.
Traffic is also far more deep than Inception, and actually understands human drives and emotions.
Because Tom Hardy isn't old and washed up. Nolan is running a soup kitchen for Berenger, Rutger Hauer, and Eric Roberts.teiresias said:What does Tom Berenger have to do with what I said? Unless he's also had the misfortune to play a badly scripted clone of Captain Picard then why even mention him in relation to my post?
:lol :lol :lolSanjuro Tsubaki said:Because Tom Hardy isn't old and washed up. Nolan is running a soup kitchen for Berenger, Rutger Hauer, and Eric Roberts.
blame space said:this is the worst kind of post. i don't even know the budget of the film but at least i hope something does well in the hopes that more projects like it can be made. anyone who thought this would outgross Avatar was either out of their minds or just making a bullshit comment like you just did.
Yeah, I teared up and I'm not even a Dad yet ..Dreams-Visions said:I ain't no punk, but whentears came on out.it became clear that he would finally see his kids
Classic ending too.
Very well done. Will see again.
9/10 from me.
Say what? Just wow, I havent seen a single person complain about the ending until now .. just no words ..GhaleonEB said:The Good
Strong performances across the board. No stand outs, no weak spots; a fantastic ensemble.
A clever premise.
A couple of neat sequences.
Good sets?
The Bad
Rarely does a movie find so many ways to piss me off.
Chris Nolan can't direct an action scene to save his fucking life. Nolan, study James Cameron movies to understand how to frame and film a coherent action scene. Jesus christ on a pogo stick this made Batman Begins' action scenes look elegant.
It ran a half hour too long.
Omitting key information that everyone in the movie knows but which the audience does not is a terrible way to generate suspense.
The score was intrusive and way too constantly noticeable. It was good but far too obnoxiously used.
The ending shot: FUCKYOUFUCKYOUFUCKYOUFUCKYOU
I'm not into grading movies, but I'd give it a C were I to do so. Strong acting and a great concept with shoddy direction and edition, and a giant "fuck you" of an ending. It didn't ruin my date night, but it did get my wife and I trashing it hard on the way home. I respect what Nolan was trying to do, but hate how he did it.
GhaleonEB said:The Bad
Omitting key information that everyone in the movie knows but which the audience does not is a terrible way to generate suspense.
I said this to myself leaving but ultimately it would have been pointless to start building stories for all the various players. The core and emotion of the story was with Cobb and the payoff by the end is much more stronger and involving. That being said, the job all the supporting actors did with limited inspiration were all tremendous...this is something great directors accomplish from their actors.Byakuya769 said:Incredible movie. The supporting cast could have used a little more fleshing out, but I'd recommend this film to about anyone.
Me either, but when you know how much a guy has been through and is about to finally get what means most to him...shit is touching. It's easy to put yourself in the characters shoes considering how much of his background we got.irfan said:Yeah, I teared up and I'm not even a Dad yet ..
Rickard said:When?
What is this in relation to? I honestly can't recall anything that would give me that complaint.GhaleonEB said:Omitting key information that everyone in the movie knows but which the audience does not is a terrible way to generate suspense.
Yeah, I dont think I've felt as much emotion in Nolan's previous movies. To think some people are saying this movie is emotionless, robotic, cold is just ..Dreams-Visions said:Me either, but when you know how much a guy has been through and is about to finally get what means most to him...shit is touching. It's easy to put yourself in the characters shoes considering how much of his background we got.
GhaleonEB said:It ran a half hour too long.
Not knowing what it is isn't causing artifical suspense because what it is has no bearing on the film until the rest of the characters know the score later in that scene - at which point it is explained. The audience knows about it when it becomes a factor to the characters.KHarvey16 said:I assume he's talking aboutTo be honest though, not mentioning it makes sense given that it's never a problem unlesslimbo.you go get the super powered sedative from some underground chemist.
Rapping Granny said:Eames completely stole the spotlight for me, just like Joker in TDK.
Indeed. Indeed.irfan said:Yeah, I dont think I've felt as much emotion in Nolan's previous movies. To think some people are saying this movie is emotionless, robotic, cold is just ..
That being said, the job all the supporting actors did with limited inspiration were all tremendous...this is something great directors accomplish from their actors.
That train scene with his wife blew me away. Some the hardest, fastest, emotional stuff I've seen in a film in some time. Toy Story 3 notwithstanding.
GhaleonEB said:The Good
Strong performances across the board. No stand outs, no weak spots; a fantastic ensemble.
A clever premise.
A couple of neat sequences.
Good sets?
The Bad
Rarely does a movie find so many ways to piss me off.
Chris Nolan can't direct an action scene to save his fucking life. Nolan, study James Cameron movies to understand how to frame and film a coherent action scene. Jesus christ on a pogo stick this made Batman Begins' action scenes look elegant.
It ran a half hour too long.
Omitting key information that everyone in the movie knows but which the audience does not is a terrible way to generate suspense.
The score was intrusive and way too constantly noticeable. It was good but far too obnoxiously used.
The ending shot: FUCKYOUFUCKYOUFUCKYOUFUCKYOU
I'm not into grading movies, but I'd give it a C were I to do so. Strong acting and a great concept with shoddy direction and editing, and a giant "fuck you" of an ending. It didn't ruin my date night, but it did get my wife and I trashing it hard on the way home. I respect what Nolan was trying to do, but hate how he did it.
Way, way over-rated. I might have to go defend BenjaminBirdie in the spoilers thread...
CoolTrick said:Um, no they didn't. This was the worst part of the fucking movie.
I mean, what the fuck did Joseph Gordon Levitt say/do outside of kissing Ellen Page?
Where did all the life of Ellen Page go?
Why does Tom Hardy's smirk now count as a "tremendous job"?
They SUCKED.
But it was the direction. Chris Nolan insists that everything be hyper-serious and monotone. You don't need to spend more time than the movie did to add some characterization to the mix; there just was none.