Thats BS, whats is next gen gameplay? It doesn't exist, gameplay slowly evolves over time, it's a bs statement.
Next gen games play exactly like last gen games tbh.
Thats BS, whats is next gen gameplay? It doesn't exist, gameplay slowly evolves over time, it's a bs statement.
I don´t see anything wrong with the scores, i´m surprised there´s a lot of 9, the game is clearly a 7, maybe an 8 for it´s graphics only.
Looks like a next gen game, plays like a old gen game = 7-8 is fair.
Ha Sessler getting grilled and now we love Polygon!!
Never change gaf!
Lacks a fuckton of reviews for now, so that number isn't worth much.
It's my favorite open-world game in years.
Lacks a fuckton of reviews for now, so that number isn't worth much.
Solid scores. About what I expected and in line with the previous games. A nice addition to the PS4's catalogue but not a system seller.
Sessler giving Titanfall a 5/5 despite the game having basic features missing makes his inFamous review that much more of a joke.
Sessler . . . a sad little man-child. I wish he'd just leave the industry to people who are still willing to put in some critical thinking skills to it . . . of course, that's at best like three people (maybe).
Looks like a next gen game, plays like a old gen game = 7-8 is fair.
Ha. PC Games.
Just watched and wow, that sessler review is a joke. That man cannot loose any more credibility, he doesn't have any left.
I really like Sessler he is one of my favorite reviewers but giving Titanfall 5/5 and 3/5 for infamous is hard to swallow...Sessler is a goddamn joke.
It's my favorite open-world game in years.
I don´t see anything wrong with the scores, i´m surprised there´s a lot of 9, the game is clearly a 7, maybe an 8 for it´s graphics only.
Looks like a next gen game, plays like a old gen game = 7-8 is fair.
I'm going to hold off on this game, because I've had enough open world repetition to hold me off for months with AC4
I don´t see anything wrong with the scores, i´m surprised there´s a lot of 9, the game is clearly a 7, maybe an 8 for it´s graphics only.
Looks like a next gen game, plays like a old gen game = 7-8 is fair.
This, it's an assinine statement.
Ha, I got the same feeling. GAF was always raving about Sessler and how good he was in his videos. Now they're shitting on him.
I don't get it and I don't really care. He's just 1 guy out of a dozen other reviewers.
All these reviews are irrelevant without the day one patch.
What a clusterfuck.
So Edge says it looks like shit, and Sessler says it plays like shit.
And yet it's sitting mid 80's on metacritic.
These are not really subjective statements. Really highlights the problem with certain areas of the games press.
Why are we even giving these reviewers the time of day?
They are corrupt, incompetent, juvenile fanboys fuelled by junk food and dependant on the very teet they "review".
One bad review can blacklist them from events, early review copies, merchandise etc which will end their career.
We know it happens. We know they get bribed. We know they have agendas. We know they suck fucking ass. So why are we still treating them like they matter?
Sessler is a goddamn joke.
EGM 9/10
http://www.egmnow.com/articles/reviews/egm-review-infamous-second-son/
I see a new power in this review so be careful!
I know, I've beat the other 2 infamous games, they are much more fun to play and combat doesn't even compare to the shite in AC4.This plays nothing like AC......................
4Players.de 74 (suckers... infamous 2 had a similar score)
http://www.4players.de/4players.php...Station4/34432/79585/inFamous_Second_Son.html
...What is a system seller?
This probably isn't for you, which is fine. I personally found the inFamous series to be better than any of Naughty Dog's games.Expected reviews. Sucker Punch is merely a good studio, not a great one.
I'm not sure if this will be my cup of tea. I thought infamous 1 was horrendous.