It's generally better to run in the fasted state (as in running after you wake up and before you eat) since your body will start to use fat as it's fuel source during that time, but running at any time during the fasting isn't bad at all. Run whenever you want. The fasting is merely to trick your metabolism so running won't ruin anything.Question;
I like running late at night after I come home. Will I still be able to do this?
Say I start the Bulletproof Fasting program. It says not to eat after 8pm. I run around 10pm. Is it 'healthy' to fast and run 5-10k and not eat anything after?
I'm interested in this but got grad school. Not sure if I can concentrate enough without eating/caffeine.
There is no priming required with Cheat Mode. Non-training days, or "control days" as Silverhydra refers to them, actually have quite a bit more leeway than Berkhan's IF strategies:One question - do you have to do low carb for a week or so prior to it, to "prime" your body, like Carb Backloading recommends?
With this description a possible interpretation of your own control days could be eating low-carb, albeit preferably in the framework of Paleo principles.Control days are days where you do not lift weights, they are designed to optimize and preserve health and as a preemptive strike against possible harms done on weightlifting days. They are guided by the Paleo principles. The In-depth article can be found here.
- Eat mostly Paleo foods; some leeway is fine, but keep it minimal
- Eat a minimum of four meals a day
- Try to get more fatty acids, fibers, and vegetables on these days since they are under-consumed on work days
- You may intermittent fast, or you may resume day-long eating habits
- Relax; dont lift heavy shit
So is fasting the new fad thing?
The gluten free fad must be coming to a close.
I wonder what's next.
There is no priming required with Cheat Mode. Non-training days, or "control days" as Silverhydra refers to them, actually have quite a bit more leeway than Berkhan's IF strategies:
With this description a possible interpretation of your own control days could be eating low-carb, albeit preferably in the framework of Paleo principles.
The trick is not having too much fat on those post workout meals.
You can have as much black coffee or tea during your fasted period since that contains minimal calories or something. I've heard a ton of people drinking coffee when they wake up and it doesn't count as having broken the fast.
People also chew sugarless gum and stuff to keep the food cravings at bay.
That part is actually a lot more simple than I initially thought. I just had a massive PWO meal (almost 1400 calories) and the large majority of the overall fat in that meal (~12g) came from the natural peanut butter I ate, with slight contributions from the oatmeal and pasta sauce.
I also have to eat dinner again in like 2.5 hours and I'm still stuffed.
Why are you eating again? Bulking? How has CM been working for you? I think I'm going to start after my normal cheat day tomorrow.
Cheat mode?.
What did you mean by CM?
Cheat mode?
Ah.
I'm actually not doing the Cheat Mode thing, more just carb cycling workout thing like outlined in Martin Berkham's guide in the OP. High-carb low-fat foods for workout days, low-carb higher-fat on rest days, with an eating window of ~6-8 hours.
So far I am really digging the eating schedule and it doesn't interfere with my social life or whatever. Even if it would, the eating window can be modified so easily that's it's almost a non-issue.
Started up again. Nice not having to worry about breakfast again. I'm doing Martin Berkham style. 16 hours off and 8 hour eating window.
It's interesting how your body adapts.
Decided to start yesterday instead of January.
I agree, it feels...weird I guess is the way to put it. I'm sure it will take a week for my body to adjust. I'm basically doing a small meal around 3, then a huge meal after working out. Before working out one scoop of whey with water. On workout days more carbs, on rest days more fat, always high protein. 8 hour window of eating, just like you.
I'm enjoying my 24oz black coffee this morning![]()
I think I'm going to give this a go.
Starvation mode is mostly a myth, originating from the Minnesota Starvation Experiment, where participants were given 50% of their maintenance calories for months. They lost weight until their body simply had no source for ample calories (fat storage or food intake).
There are no other studies that show such metabolic slowdown; some metabolic slowdown does occur, but it is not at such a level to hinder weight loss until there are no body fat stores left. A review of existing literature found little decrease in metabolism that wasn't explained by the weight loss.
It is very difficult to actually enter starvation mode. There is even a report of an obese man who fasted for 382 days with no significant ill effects. A slowing of the metabolic rate was noted, but it was nowhere near enough to halt weight loss.
The entire "Top Ten Fasting Myths" article is worth reading for anyone who is interested in the subject but remains wary of supposed consequences. The scope of the article is beyond what a single post could cover but as the questions arise old hats of IF could chime in where necessary.4. Myth: Fasting tricks the body into "starvation mode".
Truth
Efficient adaptation to famine was important for survival during rough times in our evolution. Lowering metabolic rate during starvation allowed us to live longer, increasing the possibility that we might come across something to eat. Starvation literally means starvation. It doesn't mean skipping a meal not eating for 24 hours. Or not eating for three days even. The belief that meal skipping or short-term fasting causes "starvation mode" is so completely ridiculous and absurd that it makes me want to jump out the window.
Looking at the numerous studies I've read, the earliest evidence for lowered metabolic rate in response to fasting occurred after 60 hours (-8% in resting metabolic rate). Other studies show metabolic rate is not impacted until 72-96 hours have passed (George Cahill has contributed a lot on this topic).
Seemingly paradoxical, metabolic rate is actually increased in short-term fasting. For some concrete numbers, studies have shown an increase of 3.6% - 10% after 36-48 hours (Mansell PI, et al, and Zauner C, et al). This makes sense from an evolutionary perspective. Epinephrine and norepinephrine (adrenaline/noradrenaline) sharpens the mind and makes us want to move around. Desirable traits that encouraged us to seek for food, or for the hunter to kill his prey, increasing survival. At some point, after several days of no eating, this benefit would confer no benefit to survival and probably would have done more harm than good; instead, an adaptation that favored conservation of energy turned out to be advantageous. Thus metabolic rate is increased in short-term fasting (up to 60 hours).
Again, I have choosen extreme examples to show how absurd the myth of "starvation mode" is - especially when you consider that the exact opposite is true in the context of how the term is thrown around.
Origin
I guess some genius read that fasting or starvation causes metabolic rate to drop and took that to mean that meal skipping, or not eating for a day or two, would cause starvation mode.
The problem with health related information is that I can read and study all day, but I don't know who to believe, or who's telling the truth, ever.
I've been getting good results doing intermittent fasting, but I've had difficulty deciding when I should work out. I've heard its better to work out fasted and then break your fast an hour or two after your workout. I've been trying that but its hard to consistently maintain for me because of my part-time job.
Anybody know some specifics in this area? I'm new to fasting, and I've seen some results over the past few weeks however I want to continue to improve my method of doing it.
Some days will be worse than others.. You'll just wake up moody and craving all the time until your first meal.Starting day 4 today. At around 7:30am and 12pm, I get really hungry but then it goes away. So far not nearly as hard as I thought it would be.
Some days will be worse than others.. You'll just wake up moody and craving all the time until your first meal.
Lifting while fasted sounds like a nightmare. Am i reading this right?
It's not, I actually feel like I'm more focused and have more strength. It's probably placebo, but that's how I feel like. Or felt, I'm not really fasting these days.
I'll look into the research. I read a paper that mentioned to delay weight training after taking a pre-workout shake because the body supplants HGH easier when taxed under more limited resources. My problem is that I don't see myself completing a workout without eating beforehand because I just don't have the energy. There are a few times I've tried it and i recall bad results.
Wait, only 16 hours? In that case I've done this many times just from skipping a late breakfast.This is just fasting for 16 hours at a time for males, 14 for women.
Tomorrow is my first weigh in but I was curious and got on the scale today. Didn't lose a pound. I'll give it another week try but if I stay the same I'm stopping. Reminds me of doing ketosis for a month and not losing a pound. I swear my body is fucked up.
Wait, only 16 hours? In that case I've done this many times just from skipping a late breakfast.
Some days will be worse than others.. You'll just wake up moody and craving all the time until your first meal.