Atraveller
Banned
The was very obvious, but how that happened still made my jaw dropped.I saw the fight coming a mile away, but I actually did like the Matt Damon subplot.
I also called the twist of Murphy's Ghost being Future Coop.
The was very obvious, but how that happened still made my jaw dropped.I saw the fight coming a mile away, but I actually did like the Matt Damon subplot.
I also called the twist of Murphy's Ghost being Future Coop.
Edmunds sent out an initial signal with data but shortly thereafter died in a landslide. One of the final scenes showing Brand digging either the beacon or Edmunds up from a bunch of rocks. The implication is a land slide.
Nature is a bitch.
Well now, can't have our hero's way to the pretty girl's heart blocked now, can we.
I thought it was pretty stupid and didn't enjoy it at all. It felt like Nolan took a month, watched 2001, Contact, Apollo 13, Star Wars, Alien, and Prometheus, then marathoned a couple seasons of Ancient Aliens and decided to make a movie. The robots were so stupid and comical. The power of love saves humanity. That "twist" that I figured out very early on (although not how they got to the reveal). Some really stupid as shit dialogue befitting a Nolan movie. Stuff supposed to sound cool or deep but is actually dumb as shit if you think about anything for a second. I thought it aped pretty much all of the great space movies, and didn't do anything as well as any of those movies. About 90 minutes in I was getting pretty fed up with the movie. Then it lasted another 90 minutes and kept getting dumber.
Did not like it AT ALL.
I thought it was pretty stupid and didn't enjoy it at all. It felt like Nolan took a month, watched 2001, Contact, Apollo 13, Star Wars, Alien, and Prometheus, then marathoned a couple seasons of Ancient Aliens and decided to make a movie. The robots were so stupid and comical. The power of love saves humanity. That "twist" that I figured out very early on (although not how they got to the reveal). Some really stupid as shit dialogue befitting a Nolan movie. Stuff supposed to sound cool or deep but is actually dumb as shit if you think about anything for a second. I thought it aped pretty much all of the great space movies, and didn't do anything as well as any of those movies. About 90 minutes in I was getting pretty fed up with the movie. Then it lasted another 90 minutes and kept getting dumber.
Did not like it AT ALL.
Just saw it on IMAX today, I enjoyed it aside from two fairly minor issues that bugged me, so hopefully someone can provide reasonable answers...
1. How did Cooper get from inside a black hole to floating in space near Saturn? The black hole and the wormhole are two different things, right?
2. Was Cooper Station near Saturn because it was on its way to the wormhole, or was it orbiting Saturn? If the latter, why place a large scale colony (as opposed to a transit hub) near Saturn where there's almost no sunlight?
Just saw it on IMAX today, I enjoyed it aside from two fairly minor issues that bugged me, so hopefully someone can provide reasonable answers...
1. How did Cooper get from inside a black hole to floating in space near Saturn? The black hole and the wormhole are two different things, right?
2. Was Cooper Station near Saturn because it was on its way to the wormhole, or was it orbiting Saturn? If the latter, why place a large scale colony (as opposed to a transit hub) near Saturn where there's almost no sunlight?
Loved it, I'm sure the shine will wear off shortly but right now I'm just excited at hard science fiction in a Blockbuster. Most of my issues were with the first act and how the premise was set up, but once they got to space I thought it was great. Totally did not see Evil Matt Damon coming, but it made perfect sense. Easily my favorite part of the movie.
Just curious, do you like any Nolan films?
Dr. Mann really wasn't "evil" or maniacal in any way. Like Brand, he was doing what he thought he needed to do to preserve the future of the human race.
I like the Batman series, and Inception. Insomnia was okay.
The robots looked fucking stupid, like they were straight out of a Lost in Space of Star Trek TOS or something. They looked ridiculous. No idea how those were supposed to not be comical.
the "future human" things was pure speculation on cooper's part. I wouldn't read too much into it or make the bootstrap paradox a certain thing.
The robots looked fucking stupid, like they were straight out of a Lost in Space of Star Trek TOS or something. They looked ridiculous. No idea how those were supposed to not be comical.
Just saw it on IMAX today, I enjoyed it aside from two fairly minor issues that bugged me, so hopefully someone can provide reasonable answers...
1. How did Cooper get from inside a black hole to floating in space near Saturn? The black hole and the wormhole are two different things, right?
2. Was Cooper Station near Saturn because it was on its way to the wormhole, or was it orbiting Saturn? If the latter, why place a large scale colony (as opposed to a transit hub) near Saturn where there's almost no sunlight?
'they' played a role. if you can understand and manipulate gravity and time black holes aren't that special
The movie tried to make it pretty clear that it wasn't running off an alternate timeline version of time travel. The way they tried to explain how time travel could work, looking at time as if it were a mountain range that could be transversed, and the way the tesseract was constructed as well as the revelations as to who the ghost was and who shook Brand's hand as they passed through the wormhole make it pretty clear that Nolan was going for the bootstrap paradox. .
I'm about to blow your mind.
This is near the airlock on the International Space Station.
Except that he wasn't. The third act made it pretty clear that time was to be treated as a physical, spatial dimension, with all points in that dimension occurring and existing concurrently.
The bootstrap paradox, or ontological paradox, is a paradox of time travel that refers to scenarios whereby items or information are passed from the future to the past, which in turn become the same items or information that are subsequently passed from the past to the future - this creates a circularity of cause-effect such that the items or information have no discernible origin. Thus, the paradox raises the ontological questions of where, when and by whom the items were created or the information derived.
You don't know if it was humans who really did survive in fewer numbers on earth or there was a prior timeline when senior brand actually did complete the formula
I disagree completely (as would most who have seen the film, given the multitude of responses).
The designs for TARS and CASE were absolutely brilliantly and incredibly unique. TARS also had some of the best lines in the film.
TARS will likely become one of the most adored and well known characters in all of science fiction.
Except that he wasn't. The third act made it pretty clear that time was to be treated as a physical, spatial dimension, with all points in that dimension occurring and existing concurrently.
Dude, spoilers.The whole Plan A, Plan B thing reminded me of The Last of Us. Sacrificing your relationship with someone you love for the chance of saving humanity. Different characters took difference stances on the issue.
I love their design, looks so clunky yet super efficient at their jobs.I disagree completely (as would most who have seen the film, given the multitude of responses).
The designs for TARS and CASE were absolutely brilliantly and incredibly unique. TARS also had some of the best lines in the film.
TARS will likely become one of the most adored and well known characters in all of science fiction.
See, this is why whenever I think about the Stable Time Loop or Bootstrap Paradox, I always imagine it as some kind of spiral or spring shape, not a perfect circle. I.e., there must have been some original straight timeline where someone decided to create the self-perpetuity. The audience just never see that starting point, they only see the cycle after it's begun.
Like in Terminator, I think the original John Connor was fathered by someone else. If you put all four movies into one canon (I realize they basically aren't), or at least accept Salvation as canon (it really isn't), sending Reese and the original T-800 back in time didn't perfectly recreate the original John Connor's time. It created an altered version of it (the most notable alteration being the T-800 arriving ahead of schedule).
In Interstellar, if humans did indeed create the wormhole as Cooper merely speculates, I think it's possible they did start with another timeline. Maybe they're the descendants of the kids from Plan B who wanted to save people left behind on Earth, so they made the tesseract Cooper fell into. Maybe they're from a past where fewer people made it and they wanted to save more. Maybe they're from a past where Bran didn't lie to everyone and they immediately knew someone would have to drop into the black hole and transmit the quantum data to complete the equation, so they sent one earlier astronaut to do just that.
Why do people feel the need to post stuff like this? Make themselves feel smarter?
I disagree completely (as would most who have seen the film, given the multitude of responses).
The designs for TARS and CASE were absolutely brilliantly and incredibly unique. TARS also had some of the best lines in the film.
TARS will likely become one of the most adored and well known characters in all of science fiction.
Maybe I didn't understand it right, but I feel like the purpose and the details surrounding the formula were very unclear. Is it something that allows them to make their own wormholes? Is it something that makes much more effective interstellar ships? The only difference over the entire course of Murphy's life from finding the formula to her death was that there is an awesome cylinder space station next to the wormhole. If the formula is about space travel or gravity and time then why aren't the humans already gods over the 3rd/4th dimensions? Taking billions of humans from earth over to Saturn is a hefty undertaking but would you really need a space travel equation for that? Didn't we already have that technology?
I must have really missed something. Can someone explain the purpose/effect of the formula?
And that shows or proves all of what? The ranger in interstellar is not a space station last I checked and was not at all subjected to only that which a space station is subjected to. Cooper pulls some dangerous maneuver earlier in the film to slow one down that likely pulled a high level of g-forces, and you want me to believe that because there exists a laptop somewhere on ISS, a space station not intended for much movement and certainly not for fast maneuvers and it does some unforeseen task that it's at all believable that a standalone laptop not at all integrated into one of these ranger ships would be tasked with controlling the airlock of all the systems aboard the ship? Hell the power cable was simply plugged in, not even locked down, what happens if in one of those fast maneuvers it comes unplugged and loses power?
Incredible movie. That docking scene was the most energetic, heroic and uplifting scene I've ever seen in a movie.
But who are THEM?
The robot design is unique and from what I gather an homage to the monolith in Space Odyssey. As an engineer and a lover of robotics in sci-fi and real life it was exhilarating to see all the cool things a rectangle could do and honestly if we start to just stick with humanoid designs to robots and mock anything that tries something different then... I don't know. I guess I'll be sad.
I'm expecting TARS to feature in both amazing and terrible cosplay.
The movie tried to make it pretty clear that it wasn't running off an alternate timeline version of time travel. The way they tried to explain how time travel could work, looking at time as if it were a mountain range that could be transversed, and the way the tesseract was constructed as well as the revelations as to who the ghost was and who shook Brand's hand as they passed through the wormhole make it pretty clear that Nolan was going for the bootstrap paradox. The movie had Coop doing everything that set the movie in motion in the first place. Coop closed the loop in the third act of the movie.
If he was going for say a BttF version of time travel there wouldn't have been any need for the ghost subplot or the wormhole handshake.
Maybe I didn't understand it right, but I feel like the purpose and the details surrounding the formula were very unclear. Is it something that allows them to make their own wormholes? Is it something that makes much more effective interstellar ships? The only difference over the entire course of Murphy's life from finding the formula to her death was that there is an awesome cylinder space station next to the wormhole. If the formula is about space travel or gravity and time then why aren't the humans already gods over the 3rd/4th dimensions? Taking billions of humans from earth over to Saturn is a hefty undertaking but would you really need a space travel equation for that? Didn't we already have that technology?
I must have really missed something. Can someone explain the purpose/effect of the formula?
Well in the literal sense it was Coop communicating from the tesseract, but that was only possible because future humans had mastered the 5th dimension.
But how did humanity survive, if its survival depended on this mission's success?
Maybe Brand's new humans?
They needed the formula to get the ships to carry everyone to the wormhole off the ground. Keep in mind that these ships had to be absolutely massive to carry the sheer number of people required to make plan A work. It takes a lot of fuel to get even a rocket for three or four people into space, I can't imagine how much fuel it would take to get a rocket filled with hundreds of thousands off the ground. Let alone the number required to completely evacuate the earth.
it allowed them to understand gravity. they don't say much more. but understanding gravity and adding that to space and time would lead to much easier space travel since you don't need fuel or speed you just manipulate the space around you. it didn't allow for all understanding. I don't think it was the unified theory of everything or something.
the bootstrap paradox would be that coop had to save the future for these future humans to succeed in helping. I think they are completely independent and thus not humans, (I think the human line was kind of like coop's equivalent of the 'daddy is gonna save us' the theme was humanities reliance on each other to overcome odds, coop believed he had his fellow humans helping him).
there was no closed loop. there is no loop, he was extra dimensional, time had no meaning and was just like we think of space. all points accessible at once
The movie tried to make it pretty clear that it wasn't running off an alternate timeline version of time travel. The way they tried to explain how time travel could work, looking at time as if it were a mountain range that could be transversed, and the way the tesseract was constructed as well as the revelations as to who the ghost was and who shook Brand's hand as they passed through the wormhole make it pretty clear that Nolan was going for the bootstrap paradox. The movie had Coop doing everything that set the movie in motion in the first place. Coop closed the loop in the third act of the movie.
If he was going for say a BttF version of time travel there wouldn't have been any need for the ghost subplot or the wormhole handshake.
Anyway, I keep seeing time paradox being brought up about the part near the end. I'll say this now. A time paradox is a 3 dimensional construct.
It only exists as a "paradox" because we can only perceive time as moving in a single direction and because we can only "exist" at one spot at the same time. When you're dealing with higher dimensions it's foolish to think this is problem. Just look at 2D space and the fact we can be in multiple places in a given 2D plane at the same time. For a higher dimensional being, time would be perceived the same. They would be able to traverse it the same way we traverse 3D or 2D or 1D space.
But then you might say "Well, we can only be at 1 place at a time in 3D". Well, that's true, but go back to what I said. We (3D ppl) can be at multiple places in 2D/1D space, right? So basically, a being in an n-dimension can traverse all dimensions up to it, but can only be at 1 place in the n-dimension. Well, it wasn't just coincidence the beings in the movie were 5th dimensional, not 4th
I thought it was pretty stupid and didn't enjoy it at all. It felt like Nolan took a month, watched 2001, Contact, Apollo 13, Star Wars, Alien, and Prometheus, then marathoned a couple seasons of Ancient Aliens and decided to make a movie. The robots were so stupid and comical. The power of love saves humanity. That "twist" that I figured out very early on (although not how they got to the reveal). Some really stupid as shit dialogue befitting a Nolan movie. Stuff supposed to sound cool or deep but is actually dumb as shit if you think about anything for a second. I thought it aped pretty much all of the great space movies, and didn't do anything as well as any of those movies. About 90 minutes in I was getting pretty fed up with the movie. Then it lasted another 90 minutes and kept getting dumber.
Did not like it AT ALL.