Missing.No
Neo Member
Or does he?
![]()
I dont get it.
Or does he?
![]()
You might find this article about gender-neutral pronouns to be helpful. Its basis is historical context and grammatical use.
I dont get it.
I dont get it.
Read it previously, it's an interesting read but English (as all languages) is a shifting beast. What was gramattically correct previously may not be currently. Even more importantly even if something is "correct" that doesn't necessarily make it "right".
Read it previously, it's an interesting read but English (as all languages) is a shifting beast. What was gramattically correct previously may not be currently. Even more importantly even if something is "correct" that doesn't necessarily make it "right".
For example, "ain't" isn't a word... or I should say it wasn't a word for a very long time. It's now (like it or hate it) part of the English lexicon... funny enough I've heard it far less over the years since it became part of the language proper.
I'm not saying such words couldn't be used the way the article describes again, but as it stands it's not very natural. In the state the language currently is, it'd likely be easier to come up with a more proper '3rd option' to him/her.
But I'm still an outside looking in on the community, so my thoughts and opinions carry little weight on such things![]()
I thought of it less a personal attack and more an accurate analogy of the situation. If your perspective is that you're only curious about Kirby in your region, then that's fine for you--but it doesn't have any bearing on the larger discussion, from what I can tell. I mean, if you just wanna know whether Nintendo calls Kirby male in regions they localize to that lack socially-common gender-neutral pronouns, well, just check your region's manual and be satisfied, right? Also, discussing your dogwhistling of 'personal attack' only serves to derail the discussion, so consider this the full extent of my addressing it.
What am I trying to argue here? That Kirby has a non-binary gender identity, and it's absolutely clear and supported with evidence if you examine the original Kirby released before they were processed for other cultures. I think that's a fair view to hold.
No, but it's a dead language![]()
He's saying Kirby doesn't actually live in a dream world, he lives in a different time (either during a previous or future ice age).
Eh, I disagree. You know exactly what it is you were trying to achieve by calling me a child who was whining and bringing up something completely unrelated. Right away, it discredits me as a person who holds an equal and valid view, even if it's one you don't agree with, and it also tries to strengthen your argument because the unrelated information has nothing to do with me or what I said, but works to your advantage. These kinds of tactics are used all the time in discussions and debates, especially on the internet.
I don't know how Kirby was referred to in Japan. I don't live there. All I can go by is what Nintendo released in North America. I know, because I bought Kirby's Dream Land back in 92 for the game boy and they always referred to Kirby as he. Despite what you think, the Kirby games have always had some form of gendered representation. Look at enemies like Fololo and Falala to try and distinguish between the two. Additionally Nintendo took it one step further in newer games with characters like ChuChu and Ribbon to try and show how "females" might be, even if they use tropes like bows etc.
My point is, you choose to believe an arbitrary and extreme definition. Kirby is non-binary, guys can be wearing bows etc. And that's all true. I'm going by what is the simple explanation and one the creators probably intended. Kirby is a boy, or he's just Kirby. I mean if that's what they refer to Kirby as in Canada, US, EU releases, what's the big issue here? It's something they agree with then no? Maybe they'll clarify this in the future, maybe they won't.
I'll just note that I have a lot of beloved people in my life who use the singular 'they', and while I wasn't accustomed to using it prior to knowing these folk, it's become incredibly natural to both say and hear in all contexts and spheres. Its usage is a lot more common than this thread would indicate. It's preeeetty likely that the beast of an English language is indeed shifting in this direction.
You might find this article about gender-neutral pronouns to be helpful. Its basis is historical context and grammatical use.
I'm sorry to barge into this discussion like that, but I glanced over that article and while the information it contains seems to be correct, the way it's presented is very annoying and - as you might have said - childish.Here is another blog post (referenced by this Oxford Dictionary page), which in my opinion betters explains that issue.
Kirby is like a Hindu God or something. A perfect being transcending gender.
Ugh, you just insist on an argument. The analogy was not unrelated--it's the exact same situation. In both cases, people are discussing the nature of a character's identity, and one person insists on using an edited, localized edition as the basis of their argument, rejecting the idea that the change was made to reflect the attitudes of the country rather than the identity of the character. Your argument completely disregards the fact that Kirby was created with gender-neutral pronouns that have been used consistently in Kirby's country of origin. Where can you go from there, really?
You sound like a child whining about people discussing the LGBT themes in Sailor Moon, insisting that your 4Kids adaptation, with all its heavy alterations, is perhaps the real canon. Come on, now. This is a topic about Kirby's gender identity, and there's a wealth of discussion to be had here. What use is there ignoring the context of Kirby's portrayal in the original, pre-localized works?
You sound like a child whining about people discussing the LGBT themes in Sailor Moon, insisting that your 4Kids adaptation, with all its heavy alterations, is perhaps the real canon. Come on, now. This is a topic about Kirby's gender identity, and there's a wealth of discussion to be had here.
Gender is determined by genitalia, which Kirby lacks. I believe he is simply referred to as male because of his nature and behavior. The he/she applies here the same way people address cars and boats as "she," typically.
Kirby is male, if only to avoid calling him "it," which sounds somewhat insensitive.
So essentially you're calling people children for not subscribing to your highly speculative interpretations. What exactly does this contribute? Also, Nintendo recently claimed they make Kirby look angry in the US because US males like him better that way rather than cute.
I'm pretty sure US males only like angry eyes on other males though, as opposed to females who they probably do prefer to be cute. So at a very minimum Nintendo both acknowledges Kirby's perception as a male and also actively portrays him in a way consistent with that perception in the US. A wealth of evidence confirms that at least the US Kirby is male. As far as the Japanese Kirby you only seem to allude to speculations which you try to state as concrete facts. I'd be interested in seeing something explicit on his Japanese gender or lackthereof, especially after your needlessly aggressive fiating about this topic. Please share with us westerners.
Sex is determined by genitalia. I think my sociology class said something about a persons gender being whatever they associated with more. Does kirby feel like a male? If so he is male lol.
性別
説明書では「彼」と呼ばれており、公式サイトでの一人称は「ぼく」[8]。また、英語版のテキストでもカービィの代名詞は男性形の『he』になっており、性別は男だと思われる。
Gender
In instruction manuals, Kirby is referred to as "kare" ("he"); in the official (Kirby 64) site, he uses "boku" ("male I") in the first person. Also, in English printed media, with the masculine "he" being selected for Kirby's pronoun, Kirby's gender is considered to be male.
I always wondered myself, same with Ash's pikachu, but who cares honestly. Could be genderless for all we know, but official nintendo games and other sources make it very clear its a he, so kirby is a male.
Thats that I suppose. Dunno how anyone can refute it
Yes, they made Kirby male in the US. They also made Vivian cis female for English-speaking territories, and Birdo has been given a couple of inconsistent translations. This doesn't mean Kirby can be called 'definitely male' based on how they choose to localize it for one reason. Now, if this discussion is "Is Kirby definitely male in the United States", this discussion would be very different. But, the US isn't the world, and the US' gender binary isn't reflective of the reality of many, many individuals in the US and across the world. So, if Kirby is gender-neutral in his original works, that merits discussion, doesn't it? GAF is an international forum, and I understand that this form isn't US-centric in its discussions.
I don't speak Japanese (nor do I have any particular pedestal reserved for that country or any other), but every discussion I've seen on the subject explicitly states that Kirby doesn't have a gendered pronoun in Japan, and never has. I'll look into it more when I get to work this evening and find explicit references--I need to get concrete sources for my paper, anyway.
Japanese Wikipedia snippet
My attempt:
Or does he?
![]()
Japanese Wikipedia snippet
My attempt:
You again miss the point with these canned arguments about US centricity. Please consider what is being stated more fully and the purpose it serves before going on tangents about US centricity. The point is not that the US is the world, the point is we know for a fact he's male in western countries, and we don't actually know what he is in Japan, as not having a pronoun could just mean they don't want to reveal a gender that does exist for one reason or another, as opposed to assuming he must therefore not have one (though see post above by Lindbergh, apparently even that claim you mentioned is not totally correct). So all existing evidence so far either explicitly states he's male or just doesn't state what he is (which means he could still very well be male), while so far only your opinion suggests otherwise. But I guess I'll see what you come up with when you gather your paper sources.
Can I be the first to ask... why does it matter?
I always assumed male but my younger sister calls Kirby a "her" when she plays Smash Bros. Maybe that's the way Nintendo wanted it.
(Below, the most ridiculous post I've ever written. Enjoy.)
FWIW, I think Kirby seems to identify with a gendered traditionally male identity but as one of only two members of his species that we've explicitly met, I suspect he's no more "male" than any other alien. I don't think denizens of Dream Land necessarily need to reproduce. There's never been any evidence that "death" in the traditional sense exists in Kirby's world. His vanquished enemies always return in one form or another. "Death" is a fluid concept on Pop Star. In a game like Mass Attack, when one of the Kirbys dies, you can literally pull him back from a ghost-like form into reality. I think this is all connected with the various representations of death that Kirby fights, like Necrodeous and other nightmarish foes. These are not merely enemies but the deathly eternal beings of Kirbys world, similar to Hades in Kid Icarus. They serve as arbiters of destruction and entropy. Kirby is the opposite side of the same coin. Everything he sucks up is only gone temporarily. His nemeses seek to eradicate the world as they know it forever, usually remaking it in their own image--such as Drawcia, who seeks to recreate reality in an artsier form. So if Kirby can't die, he just "is"--and as such, reproduction is unnecessary for those on Pop Star, a planet where death is an antiquated concept. Perhaps it once existed on the Shiver Star back when it was known as earth....
Kirby is like a Hindu God or something. A perfect being transcending gender.
I like this answer best.
Kirby is male, and also a Boo ghost with legs.
Beat me to it. Best line in a SNES game!Kirby is...
![]()
a jolly fellow.
His name is fucking Kirby. He is obviously male by that indicator alone.