The man on the phone asked her if there was someone she trusted and she mentioned her fiance. He told her to call the fiance over to watch the girl and the fiance came. The manager then left and the fiance was left alone with the employee. The man on the phone convinced him to carry out the sexual acts.
Supposedly not enough proof.How did the caller escape liability? Impersonating the police is supposed to be a felony. Need some cliff notes here.
Ah right haha. I thought you meant the man on the phone was her fianceThat's what i meant. Of course, i didn't put it as clearly as you did.![]()
Already made. Not sure about that. Probably not.
That question was for jorma. I just messed up the quoting :lol
It's just unbelievably disturbing.
If anyone is lazy and wants to know what happened to everyone:
The caller = acquitted of all charges
The manager = placed on probation for 1 year and fired from McDonalds. She won $1.1 million from McDonalds
The manager's fiance = 5 years in prison (from 2006) for strip-searching and sexually abusing the girl. Never married the manager
The victim = underwent therapy to address post-traumatic stress disorder depression related to her abuse, including prescription anti-depressants. She abandoned her plans to attend the University of Louisville, where she had anticipated declaring pre-med. In an interview with ABC News she said that, after her abuse, she "felt dirty" and had difficulty making and maintaining friendships because she wouldn't "allow anyone to get too close to her." She won $6.1 million from McDonalds
More
I tend to not believe anything that's conveyed by phone. My mortgage company called me about a late payment and I laughed and told them to pound sand because I thought they were someone else just trying to get me to refinance. They had been sold to another company and I didn't recognize the name and my payments are on a direct-debit schedule, which they had also changed. Oops.
Did she sue the McDonald's? I certainly would have. I also would quit before I subjected myself to a nude strip search from my boss.
Read the article. I could somewhat understand why the people were going along with the caller up until I found out the finance had sodomized the girl. How on earth do you make something like that seem part of a 'police' search?
"Well, it's not so hard to see. A kid looking for a father and didn't have his own -- and they won't be planning to get into heavy-duty sex, but almost romantic, embracing, kissing, perhaps sleeping, but not having intercourse or anything like that. It's an understandable thing, and you know where you find it, among other clergy or important people; you look at teachers, attorneys, judges, social workers."
Read the article. I could somewhat understand why the people were going along with the caller up until I found out the finance had sodomized the girl. How on earth do you make something like that seem part of a 'police' search?
Nah, I would say both the manager and the employee are victims, one of a worse ituation than the other, but both were manipulated in ways that are hard to resist unless you know about them.