'in a world where there are questions' doesn't imply anything except there are still unknowns but I don't think we will come to an agreement here.its a negative for Microsoft and a positive for EA. oh definitely suggest it will be exclusive . if phil spencer dodging the direct question about cod staying indefinitely on ps was evidence enough
come on dude lol'in a world where there are questions' doesn't imply anything except there are still unknowns.
I will translate:
We have fucked up several times. But because is Battlefiled we got a pass from dumb fans that are willing to keep buying, because they don't half self-respect.
So. No worries.
And better yet. With the possibility of CoD becoming exclusive. We would have less competition and therefore capture those people without access to CoD. Even if our product is worse.
And yet it was the best-selling game.Its not as if the last two CoD games were such amazing products either
This was my take on the CoD situation.come on dude lol
there is absolutely no doubt Xbox has intentions to make cod exclusive.
Imagine if MS gets the next Xbox out a year before PS6, and also makes COD exclusive to Xbox at that time? Megaton!This was my take on the CoD situation.
Of course Phil was smart with that offer. It makes sense for that deal to expire by the time the next consoles come, so it will be a launch exclusive to the Xbox brand, in turn leaving the highest player base of the game assed out while hoping to leach off that addiction moving into a new gen. Smart business, indeed.
And yet it was the best-selling game.
It sounds like Deviation games will be taking the mantle.Obviously. MS takes COD exclusive means a copy cat can jump in.
It doesn't. This is the power/benefit of having a strong/established/ IP with build nostalgia.Because of conditioning not because of quality. Saying BF has to be good to be successful as opposed to COD inconsistent quality just doesn’t make sense
Hum they did?
They’ve expanded the Star Wars universe more in the last 7 years than Lucas did in 40, and not just through novelization
Sure.
They've expanded it through a sphincter and onto a big steaming pile.
Two seasons of mandalorian >>>>> the prequel trilogy
According to CEO Andrew Wilson of EA, they think CoD going exclusive could only benefit them, calling it a “tremendous opportunity”
Yup. Thats what i told as well when MS announced they was aquiring Activision. Once COD gets available on less consoles, EA has a chance to make Battlefield bigger and take over. All they have to do is actually deliver a good game, something they seem to be strugling with.Seems to me like he’s saying he hopes it goes exclusive so that battlefield has a larger audience.
Yes Activision is so much better as a company.Fuck EA and their shitty practices.
ThisBut also, fuck Activision
I bought 2043 a few days ago and I’ve been playing it all weekend, I’m enjoying it but the most fun is when I’m playing portal on the classic maps. It’s just so mediocre compared to what it used to be. They need to try to stop following trends and just deliver on the foundation that made their games so good to begin with.Yup. Thats what i told as well when MS announced they was aquiring Activision. Once COD gets available on less consoles, EA has a chance to make Battlefield bigger and take over. All they have to do is actually deliver a good game, something they seem to be strugling with.
Considering that EA wanted to sell what if Sony brought out the battlefield devs and the RTS devs aka ex Westwood devs and the rights to battlefield then they could have exclusive battlefield games and a remake of Red alert 2? Cod exclusive on next Xbox and battlefield and red alert 4 exclusive to ps6
Do they? Who?They already have a better FPS studio, 2 Infact
Do they? Who?
Bungie yes, deviation have not even made a game yet, they are as proven as a Dev like the initiative.Bungie and deviation
Bungie yes, deviation have not even made a game yet, they are as proven as a Dev like the initiative.
Those three are publishers not platform holders. What concern would they have with the possibility of fewer games to compete with on PS? It may even lead to boosts as people seek alternatives.
Anyway, I think that's what the CMA want information and assurance for, that the purchase would not lead to harm to rivals and in particular competing and new entrant multigame sub and cloud gaming rivals.
They have Vince Zampella at the helm now so we can't rule out that possibility
Who's that like?The EA CEO doesn't want to piss off the future buyer of his company.
Dice have made games before, they have lost there way recently but the team still has talent and great tech.Neither would the supposed buyout of battlefield devs, i trust ex-treyarch BLOPS vets over BF team
Socom is long forgotten and would be competing against established names (CoD/BF) A few hardcore gamers know what Socom is the rest will see it as a ''copy'' of the popular games. A missed opportunity for PS.
I might.No one is going to buy their next Battlefield game for their CoD fix.
I bought 2043 a few days ago and I’ve been playing it all weekend, I’m enjoying it but the most fun is when I’m playing portal on the classic maps. It’s just so mediocre compared to what it used to be. They need to try to stop following trends and just deliver on the foundation that made their games so good to begin with.