• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Jaffe:"Is this biased journalism? Or is it just me?"

Status
Not open for further replies.
APF said:
Every morning at work, before I'm allowed to even *touch* a computer, Rupert Murdoch comes by my desk and tells me what I can and cannot say for that day. And I'm an engineer! I can't imagine the detailed directives staff writers get.

M$NBC!

M$NBC!!

M$NBC!!!
 
Green Biker Dude said:
And the games. The PS2 had so many good games, most of them exclusives... Although this gen exclusives are rare, the Xbox 360 at least has quite a few of third party efforts: Tales of Vesperia, Ace Combat 6, Earth Defense Force, Dead Rising (non gimped version), Ninja Gaiden 2... The PS3 has like, Haze. Wow.
is this for real? :lol :lol :lol :lol
 
Coverly said:
So what does that have to do with your gaming tastes which is what is being questioned?



Well in the xboten op I thought you were just being honest, were you not?
Well you seem to think you know me, which you don't. So you basis of calling me a fanboy has nothing to it. And you really need to read slower next time, I said that I got sold on the hype and bullshit from Sony regarding what the PS3 would do, like many others. But that I had come to the realization that it was bullshit, hence me saying that having alliance to any big corporation was quite possibly the silliest thing possible. I called myself out and said that I'd learned my lesson about hype.

Vinci said:
Crush, please man ... tell me you're not referencing Nintendo in this example.
Not at all. Nintendo has always made money. I was referencing Microsoft in that case after the money used for RRoD and how they still managed to pull through to the position they're in now.
 
Wow I think people are kinda going overboard when they are saying stuff like "The Ps3 is the greatest screw up in the history of consumer electronics" and "From a business standpoint, it is a complete failure" etc etc. It was definately a fall from grace and a lot of harsh lessons learned, but this isn't the goddamn Gizmondo people.

That being said, I don't necessarily think the Journalism is extremely bias - but it does have some problems in the way it states its claims. It should be saying things like "Some might argue that blah blah blah" or "A few people have claimed that this is that and that" and maybe a few "Using this information, I think we can assume that this is the case"'s for good measure. The way the questions were asked, no one working for Sony is going to go in answering the questions without immediately being in defense mode.
 
It's pretty absurd that people are seriously entertaining the idea that Microsoft's gaming division has some kind of creative control over MSNBC. Microsoft as a whole only owns a small portion of it to begin with, one division of Microsoft doesn't have that kind of leverage.
 
MrNyarlathotep said:
I think the RRoD issue is the biggest 'screw up' this gen.

Feel free to disagree with that, but I dont think loss of marketshare is even comparable to a conservatively estimated 30% failure rate of a mass market piece of hardware and a resultant $1bn write off.
MS is not the only one with big failure rate on a system. (PS and PS2)
to me MSNBC has always been bad. I like CNN and even FOX better than MSNBC
 
Byakuya769 said:
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.... what?

What impact are you referring to?

Even Kojima has said he is addicted to L4Dead.

I'm addicted to Left 4 Dead right now, but people say to me that that game would never work in Japan.

http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3172266


The positive word-of-mouth opinion on Left4Dead is spreading like wildfire. You can see this in the monthly NPD sales charts where it is remaining a best seller.
 
CrushDance said:
Not at all. Nintendo has always made money.

Good man. I'm getting sick of people comparing the position Sony is in to the one Nintendo was in before, as they're completely different.

I was referencing Microsoft in that case after the money used for RRoD and how they still managed to pull through to the position they're in now.

To be fair, I agree with an earlier poster that the RROD fiasco was a small price to pay for MS to achieve its goal of getting the console out first and setting up the foundation for what would eventually hurt Sony enormously this generation. So I think it sort of paid off.

I mean, losing me as a customer likely doesn't matter as much as sticking it to Sony. From their point of view at least.
 
20060120h.jpg


It seems that the entire industry was cheering Dan on when he had Microsoft by the balls.

But when the hard questions are asked of Sony/Sony's Developers....its teh bias!!

Get Bent Jaffe.

It was legitimate when Dan did it, and its legitimate now.
 
FartOfWar said:
Great questions. I'd love to hear honest answers, and it's not as if David isn't able to disagree.
Don't you work for 1Up? :S Why can't you guys ask? Forget it if I'm mistaken.
The Faceless Master said:
Nope. He was trying to call me out as a fanboy, if anything I'm a fan of the system and by association I want it to succeed so that my investment is worth it. Hence why I got pretty pissed at the failure of marketing that SCEA has done in the KZ2 thread.

But I still want everyone else to succeed so that the industry can keep moving forward and everyone challenge each other with new ideas which benefit me in the end. I'm not playing nice with any company because at the end of the day they don't give a damn about you when things go wrong. A lesson I learned first hand.
 
I just wanna say that for as much as a money pit the PS3 has been,I'd feel necked without owning the machine,I think Jaffe thinks that way too,just that he took it to the next level though.
 
Vast Inspiration said:
[IM]http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h254/mysticdragula/20060120h.jpg[/IM]

It seems that the entire industry was cheering Dan on when he had Microsoft by the balls.

But when the hard questions are asked of Sony/Sony's Developers....its teh bias!!

Get Bent Jaffe.

It was legitimate when Dan did it, and its legitimate now.

Holy hell, I completely forgot about that strip. :lol
 
well sad thing is that sony learned that its not a good idea to put an awsomely build and feature rich console to the market....

and that makes me sad - because i am/was willing to pay 600€ when i think that the system is build great and has a lot of features...sadly most dont think that way
 
I think we should all just be glad the interviewer decided to omit the question regarding him fucking Jaffe's mother.
 
Green Biker Dude said:
And the games. The PS2 had so many good games, most of them exclusives... Although this gen exclusives are rare, the Xbox 360 at least has quite a few of third party efforts: Tales of Vesperia, Ace Combat 6, Earth Defense Force, Dead Rising (non gimped version), Ninja Gaiden 2... The PS3 has like, Haze. Wow.
I take serious issue with this bollocks.

None of those games are all that good, outside of NG2, and NGS is better, and a PS3 exclusive, and it's not alone.

Final Fantasy Versus XIII looks incredible
God of War 3 is going to be amazing
Gran Turismo 5 is sure to be a great game
Heavy Rain looks stunning
InFamous could be cool
Killzone 2 is awesome
LittleBigPlanet was great
Metal Gear Solid 4 was amazing
Motorstorm 2 was a lot of fun
Africa looks to be cool (yeah, I spelt it that way on purpose)
Quantum Theory looks like shit, but some people seem to be excited about it
MAG, same, looks shit to me, but people are excited
Warhawk is quite popular
Socom, same thing
Both R&C games out are good, the one out this fall is bound to be solid
Some people seem to think Resistance has some redeeming quality to it
Yakuza 3 if it comes to the rest of the world will be good no doubt
Siren is currently the best current generation horror game
Uncharted 1 was really cool
Uncharted 2 looks great
Valkyria Chronicles is much loved, though not my cup of tea
White Knight Chronicles seems to have been fairly well received, that could be good
Trico, not announced yet but Ico and SotC are two of the best games ever

I know people on GAF hate list warz, but this bullshit that the PS3 has no good games is so annoying.

Yes, anyone could put a similar list up for the 360, this is not to shit on the 360 at all. Just to say there are games for the PS3.
 
Vast Inspiration said:
20060120h.jpg


It seems that the entire industry was cheering Dan on when he had Microsoft by the balls.

But when the hard questions are asked of Sony/Sony's Developers....its teh bias!!

Get Bent Jaffe.

It was legitimate when Dan did it, and its legitimate now.

Yeah and if I made the console they were asking about, you might have a point.

OR

if they were asking me about games I had worked on, you might have a point.

OR

if I had not said I was fine with TOUGH questions but not BIASED interviews that already had an agenda going in, you would have a point.

As is, I fail to see your point. You plan on getting one?
 
Robert Ashley said:
Do you honestly believe business reporters at MSNBC get their marching orders from the Xbox marketing team?

Total ignorance.
This is what happens when people live in a bubble.
 
MotherFan said:
I'm going to have to disagree. I think 599 US dollars was the biggest screw up. RROD was bigger than blu ray but MS just wrote off the 1 bil, took some pr hit and went on. 599 US dollars crippled the ps3.
Well, you know what they say about opinions - everybody's got one.

I think I have mine because it's a difference between myopic shortsightedness on Sony's part - really a few key executives for that matter, and was committed years before that price announcement.

Microsoft's screw-up was situated cleanly in their desire to get their product to market for Christmas 2005 which resulted in multiple cut corners which hasn't hurt them as much this generation as I think it would have, but at the same time will be a stigma for generations to come. I won't buy the 360's successor until it's been on market for a couple of years to make sure it's not going to break on me. I'm sure there are a lot of other people of the same mind as me on that one.

Sony at least put out a fairly solid product - even if it wasn't right for the market.
 
davidjaffe said:
Yeah and if I made the console they were asking about, you might have a point.

OR

if they were asking me about games I had worked on, you might have a point.

OR

if I had not said I was fine with TOUGH questions but not BIASED interviews that already had an agenda going in, you would have a point.

As is, I fail to see your point. You plan on getting one?
2z65qtk.jpg
 
davidjaffe said:
Yeah and if I made the console they were asking about, you might have a point.

OR

if they were asking me about games I had worked on, you might have a point.

OR

if I had not said I was fine with TOUGH questions but not BIASED interviews that already had an agenda going in, you would have a point.

As is, I fail to see your point. You plan on getting one?
OUCH
 
Kasumi1970 said:
MS is not the only one with big failure rate on a system. (PS and PS2)
to me MSNBC has always been bad. I like CNN and even FOX better than MSNBC
Rupert told me to say I also like FOX better than those other two places.

And don't get me started on PBS, I just... I just... ARGH I CAN'T SAY IT EVEN I HAVE MY LIMITS MURDOCH
 
davidjaffe said:
Yeah and if I made the console they were asking about, you might have a point.

OR

if they were asking me about games I had worked on, you might have a point.

OR

if I had not said I was fine with TOUGH questions but not BIASED interviews that already had an agenda going in, you would have a point.

As is, I fail to see your point. You plan on getting one?

Don't hold your breath on that one Jaffe.
 
on one hand, those questions are perfectly viable. sony made some terrible mistakes in the past few years that has made the PS3 something akin to a joke in the business sense.

on the other hand, i have NO idea of why Jaffe would answer, know the answer, or even CARE about the answer. he's a developer, an employee. he's not about to tick off his mealticket, and it's silly to expect him to do so.
 
davidjaffe said:
Yeah and if I made the console they were asking about, you might have a point.

OR

if they were asking me about games I had worked on, you might have a point.

OR

if I had not said I was fine with TOUGH questions but not BIASED interviews that already had an agenda going in, you would have a point.

As is, I fail to see your point. You plan on getting one?
so what did you have for lunch anyway?
 
for the record, i don't think the questions are "biased", but they definitely do have a negative slant to them- some of them fairly, some of them unfairly.

however, you cannot condemn the journalist at all at this point, because the only thing that matters is the end result (the article).
 
I think davidjaffe should probably accept that hope for the PS3 is fading, and is most likely gone. I mean that purely in terms of a viable success for Sony financially and in terms of having the biggest userbase or even close. The jury is out on whether killing HD-DVD actually makes Blu-Ray the dominate movie format in the upcoming years, and in that we may have to revisit the ultimate answer.

PS3 is the Gamecube. It is still a viable platform that can provide plenty of fun for fans and console-specific enthusiasts (hell, I loved the Gamecube), but it's not unfair to see it is a failure. A catastrophic failure, in the arenas this guy is talking about.
 
davidjaffe said:
Yeah and if I made the console they were asking about, you might have a point.

OR

if they were asking me about games I had worked on, you might have a point.

OR

if I had not said I was fine with TOUGH questions but not BIASED interviews that already had an agenda going in, you would have a point.

As is, I fail to see your point. You plan on getting one?


HOLY shit fuck! :lol
 
Amir0x said:
I think davidjaffe should probably accept that hope for the PS3 is fading, and is most likely gone. I mean that purely in terms of a viable success for Sony financially and in terms of having the biggest userbase or even close. The jury is out on whether killing HD-DVD actually makes Blu-Ray the dominate movie format in the upcoming years, and in that we may have to revisit the ultimate answer.

PS3 is the Gamecube. It is still a viable platform that can provide plenty of fun for fans and console-specific enthusiasts (hell, I loved the Gamecube), but it's not unfair to see it is a failure. A catastrophic failure, in the arenas this guy is talking about.


Jesus dude. That is SO not what this is about. I am not defending or attacking Sony.

Maybe PS3=the cube, maybe not.

I don't actually give a rat's ass. I think there are enough folks who own it and play it that we can make a good biz out of being exclusive with Sony. We are happy to be. The more the merrier. I would LOVE more folks to have and play a PS3. I am hoping for it.

But this was never about me defending Sony.

It was/is about me thinking the interviewer's questions were-perhaps- off base.
 
Mike Works said:
however, you cannot condemn the journalist at all at this point, because the only thing that matters is the end result (the article).
Yeah, after all, the journalist could have asked a 360-exclusive developer why the PS3 is awesome where it's awesome and all.

Oh wait, now it's all messed up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom