• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

JURASSIC PARK - A Thread 65 Million Years In The Making

Status
Not open for further replies.
As a kid did anyone else buy or get one of the Dakin Jurassic Park stuffed dinosaurs? Twenty years later I still have my Triceratops & it is in perfection condition even after all this time.

1_e4faac4ea602a075fee4a6df2222f276.jpg
 
I think I found a new favorite thread. JP is my favorite movie of all time. LW is ok... and I don't even consider 3 canon.

I remember watching a review of the movie by Siskel & Ebert, and they said the chase/horror aspect of the movie doesn't allow it to live up to its potential. I wonder if they were aware of the source material, and overall message.

I hope they make a JP4, with some great actors, and screenwriters who don't turn the movie into a slapstick comedy
 
I remember reading on AICN years ago how JP4 was going to have an army of intelligent dinosaurs with rocket launchers and shit.

Such a funny concept.
 
You know what movie had special effects that stands up to this day? Little shop of horrors. Little Audrey II is an amazing piece of work.
 
I finally got around to reading the books a couple months ago and was surprised at how different they were.

The second books setting would make such an amazing fucking video game. Open worldish, dino territories you have to learn and be aware about, nature encroached facilities dotted all over the island. It would be terrifying and awesome to get around anywhere.
 
How would you guys react if they were to do a reboot of the franchise, but now with dinosaurs... with feathers for accuracy!? ;p

I'd be outraged.
 
Yes to feathers! With as much focus the bird theory gets in the JP book it's only fair they get some feathers to go with the behaviour.
 
JP3 already did that.

mqdNv.jpg

Are those feathers (looks more like hair)? I actually don't really remember if I watched Jurassic Park 3 or not, that had Stegosaurus in it, right?

Actually if they do it right, maybe it won't be so bad:

news.2010.208.dinosaurs.feathers.jpg



But then again... my iconic T-rex.
tyrannosaurusrex.jpg

:'(
 
To those who might be interested Jurassic Park is finally coming out as an e-book next month (The Lost World has been out for a while now).
 
I can't see them doing feathers. The iconic image of dinosaurs in peoples' minds is still what we had in JP1. Don't care what science says, you don't go to the cinema to see the latest scientific theories
 
All kidding aside, yes I do. I go to dinosaur movies to see real creatures, not sci-fi. I don't want them to use cell phones and I don't want them to look different from what recent scientific discoveries suggest. Part of the fun of reading and watching JP were the included real-life discussions about how dinosaurs acted and looked, debates that were going on in scientific circles at the time. It brings a whole other level of immersion and glee because it's unbelievable but believable.
 
Dinosaurs have feathers, any movie that is at all attempting any sort of realism and not be a cartoon should have dinos with feathers. There is no reason they shouldn't have feathers. If you want a realistic looking dinosaur they need to have feathers since well they had them.

You shouldn't let nostalgia trump facts.

Find a science textbook produced for schools that mention dinosaurs. None of them in print lack feathers now. It makes no sense to keep up that charade when kids are being taught that dinos had feathers. Why confuse people?
 
Dinosaurs have feathers, any movie that is at all attempting any sort of realism and not be a cartoon should have dinos with feathers. There is no reason they shouldn't have feathers. If you want a realistic looking dinosaur they need to have feathers since well they had them.

You shouldn't let nostalgia trump facts.

Find a science textbook produced for schools that mention dinosaurs. None of them in print lack feathers now. It makes no sense to keep up that charade when kids are being taught that dinos had feathers. Why confuse people?

You are forgetting one important fact: the dinosaurs of Jurassic Park are not dinosaurs. They were designer recreations continuously updated in software iterations by Henry Wu to more closely resemble the public's preconceived expectations of how dinosaurs looked and acted. He did so under the orders of John Hammond himself. When Grant called them genetically designed monsters in JP3 he wasn't far off.
 
2OMgt.jpg


Still loving the design on those cars.

Remember having 1 of those in miniature when i was young, wonder if my folks still have it..
 
I can't see them doing feathers. The iconic image of dinosaurs in peoples' minds is still what we had in JP1. Don't care what science says, you don't go to the cinema to see the latest scientific theories

Which is funny, because a big part of what made Jurassic Park what it was was the bringing the new, modern image of dinosaurs into the public light--active, bird like animals instead of swamp bound tail dragging lizards. Strange that so many Jurassic Park fans are so against what a big part of the original movie was about. It's like they completely ignored Alan Grant at the beginning.

"No wonder these guys learned how to fly."

Spielberg should just release JP "enhanced" editions with feathers CGI'ed on all the dinos.

Even the ones like Brachiosaurus, which most assuredly did not have feathers?
 
Have feathers been found on any large herbivores yet?

No. We know Sauropods (long necked dinosaurs) were covered in scales, even as infants. Thyreophorans (armored dinosaurs like Stegosaurus and Ankylosaurus) were scale covered too, as were Hadrosaurs (duck bills).

Well, recent evidence suggests Triceratops may have had quills on its tail similar to its early relative Psittacosaurus, but they're probably not analogous to feathers. Probably. Most of its body was covered in scales though.

In fact, the "only" dinosaurs that there is direct evidence of feathers for are the Coeulurosaurs, a rather large group of Theropods.

What this all means for Jurassic Park as a series would be that Tyrannosaurus may have had feathers (fluffy downy stuff if any), Velociraptor absolutely did (full blown bird feathers there), Gallimimus probably did (though what kind remains to be seen, not likely fully bird feathers), and Compsognathus should (again, fluffy proto-feathers). And Triceratops may have had quills on its tail (not really feathers probably). The rest in the series (Spinosaurus, Dilophosaurus, Brachiosaurus, Stegosaurus, etc.) are "in the clear" so to speak.
 
One of my favourite films ever. Everything about it is amazing; the music, the atmosphere, the sense of awe and wonder. THIS is how you make a summer blockbuster.

Second one is alright, but I don't even consider the third one to be a true Jurassic Park film. I remember being so hyped for the third one :(
 
I don't think the dinosaurs need to have feathers considering the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park aren't 'true' dinosaurs. The way it was handled in J3 was interesting, as the more the dinosaurs bred the chance of a mutation or inherited trait could show up. Regardless, there is no way to recreate an 100% authentic dinosaur... so why not keep the iconic appearances from the original movie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom