Professor Beef
Banned
Any Zelda ranking which doesn't include LTTP and Ocarina of Time in the top two spots is invalid, IMO.
One is boring, the other is not fun.
Any Zelda ranking which doesn't include LTTP and Ocarina of Time in the top two spots is invalid, IMO.
One is boring, the other is not fun.
Word. It just feels SO GOOD to play 2D Zelda.I generally agree with this from what I've played.
I also generally prefer 2d to 3d Zelda.
You threw me for a second, I thought you were talking about one-time EVO appearing Pokken
It isn't so much that I think the combat in Wind Waker is hard; its more that the combat in all the 3D Zelda games is pretty damn easy.
No, just the yawn-inducing (but passable) LttP and the cure for insomnia that is OoT.
What about the games did you find boring?No, just the yawn-inducing (but passable) LttP and the cure for insomnia that is OoT.
I understand ranking some games better than Ocarina.. but ranking it outside the top five is straight up contrarian nonsense.
I understand ranking some games better than Ocarina.. but ranking it outside the top five is straight up contrarian nonsense.
It's really not. The game was revolutionary in many ways but it doesn't compare objectively to several other titles in the series.
It's really not. The game was revolutionary in many ways but it doesn't compare objectively to several other titles in the series.
10) Skyward Sword
We've been over this. Yes, it does.
Um...Even though I generally think OOT is too dated to compare to anything great these days, it probably deserves a respect nod at position 5 behind LTTP, WW, TP, and whatever other one someone wants to insert in there.
I mean I'm not just going to let nostalgia cloud my judgement. I didn't think the game was amazing last time through or anything and the graphics were extremely tough to get through without a texture pack. Nearly impossible for me without a texture pack to be honest.
I played it ages ago when it was the new shit and then yeah it was something. But time has passed the N64 by and Mario 64 can barely even survive. I have played no major games from that era that hold to me graphically. A shame but whatever.
Ocarina will get remade someday anyway.
Even though I generally think OOT is too dated to compare to anything great these days, it probably deserves a respect nod at position 5 behind LTTP, WW, TP, and whatever other one someone wants to insert in there.
I mean I'm not just going to let nostalgia cloud my judgement. I didn't think the game was amazing last time through or anything and the graphics were extremely tough to get through without a texture pack. Nearly impossible for me without a texture pack to be honest.
I played it ages ago when it was the new shit and then yeah it was something. But time has passed the N64 by and Mario 64 can barely even survive. I have played no major games from that era that hold to me graphically. A shame but whatever.
Ocarina will get remade someday anyway.
Um...
And you're opinion is also pretty bad, Mario 64 still plays like a dream, and has simple graphics that haven't really aged at all.
Even though I generally think OOT is too dated to compare to anything great these days, it probably deserves a respect nod at position 5 behind LTTP, WW, TP, and whatever other one someone wants to insert in there.
I mean I'm not just going to let nostalgia cloud my judgement. I didn't think the game was amazing last time through or anything and the graphics were extremely tough to get through without a texture pack. Nearly impossible for me without a texture pack to be honest.
I played it ages ago when it was the new shit and then yeah it was something. But time has passed the N64 by and Mario 64 can barely even survive. I have played no major games from that era that hold to me graphically. A shame but whatever.
Ocarina will get remade someday anyway.
Indeed, I was born in '82... though it is true I didn't grow up with LttP, if the poster actually meant 'if you grew up with it and now say it's not as good' instead of just an age comment.Kyle Bosman is definitely born earlier than that, and I believe the user A Black Falcon is too. If you have ever read some of his threads you wouldn't dare to ask him to hand in his gamer card. http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1329906
A big complaint I had when I first approached it years ago is that the content can often feel shallow and sterile compared to the games before it (the NES games are really challenging by comparison and had truly wide worlds and labyrinthine dungeons) and after it (LA's world has great character and dungeon design and OoT really developed the universe).
It was very clearly a turning point for the series, but I'm rarely compelled to play through it again and I don't have much of an attachment to most of what's going on in it.
It used to be my least favorite of the traditional-style Zeldas, but I've warmed a bit more to it because I've started to appreciate how little "fat" it has.
As far as combat difficulty goes 3d Zelda games may not be as hard as the classic 2d Zelda games are, but even so there's a huge gulf between the nearly nonexistent "challenge" of Wind Waker and the moderate to tricky challenges of the other 3d Zelda games. I usually die a fair amount when going through a Zelda game the first time, but Wind Waker? The very first time I played it back in the mid '00s, I beat the game dying only once up to the final boss... a time where I was fighting a boss midgame after accidentally wasting my fairy.It isn't so much that I think the combat in Wind Waker is hard; its more that the combat in all the 3D Zelda games is pretty damn easy.
Yeah. As far as puzzles go WW is righti n line with the other 3d Zelda games, apart from the limited number of dungeons compared to OoT or TP and the resulting reduction in dungeon puzzles, but combat difficulty was reduced to a crazy degree, unfortunately. I like Wind Waker, it's a good game and sailing around the seas was pretty fun. The story is surprisingly decent for a non-LA Zelda game, too. The complete lack of challenge and small number of dungeons, however, really hold it back.it really,REALLY is not.
just look at how many hearts an hit in wind waker deals,and compare it to other zeldas, also count the number of fairies and hearts you find around...add to that the fact that the entire combat is a farce due to the counter that it's way too easy to pull off (and the developers knew that,since one of the secret objectives in the training was to deal 300 hits before you get hit 3 times...), and you will understand why wind waker it's way too easy,even for the low standards of the zelda series nowadays
in terms of puzzle,they are not easy by themselves,the problem here is that apart from the leaf (and in a minor part the grappling hook), the game doesn't have much in the way of new items and gameplay ideas, so you already know how to solve certain parts before you even get to them.
wind waker is several times easier than any other 3d zelda i've tried...and 3d zelda like you said are not really dark souls,but wind waker was just embarassing.
Skyward Sword is in the bottom 5 like it's supposed to be. How the rest rank don't really matter. The biggest crime last gen were people who put SS on a higher pedestal than it deserves.
Edit: To explain, as much as it progressed in control and mechanics, it regressed in pacing, storytelling, world design and hand holding.
What about the games did you find boring?
Ok, here's my rankings. I played them all except for the coop titles. While this is obviously my opinion, it's still accurate as a global view on the series' quality, rather than pushing the internet hipster/egoraptor agenda of 2D>3D/dismissing great games by overblowing tiny issues. This is getting worse than RPG fanboys grabbing any occasion to complain about FFVII being overrated smh, give credit where it's due
Um...
And you're opinion is also pretty bad, Mario 64 still plays like a dream, and has simple graphics that haven't really aged at all.
We played it when we were like 8.A Link to the Past might be a contender for the most overrated game ever made. Even with all of the rabid fanboyism and mainstream appeal for stuff like OoT or FF7, LttP was always just a pretty good game that has somehow ended up as a byword for perfection for inexplicable reasons.
Pretty terrible list imo, but I see I'm not the only one to think so. It honestly reads like it's trying too hard to list the "hidden gems" and downplay the games that everyone considers classics.
Me finding FF7 overrated isn't hipster garbage. FF6 IMO did many things it did better already, plus with much less character interchangeability (which the Materia system did).
And agree or disagree, the 2d games are much more snappy than the 3d games. The 3d-ness slowed things down quite a bit, with tasks taking comparatively more time, making otherwise forgivable repeated step monsters repetitious due to all the waiting/latency.
Mario 64 is great and all, but sits even further along the adventure side of the adventure vs. platforming axis than Super Mario World did. Needless to say, the core Mario games have always been strongest at their more platform-y.
to be fair, how interesting would these lists be if they were all just some small variations of "1. OOT, 2. LTTP, 3. MM...." etc.?