• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Kotaku's Mark Wilson: "rape me"

Barnolde

Banned
The title may be a bit overzealous, but this is something I'm genuinely curious about. Seems this fellow Mark Wilson would rather pay for nothing on the 360 than pay for actual in-game content on PS3. I don't get it.

Links in question:
PS3

Does it bother anyone else that his bicep is nearly bigger than his head? On a side note, Tecmo has announced three Survival Mode expansions for Ninja Gaiden Sigma—the first of which will hit for about $3—and we're guessing the rest will go for a similar price.

8/30: Weapons Master Mission, five weapon limit September: Speed Master Mission, quick fights on a time budget October: Rachel Master Mission, different character with five survival tests


None of these expansion missions are rocking my world, but each will offer a tangible measurement for a global ranking system sure to cut your ego down pretty quickly. And besides, your subsequent dependence on booze is a priceless commodity.


360
Dear. Microsoft,
I love the 360. Even though it breaks, and mine is currently making sounds that can best be verbalized as R2D2 getting raped, I'm enjoying the console.

But about those dashboard themes. Yes, I'll pay for them. You knew it all along, so congrats.
What I want to know is: why can't I update my Marketplace blade? Because I'll be wasting time tabbing back and forth, experiencing the sybaritic joy of Earth tones combined with the dashboard's oceanic swooshing effect, and BAM! BRIGHT ORANGE!

Please fix. I'm sure that a Smackdown Vs. Raw background on Marketplace will not hinder my consumerism.
Sincerely, Love, Waiting in angst,
Mark Wilson

A theme is $1.50 (120 points), the PS3 in-game content is $3, the price of two themes. A picture pack is $1 (80 points) for comparison. It's $1 or $1.50 to pay for pictures...

I'm all for good DLC, I bought the Crackdown DLC pack at $10 (800 points), because it was loaded with content, but I'm not going to buy Horse Armor, because it's a ripoff and does nothing, like a theme. The PS3's DLC in question seems fairly priced, the system has free wallpapers on PSN and even the 360 allows you to put up your own pictures from a USB thumbdrive, though you can't customize the blades, but still, it allows me to put up some nice nature-esque wallpapers.

Why would Mark Wilson and countless other gamers rather throw money away on nothing than buy actual content?
 
Barnolde said:
Why would Mark Wilson and countless other gamers rather throw money away on nothing than buy actual content?

Because consumers buy what appeals to them. Do I wish no one on Earth saw anything but Ratatouille all summer? Of course. Does it boggle my mind that anyone would NOT want to see it? Naturally. Yet millions have avoided it.

Such is the peril of living in a free market economy.
 
Barnolde said:
Why would someone rather buy nothing than something?



Clearly. Live does enough damage to itself with the deceptively priced MS Points.

Everytime I've bought them the price in dollars is exactly the same. This is the strawest of all straw men Anti-Live arguments.
 
People being stupid enough to buy a theme and not really wanting to spend money to expand a game aren't really all that similar.

"What, you bought a can of Coke, but you DIDN'T buy a burger?!"
 
i'm not getting it.

all i can gather from these two excerpts is that he might prefer to buy dashboard themes than the specific dlc for ninja gaiden. but since those statements weren't made in the same vacuum, i can't even say that much.
 
Tieno said:
You need to reply in the kotaku comment section.

Other folks got that covered:

Wait, so I get to buy a game MODE for three bucks a pop? SO passed on.

Downloadable Content needs to really just admit to itself that it either needs to be free small things like this, or larger expansion-pack type deals.

and

The difference is that MS charges for small things like Gamerpics, Themes, Digital OXM, game video strategy's, etc. And remember MS wanted to charge for the Gears pack, Epic wanted it to be free.

Oh and not to mention that most demos can only be downloaded with a Gold membership for a few weeks before Silver members can access them. And to top it all off I'm already paying 50 bucks a year. Hell MS would probably charge their users for Folding@home if they had it.
 
From reading Kotaku every now and then, this isn't surprising.


with that said, close this thread nothing good can come from it.
 
Why would someone rather buy nothing than something?
Where does it say that? maybe you need some english lessons he's just saying he doesn't like the new MODES very much or is he automatically supposed to like them because they $3?
 
devilscallmedad said:
Where does it say that? maybe you need some english lessons he's just saying he doesn't like the new MODES very much or is he automatically supposed to like them because they $3?

Pictures = nothing.
Content = something.

I'm not saying anything regarding the content, but it's still content.
 
I can't believe anybody would buy a theme (they're usually what, 150pts? That's almost $2 just for 4 .jpegs), no matter how big a fan you are and how much money you have to waste.
 
Barnolde said:
Pictures = nothing.
Content = something.

I'm not saying anything regarding the content, but it's still content.

So I should be more inclined to buy NBA Street characters than a pack of Penny Arcade gamerpics I happen to find rather amusing? Just because you qualify one as "nothing" (obviously not true) and the other as "something"? Even though I don't want those characters and have no interest in playing them?
 
Barnolde said:
Pictures = nothing.
Content = something.

I'm not saying anything regarding the content, but it's still content.

Did you just wake up today and say to yourself, Hey, you know what I am going to post an incoherent troll on NeoGAF based loosely on another blog?
 
X26 said:
I can't believe anybody would buy a theme (they're usually what, 150pts? That's almost $2 just for 4 .jpegs), no matter how big a fan you are and how much money you have to waste.
Lots of people buy faceplates for mobiles too. It adds zero feature. It's is just perspective.
 
X26 said:
I can't believe anybody would buy a theme (they're usually what, 150pts? That's almost $2 just for 4 .jpegs), no matter how big a fan you are and how much money you have to waste.

Thank you. Why not use a custom wallpaper?
Sadly, the best theme on XBLM is free (GTA4).
 
X26 said:
I can't believe anybody would buy a theme (they're usually what, 150pts? That's almost $2 just for 4 .jpegs), no matter how big a fan you are and how much money you have to waste.

Yep.

MirageDwarf said:
Lots of people buy crappy faceplates for mobiles too. It adds zero feature. It's is just perspective.

A faceplate is a physical piece of material, same with the ones for the 360. A theme is digital, it's a jpg, it's nothing, it's free money for MS.
 
MirageDwarf said:
Lots of people buy crappy faceplates for mobiles too. It adds zero feature. It's is just perspective.

Exactly. I bought a TGTTM background for my Cell Phone. And I bought a ring tone for it too. Stop trying to hijack my wallet, as it is filled with the money that I earned.

shagg_187 said:
Thank you. Why not use a custom wallpaper?
Sadly, the best theme on XBLM is free (GTA4).

Christ, because I don't have one that's as appealing. Or I don't want to bother. Is it really out of your realm of understanding that some people might think something just looks ****ing cool?
 
X26 said:
I can't believe anybody would buy a theme (they're usually what, 150pts? That's almost $2 just for 4 .jpegs), no matter how big a fan you are and how much money you have to waste.
yeah man that really amazes me... what a racket
 
MirageDwarf said:
Lots of people buy faceplates for mobiles too. It adds zero feature. It's is just perspective.

A mobile phone faceplate makes a lot more sense than 4 pics obscurred by dashboard icons and items

shagg_187 said:
Thank you. Why not use a custom wallpaper?
Sadly, the best theme on XBLM is free (GTA4).

All the themes I use are either free, or ones I just got of my computer and set as the background on my 360 (while you can't pick a seperate picture for each blade, alteast it's free and there's infintie choices)
 
Barnolde said:
Yep.



A faceplate is a physical piece of material, same with the ones for the 360. A theme is digital, it's a jpg, it's nothing, it's free money for MS.

People want their 360 to look nice and will pay for it, be it physical or digital. I'd never pay for either but then I have a nice free GTA theme I downloaded.
 
People paying $2 for themes and $1 for some gamerpics are skewing the whole XBLM pricing structure and are ruining XBLM.

I mean, how can Activision not charge $2 per Guitar Hero track considering the relative value of the content and effort involved. People who complain about the cost of the tracks yet buy themes and gamerpics are ridiculous. There are tons of people on the xbox boards whining about the track prices, yet have their $1 glorified icon on the left in their gamercard. Hello?! You're part of the problem.
 
2&2 said:
People paying $2 for themes and $1 for some gamerpics are skewing the whole XBLM pricing structure and are ruining XBLM.

I mean, how can Activision not charge $2 per Guitar Hero track considering the relative value of the content and effort involved. People who complain about the cost of the tracks yet buy themes and gamerpics are ridiculous. There are tons of people on the xbox boards whining about the track prices, yet have their $1 glorified icon on the left in their gamercard. Hello?! You're part of the problem.

Well, then problem solved. The Market has established itself. There's really no use grousing about it. It's been almost two years. The fight is over.
 
2&2 said:
People paying $2 for themes and $1 for some gamerpics are skewing the whole XBLM pricing structure and are ruining XBLM.

I mean, how can Activision not charge $2 per Guitar Hero track considering the relative value of the content and effort involved. People who complain about the cost of the tracks yet buy themes and gamerpics are ridiculous. There are tons of people on the xbox boards whining about the track prices, yet have their $1 glorified icon on the left in their gamercard. Hello?! You're part of the problem.

Interesting, I didn't even think of this.

Things are overpriced, because people are accustomed to paying overpriced charges. Publishers don't need to be fair, let alone free, because people will pay for them anyway. Activision sees people pay $1.50 for a theme and $1 for a picture pack and they get away with charing $2 for a song.

BenjaminBirdie said:
Well, then problem solved. The Market has established itself. There's really no use grousing about it. It's been almost two years. The fight is over.

But, but, MS listens to the community! That's pretty shitty reasoning, they've cost the same amount for a long time, the market has established nothing, MS established the prices.
 
Barnolde said:
But, but, MS listens to the community! That's pretty shitty reasoning, they've cost the same amount for a long time, the market has established nothing, MS established the prices.

The community would have spoken up a long time ago, and gamerpics and themes wouldn't have generated the mountains of cash they undoubtedly already have.

It would be like me walking into a theater TODAY and saying $10 for a movie ticket? NO THANKS.
 
cjelly said:
I opened the thread.

I saw the original poster.

I left the thread.

a) talk about wasted energy, the creator is displayed right on the forum.
b) talk about a total lie, mr i left a reply after leaving the thread
 
Ugh....I think he said that he didn't particularly like the expansions, not that he was against paying for them, nor that he thinks nobody should pay for them. Simply that he doesn't particularly like them.

So then from that tiny off hand comment you seem to have linked it to him saying that he bought something he does like on Live, and you are now trying to twist this into a Live vs PSN debate and imply that kotaku is biased because he bought something he liked on Live but said that something totally unrelated on PSN didn't float his boat?

Do you like comparing apples to airplanes or something? Why start this thread? Even Mr Fantastic knows this is too much of a stretch.....

.....troll bait thread?
 
BenjaminBirdie said:
The community would have spoken up a long time ago, and gamerpics and themes wouldn't have generated the mountains of cash they undoubtedly already have.

It would be like me walking into a theater TODAY and saying $10 for a movie ticket? NO THANKS.

I'm pretty sure they have spoken and MS has just ignored them. Free money from pictures is too good to pass up. Most I've paid for a movie ticket was $8 which was ok because it was an indie theater and I knew it wouldn't be cheap, I'd certainly say no thanks to $10, because jesus christ that's a ripoff.

cjelly said:
I opened the thread.

I saw the original poster.

I left the thread.

cjelly
will gladly bend over and grab ankles for Microsoft

People like you are the problem and I'm aware that not blindly drooling over the 360 means that I must be bashed by the XDF, happens all the time.
 
Barnolde said:
Why would Mark Wilson and countless other gamers rather throw money away on nothing than buy actual content?
Why? Because it's their money and it's legal. They can spend it wherever they want.

I can't see the point of your thread. Are you trying to guide people's consumer attitudes or something ?
 
Top Bottom