You really have to be a Die Antwoord fan to appreciate Chappie. I liked the movie.
Yup I like Die Antwoord as well.
You really have to be a Die Antwoord fan to appreciate Chappie. I liked the movie.
Nails my issues with the movie 100%. It's mostly a mean spirited flick as well and you end up rooting for Chappie out of pity because almost everyone else is just that much worse.This is always the most frustrating way for someone to defend a movie. Just because you have low standards and don't care about filmmaking doesn't make those who don't share your apathy unreasonable. Also Chappie was clearly aiming a bit higher than just a 'sci-fi action movie' but couldn't stick the landing on any of its thematics.
It's a tonal mess of a movie that tried to tackle a lot of different topics but approached each one in the least sophisticated way possible. It also has distracting logic problems and every supporting character is paper thin.
I think Neil Blomkampf should really stop writing his own movies because he's clearly a very talented director, but his last 2 movies have been completely hamstrung by weak writing.
What makes you think it was trying to be more than just a sci-fi action movie? It's Robocop. It's Halo. It's Mission Impossible. Chappie was never a contender for an Oscar or Academy Award nomination. Not even as a thought in Neil's head.This is always the most frustrating way for someone to defend a movie. Just because you have low standards and don't care about filmmaking doesn't make those who don't share your apathy unreasonable. Also Chappie was clearly aiming a bit higher than just a 'sci-fi action movie' but couldn't stick the landing on any of its thematics.
It's a tonal mess of a movie that tried to tackle a lot of different topics but approached each one in the least sophisticated way possible. It also has distracting logic problems and every supporting character is paper thin.
I think Neil Blomkampf should really stop writing his own movies because he's clearly a very talented director, but his last 2 movies have been completely hamstrung by weak writing.
What makes you think it was trying to be more than just a sci-fi action movie? It's Robocop. It's Halo. It's Mission Impossible. Chappie was never a contender for an Oscar or Academy Award nomination. Not even as a thought in Neil's head.
What Chappie is, is a movie that does what it's basic plot points and visuals intend for it to do.
Please give me an example of where Chappie went wrong and what scenes you would have changed to make it the greatest movie starring a talking robot ever made. What would have won Chappie an Academy Award?
Is this an example of a straw man argument?
Is this an example of using a buzz word to try to discredit an argument?
Please give me an example of where my post went wrong and what words you would have changed to make it the greatest post ever made. What would have won my post an Academy Award?
This is the kind of behavior people usually resort to when they lost an argument.
What makes you think it was trying to be more than just a sci-fi action movie? It's Robocop.
What makes you think it was trying to be more than just a sci-fi action movie? It's Robocop. It's Halo. It's Mission Impossible. Chappie was never a contender for an Oscar or Academy Award nomination. Not even as a thought in Neil's head.
What Chappie is, is a movie that does what it's basic plot points and visuals intend for it to do.
Please give me an example of where Chappie went wrong and what scenes you would have changed to make it the greatest movie starring a talking robot ever made. What would have won Chappie an Academy Award?
I think you're expecting way too much from a sci-fi action movie.
Ok firstly, I think you might have a gigantic misunderstanding of RoboCop if you think it is aspiring to be only a cool robot action movie. There is some pretty major satire going on in that film and it's not subtle about it.
It doesn't matter if Blomkampf thought he was going to win an Oscar or not. What matters is that he tried to tackle topics including; if humanity can exist in an AI, how environmental factors create and propogate crime, the militarisation of police, along with a few others. It creates a world with a lot of potential but does nothing with it. It doesn't tie it's ideas together into something complete, and the ending of 'the lady gangster is a robot now' felt like it came out of a different movie.
As to your shitty strawman question at the end, if Neil wanted to make a film that could stand up to critique, he could look his first film, District 9. A much better executed film that uses its sci fi conceit to explore aparteid in South Africa (not super deeply, but certainly effectively), while also offering super fun CGI action. I'm not asking for every movie to offer some grand thesis, I just like it when they have something coherent to say.
In what world is Elysium and Chappie bad movies?? Did I somehow miss this new memo where all movies should be a sober British drama about human existential crisis in 1940s. Like for real OP, it is a sci-fi movie and while it doesn't stretch the topic or medium far or innovative wise, it does a damn good job at being a fun movie
It was a huge step up from Elysium.
Is Neil Blomkampf the new M.Night
Everyone loved district 9 because it was unique in a lot of ways. I was expecting great things from him after district 9.
But then he just ran with the district 9 look, pairing them with generic stories about distopian future. I am honestly having doubts about his alien project.
So M. Night but he fell of is earlier
The movie was about a robot and its relationship with a woman, her abusive partner, its creator and further down the line, its creator's rival. In order to spend it's hour and a half to two hours on the political climate would have made for a completely different movie.Ok firstly, I think you might have a gigantic misunderstanding of RoboCop if you think it is aspiring to be only a cool robot action movie. There is some pretty major satire going on in that film and it's not subtle about it.
It doesn't matter if Blomkampf thought he was going to win an Oscar or not. What matters is that he tried to tackle topics including; if humanity can exist in an AI, how environmental factors create and propogate crime, the militarisation of police, along with a few others. It creates a world with a lot of potential but does nothing with it. It doesn't tie it's ideas together into something complete, and the ending of 'the lady gangster is a robot now' felt like it came out of a different movie.
As to your shitty strawman question at the end, if Neil wanted to make a film that could stand up to critique, he could look his first film, District 9. A much better executed film that uses its sci fi conceit to explore aparteid in South Africa (not super deeply, but certainly effectively), while also offering super fun CGI action. I'm not asking for every movie to offer some grand thesis, I just like it when they have something coherent to say.