-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Mario Galaxy 1 v Mario Galaxy 2 - Make your Pick!!
- Thread starter Chinbo37
- Start date
Shalashaska161
Member
2 gets my vote. Just liked it more.
Mango The Magician
Banned
Galaxy 1 is better in some regards to me, at least in my opinion, and I honestly prefer how a lot of it's levels are structured over the the levels of SMG2, plus it has a better hub world. Oh and Rosalinas story was a magical point of Mario for me that was not replicated in SMG2 because story is the devil or something.
clutch.as.it.gets.
Member
A for me.
It just felt more like an real adventure and Gusty Garden is my favorite world/galaxy.
It just felt more like an real adventure and Gusty Garden is my favorite world/galaxy.
Arthr2ShdsJcksn
Banned
I guess Galaxy 1 wins by default since I haven't played 2. Everytime I think about getting 2, though, I end up launching 1 and getting my fill of Mario goodness.
Haloid1177
Banned
A. The first Galaxy blew my mind when I played through it, and while Galaxy 2 was fantastic it just felt like a more refined game, not an innovative game.
.
The hub world makes a huge difference. It was like the next gen version of the 64 castle. Galaxy 2 lost that.
Franchuzas87
Member
B.
Galaxy 2 trimmed a bit better the fat (story and stage selection), has more levels, better bosses, best use of Yoshi in a Mario game and much, much, much better endgame content (extra world and meaningful green stars).
Galaxy 2 trimmed a bit better the fat (story and stage selection), has more levels, better bosses, best use of Yoshi in a Mario game and much, much, much better endgame content (extra world and meaningful green stars).
A - Galaxy 1 ALL THE WAY
First things first: the main reason I prefer the first one because it felt totally fresh, whereas SMG2 (despite it slightly being better platform-wise) kinda felt like a drag at a certain point. Probably my own fault, because I thought it would be a good idea to replay SMG1 just before the launch of part 2. But still, SMG1 has the much better hub in my opinion, soundtrack was a bit more memorable and everything just clicked together so wonderfully. Instead of just little segments in SMG2, it kinda felt like a cohesive whole in the first one. Also, and I'm aware this might be a little blasphemous to some, I didn't like the levels in SMG2 where Yoshi was essential. I kinda tried avoiding him unless you HAD to use him to complete levels. I don't know, just didn't like it that much.
First things first: the main reason I prefer the first one because it felt totally fresh, whereas SMG2 (despite it slightly being better platform-wise) kinda felt like a drag at a certain point. Probably my own fault, because I thought it would be a good idea to replay SMG1 just before the launch of part 2. But still, SMG1 has the much better hub in my opinion, soundtrack was a bit more memorable and everything just clicked together so wonderfully. Instead of just little segments in SMG2, it kinda felt like a cohesive whole in the first one. Also, and I'm aware this might be a little blasphemous to some, I didn't like the levels in SMG2 where Yoshi was essential. I kinda tried avoiding him unless you HAD to use him to complete levels. I don't know, just didn't like it that much.
B
It doesn't matter what came first, it's what excelled in the end that matters most, and for me, that is SMG2.
Only going to talk about the hub world to compare between the two games. The Comet Observatory in SMG1 only added more to the playtime. It didn't do anything that you can't do on Starship Mario other than take longer to get to other worlds.
It doesn't matter what came first, it's what excelled in the end that matters most, and for me, that is SMG2.
Only going to talk about the hub world to compare between the two games. The Comet Observatory in SMG1 only added more to the playtime. It didn't do anything that you can't do on Starship Mario other than take longer to get to other worlds.
Gotdatmoney
Member
I preferred 2. More refined and took the ideas further than the first game. I prefer the world map to the observatory since it was way easier to navigate. There is very little of interest in the Observatory imo, just an extended run to get to where I wanted to go. Plus I prefer Galaxy 2's end game.
B definitely. I actually played Galaxy 2 first so that might influence my decision as I won't have that whole "freshness" argument, but it's honestly my favourite 3D platformer. Playing 1 after, it feels like they were using the gravity gimmick a lot because at the time, it was new and exciting. But when 2 came along, it was doing so much more than just being a novelty. The addition of the Yosh also helped a lot.
PK Strawstorm
Member
A - I loved the HubWorld. It really ties everything together and gives the whole game more feeling.
Can't help but agree with this. Not to mention Galaxy 2 was the one with the Fluzzard levels, which were absolute trash. Inferior soundtrack as well. And a boring Hub world to boot.
A.
GiantBreadbug
Member
A
I'll never understand people who say they preferred 2 because it "trimmed the fat." 3D Mario were better for their "fat," if it could be called that. The story in 1 was unobtrusive and among the best in any Mario title. The hub, while a bit lacking compared to those of Sunshine and 64, was charming and warm. The levels themselves were less "run forward till you reach the goal" and I feel had more emphasis on exploring, which is what I find fun about the 3D titles.
2 was a great, focused platformer, but was easily a weaker package altogether. I do feel that the soundtrack was more refined, but that's probably thanks to borrowing so much from 1.
When I have a desire to go back and experience the magic of the Galaxy titles, I always replay 1.
I'll never understand people who say they preferred 2 because it "trimmed the fat." 3D Mario were better for their "fat," if it could be called that. The story in 1 was unobtrusive and among the best in any Mario title. The hub, while a bit lacking compared to those of Sunshine and 64, was charming and warm. The levels themselves were less "run forward till you reach the goal" and I feel had more emphasis on exploring, which is what I find fun about the 3D titles.
2 was a great, focused platformer, but was easily a weaker package altogether. I do feel that the soundtrack was more refined, but that's probably thanks to borrowing so much from 1.
When I have a desire to go back and experience the magic of the Galaxy titles, I always replay 1.
anon_mastermind
Member
B
Galaxy 2 went above and beyond the original, with more creative scenarios and less filler.
Galaxy 2 went above and beyond the original, with more creative scenarios and less filler.
MillionVolts
Member
B.
I was more blown away by Galaxy 1 when I first played it, but these days I would rather play Galaxy 2. It's harder, it trimmed the excess fat that was the Observatory, has better post game content, has better power ups, and Yoshi.
I was more blown away by Galaxy 1 when I first played it, but these days I would rather play Galaxy 2. It's harder, it trimmed the excess fat that was the Observatory, has better post game content, has better power ups, and Yoshi.
User 479360
Banned
I'm ashamed to admit that, even though I LOVED Galaxy, I've yet to play the sequel. It's just sitting there in my closet waiting to be played.
I wasn't a big fan of the Wii and rented too many games, so I just never got around to playing it. I wanted to, but something always came up (a new release, a rental, etc.)
I need to rectify that soon.
I wasn't a big fan of the Wii and rented too many games, so I just never got around to playing it. I wanted to, but something always came up (a new release, a rental, etc.)
I need to rectify that soon.
CarolinaMike
Member
B -- SMG1 is great but SMG2 is a masterpiece
Hades Hotgun
Banned
A - Galaxy 1 was a better experience for me. Galaxy 2 seemed like an expansion pack.
LegendofLex
Member
Mario Galaxy 1.
Don't get me wrong, 2 has better highs. But 2 feels like a game with "better level design," not a game with more charming, timeless content. 2 also feels incredibly factory-made and level-pack-ish in comparison (Chompworks, boss gauntlet, etc.). It was clearly designed as a follow-on to the original.
Galaxy 1, on the other hand, blew the roof off the genre, and seems like it was designed from the start to be a redeeming light for the 3D Mario series. (It was successful, by the way.)
Galaxy 1 also completely justified its space adventure theme; Galaxy 2 didn't really feel like it tried very hard - Starship Mario was a poor follow-up to the Comet Observatory, and the world map structure, while convenient, felt really washed-up compared to the creative "observatory dome" thing going on in the first game.
Don't get me wrong, 2 has better highs. But 2 feels like a game with "better level design," not a game with more charming, timeless content. 2 also feels incredibly factory-made and level-pack-ish in comparison (Chompworks, boss gauntlet, etc.). It was clearly designed as a follow-on to the original.
Galaxy 1, on the other hand, blew the roof off the genre, and seems like it was designed from the start to be a redeeming light for the 3D Mario series. (It was successful, by the way.)
Galaxy 1 also completely justified its space adventure theme; Galaxy 2 didn't really feel like it tried very hard - Starship Mario was a poor follow-up to the Comet Observatory, and the world map structure, while convenient, felt really washed-up compared to the creative "observatory dome" thing going on in the first game.
Danny Dudekisser
I paid good money for this Dynex!
I'd go with Galaxy 1. I liked the hub world better, and it felt more like it took place in space than the second game.... which was neat.
Basically, it comes down to aesthetics. Both games were stupid good.
Basically, it comes down to aesthetics. Both games were stupid good.
princemarth23
Member
2 is clearly the better game in my eyes. It is everything a direct sequel should be.
andrerobot
Member
A FTW.
SMG2 was a great expansion pack though.
SMG2 was a great expansion pack though.
Galaxy 2.
+ Smaller but better hub world
+ Streamlined world map
+ More refined gameplay and expanded on the ideas of Galaxy 1
+ Better boss battles
+ Cloud Suit power up is awesome
+ Did not include the garbage bomb throwing missions
- Good music but not quite as good as Galaxy 1's
- Repetitive but slightly more challenging Bowser battles
+ Smaller but better hub world
+ Streamlined world map
+ More refined gameplay and expanded on the ideas of Galaxy 1
+ Better boss battles
+ Cloud Suit power up is awesome
+ Did not include the garbage bomb throwing missions
- Good music but not quite as good as Galaxy 1's
- Repetitive but slightly more challenging Bowser battles
ThatRandomCliff
Member
Mario Galaxy 2. I simply found it more enjoyable than the first. Make no mistake, I still love the first, just not as much as the second.
Beerman462
Member
Sunshine
Deputy Moonman
Member
I can't participate in the discussion, because I didn't care for either. I'd rather play Super Mario 64 or Super Mario World on the SNES any day of the week. That or Tropical Freeze.