Remaster port begging will take over tho.Everything in line with the leaks, iirc.
Not very excited. At least the ME1 fans might finally stop whining tho
But I do find the idea of being essentially a space frontiersman interesting if not surprising.
Remaster port begging will take over tho.Everything in line with the leaks, iirc.
Not very excited. At least the ME1 fans might finally stop whining tho
Everything in line with the leaks, iirc.
Not very excited. At least the ME1 fans might finally stop whining tho
The OT reads like the description of a game that is 2 or 3 years away at the very least. Considering it's being released in 2016 and a game like Mass Effect requires a huge amount of work it wouldn't surprise me if this was yet another rushed half-assed DLC-filled "game" destroyed by EA's loathsome modus operandi. ME3 doesn't give me high hopes either.
The OT reads like the description of a game that is 2 or 3 years away at the very least. Considering it's being released in 2016 and a game like Mass Effect requires a huge amount of work it wouldn't surprise me if this was yet another rushed half-assed DLC-filled "game" destroyed by EA's loathsome modus operandi. ME3 doesn't give me high hopes either.
So what's the canonical ending to Mass Effect 3, then?
So what's the canonical ending to Mass Effect 3, then?
Frostbite 3 destruction + Vanguard Charge =![]()
So what's the canonical ending to Mass Effect 3, then?
Seriously, ark theory: voyage to Andromeda commences before the trilogy ends, game technically set after the Reaper war, inhabitants of Andromeda so far away and cut off from the Milky Way they'll never know of the war's outcome. A sequel that never has to address the trilogy.
Seriously, ark theory: voyage to Andromeda commences before the trilogy ends, game technically set after the Reaper war, inhabitants of Andromeda so far away and cut off from the Milky Way they'll never know of the war's outcome. A sequel that never has to address the trilogy.
Seriously, ark theory: voyage to Andromeda commences before the trilogy ends, game technically set after the Reaper war, inhabitants of Andromeda so far away and cut off from the Milky Way they'll never know of the war's outcome. A sequel that never has to address the trilogy.
Seriously, ark theory: voyage to Andromeda commences before the trilogy ends, game technically set after the Reaper war, inhabitants of Andromeda so far away and cut off from the Milky Way they'll never know of the war's outcome. A sequel that never has to address the trilogy.
Am I one of the only people who really dislikes the fact they are ignoring the ending to ME3? There are so many possibilities and ways they could handle depicting the fallout of that conflict.
There were zero unless they canonized one of the endings.
Seriously, ark theory: voyage to Andromeda commences before the trilogy ends, game technically set after the Reaper war, inhabitants of Andromeda so far away and cut off from the Milky Way they'll never know of the war's outcome. A sequel that never has to address the trilogy.
Seriously, ark theory: voyage to Andromeda commences before the trilogy ends, game technically set after the Reaper war, inhabitants of Andromeda so far away and cut off from the Milky Way they'll never know of the war's outcome. A sequel that never has to address the trilogy.
Seriously, ark theory: voyage to Andromeda commences before the trilogy ends, game technically set after the Reaper war, inhabitants of Andromeda so far away and cut off from the Milky Way they'll never know of the war's outcome. A sequel that never has to address the trilogy.
Seriously, ark theory: voyage to Andromeda commences before the trilogy ends, game technically set after the Reaper war, inhabitants of Andromeda so far away and cut off from the Milky Way they'll never know of the war's outcome. A sequel that never has to address the trilogy.
when is 3 coming to steam
Seriously, ark theory: voyage to Andromeda commences before the trilogy ends, game technically set after the Reaper war, inhabitants of Andromeda so far away and cut off from the Milky Way they'll never know of the war's outcome. A sequel that never has to address the trilogy.
So what are the odds that there's another ancient evil that's going to threaten civilization in this new galaxy?
I wish the game was set at Milky Way after Reaper invasion.
They are kinda avoiding everything related to previous trilogy with this.
That's the best part. The reaper-war was a colossal clusterfuck.
That's the best part. The reaper-war was a colossal clusterfuck.
Sure the ending was a bit of a shit show the overall original conclusion opened up a lot of possibilities and chances for interesting power shifts and galactic shakeups. Not the least of which was developing serious FTL to replace the Mass Relays.
The EC kind of screwed that up by all but saying the Mass Relays were fixed or at least fixable and not tally destroyed, but that could be massaged to still be rather ruinous.
Set ME4 a few decades or more after ME3 Destruction ending. Make it so while the relays weren't fully destroyed most were put out of commission and needed to be repaired at the least the get them going again. Most systems simply didn't have the resources or manpower to do so after the Reaper War leaving most stranded and on their own. Certain pockets were able to restart their relays, rebuild and survive on the own, but effectively the whole galaxy was cut off from one another.
The games premise could be using some newly developed FTL/Warp drive type system that allows for near instant traversal over thousands of lightyears without the use of a Mass Relay. And your job is to go out there and reconnect with some of those lost systems and to scout out new systems in the Milky Way that were never accessible before with the Mass Relays, since that only gave access to a very small sections of the galaxy. Who knows what civilizations lay in all those uncharted areas of the galaxy. Alien races who developed space flight and possibly their own mini galactic empires totally free from Protheon/Reaper technology.
We don't need to go to a totally new Galaxy. The Mass Relays only allowed access to barely 1% of our current one.
We need to go to a new galaxy because 75% of their original endings and majority of the plot of ME3 didn't leave any room for a followup.
That's a really weak reason. In no way are they required to honor everyone's ending choice and let them continue from where they left off. It's a new trilogy, no save imports required. Your ending will always be your ending, that's how your Shepard's story ended, but for the series to continue there is only one possible ending they could choose. Destruction. They wouldn't even need to fully explain it. Just the Reapers were gone and the galaxy was broken. It's not that hard.
BioWare broke their franchise, it's not too much to ask that they put it back together, not sweep it under the rug and say "here look at this other new shiny ball."
You don't get it do you? You can't fix their broken plot, they can't fix their broken plot even if they decided to retcon 30% of the entire lore and story. Even if they focused on destruction, it would still be worse than their current trajectory of leaving the milky way and consequently the baggage of the races behind including the question of who Shepard fucking exterminated.
It absolutely is too much to ask them to try to fix things now, in fact, going to a different galaxy should have been planned in the series from the start.
i just realized they never announced a remaster ;_;
![]()