• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Mel Gibson Says That Marvel Films Are Violent "Without Conscience"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tony attempting to flat-out murder Bucky in the bunker was trying to "discipline by force"?

This question isn't accounting the context of why he went out of his way to do so at that point in the movie. Its worth pointing out up until
he saw footage of Bucky under Hydra's orders killing his parents; he had finally started listening to Cap's insistence about Bucky being framed for over the UN bombing incident and wasn't trying to capture hum for once.
It's not like he spontaneously decided to off him for no reason whatsoever.

To put the shoe on the other foot, this would be akin to giving Gibson's character Riggs flak for going completely unhinged at the third act of Lethal Weapon 2 and arguably engaging in the same "violence without consequence" Gibson himself is criticizing in the OP; while glossing over the fact that the film's villains revealed they unintentionally killed Riggs' wife while trying to get him (as opposed to his wife's death being an accident as stated in the first film) while also drowning his new girlfriend(?) in the same scene.

I can't tell if people are accidentally or deliberately omitting the framework presented in scenes such as the above to make the Marvel/ MCU movies inherently flawed in accordance to Gibson's remarks, but it's rather annoying nonetheless.

It was about ethics in diplomatic immunity.

Hehe, this is pretty good.
 
Yo... what parts? Where Guardians of the Galaxy has 83,871 deaths on screen? Where violence solves every thing? How about in Age of Ultron's amazing opening scene where the Avenger's mow down nameless goons while joke about cursing? (It's weird because killing guys is not as bad as swearing.) Or how about Civil War where they try to confront their violent ways but have a big brouhaha at the airport and then ends perfectly:
Tony Stark beating up Winter Soldier and Captain America.
In the latest Strange film we see
Strange upset because he doesn't want to kill... but then people are dying all around him but whatevs, not like he did it.

Should I keep going? The MCU movies aren't brutal or violent where they'll show like someone being slashed open but they're very casual about when random background people die. It's very ironic because it's used as a motivator for the heroes but when you kill a hero it's called cheap story telling... and it's like the biggest motivator for Doctor Strange.

Sure, Mel has been in some violent for violent sake movies but that's just y'all not wanting to actually discuss what he said.
How about the part of the Avengers where they literally show a memorial and televised tributes to the civilians that died in the Battle of New York?
And no one dies after the one dude Strange kills. They either had their deaths reversed by time or they're trapped in the dark dimension, staying alive forever
.
 
I can't tell if people are accidentally or deliberately omitting the framework presented in scenes such as the above to make the Marvel/ MCU movies inherently flawed in accordance to Gibson's remarks, but it's rather annoying nonetheless.

I was just being humorous in my original remark and wasn't making any kind of serious point. I just objected in my reply to the dude's odd description of Tony's actions.
 
Is the topic supposed to be about Gibson's past transgressions or the comments he made about violence in recent films? It seems like it ought to be the latter, given the title, but there have been plenty of posts that have dropped in to say how much they don't like Gibson and aren't even pretending to engage otherwise.

No one should let him off the hook for what he's done if they feel that strongly about it, but I don't think it should come at the expense of not having a discussion about something that has been a genuine issue across the board for blockbuster filmmaking.

If Mel had shown a modicum of remorse for his actions and words, I'd agree. But alas...

How about the part of the Avengers where they literally show a memorial and televised tributes to the civilians that died in the Battle of New York?
And no one dies after the one dude Strange kills. They either had their deaths reversed by time or they're trapped in the dark dimension, staying alive forever
.

why you so defensive bruh.
 
How about the part of the Avengers where they literally show a memorial and televised tributes to the civilians that died in the Battle of New York?

There are two tiny screens showing people lighting candles for the deceased while the news anchor talks about "the extraordinary heroics of a group called The Avengers" and then there's a Stan Lee gag 10 seconds later
 
I was just being humorous in my original remark and wasn't making any kind of serious point. I just objected in my reply to the dude's odd description of Tony's actions.

Ah, OK. I genuinely couldn't tell if you were speaking in earnest or not, you have my apologies.
 
If Mel had shown a modicum of remorse for his actions and words, I'd agree. But alas...
That's fine if the topic is if we should forgive Gibson for what he's done in the past. The problem I have is that isn't the topic at hand.

Personally, I think that even the biggest assholes can raise good points that are worthy of discussion. It doesn't mean that I'll stop thinking that they're an asshole otherwise, but being an asshole shouldn't be grounds for immediate dismissal.
 
There are two tiny screens showing people lighting candles for the deceased while the news anchor talks about "the extraordinary heroics of a group called The Avengers" and then there's a Stan Lee gag 10 seconds later

Lmao Forreal. Are we really gonna call that movie of all of them an example of having emotional weight for its actions? Which is what the full quote really talks about. Violence without caring about the people involved. And he's right. Many of these films are so quick to alleviate with humor that it's hard to really care about what they did or who got hurt etc. And it's not just the funny ones either. Can't say man of Steel did it either with its disaster porn finale. Something that BvS rightly needed to correct in its opening

Or maybe you're just unnecessarily hating on marvel movies which should be beyond reproach and youre forgiving a racists actions in doing so...hahaha

Like it's perfectly fine to disagree with him here but don't paint everybody who does agree with his point as a racist sympathizer. Fuck off with all that.
 
How about who fucking cares because it's a fucking movie? Nobody died. There are bigger issues in this world right now than fake deaths.
 
That's fine if the topic is if we should forgive Gibson for what he's done in the past. The problem I have is that isn't the topic at hand.

Personally, I think that even the biggest assholes can raise good points that are worthy of discussion. It doesn't mean that I'll stop thinking that they're an asshole otherwise, but being an asshole shouldn't be grounds for immediate dismissal.

Take it up with a mod.

Or maybe you're just unnecessarily hating on marvel movies which should be beyond reproach and youre forgiving a racists actions in doing so...hahaha

I'd love to read those posts. Because there's quite a lot in this thread of people insinuating that the only reason someone would disagree with Mel is because he attacked Marvel/CBMs. There's a post outright saying that people care more about comics than Mel's racist remarks.
 
I love how the success of comic book movies is driving people insane with salty rage. Some people are just incapable of turning off a certain part of your brain and enjoying a popcorn flick twice a year.
 
How about who fucking cares because it's a fucking movie? Nobody died. There are bigger issues in this world right now than fake deaths.

He was asked a question and he gave an answer. Obviously there are more important things happening in the world but what does that have to do with this thread?
 
My sense is that Gibson does not see the genre is being on equal footing with other genres and therefore reduces it in his mind to "people in tights." So, he's dismissive in the way that older generations tend to be re: new trends or market shifts.
 
Lmao Forreal. Are we really gonna call that movie of all of them an example of having emotional weight for its actions? Which is what the full quote really talks about. Violence without caring about the people involved. And he's right. Many of these films are so quick to alleviate with humor that it's hard to really care about what they did or who got hurt etc. And it's not just the funny ones either. Can't say man of Steel did it either with its disaster porn finale. Something that BvS rightly needed to correct in its opening

Or maybe you're just unnecessarily hating on marvel movies which should be beyond reproach and youre forgiving a racists actions in doing so...hahaha

Like it's perfectly fine to disagree with him here but don't paint everybody who does agree with his point as a racist sympathizer. Fuck off with all that.
Or maybe fuck Mel Gibson.
Don't need to be a Marvel fan for that.
 
"The Marvel movies don't address death and violence!"
"Yes they do, here's an example."
"THAT DOESN'T COUNT."

0
 
"The Marvel movies don't address death and violence!"
"Yes they do, here's an example."
"THAT DOESN'T COUNT."

0

See the problem is people haven't seen the glorious movie Thor 2 Dark World which dealt directly with violence, death and the emotions that go with it.
 
"The Marvel movies don't address death and violence!"
"Yes they do, here's an example."
"THAT DOESN'T COUNT."

What I meant was it's a really weak way to address the violence of an alien terrorist attack, two tiny little diegetic screens with no sound or focus sandwiched in between superhero adulation and a meta joke? For an alien invasion that, according to Netflix's Daredevil, hundreds were killed, that's not enough to address it. If you think it does count, then I guess it's a matter of sensibility. I felt absolutely nothing when I saw those people lighting candles for three seconds, I only laughed at Stan Lee
 
Given the heights his movies can achieve in terms of expression and the capacity to make audiences feel, I can agree with his views on the current landscape of blockbuster movies. Marvel movies do what they set out to do, and bombastic violence is an intricate part of them, no doubt.

That said, this is his opinion, and he is entiteled to one. No one needs to agree with it.
 
"The Marvel movies don't address death and violence!"
"Yes they do, here's an example."
"THAT DOESN'T COUNT."

0

It's rather pointless if punching the bad guy in the face is still the way to end the movie's conflict.

It's like the antiwar nonsense in Metal Gear, everything is shallow and empty.
 
It's rather pointless if punching the bad guy in the face is still the way to end the movie's conflict.

It's like the antiwar nonsense in Metal Gear, everything is shallow and empty.

Just like in the real world. We kill people who kill people because killing people is wrong.
 
he's not wrong. superhero movies/comics have always been like that. frankly, i'm tired of superhero shit. enough already. it's watered down and all the same now.

aren't some of you tired yet?
 
How about the part of the Avengers where they literally show a memorial and televised tributes to the civilians that died in the Battle of New York?
And no one dies after the one dude Strange kills. They either had their deaths reversed by time or they're trapped in the dark dimension, staying alive forever
.

Aww, they had a memorial. Wrap it up, guys! DIPLI- CRITICISM IMMUNITY. Good thing that's just a cheap trick. Age of Ultron opens with quips about cursing as the murder a bunch of goons. As I said before cursing is a bigger issue than violence in MCU.

People do die in Strange
but they're time dumbed back to life--still senseless violence.
The spectacle isn't above criticism, guys.

No one's expecting a MCU movie to have a message other than "bad guy is bad and wants to shoot/kill/stab/blow up/conquer company/country/universe/galaxy but that doesn't mean it's immune to how shallow the violence is.

"The Marvel movies don't address death and violence!"
"Yes they do, here's an example."
"THAT DOESN'T COUNT."

0

Good thing all their movies still feature a bunch of violence... but don't worry, though, they'll have a memorial and go right back to ass kicking.
 
Civil War was all about people dying due to the Avenger's involvement. Then there's still senseless violence in the movie.
I heard a lot of people say Civil War dealt with stakes well, but watching the airport fight..... I thought it was entertaining but all sorts of stupid. Cap and Iron Man proved themselves to be both kinda unaccountable and ruined both their arguments but all that property damage is OK cos no one died. I saw the wise cracks and thought to myself how seriously am I supposed to take this? I am not saying this as a DC fanboy, I like both sides but I don't understand how I am supposed to feel emotional when someone gets hurt in that scene. If i got a few of my boys together and we play fought with fencing swords and no protective gear and one of us got injured you'd call me a dumbass that shouldn't be surprised i ended up looking like a kebab. Now you have superpowered and a few non-superpowered beings, dropping cars, explosive arrows, fuel trucks and other shit i forgot on each other and you expect me to be surprised someone gets hurt. And people criticise Superman for being selfless with the spear in BVS.

Edit: I also found it unusual how much cursing the MCU gets away with. CW had way more gratuitous swearing than the R rated cut of BVS yet that cut was criticised for its language cos a character sayswhat the fuck are you doing in my house when Lex is randomly this dude's house.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom