• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Men with long hair still looked down upon?

Long hair on guys almost always looks terrible. But people with bad haircuts get jobs all the time so this should be no different.
If you aren't going to be a model then why it should matter how beautiful you are when you are looking for a job?
 
Past the shoulder, on dudes, and you are guaranteed to look terrible.

If you aren't going to be a model then why it should matter how beautiful you are when you are looking for a job?

Cause its unprofessional looking. Just like i wouldnt wear flip flops to an interview.
 
This thread and its replies are informed by conservative, traditionalist mentalities. Your hairstyle should not dictate whether or not you get hired, period.
Yeah, How dare people expect you look professional in a professional environment. /s

Like it or not appearance has always and will always matter. It’s the very first thing people will notice about you, when you work for a company you are representing that company.
 
This thread and its replies are informed by conservative, traditionalist mentalities. Your hairstyle should not dictate whether or not you get hired, period.

I agree 100% but it’s the reality in a lot of industries so you either adapt by cutting your hair and expand the amount of potential jobs or try and find an employer who doesn’t care (from a severely limited pool of jobs).
 
Your look is absolutely going to effect your efficiency at certain jobs. People shouldn't be discriminated against for things they can't control, but generally speaking attire and a haircut aren't in that category.
Cause its unprofessional looking. Just like i wouldnt wear flip flops to an interview.
But it's still a rule that only applies to men. Is that OK?
 
Past the shoulder, on dudes, and you are guaranteed to look terrible.

Steve Aoki wears the Japanese Jesus look pretty well

ht-Steve-Aoki-mt-170208_12x5_992.jpg
 
A bit like this:

19-sleek-low-ponytail.jpg


But without the beard. He is also blond. He keeps his hair in pristine condition.
The Jesus look wouldn't really work for me either. Beard life is fine, but the long hair? Nah. I've never turned anyone down for a position on my team because of their appearance, but things like long hair and neck tats would probably warrant it.
 
Yes because I'm tired of being jealous of men having nicer hair then me!

I'm joking!

I personal find medium/long (Just above the shoulders) hair attractive on many men. One of my guy friends had really nice hair but he had to cut it for a job.
 
But it's still a rule that only applies to men. Is that OK?

Are you going to put as much time into your hair as women do? This is something a lot of men who complain about it overlook.

I loved my long hair, but it's a bitch on maintenance. And by that, I don't just mean in the morning. I mean if there is rain, humidity, time of day, etc.
 
This thread and its replies are informed by conservative, traditionalist mentalities. Your hairstyle should not dictate whether or not you get hired, period.
No. If I was a owner of a business and had people running the front I want someone with clean cut and clean shave or at least a well kept beard. Having clean employees versus dirty ones can hurt your business.
 
Sorry, but most times long hair on dudes looks terrible. You have to know who you are interviewing with. If long hair wouldn't look professional in the interview it's not really all that different than wearing the wrong clothes.
 
They shouldn't though, right?

To a certain extent, no. You can look at the natural hair movement for that.

But there is a societal standard as to what people will judge you by, and that usually means proper hygiene, having a shower and not having excessively long hair. And being within those standards is a hell of a lot easier for men than women.
 
I currently have long hair, few centimiters above my belly button and I'm in an office job and never had any issues with my bosses for that. They are open mind about that stuff despite they are all 60+ years old. I believe that's because they used to have long hair + long beard back when they were young. Also because I always put my hair into a massive bun when I'm at the office lol. Been working there for 5 + years so that's why I haven't had issues with that. I'm aware that once I had to get a new job, I will have to cut it because people here in México are still very close minded on those aspects :(
 
Tell your friend to cut it and just grow it back during the new gig, the person interviewing is likely just a one and done barrier.
 
I guess that's the one nice thing about working in the entertainment business. Tattoos, long hair, piercings. Its all good.
 
I have longish hair and it didn't matter too much when I was working as a translator.

It probably would have been a problem if I was applying as an interpreter and had to deal with people outside the company though. It sucks, but there isn't really much you can do about it

On the other hand, my cousin's husband has waist length hair and is well on his way to become a professor. I guess it depends on the profession and the nature of your work.
 
Yeah, How dare people expect you look professional in a professional environment. /s

Like it or not appearance has always and will always matter. It's the very first thing people will notice about you, when you work for a company you are representing that company.

I agree 100% but it's the reality in a lot of industries so you either adapt by cutting your hair and expand the amount of potential jobs or try and find an employer who doesn't care (from a severely limited pool of jobs).

That's how the world works though!
I understand full well how the world works in terms of how society views men with long hair versus men with short hair. However, I advocate that people broaden their scope when it comes to writing someone off based on their appearance alone. Employers should focus on performance and experience versus policing someone's hair when hiring.

The line itself for "clean and kept" is incredibly vague as well. This results in all types of hair that deviates from the norm to be considered unprofessional. An example of this is traditionally Black hairstyles like dreads being banned from the workplace because it isn't "clean and kept."
No. If I was a owner of a business and had people running the front I want someone with clean cut and clean shave or at least a well kept beard. Having clean employees versus dirty ones can hurt your business.
This type of mentality hurts people that legitimately go out of their way to practice hair maintenance. Hair length is not indicative of one's own personal hygiene and self-care. Allowing yourself to cloud your perceptions with antiquated mindsets does no good.
 
This thread and its replies are informed by conservative, traditionalist mentalities. Your hairstyle should not dictate whether or not you get hired, period.

You so woke.

What is you opinion on the fact I had to tell a guy that used to work for us that he had to cut his dreads of ~10 years off because he was unable to wear a hardhat?
 
I work at Publix and we're required to have very short hair and be clean shaven. If our hair touches our collar or we have five-o-clock shadow we're ordered to get a hair cut before next shift and, in regards to facial hair, return home, shave, and come back within a reasonable time and you're off the clock till you do. If they're busy they make you go buy a razor and do it in the restroom.

I absolutely hate it.

People who have long hair or facial hair for religious reasons are simply not hired even tho they say it's an exception. A dude is actually suing them over this.
 
You so woke.

What is you opinion on the fact I had to tell a guy that used to work for us that he had to cut his dreads of ~10 years off because he was unable to wear a hardhat?

That's about the requirements for the job though, not about how you should look for the job.
 
If you aren't going to be a model then why it should matter how beautiful you are when you are looking for a job?
Because our society for the most part puts weight behind a certain type of person for the "business world". 99% of advertisements and media of offices are just some short hair blokes.
 
That's about the requirements for the job though, not about how you should look for the job.

And a requirement for many jobs is the ability to look professional in your field / like someone your clients will not have any hangups about dealing with.

The OP has not mentioned the field this guy was applying for.
 
Because our society for the most part puts weight behind a certain type of person for the "business world". 99% of advertisements and media of offices are just some short hair blokes.
I am aware of that. But my issue is that this is still a thing today where the civilized world tries to be more inclusive.


The OP has not mentioned the field this guy was applying for.
He didn't mention any job where long hair would be an obstacle for anyone and he only had to cut it because he is a man. Last one was in a small retail chain.
 
You so woke.

What is you opinion on the fact I had to tell a guy that used to work for us that he had to cut his dreads of ~10 years off because he was unable to wear a hardhat?
I don't know, did you tell him to shorten his dreadlocks to the point where the hard hat would be actually fit him with his dreadlocks, or did you tell him to cut his dreadlocks off entirely?
 
I understand full well how the world works in terms of how society views men with long hair versus men with short hair. However, I advocate that people broaden their scope when it comes to writing someone off based on their appearance alone. Employers should focus on performance and experience versus policing someone's hair when hiring.

The line itself for "clean and kept" is incredibly vague as well. This results in all types of hair that deviates from the norm to be considered unprofessional. An example of this is traditionally Black hairstyles like dreads being banned from the workplace because it isn't "clean and kept."

This type of mentality hurts people that legitimately go out of their way to practice hair maintenance. Hair length is not indicative of one's own personal hygiene and self-care. Allowing yourself to cloud your perceptions with antiquated mindsets does no good.
It’s the same reason many places require a clean shave. It looks terrible on most men and it’s just much easier to have an universal policy. If you let some people have long hair but ban others you are asking for a lawsuit.
I am aware of that. But my issue is that this is still a thing today where the civilized world tries to be more inclusive.



He didn't mention any job where long hair would be an obstacle for anyone and he only had to cut it because he is a man. Last one was in a small retail chain.
Appearance is extremely important in retail as you are in contact with customers constantly
 
I don't know, did you tell him to shorten his dreadlocks to the point where the hard hat would be actually fit him with his dreadlocks, or did you tell him to cut his dreadlocks off entirely?

I don't recall.

I am aware of that. But my issue is that this is still a thing today where the civilized world tries to be more inclusive.



He didn't mention any job where long hair would be an obstacle for anyone and he only had to cut it because he is a man. Last one was in a small retail chain.

Retail huh? Anyway, we're still decades out from what the majority of businesses and corporations consider an 'acceptable' look from morphing.

There are still many, many workplaces that won't allow their female staff to dye their hair in more extreme colours, it isn't just men that have certain hairstyles they are expected to conform to.
 
It's the same reason many places require a clean shave. It looks terrible on most men and it's just much easier to have an universal policy. If you let some people have long hair but ban others you are asking for a lawsuit.

Appearance is extremely important in retail as you are in contact with customers constantly
Universal for men only though?

Also, long hair on men is officially bad looking then, so it's a policy?
 
Cut it then grow it back out while you work there - being terminated for long hair is way more of a litigious liability than being denied a position.
 
It's the same reason many places require a clean shave. It looks terrible on most men and it's just much easier to have an universal policy. If you let some people have long hair but ban others you are asking for a lawsuit.
If the primary requirement is to "look professional" on the job, then you can absolutely accomplish that requirement regardless of other people's opinions on whether or not you look "professional" to them.

To elaborate:

When people say be "professional" the connotation is actually meant to be "hygienic." You can be hygienic regardless if people think of you as looking professional or not. Looking professional is an arbitrary excuse that bars certain types of people from entering certain types of industries.
 
There are still many, many workplaces that won't allow their female staff to dye their hair in more extreme colours, it isn't just men that have certain hairstyles they are expected to conform to.
Are men allowed to dye their hair in those workplaces though? Or it's a rule for everyone?

If it's a rule for everyone, that's great.
 
One more reason I'm happy to be a developer. They can get me to cut my hair when I'm six feet under and not a moment sooner. There's a bunch of coworkers of mine with various hair styles even in customer-facing positions. As long as I actually take care of my long hair I'm golden.

Though if you're someone that has long hair never, ever put it up in a manbun or ponytail unless it's for sanitary reasons. That's a recipe for disaster.
 
Top Bottom