There was never any doubt that the Wii and Wii U were going to be on the exact same technical level respective to their competition. The only difference is that when the Wii launched, the 360 was already out and the PS3 alongside it, so it made it look worse in comparison. The same thing will happen when the first gen PS4/NExtbox stuff comes out makes it very clear just how much of a leap it is from the Wii U. I honestly think there is a sect of Nintendo fans set themselves up for disappointment, constantly thinking that the "This time" the old Nintendo that courts 3rd parties, and delivers state of the art hardware, is finally coming back. The Wii was just a way to make money, now that they have a massive war chest, we'll get the old SNES/NES era Nintendo back. It makes no sense. I have my gripes with the Wii U, but from a technical perspective they made the most logical move. They tried the arms race thing with Gamecube and it got them nowhere. They don't have the money to bleed on cutting edge, expensive hardware the way Sony and MS do. I never understood why people didn't expect them to use the exact same philosophy that made the Wii a huge success and translate that over to it's successor. Will the hardware drawbacks make it harder for them to get 3rd party support? Of course. But the 3rd party stuff has always just been lip service. They throw a bone every once in a while, like they did on Gamecube with the "Capcom 5", or like they did on Wii U by announcing and hyping up ports of CoD, Batman and AC3, but they are never going all out the way MS or Sony do. That's not their objective. What they want is to sell a ton of inexpensive hardware at (eventually) a profit, and sell 20 million copies of NSMB/Mario Kart/Wii Sports/ect...