• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Michael Moore Getting Ethered On Twitter

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nothing in that tweet corelates to your paragraph in any way. Its basically 99% your own conjecture of what he means when he could mean something completely different.

It's not a perfect analogy, but he basically said the gender equivalent of "asians are good at math". I'm sure people who say that as a blanket statement think it's a compliment but it's as facile as what Michael Moore said.
 
I'll go with Moore on this one. It's a generalization but I think we need some to actually keep the world moving and not turn us all to despair.
 
The Koch sister you never hear about.

image.jpg
 
Ok, one more time. I never took any issue with anything Jessica said.

You quoted Shaanyboi who basically paraphrased Jessica's own tweets and said he is "just running with it" but now you're saying you don't take any issue with what Jessica said, which is the same thing Shaanyboi said.
 
It's not a perfect analogy, but he basically said the gender equivalent of "asians are good at math". I'm sure people who say that as a blanket statement think it's a compliment but it's as facile as what Michael Moore said.

No, this is what you are taking it to mean.

As I said before, this could be very well be him simply meaning that hey men in power have been responsible for a lot of terrible shit(unquestionably true), give a woman a chance(obvious context is the upcoming election) .

Yeah he may be factually wrong in his statements, but to then then take this all the way to the bank and say he's trying to "erase" women from history is a bit much from such a vague context-less tweet. Again, nothing in that tweet implies that a woman's shit doesn't stink or can't stink . So no, I don't understand the crusade.
 
That self-loathing attitude is something I've never understood. If you're a straight white guy, seems like you could be doing a lot more useful things like helping to combat sexism or prejudice instead of pretending that you're the root of all issues and wallowing in guilt.



Eh, I think in this case the verb fits. He threw out something incredibly dumb that someone dismantled completely and in less than ten tweets. He cannot have any good comeback to that.

When I wrote that I was thinking more along the lines of those Youtube video titles I'm sure you've come across. Feminist gets DESTROYED by woman. Dumb Liberal ANNIHILATED by some idiot.
 
No, this is what you are taking it to mean.

As I said before, this could be very well be him simply meaning that hey men in power have been responsible for a lot of terrible shit, give a woman a chance(obvious context is the upcoming election) .

Yeah he may be factually wrong, but to then then take this all the way to the bank and say he's trying to "erase" women from history is a bit much from such a vague context-less tweet. Again, nothing in that tweet implies that a woman's shit doesn't stink or can't stink . So no, I don't understand the crusade.

So you DID take issue with what she said? ugh

By saying women have never done the things that they infact have done is to erase women. Those were all powerful women who happened to also be awful and infact did the very things that Moore claimed no women had done.

To say women haven't done those things and therefore aren't capable of those things is wrong and unfair to women.

The "asains are good at math" analogy above is apt. Just because it's a compliment does not mean it not wrong, racist and unfair to people from Asia.
 
So you DID take issue with what she said? ugh

By saying women have never done the things that they infact have done is to erase women. Those were all powerful women who happened to also be awful and infact did the very things that Moore claimed no women had done.

To say women haven't done those things and therefore aren't capable of those things is wrong and unfair to women.

The "asains are good at math" analogy above is apt. Just because it's a compliment does not mean it not wrong, racist and unfair to people from Asia.

This is exactly what im talking about. I can't sorry.
 
From my experience this has been an incredibly popular statement to make. You hear it all the time from comedians, and offhand from people when it comes to talking about women in politics. It's one of those obviously more complicated statements that no one is really called out on. Interestingly enough for once you could look at his mentions and be confused about if he's being criticized by alt-right or far left folks.
 
What's the context here?

Weird he would just tweet that randomly.

Could be an attempt to advocate for the first female President. Not sure. But I can understand the reasoning were it so considering that some of the arguments against a woman President being an inherent inability to govern; men themselves haven't covered themselves in glory. If men with power can wage wars and use nuclear weapons, how could a woman be comparatively worse?

Again, I'm not sure of the context behind the original tweets but I can't imagine Michael Moore suggesting that women are inherently more innocent.

Moore has been pushing this line of thinking for years. go back to his old books and movies and he'll always be mentioning this, that with women in charge none of the things that men have done will repeat.
 
Everything she says sounds right except for "Being ethically good is no easier for us than it is for men"

I mean...if that were the case wouldn't there be way more women in jail?

That's some racist ass logic. Your argument would conclude that black men are inherently less ethically good than other men. Maybe, just maybe, the US justice system is stacked against men and black men in particular.
 
I agree with batting aside Michael Moore's ridiculous blanket statement. But having said that, testosterone dramatically increases aggression. I think men do have a harder time being ethically good as we have the stronger tendency to lash out aggressively.
 
When I wrote that I was thinking more along the lines of those Youtube video titles I'm sure you've come across. Feminist gets DESTROYED by woman. Dumb Liberal ANNIHILATED by some idiot.

Oh. Yeah, those are definitely dumb. But hey, they make it easy to figure out the video probably isn't worth your time.
 
But what i really hate is this constant framing of discussions as a competition.

Yup.

>"I think A."
>> "Actually, B is true."

Internet: "Damn, the first dude got ethered!"

Moore's tweet was dumb and I'm happy that he was called out on it. It's how you learn. It's discussion, discourse, debate. Not ever refutation is a mic drop at a rap battle.
 
Good lord!

Can we hire her to do the rounds for like, a week?

That was a movement of both savagery and grace. I want to read that again for the first time.
 
I mean that's human but I think the point still remains that guys still do more bad things that have nothing to do with physical differences.



So at least we can all agree over the course of civilisation, guys have done way more evil, not to take away from the bad stuff women have done but it's just a fact we've racked up a higher record.

Mostly because we beat them to the punch, not because they are inherently better than us.

When will people realize that putting women on a pedestal is just as wrong as degrading them?

Hmm. It is not just as wrong. If you are an asshole to women, you KNOW what you are more often than not. The other case has plenty of room for ignorance.
 
I mean she's right but she's coming on a little strong.

Like talking to an atheist who wants to pounce on what they perceive as even the smallest thing. Like okay yeah, but... was all that really necessary?

I think it's best not to sugarcoat things like this. But that's just me.
 
Jessica is quite right and I agree with her.

I think toxic masculinity is a major problem though, so even if Moore said it in a dumb way I sort of sympathize with what I think might have been his overall intention.
 
So weird... I could have sworn I heard a speech of his where he's basically encouraging people to vote Trump.

Maybe it was during the Republican Primaries, back when many liberals wanted Trump to win so that Hillary would "win in a landslide" in the General Election.
 
Not that women can't. They just usually don't.

Which is true, and probably more what he was aiming for.
Then he should have opened with that. It's probably not entirely true either, mind (Margaret Thatcher comes to mind), but his other tweet was just so powerfully dumb. Michael Moore might have good intentions but he's just... not nearly as smart as he thinks he is. -_-

Putting women on a pedestal is still stupid, old-fashioned sexism. It might be "benevolent", but it's still harmful.

If this was meant to compliment Clinton... meh. She isn't better qualified than the other candidates because she's a woman, she's better qualified because of her intellect and experience. You could talk about her being a woman with regards to women's issues, maybe, because she would indeed be likely to have a fresh perspective, but other things like climate change, foreign policy, etc.? No, shut up Moore, you're out of your element.

So that's why women spend so much time in the female lavatories. They're releasing all their pent up gas throughout the day, and have farting parties.
Oh no, he's on to us! GET 'IM GIRLS!
 
Yeah patronize other human beings even if you had good intentions, is still being patronizing.

But man, I'm pretty shocked that Moore is still relevant. I honestly forget he existed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom