ThoseDeafMutes
Member
LOL at the VRAM debacle
GTX 570 (1.28GB VRAM), i5 2500k @ 4.2GHz, 8GB Ram
Just as a correction, 1280mb is 1.25GB, not 1.28GB, since a GB is 1024, not 1000 MB.
LOL at the VRAM debacle
GTX 570 (1.28GB VRAM), i5 2500k @ 4.2GHz, 8GB Ram
With the results so far, PC. It seems the VRAM fears were greatly exaggerated.
sounds like a decent to good port? scales well with different settings?
Still seems crazy that the only AA option in-game is supersampling. What do the console versions use?
I have this setup, but no game - guys, if anyone has this GPU, let me know what you are getting.
i7 3770k@4.5
16GB RAM
7970 3GB GHz
Alright here we go... again:
i7 4770k @ 4.2GHz - GTX TITAN SC - 16GB DDR3 2133MHz - Samsung 840 Pro SSD
All maxed settings @ 2560x1440 w/ Ultra Texture Pack downloaded and enabled.
--------------------
I saw a drop of 1 fps (but that could just be a negligible variable) with Ultra Texture Pack enabled. The game does not use 6GB of VRAM as claimed. Max is 4.8GB and that is at 1440p.
All I have under DLC for the game is "Test of Power" -- this isn't the HD content, is it? I can run it ok on Ultra textures -- is that what the HD content pack enables?
All I have under DLC for the game is "Test of Power" -- this isn't the HD content, is it? I can run it ok on Ultra textures -- is that what the HD content pack enables?
I don't think the TEXTURE QUALITY settings does anything. I just went from low, med, high to ultra and they all use 5.2GB of VRAM. I didn't notice any difference in video quality.
Alright here we go... again:
i7 4770k @ 4.2GHz - GTX TITAN SC - 16GB DDR3 2133MHz - Samsung 840 Pro SSD
All maxed settings @ 2560x1440 w/ Ultra Texture Pack downloaded and enabled.
--------------------
I saw a drop of 1 fps (but that could just be a negligible variable) with Ultra Texture Pack enabled. The game does not use 6GB of VRAM as claimed. Max is 4.8GB and that is at 1440p.
So all you GTX 970/980 folk, do not fret. You will be fine!
You can tell a big difference in the clothing of the MC in the low/high comparison posted on the last page.I don't think the TEXTURE QUALITY settings does anything. I just went from low, med, high to ultra and they all use 5.2GB of VRAM. I didn't notice any difference in video quality.
LOL at the VRAM debacle
GTX 570 (1.28GB VRAM), i5 2500k @ 4.2GHz, 8GB Ram
Settings (1080p no supersampling):
Performance:
Also min, max is taken from the very starting frames which is why you get such weird values.
Where is the supersampling setting? Did you have it on?
You can set the resolution to 150% or 200% instead of 100% / monitor res
I am looking at my screenshots and I would assume there would be a huge difference from low to Ultra, but I am not seeing it.You can tell a big difference in the clothing of the MC in the low/high comparison posted on the last page.
I don't see a supersampling setting in the game. I have no clue what people are talking about?
How large is the HD texture pack?
Are you restarting the game? Otherwise you are changing nothing.I am looking at my screenshots and I would assume there would be a huge difference from low to Ultra, but I am not seeing it.
3.7 gb
Are you restarting the game? Otherwise you are changing nothing.
Whatever, nerdsssss.
It's not 1.28GB anyway under that definition, since memory comes in MiB not "MB".
Are you restarting the game? Otherwise you are changing nothing.
in Firefox, and then it added it to the downloads section. Thanks.steam://install/311670/
i7 920 @ 3.8GHz
6GB RAM
GTX 770 2GB
Everything maxed except textures set to high (yes not medium!)
Tesselation off.
1920x1080
Generally getting around 55 FPS.
I saw a drop of 1 fps (but that could just be a negligible variable) with Ultra Texture Pack enabled. The game does not use 6GB of VRAM as claimed. Max is 4.8GB and that is at 1440p.
With HD Texture Pack Installed @ 4k
Ignore the shitty compression by imgur. Game is using 6036MB VRAM at 4k. Got 28fps at end of benchmark
You can see the other 2 cards are at 14% usage. Need dat SLI profile.
Upgrading to the Ultra textures BARELY affected the benchmark at all. It dipped around 59ish during the explosion (was 65ish before), that's about it, on a 970.
This benchmark is bizarre. Despite no noticeable drops at all from 60 apparently my minimum fps is 33. Weird.
Why? Its very demanding?