So right up until 2013, the internet wasn't really a thing?
What a way to interpret what he said, wow :lol
So right up until 2013, the internet wasn't really a thing?
That's the problem.
Ani, where are you getting this from? It's on a basic level the complete opposite of what makes art, art.
Are you saying that cars can't be art?
This is so stupid.
I don't really understand your point of view, do you mean that games can't be considered as art because they require input from a player? Or because they require a platform to run on? Or because a game can have a "mind of it's own" due to different mechanics?
Yeah, that's weird too. Film (or movies, but saying film drives the point home better) requires a lot of "engineering"/"design" to be properly exhibited or created even. Cameras, projectors, the film itself...
That's nice.
Mario Kart has online. Smash will have online. Luigi's Mansion has online. You picked a few games that don't.
I didn't just pick games. I listed Nintendo's own launch and first year software for the WiiU. NintendoLand doesnt even feature online leaderboards for fucks sake, a feature implemented in every single XBLA game.
Explain in clear terms why cars are not or cannot be art.yeah. cars aren't art. neither is a car manual. neither is sorry! from parker brothers.
This has nothing to do with Ebert. Personally, I would agree with his conclusion with the way he's been introduced to games, and especially after bad games that gamers tried to use to convince him that games are art ("Wordy fortune cookie" is the best description of Braid that I've seen.)i think people get hung up on what looks like someone talking down about their hobby, when i am just placing it in its correct category. while i agree with roger ebert's conclusion, i don't agree with the emotion or reasoning behind it.
Have you played NintendoLand??????
it's not exactly the player input that matters, but that the game exists for player input. this is usually based on research from the designer in how they want to communicate with the audience.
i think people get hung up on what looks like someone talking down about their hobby, when i am just placing it in its correct category. while i agree with roger ebert's conclusion, i don't agree with the emotion or reasoning behind it.
NeoGAF being dumb again... Quelle Surprise. How anybody gets "the Internet wasn't a thing until 2013" from reading that, I don't know - that rather says more about your reading comprehensions than the Great One. Miyamoto is actually spot on there.
While it is true that online gaming has existed for many years, that was primarily on PCs, and accessible in public areas, universities, etc. rather than homes. It wasn't a global standard or anywhere near as huge as it is now on consoles, although it existed during the 6th Generation. This is true for the Internet, too - In fact, research in 148 countries showed that 20% of US homes were without home Internet access in 2011; that percentage was higher in Japan (27%) and even in mainland European countries such Germany (23%), Italy (37%), Spain (30%). Furthermore, online gaming meant that home internet access had to be cheaper than it was in its earlier years, running at a decent speed and also stable. Now, it is more accessible to homes in some countries, but it is not the case for a lot of people. They might be able to view a few websites or read and send e-mails, but they won't be able to have gaming sessions due to limited data or costs. Today, more people are connected, and the rise of tablets and smartphones has a lot to do with that - it's also true that PS360 consoles have helped online gaming's growth, and we now have more effective and efficient Internet Service Providers.
Worldwide, just over 1 in 5 adults (21%) had home Internet access in 2007 (presumably fewer than that and lower percentages in all countries at the advent of the 7th Generation in 2005, then 2006). In 2011, 1 in 3 adults reported home internet access.
Being a toy doesn't disqualify it from being art...I think (I know) I'm old, because I still think of video games as toys and probably always will. And I mean that in the best possible way.
Question: Is there a high-profile developer who clearly stated he sees games as art?
Pikmin 3 online multiplayer! Believe!
He doesn't really oversee 15 games.
He turns up every now and again, looks at what the young blood are doing and shits on their work and fucks them over.
Nintendo need to let their developers breath instead of letting this Dinosaur hold them back.
Didn't Gabe say that Super Mario 64 taught him that games can be art?
Give up Miyamoto.
The industry has moved on.
You are holding back Mario, Zelda and Nintendo.
You have failed this Industry with your backwards ass thinking.
He doesn't really oversee 15 games.
He turns up every now and again, looks at what the young blood are doing and shits on their work and fucks them over.
Nintendo need to let their developers breath instead of letting this Dinosaur hold them back.
Ping, Lag and guesstimates. Enjoy jumping on a platform that isn't actually there because your game is a bit behind everyone else's and they moved on.Nah man, you need precision that just isn't possible via online multiplayer, just as with NSMBU. It ain't possible. You ever heard of online multiplayer in a FPS ? Of course not ! That would be ludicrous.
And you know this... How?He doesn't really oversee 15 games.
He turns up every now and again, looks at what the young blood are doing and shits on their work and fucks them over.
Nintendo need to let their developers breath instead of letting this Dinosaur hold them back.
Thats quite ironic now.
I think it's time for Miyamoto to retire. He's really out of touch and he's obviously holding Nintendo back. I don't even want to imagine how the internal teams really see him. It must be HELL...
...I wish a real, no bs interview would happen with him. An ASK SHIGGY, uncut.
I think it's time for Miyamoto to retire. He's really out of touch and he's obviously holding Nintendo back. I don't even want to imagine how the internal teams really see him. It must be HELL.
It's a shame to see him fall behind like this. It's not something I would had expected. He appears to be very very closed minded about the gaming industry; and look at the game preservation quote.. This kind of thinking, in 2013?
I wish a real, no bs interview would happen with him. An ASK SHIGGY, uncut.
I also hope that Nintendo and Shiggy never change for reasons that are probably very different from yours.What radical new gaming philosophies are there in 2013? Cinematic gameplay? B-movie stories? QTE? Pay to win? Slow motion animations of brutal moves, tacking on terrible online multiplayer just because? I hope Shiggy never changes.
I agree, video games are art, not just entertainment products whose only artistic value is their industrial design or something.![]()
They can only be preserved on video? But what about emulation?
And you know this... How?
you don't design a piece of art, you design a piece of design. it's almost like saying, 'i engineered a drawing today.' it's not technically wrong, but we know the difference.
the poster, if it's made for a movie, or play, or charity, or what have you, is visually communicating one message to an audience for a purpose. that is how the poster functions. that poster has much more in common with, say, a car, than it would a movie.
I don't see what's so bad about that quote in particular.look at the game preservation quote.. This kind of thinking, in 2013?
You say this in every Miyamoto thread.Give up Miyamoto.
The industry has moved on.
You are holding back Mario, Zelda and Nintendo.
You have failed this Industry with your backwards ass thinking.
What radical new gaming philosophies are there in 2013? Cinematic gameplay? B-movie stories? QTE? Pay to win? Slow motion animations of brutal moves? Tacking on terrible online multiplayer just because? I hope Shiggy never changes.
Give up Miyamoto.
The industry has moved on.
You are holding back Mario, Zelda and Nintendo.
You have failed this Industry with your backwards ass thinking.
He doesn't really oversee 15 games.
He turns up every now and again, looks at what the young blood are doing and shits on their work and fucks them over.
Nintendo need to let their developers breath instead of letting this Dinosaur hold them back.
He doesn't really oversee 15 games.
He turns up every now and again, looks at what the young blood are doing and shits on their work and fucks them over.
Nintendo need to let their developers breath instead of letting this Dinosaur hold them back.
So Miyamoto's idea of a typical family playing games is one person playing while everyone else watches?
THIS!
I see some people wanting Nintendo to become something like Sony/Microsoft ITT. And this is the last thing I want. Why would I want three companies doing exactly the same thing?
I know I'm going against the flow here, but apart from some minor changes (like changing their accounts system) I do hope Nintendo keeps on doing what they do and following their own path.
Some of you come up with the worst examples ever conceived in the history of man. You don't need highspeed Internet to enjoy Google and Facebook. In fact Google started life by being a no thrills search engine.Yes, the internet wasn't as pervasive as it is now. Someone should have told Google and Facebook they launched a decade too early.
Give up Miyamoto.
The industry has moved on.
You are holding back Mario, Zelda and Nintendo.
You have failed this Industry with your backwards ass thinking.