-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Modern Warfare 3 Versus Battlefield 3 Garbage Thread
- Thread starter Nirolak
- Start date
Rage compilation. First few seconds are fucking crazy lol.Fjordson said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqMykZRH3ik
OldJadedGamer
Banned
Metalmurphy said:
Here is what the lead designer at DICE said previously about prone in BC2:
"there will be no prone.. we tried it many times and decided it didn't feel right for the dynamic, destructable world we made."
Metalmurphy
Member
OldJadedGamer said:
Well, the world IS less destructable and dynamic this time around.
Angry Fork
Member
It's only been a few years and in the same generation. It's not like we're comparing Goldeneye with Killzone 2.NBtoaster said:
Having MW2 better graphics score than BF3? What justification is there. You can't defend it with 'different reviewer' type shit, that's called being visually impaired. Are we to say it's okay if Uncharted 1 got a 10 in graphics and Uncharted 3 got a 9.5 it would be okay because of different times/reviewers?
I actually don't care much about this btw I don't really read reviews I like to watch all the people go ape shit over them, I'm just saying I don't know how you can possibly defend MW2 getting a 10 in graphics over some other much better looking games. Presentation is different, I think COD as an overall package does presentation really well but that's not the same as graphics alone.
Mr. Enigma
Member
belvedere said:
This is when he announced he was "jumping" to the 360. He posted this the day after LeBron's "The Decision" aired.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Adok7odFz6o
If you can't appreciate this guy's sense of humor after watching this, you be dumb.
crazy monkey
Banned
Khal_B said:
frame rate was horrible in that video but goddamn It was sooo funny haha
Xplatformer
Member
Fjordson said:
He's hilarious!!!
Nizz
Member
You know, dude has a point about the controls in BF3. I just got the game today and was eager to try it since I've heard so much about the controls on PS3 being off. It's straight up Killzone 2 controls in this game. I have no idea what happened between the beta and retail game but something went horribly wrong.Khal_B said:
It's really frustrating trying to aim in this game. I played about maybe 20 minutes of the campaign before I quit out of frustration with the controls. The game looks nice though.
I get enjoyment out of both the Battlefield and COD franchises. It's just that this season I was more excited for BF3. I would eventually get MW3 somewhere down the line but it may be sooner if they don't patch the controls in BF3.
gray_fox224
Junior Member
anyone plan to buy both games?
iSurvivedTheOutage
Member
lmfaaaaaaaaaaao dude is hilarious *suscribes*
Always-honest
Banned
And he knowsOldJadedGamer said:
Red Nightmare
Banned
purple cobra said:
Ugg. Are the controls better on 360? Or are they equally as sucky?
Say what you want about CoD. At least that game has buttery smooth controls. It's hard to play a clunky chunky controlling FPS after CoD.
Foliorum Viridum
Banned
I just listen to a sound clip of Capt Price's voice to even it out. My soul remains fine!
Sho_Nuff82
Member
A buddy of mine just posted a ranting fb status update on why no one should buy the "broken" 360 version of Battlefield 3. I'll find some choice quotes later. Is the console version that much of a mess right now?
Angry Fork
Member
lol @ the elpres vid. Pronefield 3
I know exactly his frustration though. I liked BF3 but people camping is the worst fucking shit about it. And honestly it's not really the enemies I get mad at it's the stupid fucking teammates who just sit in rooms all fucking game instead of moving up and taking objectives.
The round is about to end in 30 seconds unless the objective is taken and everyone of the fucking teammates is jerking off together in some room with their cunt flashlight waiting for people instead of trying to win. That shit was all over the place in the beta with the exception of a few people that used teamwork. But so many people were laying down in the subway with their little flashlight blinding people's screens once they jump down from ledges they get shot etc. it was ridiculous.
BF3 was still fun though. If I had the money to get a new video card I'd get it over MW3 but I'd rather not play it then play it at medium. BF3 definitely seems like the type of game you want to play on at least high/1080p at 60fps at launch to have the best experience.
I know exactly his frustration though. I liked BF3 but people camping is the worst fucking shit about it. And honestly it's not really the enemies I get mad at it's the stupid fucking teammates who just sit in rooms all fucking game instead of moving up and taking objectives.
The round is about to end in 30 seconds unless the objective is taken and everyone of the fucking teammates is jerking off together in some room with their cunt flashlight waiting for people instead of trying to win. That shit was all over the place in the beta with the exception of a few people that used teamwork. But so many people were laying down in the subway with their little flashlight blinding people's screens once they jump down from ledges they get shot etc. it was ridiculous.
BF3 was still fun though. If I had the money to get a new video card I'd get it over MW3 but I'd rather not play it then play it at medium. BF3 definitely seems like the type of game you want to play on at least high/1080p at 60fps at launch to have the best experience.
This also, it's a character. Part of him definitely believes what he's saying at times but you can tell when he goes over the top on purpose just to troll people. I do think he hates BF3 and campers but he yells emphatically in his commentaries just for entertainment purposes.web01 said:
Sho_Nuff82
Member
He citestokra2003 said:
-horrendous clipping
-terrible spawn points
-no kill cam
-obtuse muting options
-inability to quit between rounds without quitting the entire game
-no population stats for each game mode
-server browser instead of matchmaking
-multi map is too tiny to be useful
-"played multi for two days and couldn't find a vehicle"
Interfectum
Gold Member
http://www.amazon.com/best-sellers-video-games/zgbs/videogames/
MW3 on top. Bu bu 10 million shipped.
Boom.
MW3 on top. Bu bu 10 million shipped.
Boom.
LabouredSubterfuge
Member
Interfectum said:
Simple. CoD players are stupid enough to buy their games from Amazon.
Angry Fork
Member
I think it's more awesome that Uncharted 3 is managing 2nd place right now over COD on PS3 and even BF3 on 360. That's great hopefully it stays like that.Interfectum said:
Genesis Knight
Member
-horrendous clipping
- sometimes in kill cam if someone is crawling around the camera will go through the floor. I haven't seen clipping problems in actual gameplay.
-terrible spawn points
- not sure what he's talking about. You can spawn into objectives, onto teammates, or onto vehicles/spawn beacons. He's probably just making dumb spawn choices and getting killed instantly. Let me know how many usable vehicles he sees in MW3.
-no kill cam
- there is a killcam - it shows you your enemy's location. It's just not CoDs 'instant replay"
-obtuse muting options
- I guess?
-inability to quit between rounds without quitting the entire game
- BC2 was the same way, it's a gimmick to keep you playing.
-no population stats for each game mode
- and that makes it broken? who cares?
-server browser instead of matchmaking
- there is matchmaking, it's called 'Quick Match'. Besides, server browsers are awesome, you'd be dumb to use matchmaking instead.
-multi map is too tiny to be useful
- uh, okay? Not true IMO, but it's opinion, not 'broken'
-"played multi for two days and couldn't find a vehicle"
- I've unlocked several tank upgrades and had some chopper/jet time. I think I've played for 4 hours last I checked.
Your friend doesn't sound like he's trying at all.
- sometimes in kill cam if someone is crawling around the camera will go through the floor. I haven't seen clipping problems in actual gameplay.
-terrible spawn points
- not sure what he's talking about. You can spawn into objectives, onto teammates, or onto vehicles/spawn beacons. He's probably just making dumb spawn choices and getting killed instantly. Let me know how many usable vehicles he sees in MW3.
-no kill cam
- there is a killcam - it shows you your enemy's location. It's just not CoDs 'instant replay"
-obtuse muting options
- I guess?
-inability to quit between rounds without quitting the entire game
- BC2 was the same way, it's a gimmick to keep you playing.
-no population stats for each game mode
- and that makes it broken? who cares?
-server browser instead of matchmaking
- there is matchmaking, it's called 'Quick Match'. Besides, server browsers are awesome, you'd be dumb to use matchmaking instead.
-multi map is too tiny to be useful
- uh, okay? Not true IMO, but it's opinion, not 'broken'
-"played multi for two days and couldn't find a vehicle"
- I've unlocked several tank upgrades and had some chopper/jet time. I think I've played for 4 hours last I checked.
Your friend doesn't sound like he's trying at all.
Stallion Free
Cock Encumbered
Clipping = players going into the environment. This is a constant issue with prone campers.
As more people learn the maps I'm hoping prone shouldn't be as much of an issue. I'm encountering it less and less in the live game then I did in the beta. I only use it sparingly. Mainly because I'm not used to it from playing a lot of Bad Company 2. I found it worthless in CoD personally so never used it other then because I felt like trying to dive.
Interfectum
Gold Member
mxgt said:
D3, Uncharted 3, Skyrim, Batman... yeah horrid taste.
Stallion Free
Cock Encumbered
Prone is incredibly useful in both games.Effect said:
Heavy's Sandvich
Member
Battlfield 3 is no. 1, 3 and 4 on Amazon.co.uk just to say.
Anton Sugar
Member
Complaining about prone camping in BF3 is getting near the bottom barrel of worthless bitching for me. The game gives you a kill cam that shows exactly where the player is and/or where they're going, scope glint, an indicator on the minimap whenever they shoot, and a 3D spotting system. If you're going to complain about the prone in BF3, complain about the clipping that essentially turns someone into half of a target, when they were already laying down to begin with. I have a feeling they're not going to "fix" this, either.
Sho_Nuff82
Member
Genesis Knight said:
He says that bodies clip through walls and in mid-air.
His specific gripe was that it takes minutes of walking to get back into the action after getting killed due to sprawling map size.
He wants instant replay. He says it's meaningless to just show the killer.
But frustrating for people used to the option I'd guess.
He'd like to know before entering a mode what people are playing so he knows the chance of finding a good match, Halo and CoD both have this.
Does quickmatch allow you to choose game mode and player count? If so, he's probably just whining here.
The arrows are pretty hard to discern, almost like Crysis 1.
He's been a hardcore CoD player since 3, he says he's trading in BF3 immediately. So yeah, I don't think the game is for him.
OldJadedGamer
Banned
Sho_Nuff82 said:
If he is a Hardcore COD player then he should not be crying about the killcam since the killcam is removed in all hardcore COD games.
His whole list can be summed up as "BF3 doesn't play like COD and I'm not good enough of a player to learn new things if they are better or not"
As I was reading through reviews of Battlefield 3 via Metacritic, I remembered a time when John Riccitiello was discussing how to "beat" Call of Duty with a "90" Metacritic game vs. their "85" (as in, make a better product).
Why the hell are these CEOs so obsessed with Metacritic? Does it really have that much bearing in the mainstream game-purchasing community?
Anyway, I'm assuming he's trying to beat CoD on the console front and I found it quite amusing that the console version of Battlefield 3 is currently sitting on an 85, which is lower than any Call of Duty game (bar World at War) released this gen as well as Bad Company 2. The Infinity Ward-developed CoDs always do exceptionally well review-wise, too (not that the current MW3 dev team is the same IW).
Upon MW3's release, if it does average 90+ and BF3 is still on 85 for console versions, I will find it unprofessionally hilarious if Kotick brings up Riccitiello's aforementioned quote.
Why the hell are these CEOs so obsessed with Metacritic? Does it really have that much bearing in the mainstream game-purchasing community?
Anyway, I'm assuming he's trying to beat CoD on the console front and I found it quite amusing that the console version of Battlefield 3 is currently sitting on an 85, which is lower than any Call of Duty game (bar World at War) released this gen as well as Bad Company 2. The Infinity Ward-developed CoDs always do exceptionally well review-wise, too (not that the current MW3 dev team is the same IW).
Upon MW3's release, if it does average 90+ and BF3 is still on 85 for console versions, I will find it unprofessionally hilarious if Kotick brings up Riccitiello's aforementioned quote.
Red Nightmare
Banned
Does anybody really care about that? I never even think about sites like that. I think most people rely on word of mouth or message boards.WhyMe6 said:
Red Nightmare said:
Exactly. If you're into researching games online and browsing message boards and the like, you're going to draw opinions from like-minded individuals who have experienced the game from online communities.
If you're not into researching games online, you're going to rely on word of mouth and experiences from your mates.
I don't understand this company obsession with Metacritic, it's been around for years along with Gamerankings but those in the mainstream industry rarely used to bring it up :/