This gruesome chunk is only a small part of the ongoing ritual in this violent chapter.
Looper:
![]()
Prisoners.
![]()
Hugh Jackman's character did some pretty horrible things to Paul Dano's character likeputting him in a box with a shower that was rigged to only shoot out either boiling hot water or freezing water. Not to mention that he kept him in there for days and beat him badly everyday before that.
It's all made worse when you find outthat Paul Dano's character was another victim and the mental problems that prevented him from saying stuff was because of the drugs they kept him on his entire life.
watching this with a female friend and not getting any sex out of it
![]()
Yes yes it can.
handling a subject like rape poorly can ruin series, so yes,
It has to be earned. He now has to not only explain his self, his intentions and why the universe of MGS got so dark all of sudden( or at least way darker than it was., espically after mgs 4 a game all things considered that was actually pretty effing silly. It had you fighting your borthers ghost possessing on of your clone dad's stans on the top of a thing while at any moment he could grapple you and kiss you) . He must now explain skull face, if he fails at that, well he Kickassed- SAO'ed, however you wanna name it.
Earned, you can't just throw rape and a thing and yell, " now it has tension " that can fuck your whole operation if you do that poorly.
So we are back to this "It's wrong because MGS as a franchise has been silly (giant robots) in the past". Your argument is weak.
So if Skullface had tortured them with just non sexual violence it would have been fine?Rape in film/tv/games has become an all too common plot device that is purely designed to give the victim motivation, or for the audience to hate the perpetrator. It's used one dimensionally almost all the time.
The issue with MGSV is that it comes across more like, Paz and Chico deals with this shit, so we can hammer into the audience how bad Skullface is.
All of this felt supremely weird to me, especially after encountering the whole Paz situation in Peace walker.
This blog post pretty much sums up my feelings about how it's all handled.
Rape in film/tv/games has become an all too common plot device that is purely designed to give the victim motivation, or for the audience to hate the perpetrator. It's used one dimensionally almost all the time.
The issue with MGSV is that it comes across more like, Paz and Chico deals with this shit, so we can hammer into the audience how bad Skullface is.
All of this felt supremely weird to me, especially after encountering the whole Paz situation in Peace walker.
This blog post pretty much sums up my feelings about how it's all handled.
Could you show me an example when rape was used effectively in any media?
So if Skullface had tortured them with just non sexual violence it would have been fine?
Could you show me an example when rape was used effectively in any media?
Even though it wasn't the best movie in the world, the 2009 remake of The Last House on the Left handled a rape scene pretty effectively.
The main character wasn't objectified or made to sound like she enjoyed it (as some scenes in media unfortunately tend to try and do) during the scene in question; she tried to remain calm and then fought back when she had the opportunity.
The rape and attack afterwards was a major plot point as it then drove the main character's parents to vengeance which became the central story of the second half of the film.
It was one of few instances where I wasn't eye rolling at Hollywood for rape, especially given the original film it was based on.
But the argument is, did it absolutely have to be rape? Do you think it couldn't have told the same story without raping the girl? What if she was beaten up and tortured to near death but not raped? Do you think that would have changed the plot too much?
Yes and no. Yeah they could have rewritten it, but as the antagonists were convicted sex offenders it may have come off as weird if one of them didn't try anything.
Plus there's the parents, particularly the girl's father who was even more affected. Extreme physical violence against your child is certain to make any parent angry, some enough to even kill. But rape is always perceived as something worse, something beyond violent that in our society, someone that may not be willing to kill over violence would break that moral rule if that person were raped.
So while I can't guarantee that a person wouldn't fly off the handle and murder someone who attacked their daughter, I feel it would be more likely if the girl were raped. And since the whole plot of that film revolved around the parents becoming the Jason Voorhes-like terror to the antagonists, it may have been deemed necessary to leave in by the writers of the remake, the same writers who took out most of the similar sexual content from the original film.
My vote go to these two:
GAME OF THRONES SEASON 3 SPOILERS!!!
Heh. YeahStir of Echoes always made me shudder uncomfortable when the rape scene popped up.
This might not fit in the torture porn theme of the threadbut I'm reading 1946's El Señor Presidente (Miguel Angel de Asturias) and one particular part of how the interrogation went for certain woman left me speechless and disturbed. I avoid most torture in modern films because is laughable and made mostly on shock value, but this one part revolt me, specially because you know stuff like that probably happened in Guatemalan dictatorships.
I haven't finished so don't spoil the ending![]()
Where are you from? Dictators have always committed incredible crimes, you can still see that happening in North Korea's camps. I haven't read that book yet, but I believe Asturias' work was pretty accurate on many aspects.
By the way, his name is Miguel Ángel Asturias, not "de Asturias".