Nah it should be fine. I doubt it was right next to his head.didnt read all the comments in this thread because most are probably stupid and probably defending the criminals but this just popped in my head when I read this story
won't that baby have some serious ear damage from a shotgun going off right next to its head without any ear protection. Shes holding two guns and a baby so i'm assuming she couldn't earmuff it.
Never fired a shotgun before so i'm not sure how loud they are but was wondering if this could have did some major damage to the baby's eardrum. I understand she had to do it, was just wondering.
12 Gaugeanyone know what caliber that shotgut she has is?
Did she warn the guys while they were breaking in? I mean who's willing to charge into a loaded rifle?
One was carrying a shot gun and a pistol, one was carrying a knife, who do you think will win?
I'm from the UK but I wish we had that US law.
She should have just shot him in knee.
Then he would have a cool story to tell: "I used to be a burglar but then I took a shotgun blast to the knee".
Arrow in the knee jokes haven't been made bannable yet, right?
If he literally burst in and it all happened in seconds, yes, but are you saying she had no chance to shout "get the fuck out, cos I have a 12 gauge" in this instance?That line of reasoning goes out the windows when someone's charging you with a knife. Sorry
If he literally burst in and it all happened in seconds, yes, but are you saying she had no chance to shout "get the fuck out, cos I have a 12 gauge" in this instance?
If he literally burst in and it all happened in seconds, yes, but are you saying she had no chance to shout "get the fuck out, cos I have a 12 gauge" in this instance?
I wouldn't want to ever have to shoot someone. I'd rather they took the warning and fucked off, so I'd make sure they knew they risked getting shot, plus it makes it easier for me to live with having killed someone if that's what I ended up having to do.
No man, you should totally take that chance with your life and the life of your child!What if they also have a gun and now know exactly where you are and are prepared to open fire without returning the favor of a warning? Criminals breaking into your home aren't exactly known to be fair.
I knew before clicking on this thread that the "she should have just wounded him!" apologists would be out in force. Jesus Christ.
Technically, she did wound him. Mortally. I guess that isn't a good compromise.I knew before clicking on this thread that the "she should have just wounded him!" apologists would be out in force. Jesus Christ.
I think that allowing people to be judge, jury and executioner should come with some responsibility, that's all. I wouldn't want to shoot some 13 year old kid that broke into my house trying to steal my wallet. That's a whole different thing to a man breaking in with a gun looking to rape my wife. You can say "but you can't know who it is and what their intentions are" - and I agree - but you can give them one chance to leave before you execute them.What if they also have a gun and now know exactly where you are and are prepared to open fire without returning the favor of a warning? Criminals breaking into your home aren't exactly known to be fair.
I think that allowing people to be judge, jury and executioner should come with some responsibility, that's all. I wouldn't want to shoot some 13 year old kid that broke into my house trying to steal my wallet. That's a whole different thing to a man breaking in with a gun looking to rape my wife. You can say "but you can't know who it is and what their intentions are" - and I agree - but you can give them one chance to leave before you execute them.
I already said that I'm on her side overall, but had it been me, I would have shouted a warning. Mind you, had it been me I wouldn't have appeared on the evening news posing for the cameras while looking down the barrel of a shotgun like Charles Bronson either.
She should have shot the baby, then herself, then the burglar, then the baby again.
I think that allowing people to be judge, jury and executioner should come with some responsibility, that's all. I wouldn't want to shoot some 13 year old kid that broke into my house trying to steal my wallet. That's a whole different thing to a man breaking in with a gun looking to rape my wife. You can say "but you can't know who it is and what their intentions are" - and I agree - but you can give them one chance to leave before you execute them.
I already said that I'm on her side overall, but had it been me, I would have shouted a warning. Mind you, had it been me I wouldn't have appeared on the evening news posing for the cameras while looking down the barrel of a shotgun like Charles Bronson either.
The reason I don't own a gun is because I'm more likely to die by tripping over my own shoe laces than to be shot by an intruder armed with a gun. The situations are purely hypothetical for me, cos if I was that scared of something like that happening, I'd have applied for a gun license and got a gun. I'm not though.You might have just got yourself killed if 'a man's breaking in with a gun looking to rape my wife'
You lost your element of surprise, and announced to him you have a weapon. Why would he have a gun if he didn't expect resistance? Now he knows you have a gun and can change his plan accordingly. It doesn't take a gun to rape your wife, it takes a gun to kill YOU.
I just find it to be in very poor taste. You break in, I shoot you, most agree that it was justified, case closed. But you were someone's son. You may have had a wife and kids. I wouldn't feel proud about what I'd done and I wouldn't want to be seen on TV waving a gun about.cr_blah_blah said:As for the posing with a gun for the cameras, well, she's from Oklahoma.
I think that allowing people to be judge, jury and executioner should come with some responsibility, that's all. I wouldn't want to shoot some 13 year old kid that broke into my house trying to steal my wallet. That's a whole different thing to a man breaking in with a gun looking to rape my wife. You can say "but you can't know who it is and what their intentions are" - and I agree - but you can give them one chance to leave before you execute them.
I already said that I'm on her side overall, but had it been me, I would have shouted a warning. Mind you, had it been me I wouldn't have appeared on the evening news posing for the cameras while looking down the barrel of a shotgun like Charles Bronson either.
The reason I don't own a gun is because I'm more likely to die by tripping over my own shoe laces than to be shot by an intruder armed with a gun. The situations are purely hypothetical for me, cos if I was that scared of something like that happening, I'd have applied for a gun license and got a gun. I'm not though.
If I did have a gun, I wouldn't want to shoot without warning for the reasons I've given.
I just find it to be in very poor taste. You break in, I shoot you, most agree that it was justified, case closed. But you were someone's son. You may have had a wife and kids. I wouldn't feel proud about what I'd done and I wouldn't want to be seen on TV waving a gun about.
The reason I don't own a gun is because I'm more likely to die by tripping over my own shoe laces than to be shot by an intruder armed with a gun. The situations are purely hypothetical for me, cos if I was that scared of something like that happening, I'd have applied for a gun license and got a gun. I'm not though.
If I did have a gun, I wouldn't want to shoot without warning for the reasons I've given.
I just find it to be in very poor taste. You break in, I shoot you, most agree that it was justified, case closed. But you were someone's son. You may have had a wife and kids. I wouldn't feel proud about what I'd done and I wouldn't want to be seen on TV waving a gun about.
I'm glad she and the kid are safe, I'm sorry he's dead, I don't think there's anything she should have done differently, anything else would have possibly left her open to danger.
He brought about his own death through his actions but people celebrating his death are being quite vulgar. It's not particularly effective to call the guy "a scumbag" or say that "he got what he deserved" what does that serve other than satisfy the commenters own vicarious bloodlust?
As an attitude it represents such a vast oversimplification of criminal behaviour and crime by typifing some sort of childishly naive good/evil line that it does serious harm to any ability to effectively deal with and PREVENT crime. The way it happened was better than how it could have and the mother did everything right but the fact that it happened at all, and continues to happen, suggests failure on a societal level.
That's missing the point of what I was saying. I said this: -i find terrorizing a freshly widowed woman and her newborn to be in very poor taste.
It's not about the guy with the knife. I'm not going to assume that his entire family were cunts as well.surly said:But you were someone's son. You may have had a wife and kids. I wouldn't feel proud about what I'd done and I wouldn't want to be seen on TV waving a gun about.
Yeah, cos if I was in a house with my 12 gauge and handgun while a 13 year old kid with his big knife took 20 minutes to get in, the only choice I'd have is to wait until he comes into my room before I blow his head clean off. I can totally see where you're coming from with that. :|The Faceless Master said:well, if some 13 year old kids have a large knife and spend 20 minutes breaking into the house with people in it, then break into the bedroom, maybe they should be shot?
I have no sympathy for those who choose to live a life of crime, and are a danger to the greater community. Call it bloodlust, whatever you want...but I am glad he is dead, he deserved it.
Yeah, cos if I was in a house with my 12 gauge and handgun while a 13 year old kid with his big knife took 20 minutes to get in, the only choice I'd have is to wait until he comes into my room before I blow his head clean off. I can totally see where you're coming from with that. :|
If I had a choice between an idealized notion of absolute free will and an actual understanding of causality and psychology and sociology well, I wouldn't really have a choice now would I?
That's missing the point of what I was saying. I said this: -
It's not about the guy with the knife. I'm not going to assume that his entire family were cunts as well.
Yeah, cos if I was in a house with my 12 gauge and handgun while a 13 year old kid with his big knife took 20 minutes to get in, the only choice I'd have is to wait until he comes into my room before I blow his head clean off. I can totally see where you're coming from with that. :|
Somehow I knew, despite the story describing the mother being armed with a shotgun, that "shoot to wound" defense force would be descending on this thread.
This is why I always let these threads get to around 4 or 5 pages (100ppp of course) before I enter. The "shoot to wound/hurrr durrrr America" crowd never, ever fail to appear. How else would the rest of GAF know how enlightened and cool under pressure they are?I knew before clicking on this thread that the "she should have just wounded him!" apologists would be out in force. Jesus Christ.
:lol
It's not about the guy with the knife. I'm not going to assume that his entire family were cunts as well.
These threads always leave me feeling conflicted. On one hand, those saying she should've acted differently are idiots. On the other hand, some of you seem to be drowning in the jizz of your righteous affirmations on gun control issues, while using the blood of the guy who was shot as lube for your masturbation session.
go ahead. Doesn't change the fact that prisons are a fucked up mess that literally breeds criminality, doesn't change the fact that tough on crime legislation is nothing more than an expensive vote-buy on the right. That reduced funding for social programs, ineffectual education, a lack of employment opportunities, all feed crime, everyone who ever committed a crime woke up one day and said WELP, TODAY I'VE DECIDED THAT I'M GOING TO BE A CRIMINAL FROM NOW ON AND ATTACK PEOPLE AND SHIT CUZ IT SOUNDS LIKE FUN. That's the reasonable and absolutely not in any way lulzworthy opinion to hold.
lol.
You don't know me, so it's not wise to assume you know anything about me.It's pretty obvious you have no one in your life that you are ever responsible for because any reasonable person who puts their family first will do what is necessary to protect them.
I guess in Candyland it's always raining gumdrops and licorice though, huh?
So all of the members of any criminal's family are in some way liable as they didn't intervene? Don't be silly. Her posing with the gun is pure sensationalism for the TV news. It's pretty disgusting and there's no need for it.Hero said:Who gives a fuck about the criminals' families? Are you fucking serious? Maybe they should have intervened at some point before their life became so shitty they had to resort to a life of crime.