• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Mother (18) kills intruder breaking into her home while on phone with 911

Status
Not open for further replies.
If he has any actual marksman training and maybe military (or something like it), such that he remains cool under pressure, then it's believable.

But if we turn him into an 18-year-old mother, scared shitless for herself and her baby, possibly without any real marksman training, let alone the experience needed to remain cool under any such situation (she's fucking 18 years old?)... yeah. Good luck with that logic.

Agreed. Even as a trained military man, he'd understand that not every scenario allows or calls for the divulging of such information. Depending on the intent of the invader, it could just mean, "retreat to the truck and retrieve the pistols and go in a different way."

IMO, informing home invaders of your position and armament gives away your own advantage at the risk of hoping someone turns tail and runs. These guys had bad intentions, and I'd rather it went down the way it did than taking a chance and hoping the *claim* of being armed behind a door is enough to repel an assault.

Geez, she could've just shot the knife out of his hand. I mean maybe he was just desperately hungry and looking to break in so he could cut a piece of bread to eat.
<3
 
Geez, she could've just shot the knife out of his hand. I mean maybe he was just desperately hungry and looking to break in so he could cut a piece of bread to eat.
 
The most shocking part of this story is that in 2012 there are still people having kids and getting married at the age of 18.
 
Not this tired old bullshit. I didn't buy any knives to use them for a defensive or offensive purpose. I bought them so that I could cut up food and eat it, or cut electrical tape, or slice open a box. There's no good alternative for a knife. Some people in this thread are buying guns solely in case they might have to shoot people with them, so it's not quite the same thing is it?

Well the guy that got shot clearly wanted to use that knife for an offensive purpose. I don't think he intended to break into her room to cut up some chicken and eat it. So that knife could have been used for something productive, or something destructive like harming the lady and her baby.

I'm sure some people buy guns solely in case they have to shoot someone that breaks into their house (failing to see the harm in being prepared for that), but some like myself would have them for the former as well as for target practice at the range. It's fun to shoot a gun.

JoshDigi said:
The most shocking part of this story is that in 2012 there are still people having kids and getting married at the age of 18.

Watch out, surly is going to castigate you in 5 seconds for not being shocked at a burglar with a deadly weapon being shot.
 
Not this tired old bullshit. I didn't buy any knives to use them for a defensive or offensive purpose. I bought them so that I could cut up food and eat it, or cut electrical tape, or slice open a box. There's no good alternative for a knife. Some people in this thread are buying guns solely in case they might have to shoot people with them, so it's not quite the same thing is it?

In the time it took you to write that post, hundreds of guns were sold to law abiding citizens. How does that make you feel?
KuGsj.gif


Let the hate, flow.. young surly.
 
Well the guy that got shot clearly wanted to use that knife for an offensive purpose. I don't think he intended to break into her room to cut up some chicken and eat it. So that knife could have been used for something productive, or something destructive like harming the lady and her baby.

I'm sure some people buy guns solely in case they have to shoot someone that breaks into their house (failing to see the harm in being prepared for that), but some like myself would have them for the former as well as for target practice at the range. It's fun to shoot a gun.



Watch out, surly is going to castrate you in 5 seconds for not being shocked at a burglar with a deadly weapon being shot.
+1
 
Not this tired old bullshit. I didn't buy any knives to use them for a defensive or offensive purpose. I bought them so that I could cut up food and eat it, or cut electrical tape, or slice open a box. There's no good alternative for a knife. Some people in this thread are buying guns solely in case they might have to shoot people with them, so it's not quite the same thing is it?

12in-silver-explorer-survival-knife-210895SL.jpg


"here honey let me cut up that steak for you."
 
Bit more info from the affidavit as told by the guy she didn't have a chance to shoot:
http://s3.amazonaws.com/content.newsok.com/documents/j5dlsaffidavit.pdf

Justin Shane Martin, 24, of Blanchard, died clutching a knife in his gloved left hand, according to court records filed in Grady County district court. His alleged accomplice, Dustin Louis Stewart, 29, also of Blanchard, shown above, later turned himself in to police.

Stewart later confessed to police that he and Martin "devised a plan to burglarize the residence" because Martin knew that "a resident of the home had recently died of cancer" and he "suspected narcotics may be located inside the residence," according to an affidavit. Stewart also told police that he and Martin took the drug hydrocodone about 30 minutes before the planned break-in, according to the court records.
 
Hush, now, child. It'll be okay.
Ah, yes, this tactic. It's very common on forums when people haven't got any comeback. "Evil criminal gene", LOL.

alphaNoid said:
In the time it took you to write that post, hundreds of guns were sold to law abiding citizens. How does that make you feel?
It doesn't bother me. I don't live in America and thankfully, most of you don't own passports so you won't come here and start annoying me. :p

andycapps said:
Well the guy that got shot clearly wanted to use that knife for an offensive purpose. I don't think he intended to break into her room to cut up some chicken and eat it. So that knife could have been used for something productive, or something destructive like harming the lady and her baby.
You missed the point. I can use all kinds of heavy or sharp objects to kill people. I could kill you with my computer monitor if I hit you hard enough with it. It's about intended and primary purposes and whether there is an alternative. Most people don't buy knives with the intention that one day they will use them to harm another person.

andycapps said:
I'm sure some people buy guns solely in case they have to shoot someone that breaks into their house (failing to see the harm in being prepared for that), but some like myself would have them for the former as well as for target practice at the range. It's fun to shoot a gun.
You could get an air gun for shooting targets. It's safer as it's much harder to kill people with one.............ahhh, that's why you wouldn't buy one.

12in-silver-explorer-survival-knife-210895SL.jpg


"here honey let me cut up that steak for you."
I've got a carving knife with a bigger blade than that. I don't see what your point is. It's amusing that the picture is from an American website called Wholesale Self Defence though.
 
Neither of those exist primarily as a means of injuring or killing things.

Semantics.

Alcohol is a fucking POISON (bad). Primarily used getting intoxicated (good)

A car is a weapon at high speeds (bad). Primarily used as transportation (good)

A gun is a weapon that *can* be used to murder innocent people (bad!). Primarily used to protect good, innocent people from bad ones and kill delicious animals (good).

Dig?
 
Semantics.

Alcohol is a fucking POISON (bad). Primarily used getting intoxicated (good)

A car is a weapon at high speeds (bad). Primarily used as transportation (good)

A gun is a weapon that *can* be used to murder innocent people (bad!). Primarily used to protect good, innocent people from bad ones and kill delicious animals (good).

Dig?

Don't forget shovels. You can use them to plant trees or bury corpses.
 
Semantics.

Alcohol is a fucking POISON (bad). Primarily used getting intoxicated (good)

A car is a weapon at high speeds (bad). Primarily used as transportation (good)

A gun is a weapon that *can* be used to murder innocent people (bad!). Primarily used to protect good, innocent people from bad ones and kill delicious animals (good).

Dig?
Yeah but then we get into the terribly murky realm of personal responsibility. Much easier on the ol' conscience to just blame the guns, y'see.
 
Ah, yes, this tactic. It's very common on forums when people haven't got any comeback. "Evil criminal gene", LOL.


It doesn't bother me. I don't live in America and thankfully, most of you don't own passports so you won't come here and start annoying me. :p


You missed the point. I can use all kinds of heavy or sharp objects to kill people. I could kill you with my computer monitor if I hit you hard enough with it. It's about intended and primary purposes and whether there is an alternative. Most people don't buy knives with the intention that one day they will use them to harm another person.


You could get an air gun for shooting targets. It's safer as it's much harder to kill people with one.............ahhh, that's why you wouldn't buy one.

Why would I need a comeback? You keep diggin' yourself deeper and deeper, all on your own. Refer to the bolded part of your post for examples. :D
 
Bit more info from the affidavit as told by the guy she didn't have a chance to shoot:
http://s3.amazonaws.com/content.newsok.com/documents/j5dlsaffidavit.pdf

YES! I was right! SUCK IT EVERYONE WHO NEVER REALLY DISAGREED WITH THAT PREMISE!

Bu-bu-bu-but there has to be more to this story!!!

She and her dead husband must owe drug dealers money!!!!

There is more to the story and in fact a connection to the couple. BTW, I never thought she did anything wrong. She did the only logical thing, under the circumstances.
 
It doesn't bother me. I don't live in America and thankfully, most of you don't own passports so you won't come here and start annoying me. :p

C'mon man. Get the fuck out of here with that bullshit. I don't live in the UK, but you're not going to see me bashing them. The vast majority are good, decent, hardworking people. Stop with the nationalist bullshit and stick to the debate.
 
You're arguing with a brick wall. Some people are to attached to their ideology that they can't see out of it, and I'm guessing surly and the people who made excuses for these guys have that attitude towards guns.

First you try to discredit the story. (Well there must be more we don't know. Maybe they owed drug money?)

Then you blame the shooter(well why didn't she shoot the leg?)

Then you blame the culture(Well if Americans weren't so individualistic, liked the 2nd amendment, followed our policies, these guys wouldn't exist and this girl wouldn't be in trouble. We should be exactly like the UK)

and finally it turns into a "What good are guns?" and people deem them to only have one evil purpose.

Give it 2 more pages and it turns into a "Recommend me a gun to defend myself" thread.
 
Holy shit, I misread the title as

'Mark Hamill Commits Suicide'. Don't ask me how.
Some people in here would still celebrate that. It's a death after all.

Mammoth Jones said:
C'mon man. Get the fuck out of here with that bullshit.
It's not bullshit. Most Americans don't own passports, which Americans sometimes see as a bad thing, but the rest of the world sees as a good thing. (It's just a joke!)

remnant said:
You're arguing with a brick wall. Some people are to attached to their ideology that they can't see out of it, and I'm guessing surly and the people who made excuses for these guys have that attitude towards guns.
ONE LAST TIME - I DID NOT MAKE EXCUSES FOR THESE GUYS. Read my posts you fucking mongs, lol. I said that I was on her side when it came to the shooting, but that she shouldn't have posed on TV looking down the barrel of a shotgun cos it was tasteless.
 
YES! I was right! SUCK IT EVERYONE WHO NEVER REALLY DISAGREED WITH THAT PREMISE!

I keep reading this sentence and failing to understand it. lol. Did anyone really disagree that there may be more to the story? But yes, emboldened to try to rob a dead drug dealer's stash is interesting and yes, she did what she had to do.

Script for Winter's Bone 2?
 
Upon reading this thread, I don't understand you people defending the criminals. You don't want to get shot, don't break into people's houses and obey the damn law. It's so simple.

Somebody breaks into my house while I am home, they are getting shot, stabbed, or beat with a baseball bat.

Moral of the story. Don't be a scumbag human being, and break into/onto other people's property (with weapons no less). Show some damn respect.

This guy got what he deserved.
 
You're arguing with a brick wall. Some people are to attached to their ideology that they can't see out of it, and I'm guessing surly and the people who made excuses for these guys have that attitude towards guns.

First you try to discredit the story. (Well there must be more we don't know. Maybe they owed drug money?)

Then you blame the shooter(well why didn't she shoot the leg?)

Then you blame the culture(Well if Americans weren't so individualistic, liked the 2nd amendment, followed our policies, these guys wouldn't exist and this girl wouldn't be in trouble. We should be exactly like the UK)

and finally it turns into a "What good are guns?" and people deem them to only have one evil purpose.

Give it 2 more pages and it turns into a "Recommend me a gun to defend myself" thread.

It's disappointing. I wake up, I get dressed, I eat breakfast, I drive to the train station, I go to work, I come home, I eat dinner, I play games, I make love, I go to sleep.

Just because I'm a gun owner doesn't mean I'm some snarling neanderthal with drool dripping out of the side of my mouth with a hard-on for someone to cross me so I can blow their heads off in a fit of anger and get away with it due to a legal technicality of self defense.

I just want to keep some guns because I firmly believe that my defense and the defense of my family is my responsibility and I can't rely on the police to prevent my family or myself from coming to harm should the unthinkable occur so I should be prepared to do what I have to do. That's it.

"Everyone's crazy, no one should have a gun"
"Everyone's crazy, I need to have a gun"

Chose one. (and no, I don't really believe "everyone" is crazy, lol. Like I've said...the vast majority of people are decent)
 
There is more to the story and in fact a connection to the couple. BTW, I never thought she did anything wrong. She did the only logical thing, under the circumstances.

Not the connection that was specified as being due to illegal narcotics or some illegal debt owed to the villains. Not saying you said that, but others did.

And I am laughing at them.
 
Most people do. That's why we have laws that make it an offence to not wear a seatbelt while driving, to drive too fast, to drive while drunk, to drive while using a phone etc. People are fucking idiots generally and need to be protected from their own stupidity. Giving them guns isn't a particularly good idea.


I'm from the UK. Nobody owns guns to protect themselves here. We're missing the FEAR that you guys have I guess.


I've already said that I didn't have a major issue with her shooting the guy. My gripe is with her posing on TV while looking down the barrel of a gun into the camera. Either she suggested that or she was asked to do it, but if it was the latter she could have said no. It was fucking tasteless. The sort of thing that the "I'm glad someone is dead!" crowd get semis over.

All of those laws -seatbelt are to protect the innocent from the reckless, not individuals from themselves. But it doesn't hurt.


UK has the highest amount of violent crime in Europe, 4x the amount of America, CCTV cameras on every street corner, but you don't have the same fear. So brave

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/fear-of-crime-makes-uk-most-watched-country-in-europe-561265.html
 
Upon reading this thread, I don't understand you people defending the criminals. You don't want to get shot, don't break into people's houses and obey the damn law. It's so simple.

Somebody breaks into my house while I am home, they are getting shot, stabbed, or beat with a baseball bat.

Moral of the story. Don't be a scumbag human being, and break into/onto other people's property (with weapons no less). Show some damn respect.

This guy got what he deserved.

Please find me one post of anyone defending the criminal.
 
I'm not ready to believe she is a "hero" just yet. The shooting is probably justified no matter what, but there are a lot of more likely reasons for men to be breaking into a house then rape and murder. Were these associates or her late husband? Did he have something of theirs? You see where I'm going?

Maybe I'm being pessimistic, but I can remember similar scenarios where the intruders were looking to collect drugs/drug money that someone owed them, forced their way in, and got blasted.

Her husband being a secret drug kingpin is definitely more likely than two stalkers with a knife, knowingly entering the home of the person they've been stalking, while they know her to be present, being murderers

People looking to loot a house stalk so they can COME BACK WHEN THE HOUSE IS EMPTY. Rapists and murderers intentionally wait for the person to be home, come in armed, and try to get into that one room they are in. As soon as she sees their face they have to kill her.mif she is locked in a room and they don't want to be violent, they can just grab the tv and car keys and leave with no one knowing who did it
 
I would love to see someone "shoot to wound" at that range with a shotgun. You're likely to take the whole limb off or at the very least sever a major artery.

Bit more info from the affidavit as told by the guy she didn't have a chance to shoot:
http://s3.amazonaws.com/content.newsok.com/documents/j5dlsaffidavit.pdf
Freaking called it on the first page...

Screw that. If he was stalking her, he knew that her husband was dead and probably thought she was defenseless.
 
It's not bullshit. Most Americans don't own passports, which Americans sometimes see as a bad thing, but the rest of the world sees as a good thing. (It's just a joke!)
I have a passport, and you don't have to worry about me coming to the UK. Wouldn't be caught dead there. :p

Re: your earlier comment about why I should just get an airsoft gun for target practices instead of a real gun, hahahahaha. That's a good one. I'm starting to like your sarcasm.
 
Not the connection that was specified as being due to illegal narcotics or some illegal debt owed to the villains. Not saying you said that, but others did.

And I am laughing at them.

Yeah, all my instinct said was: There is a deeper connection between the people and there is a deliberate intent that has nothing to do with this woman, per se.
 
I have a passport, and you don't have to worry about me coming to the UK. Wouldn't be caught dead there. :p

Re: your earlier comment about why I should just get an airsoft gun for target practices instead of a real gun, hahahahaha. That's a good one. I'm starting to like your sarcasm.
Why the fuck would anyone want an airsoft gun for target practice? Lol
 
I'm from the UK. Nobody owns guns to protect themselves here.
We're missing the FEAR that you guys have I guess.

Ironically, gun control is far more motivated by fear than is gun ownership. After all, if you didn't FEAR what you imagine everyone might do if they had guns, you wouldn't support banning guns.

Your accusing everyone else of being filled with FEAR is nothing but a poor attempt to keep everyone from seeing that YOU'RE the fearful one.
 
I'm from the UK. Nobody owns guns to protect themselves here. We're missing the FEAR that you guys have I guess.

Are you for real? Do you just live with your head up your ass? The UK is one of the worst places to live as far as violent crime goes. And most, if not all, of that has to do with the fact that the ordinary commoner can't acquire a gun to protect themselves.

Every time you post you make yourself look more idiotic. I doubt you've even ever held or fired a real gun once.
 
So, what I get from OWV's update is that they knew the guy died of cancer and thought there might still be some of his painkillers (dont some cancer patients get morphine pills or such? I'm not sure) or other meds might still be there to steal. Then they got high off painkillers and tried to rob the place.

Yea, still no sympathy, since he tried to force his way into the barricaded bedroom and charge her with a knife.

also, ITT, surly trolls GAF
 
Ironically, gun control is far more motivated by fear than is gun ownership. After all, if you didn't FEAR what you imagine everyone might do if they had guns, you wouldn't support banning guns.
You do know that you can get a gun here right? I could be "popping caps in asses" just like you guys if I applied for a license.

We did ban some types of guns after the Dunblane school shooting in 1996. There hasn't been another one since, so maybe it worked.

racerx77 said:
Oh, come on. Situations like this , you have very little time to react. He had a HUNTING KNIFE and BROKE IN. No warning needed IMO.
She had plenty of time to issue a warning in this case. She heard them trying to get in, so she barricaded the front door. She then went and put a bottle in her baby's mouth, grabbed a shotgun and handgun and called the police. She was on the phone to the police for 21 minutes. When the first guy eventually broke the door down and got in, she shot him with the shotgun and killed him and the other guy ran away.

Hero said:
The UK is one of the worst places to live as far as violent crime goes. And most, if not all, of that has to do with the fact that the ordinary commoner can't acquire a gun to protect themselves.
But you can legally acquire a gun here.

Statistically speaking, you're more likely to be injured/killed by your own gun or shot by a friend/relative using your own gun, than you are to be injured/killed by a violent intruder breaking into your home.

Hero said:
I doubt you've even ever held or fired a real gun once.
LOL! Yeah, cos that makes all the difference. I have fired a shotgun, so presumably that would count as a "real gun".
 
God, people act like she went picking a fight with these intruders. Some of your stances are almost as dumb as whoever told the girl to aim the shotgun at the cameraman for a shot.
 
But you can legally acquire a gun here.

Statistically speaking, you're more likely to be injured/killed by your own gun or shot by a friend/relative using your own gun, than you are to be injured/killed by a violent intruder breaking into your home.
Based on what stats?
Statistically speaking, you're more likely to be killed in a car accident if you own a car.
 
My main concern would've been... what if it's someone you know playing a practical joke?

If someone I knew thought it would be funny to force their way into my house and lunge at me with a knife, I wouldn't feel too bad about mistakenly injuring them. It'd be at least as funny.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom