• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Motorola announced Moto G: Midrange specs, $179/$199

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's running Android 4.1 though, didn't 4.2 introduce a lot of changes under the hood to boost Android performance? I presume 4.3 did too which the G launches with.

How the G beats the Nexus 4 though is confusing me as for raw grunt the N4 should be a good bit ahead since it's a quad core Krait with higher clock speeds to boot.

there is between a 5-10% boost in quadrant from 4.1 to 4.3 in benchmarks from the Galaxy S3 and N10 (ones i could find the difference)

The Moto G has a 50% higher score then the Xperia M in quadrant. Its clearly better then that chipset
 
I don't know - the benchmarks seem a bit funky to me. There's no way the G should be beating a Nexus 4. The CPU and GPU in the 4 are both significantly more powerful (A7 vs. Krait, Adreno 305 vs. 320).
 
I don't know - the benchmarks seem a bit funky to me. There's no way the G should be beating a Nexus 4. The CPU and GPU in the 4 are both significantly more powerful (A7 vs. Krait, Adreno 305 vs. 320).

i'll chalk the 4 up to something weird, and its close anyway. It doubles the XperiaM (520/620 chipset), which was the original comparison
 
there is between a 5-10% boost in quadrant from 4.1 to 4.3 in benchmarks from the Galaxy S3 and N10 (ones i could find the difference)

The Moto G has a 50% higher score then the Xperia M in quadrant. Its clearly better then that chipset

And if you trust Quadrant that means it's also faster than the Nexus 4, which has by far the better chipset. It's a poor benchmark to compare with and is quite clearly flawed.

It shouldn't be beating what's in the Xperia M never mind the Nexus 4. There is something very wrong somewhere.
 
And if you trust Quadrant that means it's also faster than the Nexus 4, which has by far the better chipset. It's a poor benchmark to compare with and is quite clearly flawed.

It shouldn't be beating what's in the Xperia M never mind the Nexus 4. There is something very wrong somewhere.

and antutu and vellamo (which is by qualcomm)?

edit... no vellamo, my bad, i thought I saw a vellamo benchmark, but dont see one
 
Yes, as again it shouldn't be beating a Nexus 4 in that benchmark.

It seems to outperform a Nexus 4 in that benchmark too.
http://i.imgur.com/byikRev.png

Quick and dirty comparison so far:

Moto G <-> Nexus 4

Antutu: 17.200 <-> 15.700
Quadrant 8.300 <-> 4.800
Vellamo (HTML 5) 1.966 <-> 1276
3DMark 5.400 <-> 5.513

First impressions of battery life are very postitve. One guy at XDA reported 60% of battery remaining after a day and compared it to the Xperia Z1 with 3.000mAh battery.
 
Wait, these benchmarks for the Moto G aren't even for Kit Kat, right? That makes the results even weirder. What kind of black magic optimizations is Motorola putting in their phones?
 
Wait, these benchmarks for the Moto G aren't even for Kit Kat, right? That makes the results even weirder. What kind of black magic optimizations is Motorola putting in their phones?

The American Difference™
 
Nexus 4 benchmarks have always been duds, something about the thermal throttling used in the chipset means it never manages to use its full power.

Look at the LG Optimus G for an idea of how that chipset (S4 Pro + Adreno 320) really performs.
 
Shopping for a phone and this looks interesting. How is Motorola generally speaking compared to HTC and Samsung? I do remember people complaining that the Razr didn't even allow simple stuff like using own ringtones..

Need a good GPS reception, stable software and decent speakers.

Mmh those benchmarks and the battery life all sound great..


something useful from a bayern fan? How unusual :P

Thanks, man!

EDIT: Just read that it doesn't have an sd slot. I'm out
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom