Atomski said:
Amazon shows instock for me..
move controller is sold out pretty damn near everywhere. What you are seeing on amazon is the bundle. the actual controller is showing 2-4 weeks shipping on amazon and sold out on gamestop as well. The thing is, like I mentioned earlier, savvy PS3 owners are buying the Move controller and a used PS Eye from Gamestop or ebay, or buying a bundle and an extra controller or two at worst.
That's kind of an interesting point here.. The perfect sale for Kinect is 1:1 with 360 consoles.. so what is the perfect sale for Move? 1:1? 2:1? etc?
In this respect I actually kind of agree with MS. This IS almost like a second console launch... however, unlike MS, I'm calling it like I see it. 32x. Not in terms of bomba, but really they are working to release an add on to extend the life of their 5 year old console for another couple of years. it could either work, or it could bomb.
my only concern is the universal mention of lag. we know the tracking works to some sort of degree, so it remains to be seen if the problems we see in the videos are software or system related. but with everyone mentioning lag. I mean I guess if you just become accustomed to dealing with it that's fine.. but it pretty much guarantees that fast reflex games will pretty much never exist on the system if that's the case..
PSGames said:
Can you honestly not see the difference between this and eyetoy? Notice how it seperates the player from the background? Check out the green and orange lines. That is full skeletal tracking in 3d. Far more advanced than anything eyetoy.
correct me if I'm wrong, but what you are actually seeing in that footage is processed information from images captured from the two cameras, right? as far as I understand it, the actual camera has no motion processing hardware in it whatsoever. in that respect, and I don't mean this mockingly, it's not "much different" than eye toy. The camera tech is a bit more sophisticated, what with two cameras one of which working in the IR frequency, but in the end the real power of kinect comes from the 360 processing the image data from both cameras and interpreting that into movement and mapping. in that respect, it damn close to the same thing as eyetoy, just at a significantly higher level of computing power and the added camera to provide depth information (which again it's not providing the actual information, just the added IR video stream for the 360 to extrapolate it).
and I think the people riding on it are doing so for that reason.. It IS in fact a next gen version of eyetoy.. I don't think anyone is saying anything stupid like "it's two eyetoys taped together". I just think people are thinking that 8 years and a serious processing jump later, that we would have moved further than just a bit more accurate motion interpretation. If that is appropriate or not, who knows? Maybe it really is what they expected?